Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 23 Oct 2014, 05:12

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Editorial: An arrest made by a Midville police officer is pr

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Nov 2010
Posts: 293
Location: India
GMAT 1: 670 Q49 V33
WE: Consulting (Telecommunications)
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 75

Re: Editorial: An arrest made by a Midville police officer is [#permalink] New post 19 Feb 2013, 04:26
Editorial: An arrest made by a Midville police officer is provisional until the officer has taken the suspect to the
police station and the watch commander has officially approved the arrest. Such approval is denied if the
commander judges that the evidence onwhich the provisional arrest is based is insufficient. A government
efficiency expert has observed that almost all provisional arrests meet the standards for adequacy of
evidence that the watch commanders enforce
. The expert has therefore recommended that, because the
officers' time spent obtaining approval is largely wasted
, the watch commander's approval nolonger be
required. This recommendation should be rejected as dangerous, however, since there is no assurance that the
watch commanders' standards will continue to be observed once approval is no longer required.

In the editorial, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

(A) The first is a claim, the accuracy of which is disputed bythe editorial; the second is a conclusion drawn in
orderto support the main conclusion of the editorial. No dispute

(B) The first is an observation that the editorial disputes; the second is a conclusion that was drawn from that
observation. No dispute

(C) The first is a finding that was used in support of a proposal that the editorial opposes; the second is a
judgment that was based on that finding and in turn was used to supportthe proposal.

(D) The first is a fin ding introduced to supportthe main conclusion of the editorial; the second is that main
conclusion.
Second is not the conclusion. I have highlighted the conclusion in Green

(E) The first is a conclusion, the evidence for which the editorial evaluates; the second is part of the evidence
cited in favor of that conclusion.First is not the conclusion. I have highlighted the conclusion in Green
_________________

YOU CAN, IF YOU THINK YOU CAN

Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Squeezing the last few ounces
Joined: 14 Feb 2013
Posts: 88
Location: United States (MI)
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GMAT 1: 580 Q44 V28
GMAT 2: 690 Q49 V34
GPA: 3.5
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 18

Re: An arrest made by a Midville police officer is provisional [#permalink] New post 26 Mar 2013, 07:35
Not sure how 1st BF is a finding, as the passage clearly states that
Quote:
A government
efficiency expert has observed that almost all provisional arrests meet the standards for adequacy of
evidence that the watch commanders enforce
.


So 1st BF must be an Observation as Findings are more rigorous and must be appropriately tested using tightly controlled variables.
Although I must admit that the 2nd BF is not really a conclusion but Choice B is the best.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
sanjoo wrote:
Yup C it is..second bf is not conclusion..!!..Choice A B D gone..!!

E..first is not conclusion..its finding..which is mentioned in C..therefor correct

carcass wrote:
Editorial: An arrest made by a Midville police officer is provisional until the officer has taken the suspect to the
police station and the watch commander has officially approved the arrest. Such approval is denied if the
commander judges that the evidence onwhich the provisional arrest is based is insufficient. A government
efficiency expert has observed that almost all provisional arrests meet the standards for adequacy of
evidence that the watch commanders enforce
. The expert has therefore recommended that, because the
officers' time spent obtaining approval is largely wasted
, the watch commander's approval nolonger be
required. This recommendation should be rejected as dangerous, however, since there is no assurance that the
watch commanders' standards will continue to be observed once approval is no longer required.

In the editorial, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

(A) The first is a claim, the accuracy of which is disputed bythe editorial; the second is a conclusion drawn in
orderto support the main conclusion of the editorial. (first is not a claim, second is not conclusion)..wrong..

(B) The first is an observation that the editorial disputes; the second is a conclusion that was drawn from that
observation.(First is not obersvation, again like A..Second is not conclusion)

(C) The first is a finding that was used in support of a proposal that the editorial opposes; the second is a
judgment that was based on that finding and in turn was used to supportthe proposal.(correct, first is a finding that was used to support..second is judgement and suprtng the puposal..agreed..!!)

(D) The first is a fin ding introduced to supportthe main conclusion of the editorial; the second is that main
conclusion.

(E) The first is a conclusion, the evidence for which the editorial evaluates; the second is part of the evidence
cited in favor of that conclusion.

_________________

Life is a highway
I wanna ride it all night long

GMAT Pill Representative
User avatar
Joined: 07 Nov 2012
Posts: 346
Schools: LBS '14 (A)
GMAT 1: 770 Q48 V48
Followers: 140

Kudos [?]: 186 [0], given: 4

Re: Editorial: An arrest made by a Midville police officer is [#permalink] New post 26 Mar 2013, 07:51
Hi Prasun,

I think that you're mistaken on the first BF passage. Just because it says 'observed' doesn't mean it's simply an observation.

For example 'Darwin observed over a number of years evidence that supported Natural Selection' - you would call this a 'finding' that he had observed lots of evidence.

As you rightly say the 2nd BF is definitely not the overall conclusion, so this alone should put you off B.

C is the official answer and is correct.
_________________

Former GMAT Pill student, now on staff. Used GMATPILL OG 12 and nothing else: 770 (48,48) & 6.0



... and more


Last edited by Narenn on 05 Oct 2013, 12:23, edited 1 time in total.
All similar threads have been merged.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 03 Dec 2012
Posts: 367
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 291

Re: Editorial: An arrest made by a Midville police officer is pr [#permalink] New post 24 Oct 2013, 02:09
Why are you guys posting answers to a different question??? The answer to the first question in the thread is C. and it is the OA.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 05 Nov 2012
Posts: 163
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 56

Re: Editorial: An arrest made by a Midville police officer is pr [#permalink] New post 06 Dec 2013, 20:23
I agree with answer C but can someone help me in understanding the stem completely...

Police officers make an arrest which is considered as provisional until he takes that person to the station where the station commander checks if the evidence is sufficient.....
Govt expert says that since whatever standards commander enforces are met by the arrests this commander assessing of sufficiency of evidence should be taken away.....
The editorial rejects this recommendation and introduces a counter premise 'however'...... so this line should talk against the conclusion right.... so even though there is no assurance that the commander does a quality job, editorial still enforces this check step to be needed.... so what do they mean by "once approval is no longer required"? If this check step or approval is not needed/eliminated as per govt expert, commander would no longer be in the scene.... It is taken for granted that police officers make a good job in arresting people.... Shouldn't the last line be "This recommendation should be rejected as dangerous, however, since there is no assurance that the watch commanders’ standards will continue to be observed once this proposal is struck down"
Re: Editorial: An arrest made by a Midville police officer is pr   [#permalink] 06 Dec 2013, 20:23
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Experts publish their posts in the topic Editorial: An arrest made by a Midville police officer is carcass 0 26 Mar 2013, 07:51
Editorial: An arrest made by a Midville police officer is ankur55 0 28 Mar 2012, 17:45
Editorial: An arrest made by a Midville police officer is Nihit 0 30 Sep 2008, 10:09
BF arrest in Midville Gauss 4 19 Jul 2006, 15:57
A. Regardless of the consequences, the police officer was ngobaotrung 1 27 Apr 2005, 23:28
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Editorial: An arrest made by a Midville police officer is pr

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3   [ 45 posts ] 



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.