Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 25 May 2013, 21:25
Customize  |  Hide

Editorial: Spam, or unsolicited commercial email, exists

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  
Author Message
TAGS:
Director
Director
Joined: 21 Dec 2009
Posts: 592
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Finance
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 130 [0], given: 20

GMAT Tests User
Editorial: Spam, or unsolicited commercial email, exists [#permalink] New post 06 Nov 2012, 10:47
00:00

Question Stats:

100% (02:35) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 5 sessions
Editorial: “Spam,” or unsolicited commercial email, exists only because a significant number of people buy the
advertised products. A response by just one recipient out of every thousand receiving a spam message makes spam
profitable enough to encourage certain businesses to send more. But any benefits the few respondents receive from
the purchased products are surely outweighed by the nuisance that spam creates for the vast number of
uninterested recipients. Therefore, it is socially irresponsible to buy anything advertised through spam.

Which of the following, if assumed, would enable the conclusion of the editorial’s argument to be properly drawn?

A. Doing anything that encourages a person or organization to act in a way that creates a nuisance for many more people
than it benefits is socially irresponsible.
B. Any socially irresponsible action creates a nuisance for at least some other people.
C. At least some socially irresponsible actions create a nuisance for a vast number of people while benefiting few if any people.
D. It is socially irresponsible for a business to send spam to a vast number of uninterested recipients in order to reach only a
few interested recipients.
E. When deciding whether to purchase an advertised product, one should consider whether the benefits one will receive from
the product outweigh the nuisance the advertising creates for other people.

OA only after discusions.
_________________

KUDOS me if you feel my contribution has helped you.

Intern
Intern
Joined: 29 Oct 2012
Posts: 1
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: unsolicited commercial email [#permalink] New post 06 Nov 2012, 13:25
I guess the answer would be "E".
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 02 Jul 2012
Posts: 769
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 19

Kudos [?]: 260 [0], given: 45

GMAT Tests User
Re: unsolicited commercial email [#permalink] New post 06 Nov 2012, 13:37
Answer should be A. It fills the logic jump from "any benefits the few respondents receive from
the purchased products are surely outweighed by the nuisance that spam creates for the vast number of
uninterested recipients" to " it is socially irresponsible to buy anything advertised through spam".

Kudos Please... If my post helped.
_________________

Kudos Please... If my post helped.

Thanks To The Almighty - My GMAT Debrief
My Own CR Question 1|My Own CR Question 2|My Own DS Question 1|My Own DS Question 2|
My Own PS Question 1

Manager
Manager
Joined: 02 Jan 2011
Posts: 201
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 22

GMAT Tests User
Re: unsolicited commercial email [#permalink] New post 07 Nov 2012, 09:33
B and C can be eliminated straight away as they generalize the whole assumption thing.
D and E talks from the perspective of the user. Wrong.
A fills the gap between the premise and the conclusion correctly.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 22 Oct 2012
Posts: 34
Concentration: Economics, Finance
GMAT Date: 11-08-2012
GPA: 2.67
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 4

Re: unsolicited commercial email [#permalink] New post 07 Nov 2012, 09:42
gmatbull wrote:
Editorial: “Spam,” or unsolicited commercial email, exists only because a significant number of people buy the
advertised products. A response by just one recipient out of every thousand receiving a spam message makes spam
profitable enough to encourage certain businesses to send more. But any benefits the few respondents receive from
the purchased products are surely outweighed by the nuisance that spam creates for the vast number of
uninterested recipients. Therefore, it is socially irresponsible to buy anything advertised through spam.

Which of the following, if assumed, would enable the conclusion of the editorial’s argument to be properly drawn?

A. Doing anything that encourages a person or organization to act in a way that creates a nuisance for many more people
than it benefits is socially irresponsible.
B. Any socially irresponsible action creates a nuisance for at least some other people.
C. At least some socially irresponsible actions create a nuisance for a vast number of people while benefiting few if any people.
D. It is socially irresponsible for a business to send spam to a vast number of uninterested recipients in order to reach only a
few interested recipients.
E. When deciding whether to purchase an advertised product, one should consider whether the benefits one will receive from
the product outweigh the nuisance the advertising creates for other people.

OA only after discusions.

The questions asks us to find the assumption behind the conclusion of the author. So, the first step is to find out the conclusion and the premises:
Conclusion: it is socially irresponsible to buy anything advertised through spam
Premise: Benefit of buyers from the purchase < nuisance for uninterested recipients due to the purchase (how a purchase leads to nuisance to others is explained in the first two statements)

Now, let's go over options one by one:
A. Doing anything that encourages a person or organization to act in a way that creates a nuisance for many more people
than it benefits is socially irresponsible. - the premise says that the benefit due to purchases through spams is less than nuisance to others and the conclusion says that it is socially irresponsible to buy anything advertised through spam. An assumption is inbuilt about the meaning of social irresponsibility. This option defined what is socially irresponsible and thus connects the initial premise with the conclusion. Thus, this appears to be correct.
B. Any socially irresponsible action creates a nuisance for at least some other people. - comparing with the conclusion, we can see that this option is completely off track.
C. At least some socially irresponsible actions create a nuisance for a vast number of people while benefiting few if any people. - Doesn't help in explaining the conclusion.
D. It is socially irresponsible for a business to send spam to a vast number of uninterested recipients in order to reach only a
few interested recipients. - The conclusion is saying that it is socially irresponsible to buy anything advertised through spam and this options says some other thing to be socially irresponsible. Thus, does not help explain the conclusion.
E. When deciding whether to purchase an advertised product, one should consider whether the benefits one will receive from
the product outweigh the nuisance the advertising creates for other people. - If I don't consider these, would I be called socially irresponsible? May be or may not be. We don't know what socially irresponsible means here. Thus, this option does not help us explain the conclusion, which talks about socially irresponsible behavior.

Based on the above understanding, option A is the correct choice.

Cheers,
CJ
_________________

If this post is helpful, think of giving KUDOS.

Re: unsolicited commercial email   [#permalink] 07 Nov 2012, 09:42
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Popular new posts More unsolicited viewbooks... Mark4124 25 18 Nov 2006, 10:24
Popular new posts Unsolicited emails from bSchools sm176811 16 06 Mar 2007, 13:19
New posts Email nitindas 6 28 Mar 2009, 15:53
New posts EXPERTS_POSTS_IN_THIS_TOPIC SPAM :) bb 3 02 Oct 2009, 15:42
New posts Tip: How to ensure your university emails never go to spam IndianGuardian 1 01 Feb 2010, 06:22
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Editorial: Spam, or unsolicited commercial email, exists

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.