Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 24 May 2013, 19:37
Customize  |  Hide

Economist: At the insistence of the International Monetary

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  
Author Message
TAGS:
1 KUDOS received
Director
Director
Joined: 21 Dec 2009
Posts: 592
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Finance
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 130 [1] , given: 20

GMAT Tests User
Economist: At the insistence of the International Monetary [#permalink] New post 23 Nov 2012, 05:54
1
This post received
KUDOS
00:00

Question Stats:

77% (02:12) correct 22% (02:08) wrong based on 1 sessions
Economist: At the insistence of the International Monetary Fund, India slashed import duties from an average of
90 percent in 1991 to 30 percent in 1997. Many feared that the result would be a devastating drop in Indian
manufacturing due to competition with imported goods, but the doomsayers were wrong. Manufacturing output
increased by 50 percent in that time. The increase was due to the decrease in duties, since, with the decrease,
imports of goods used in manufacturing were much higher than imports of consumer goods.

Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the economist’s argument?

A. A significant portion of manufacturers in India continued to produce goods from the same raw materials as before
1997 but at much lower cost.
B. Manufacturing increased significantly worldwide after 1992.
C. Production of goods and services in India was significantly enhanced by an increase in telecommunication
infrastructure in the 1990s.
D. Economic growth did not increase everywhere in India in the 1990s and 2000s.
E. Much of the increase in manufacturing output was of goods for export.
_________________

KUDOS me if you feel my contribution has helped you.

Verbal GMAT Forum Moderator
Verbal GMAT Forum Moderator
User avatar
Status: Preparing for the another shot...!
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 1322
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GMAT 1: 720 Q V
GPA: 3.75
Followers: 64

Kudos [?]: 314 [0], given: 52

GMAT ToolKit User GMAT Tests User CAT Tests
Re: At the insistence of the International Monetary Fund [#permalink] New post 23 Nov 2012, 10:50
gmatbull wrote:
Economist: At the insistence of the International Monetary Fund, India slashed import duties from an average of
90 percent in 1991 to 30 percent in 1997. Many feared that the result would be a devastating drop in Indian
manufacturing due to competition with imported goods, but the doomsayers were wrong. Manufacturing output
increased by 50 percent in that time. The increase was due to the decrease in duties, since, with the decrease,
imports of goods used in manufacturing were much higher than imports of consumer goods.

Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the economist’s argument?

A. A significant portion of manufacturers in India continued to produce goods from the same raw materials as before
1997 but at much lower cost.
B. Manufacturing increased significantly worldwide after 1992.
C. Production of goods and services in India was significantly enhanced by an increase in telecommunication
infrastructure in the 1990s.
D. Economic growth did not increase everywhere in India in the 1990s and 2000s.
E. Much of the increase in manufacturing output was of goods for export.


Clear A.
The increase was due to the decrease in duties, since, with the decrease,
imports of goods used in manufacturing were much higher than imports of consumer goods.

It clearly tells that the instruments with which things were manufactured were now imposed with lower duties. So manufacturers can produce the same goods at much lower cost.
As told by A.
I shall be surprised if I get this one wrong.
_________________

Prepositional Phrases Clarified|Elimination of BEING| Absolute Phrases Clarified
Rules For Posting

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 19 Jul 2012
Posts: 151
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, International Business
Schools: Tuck '16
GMAT 1: 610 Q49 V25
GPA: 3.3
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 23

CAT Tests
Re: At the insistence of the International Monetary Fund [#permalink] New post 24 Nov 2012, 11:57
IMO A.

The argument is pretty strong and answer choices do not fit.

Among all A looks best.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 1749
Followers: 56

Kudos [?]: 582 [0], given: 467

Re: At the insistence of the International Monetary Fund [#permalink] New post 24 Nov 2012, 12:12
A

and 300/500 level.........nothing more. !!
_________________

KUDOS is the good manner to help the entire community.

Director
Director
Joined: 21 Dec 2009
Posts: 592
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Finance
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 130 [0], given: 20

GMAT Tests User
Re: At the insistence of the International Monetary Fund [#permalink] New post 24 Nov 2012, 14:18
Yeah,
[Reveal] Spoiler:
A, the OA
fits most;
_________________

KUDOS me if you feel my contribution has helped you.

Re: At the insistence of the International Monetary Fund   [#permalink] 24 Nov 2012, 14:18
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts Economists Bhai 7 02 Jun 2004, 21:16
New posts Monetary Policy rejinky 5 19 Aug 2005, 16:52
New posts Monetary Policy metallicafan 3 15 May 2010, 15:01
New posts 1 The Economist’s ninth ranking of international MBA programme Alchemist1320 1 13 Oct 2011, 23:29
New posts EXPERTS_POSTS_IN_THIS_TOPIC A good reading on International Monetary Found carcass 0 13 Jan 2013, 15:04
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Economist: At the insistence of the International Monetary

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.