Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 02 Oct 2014, 02:33

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Editorial: An arrest made by a Midville police officer is pr

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
1 KUDOS received
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 709
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 103 [1] , given: 0

Editorial: An arrest made by a Midville police officer is pr [#permalink] New post 19 Apr 2008, 02:52
1
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  45% (medium)

Question Stats:

69% (02:48) correct 31% (01:49) wrong based on 273 sessions
Official Guide for GMAT Verbal Review, 2nd Edition

Practice Question
Question No.: 48
Page: 135
Difficulty:


Editorial: An arrest made by a Midville police officer is provisional until the officer has taken the suspect to the police station and the watch commander has officially approved the arrest. Such approval is denied if the commander judges that the evidence on which the provisional arrest is based is insufficient. A government efficiency expert has observed that almost all provisional arrests meet the standards for adequacy of evidence that the watch commanders enforce. The expert has therefore recommended that, because the officers’ time spent obtaining approval is largely wasted, the watch commander’s approval no longer be required. This recommendation should be rejected as dangerous, however, since there is no assurance that the watch commanders’ standards will continue to be observed once approval is no longer required.

In the editorial, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

(A) The first is a claim, the accuracy of which is disputed by the editorial; the second is a conclusion drawn in order to support the main conclusion of the editorial.
(B) The first is an observation that the editorial disputes; the second is a conclusion that was drawn from that observation.
(C) The first is a finding that was used in support of a proposal that the editorial opposes; the second is a judgment that was based on that finding and in turn was used to support the proposal.
(D) The first is a finding introduced to support the main conclusion of the editorial; the second is that main conclusion.
(E) The first is a conclusion, the evidence for which the editorial evaluates; the second is part of the evidence cited in favor of that conclusion.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Persistence+Patience+Persistence+Patience=G...O...A...L


Last edited by Narenn on 07 Oct 2013, 09:42, edited 4 times in total.
Complete Rework for Official Guide Verbal Review 2nd Edition Project
Kaplan Promo CodeKnewton GMAT Discount CodesVeritas Prep GMAT Discount Codes
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 17 May 2007
Posts: 2995
Followers: 56

Kudos [?]: 438 [0], given: 210

Re: CR:Editorial [#permalink] New post 19 Apr 2008, 03:34
B here. Looks pretty straightforward.
prasannar wrote:
Editorial:
An arrest made by a Midville police officer is provisional until the officer has taken the
suspect to the police station and the watch commander has officially approved the arrest.
Such approval is denied if the commander judges that the evidence on which the
provisional arrest is based is insufficient. A government efficiency expert has found that
almost all provisional arrests meet standards for adequacy of evidence that watch
commanders enforce. The expert therefore recommends that the watch commander’s
approval should no longer be required
since the officers’ time spent obtaining approval
is largely wasted. This recommendation should be rejected as dangerous, however,
since there is no assurance that the watch commanders’ standards will continue to be
observed once approval is no longer required.

In the editorial, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A. The first is a recommendation made by the editorial; the second acknowledges a
potential objection against that recommendation.
B. The first is a proposal against which the editorial is directed; the second is a
judgment reached by the editorial concerning that proposal.

C. The first provides evidence in support of a recommendation that the editorial
supports; the second is the conclusion reached by the editorial.
D. The first is a position that the editorial challenges; the second is a judgment that
was made in support of that challenged position.
E. The first is a recommendation that the editorial questions; the second provides
evidence against that recommendation.
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 1593
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 73 [0], given: 2

Re: CR:Editorial [#permalink] New post 19 Apr 2008, 04:52
B for me as well. There are a few other choices that are close, but the second boldface is really just stating the position of the argument, and not providing any evidence, etc.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 26 Mar 2008
Posts: 341
Location: Washington DC
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 4

Re: CR:Editorial [#permalink] New post 21 Apr 2008, 10:07
I guess A is the best answer.
Reason first boldface is actually recommendation that editorial made and second boldface is potential objection against that. Anyways Whats the OA?
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 18 Feb 2008
Posts: 798
Followers: 20

Kudos [?]: 88 [0], given: 25

Re: CR:Editorial [#permalink] New post 21 Apr 2008, 10:14
B for me as well.

The first is a proposal by somebody else, the second is editorials opinion that this proposal must be rejected.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 19 Aug 2007
Posts: 206
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

Re: CR:Editorial [#permalink] New post 21 Apr 2008, 12:23
The first is a recommendation/suggestion/propsal by the expert, the second is the position/stand of the editorial.

and this proposal is something the editorial is against. Only B conveys that.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Jan 2007
Posts: 451
Location: Earth
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 0

Re: CR:Editorial [#permalink] New post 22 Apr 2008, 11:49
one more B for same reasons.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 26 Mar 2008
Posts: 341
Location: Washington DC
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 4

Re: CR:Editorial [#permalink] New post 22 Apr 2008, 12:47
OA please??
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 19 Apr 2008
Posts: 325
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 0

Re: CR:Editorial [#permalink] New post 23 Apr 2008, 14:40
I tend to agree with A as well ,

"This recommendation should be rejected as dangerous" -usage of 'should' sound more like an objection than a judgement ----

What is OA?
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 14 Jan 2007
Posts: 782
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 0

Re: CR:Editorial [#permalink] New post 23 Apr 2008, 15:45
I would go for 'B'.

As the recommendations are made by experts not by the editorial, so A is not correct.
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1941
Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Followers: 18

Kudos [?]: 294 [0], given: 1

Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: CR:Editorial [#permalink] New post 23 Apr 2008, 17:25
prasannar wrote:
Editorial:
An arrest made by a Midville police officer is provisional until the officer has taken the
suspect to the police station and the watch commander has officially approved the arrest.
Such approval is denied if the commander judges that the evidence on which the
provisional arrest is based is insufficient. A government efficiency expert has found that
almost all provisional arrests meet standards for adequacy of evidence that watch
commanders enforce. The expert therefore recommends that the watch commander’s
approval should no longer be required
since the officers’ time spent obtaining approval
is largely wasted. This recommendation should be rejected as dangerous, however,
since there is no assurance that the watch commanders’ standards will continue to be
observed once approval is no longer required.

In the editorial, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A. The first is a recommendation made by the editorial; the second acknowledges a
potential objection against that recommendation.

The first boldface is made by the goverment expert, not by editorial

B. The first is a proposal against which the editorial is directed; the second is a
judgment reached by the editorial concerning that proposal.

C. The first provides evidence in support of a recommendation that the editorial
supports; the second is the conclusion reached by the editorial.

The first by itselt is a recomendation made by editorial, not evidence

D. The first is a position that the editorial challenges; the second is a judgment that
was made in support of that challenged position.

The second is itselt a challenge, not something used to support the challenge
E. The first is a recommendation that the editorial questions; the second provides
evidence against that recommendation.


The second itselt is aganst the recommendation, not an evidence to challenge the recomendation

B
_________________

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Dec 2007
Posts: 463
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 6

Editorial: An arrest made by a Midville police officer is [#permalink] New post 26 Sep 2008, 12:19
Editorial:
An arrest made by a Midville police officer is provisional until the officer has taken the
suspect to the police station and the watch commander has officially approved the arrest.
Such approval is denied if the commander judges that the evidence on which the
provisional arrest is based is insufficient. A government efficiency expert has found that
almost all provisional arrests meet standards for adequacy of evidence that watch
commanders enforce. The expert therefore recommends that the watch commander’s
approval should no longer be required
since the officers’ time spent obtaining approval
is largely wasted. This recommendation should be rejected as dangerous, however,
since there is no assurance that the watch commanders’ standards will continue to be
observed once approval is no longer required.
In the editorial, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
A. The first is a recommendation made by the editorial; the second acknowledges a
potential objection against that recommendation.
B. The first is a proposal against which the editorial is directed; the second is a
judgment reached by the editorial concerning that proposal.
C. The first provides evidence in support of a recommendation that the editorial
supports; the second is the conclusion reached by the editorial.
D. The first is a position that the editorial challenges; the second is a judgment that
was made in support of that challenged position.
E. The first is a recommendation that the editorial questions; the second provides
evidence against that recommendation.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Aug 2008
Posts: 150
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

Re: bold face CR [#permalink] New post 26 Sep 2008, 13:33
Nihit wrote:
Editorial:
An arrest made by a Midville police officer is provisional until the officer has taken the
suspect to the police station and the watch commander has officially approved the arrest.
Such approval is denied if the commander judges that the evidence on which the
provisional arrest is based is insufficient. A government efficiency expert has found that
almost all provisional arrests meet standards for adequacy of evidence that watch
commanders enforce. The expert therefore recommends that the watch commander’s
approval should no longer be required
since the officers’ time spent obtaining approval
is largely wasted. This recommendation should be rejected as dangerous, however,
since there is no assurance that the watch commanders’ standards will continue to be
observed once approval is no longer required.
In the editorial, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
A. The first is a recommendation made by the editorial; the second acknowledges a
potential objection against that recommendation.
B. The first is a proposal against which the editorial is directed; the second is a
judgment reached by the editorial concerning that proposal.
C. The first provides evidence in support of a recommendation that the editorial
supports; the second is the conclusion reached by the editorial.
D. The first is a position that the editorial challenges; the second is a judgment that
was made in support of that challenged position.
E. The first is a recommendation that the editorial questions; the second provides
evidence against that recommendation.


IMO B

Evidence follows words like since, because. Experts recommends means it is a proposal, but not by the editorial but by the experts.

Further 1st underlined portion precedes the word since, & evidence usually suceedes the word 'since', so all the options that call 1st underlined portion as evidence must be rejected. Also editorial rejects this proposal. So eliminate options that call it to be supported by editorial.

Finally the 2nd line also precedes since, so it must not be evidence. Also it is supported by editorial. So the best option is B.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 May 2006
Posts: 186
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

Re: bold face CR [#permalink] New post 26 Sep 2008, 14:44
Agree with B.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 28 Feb 2007
Posts: 308
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 0

Re: bold face CR [#permalink] New post 26 Sep 2008, 16:06
B
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 30 Jun 2008
Posts: 1048
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 285 [0], given: 1

Re: bold face CR [#permalink] New post 26 Sep 2008, 18:53
Nihit wrote:
Editorial:
An arrest made by a Midville police officer is provisional until the officer has taken the
suspect to the police station and the watch commander has officially approved the arrest.
Such approval is denied if the commander judges that the evidence on which the
provisional arrest is based is insufficient. A government efficiency expert has found that
almost all provisional arrests meet standards for adequacy of evidence that watch
commanders enforce. The expert therefore recommends that the watch commander’s
approval should no longer be required
since the officers’ time spent obtaining approval
is largely wasted. This recommendation should be rejected as dangerous, however,
since there is no assurance that the watch commanders’ standards will continue to be
observed once approval is no longer required.
In the editorial, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A. The first is a recommendation made by the editorial; the second acknowledges a
potential objection against that recommendation.
B. The first is a proposal against which the editorial is directed; the second is a
judgment reached by the editorial concerning that proposal.
C. The first provides evidence in support of a recommendation that the editorial
supports; the second is the conclusion reached by the editorial.
D. The first is a position that the editorial challenges; the second is a judgment that
was made in support of that challenged position.
E. The first is a recommendation that the editorial questions; the second provides
evidence against that recommendation.


E) The second is not an evidence
D) The second is not a judgment in support of the challenged position. It is against it.
C)First is not the evidence.
A) first is not recommendation of the editorial.

This leaves us with B
_________________

"You have to find it. No one else can find it for you." - Bjorn Borg

Check out my GMAT blog - GMAT Tips and Strategies

VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1406
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 118 [0], given: 0

Re: bold face CR [#permalink] New post 26 Sep 2008, 20:24
Nihit wrote:
Editorial:
An arrest made by a Midville police officer is provisional until the officer has taken the
suspect to the police station and the watch commander has officially approved the arrest.
Such approval is denied if the commander judges that the evidence on which the
provisional arrest is based is insufficient. A government efficiency expert has found that
almost all provisional arrests meet standards for adequacy of evidence that watch
commanders enforce. The expert therefore recommends that the watch commander’s
approval should no longer be required
since the officers’ time spent obtaining approval
is largely wasted. This recommendation should be rejected as dangerous, however,
since there is no assurance that the watch commanders’ standards will continue to be
observed once approval is no longer required.
In the editorial, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
A. The first is a recommendation made by the editorial; the second acknowledges a potential objection against that recommendation.-> first is the reco against which editorial argues..ELIMINATE
B. The first is a proposal against which the editorial is directed; the second is a judgment reached by the editorial concerning that proposal. -> this is PERFECT HOLD THIS IMO
C. The first provides evidence in support of a recommendation that the editorial supports; the second is the conclusion reached by the editorial.-> first is not in support of the argument,ELIMINATE

D. The first is a position that the editorial challenges; the second is a judgment that was made in support of that challenged position. ->
second is not a judgement in support of the positiion,itys against that challenged position.ELIMINATE
E. The first is a recommendation that the editorial questions; the second provides evidence against that recommendation. -> second is not an evidence ,its the concl or final word of this editorial.ELIMINATE



reco of expert : The expert therefore recommends that the watch commander’s approval should no longer be required since the officers’ time spent obtaining approval
is largely wasted.

Edi premise :however, since there is no assurance that the watch commanders’ standards will continue to be observed once approval is no longer required.

Editorial's concl : This recommendation should be rejected as dangerous

Clearly B
_________________

cheers
Its Now Or Never

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 20 Sep 2006
Posts: 658
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 63 [0], given: 7

Re: bold face CR [#permalink] New post 26 Sep 2008, 20:46
IMO B. coz ... second BF is conclusion.
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1579
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 185 [0], given: 0

Re: bold face CR [#permalink] New post 30 Sep 2008, 00:45
Another B.
Retired Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 18 Jul 2008
Posts: 997
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 72 [0], given: 5

Re: bold face CR [#permalink] New post 30 Sep 2008, 09:33
b
Re: bold face CR   [#permalink] 30 Sep 2008, 09:33
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Experts publish their posts in the topic Editorial: An arrest made by a Midville police officer is carcass 0 26 Mar 2013, 07:51
Editorial: An arrest made by a Midville police officer is ankur55 0 28 Mar 2012, 17:45
Editorial: An arrest made by a Midville police officer is Nihit 0 30 Sep 2008, 10:09
BF arrest in Midville Gauss 4 19 Jul 2006, 15:57
A. Regardless of the consequences, the police officer was ngobaotrung 1 27 Apr 2005, 23:28
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Editorial: An arrest made by a Midville police officer is pr

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Go to page    1   2   3    Next  [ 45 posts ] 



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.