Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 25 Oct 2014, 13:33

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Editorial: In Ledland, unemployed adults receive government

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
1 KUDOS received
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 10 Jun 2007
Posts: 1467
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 108 [1] , given: 0

Editorial: In Ledland, unemployed adults receive government [#permalink] New post 28 Sep 2007, 17:21
1
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

55% (02:18) correct 45% (02:00) wrong based on 7 sessions
Editorial:
In Ledland, unemployed adults receive government assistance. To reduce
unemployment, the government proposes to supplement the income of those who accept jobs that pay less than government assistance, thus enabling employers to hire workers cheaply. However, the supplement will not raise any worker’s income above what government assistance would provide if he or she were not gainfully employed. Therefore, unemployed people will have no financial incentive to accept jobs that would entitle them to the supplement.

Which of the following, if true about Ledland, most seriously weakens the argument of the editorial?

A. The government collects no taxes on assistance it provides to unemployed individuals and their families.
B. Neighboring countries with laws that mandate the minimum wage an employer must pay an employee have higher unemployment rates than Ledland currently has.
C. People who are employed and look for a new job tend to get higher-paying jobs than job seekers who are unemployed.
D. The yearly amount unemployed people receive from government assistance is less than the yearly income that the government defines as the poverty level.
E. People sometimes accept jobs that pay relatively little simply because they enjoy the work.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 17 Sep 2005
Posts: 931
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 28 Sep 2007, 18:02
Initially I thought A but then I realized "A" is talking about "unemployed individuals" and not about newly employed people who were unemployed.

If I negate A then only relevant option left is C.

Once unemployed become employed, they may look for a new job that may offer them higher salary.....

I am going with C.

- Brajesh
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 2500
Followers: 54

Kudos [?]: 512 [0], given: 19

Re: CR [#permalink] New post 28 Sep 2007, 18:56
bkk145 wrote:
Editorial: In Ledland, unemployed adults receive government assistance. To reduce unemployment, the government proposes to supplement the income of those who accept jobs that pay less than government assistance, thus enabling employers to hire workers cheaply. However, the supplement will not raise any worker’s income above what government assistance would provide if he or she were not gainfully employed. Therefore, unemployed people will have no financial incentive to accept jobs that would entitle them to the supplement.

Which of the following, if true about Ledland, most seriously weakens the argument of the editorial?

A. The government collects no taxes on assistance it provides to unemployed individuals and their families.
B. Neighboring countries with laws that mandate the minimum wage an employer must pay an employee have higher unemployment rates than Ledland currently has.
C. People who are employed and look for a new job tend to get higher-paying jobs than job seekers who are unemployed.
D. The yearly amount unemployed people receive from government assistance is less than the yearly income that the government defines as the poverty level.
E. People sometimes accept jobs that pay relatively little simply because they enjoy the work.


C. very ideal Gmat question.
Current Student
avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2004
Posts: 3403
Location: New York City
Schools: Wharton'11 HBS'12
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 164 [0], given: 2

 [#permalink] New post 28 Sep 2007, 20:05
down to C and E...

i think C makes the cut..E is weak cause it says "some"..
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 10 Jun 2007
Posts: 1467
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 108 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 28 Sep 2007, 21:04
OA=C
thanks guys.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 15 Mar 2007
Posts: 45
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: CR [#permalink] New post 28 Sep 2007, 21:12
bkk145 wrote:
Editorial:
In Ledland, unemployed adults receive government assistance. To reduce
unemployment, the government proposes to supplement the income of those who accept jobs that pay less than government assistance, thus enabling employers to hire workers cheaply. However, the supplement will not raise any worker’s income above what government assistance would provide if he or she were not gainfully employed. Therefore, unemployed people will have no financial incentive to accept jobs that would entitle them to the supplement.

Which of the following, if true about Ledland, most seriously weakens the argument of the editorial?

A. The government collects no taxes on assistance it provides to unemployed individuals and their families.
B. Neighboring countries with laws that mandate the minimum wage an employer must pay an employee have higher unemployment rates than Ledland currently has.
C. People who are employed and look for a new job tend to get higher-paying jobs than job seekers who are unemployed.
D. The yearly amount unemployed people receive from government assistance is less than the yearly income that the government defines as the poverty level.
E. People sometimes accept jobs that pay relatively little simply because they enjoy the work.


E.
The statment assumes that people should be employed only for income.
E states that may prompt people to take up because they like rather than for the sole purpose of getting payed.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Jul 2006
Posts: 299
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

Re: CR [#permalink] New post 29 Sep 2007, 09:52
bkk145 wrote:
Editorial:
In Ledland, unemployed adults receive government assistance. To reduce
unemployment, the government proposes to supplement the income of those who accept jobs that pay less than government assistance, thus enabling employers to hire workers cheaply. However, the supplement will not raise any worker’s income above what government assistance would provide if he or she were not gainfully employed. Therefore, unemployed people will have no financial incentive to accept jobs that would entitle them to the supplement.

Which of the following, if true about Ledland, most seriously weakens the argument of the editorial?

A. The government collects no taxes on assistance it provides to unemployed individuals and their families. (This is an incentive not to get a job, as they would be paying taxes on their earnings as opposed to having a full tax free employment)


B. Neighboring countries with laws that mandate the minimum wage an employer must pay an employee have higher unemployment rates than Ledland currently has.(wrong country)

C. People who are employed and look for a new job tend to get higher-paying jobs than job seekers who are unemployed.(an incentive to get a job, because it will eventually lead to higher pay --good)

D. The yearly amount unemployed people receive from government assistance is less than the yearly income that the government defines as the poverty level. (poverty level is outside of the scope)

E. People sometimes accept jobs that pay relatively little simply because they enjoy the work. (we are looking for economic benefits, so outside of the scope)

Answer C

Director
Director
avatar
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: Chicago Booth Class of 2015
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 995
Followers: 15

Kudos [?]: 422 [0], given: 36

Re: CR [#permalink] New post 28 Jun 2010, 20:08
A is actually strengthening - "assistance is good. No financial incentive on the job"
_________________

Please press kudos if you like my post.

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 26 Jun 2010
Posts: 34
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 4

Re: CR [#permalink] New post 28 Jun 2010, 20:27
i do not see anyother option strengthening the argument other than C so i think C is the answer, what is the OA
Director
Director
avatar
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: Chicago Booth Class of 2015
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 995
Followers: 15

Kudos [?]: 422 [0], given: 36

Re: CR [#permalink] New post 28 Jun 2010, 20:52
Sorry I was reasoning why A is NOT an answer :-)

Which of the following, if true about Ledland, most seriously [highlight]weakens[/highlight] the argument of the editorial?

paresh124 wrote:
i do not see anyother option strengthening the argument other than C so i think C is the answer, what is the OA

_________________

Please press kudos if you like my post.

SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 1560
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 227 [0], given: 6

Re: CR [#permalink] New post 02 Jul 2010, 17:19
C for me.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 2355
Followers: 279

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: Editorial: In Ledland, unemployed adults receive government [#permalink] New post 07 Sep 2014, 07:16
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: Editorial: In Ledland, unemployed adults receive government   [#permalink] 07 Sep 2014, 07:16
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
8 Experts publish their posts in the topic Editorial: In Ledland, unemployed adults receive government venmic 7 03 Sep 2012, 06:46
Editorial: In Ledland, unemployed adults receive government rpmodi 13 30 Jun 2008, 20:37
In Ledland, unemployed adults receive government assistance. gregspirited 5 19 Nov 2007, 12:08
2 Editorial: In Ledland, unemployed adults receive government ttanvir 13 25 Dec 2006, 03:33
In Ledland, unemployed adults receive government assistance. KC 5 31 Oct 2006, 08:08
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Editorial: In Ledland, unemployed adults receive government

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.