Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 28 Jun 2016, 19:44
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Editorial: The government claims that the country's nuclear

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

3 KUDOS received
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 29 Oct 2008
Posts: 410
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, Technology
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 219 [3] , given: 34

Editorial: The government claims that the country's nuclear [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Jul 2012, 17:57
3
This post received
KUDOS
14
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  95% (hard)

Question Stats:

50% (03:09) correct 50% (02:36) wrong based on 807 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Editorial: The government claims that the country's nuclear power plants are entirely safe and hence that the public's fear of nuclear accidents at these plants is groundless. The government also contends that its recent action to limit the nuclear industry's financial liability in the case of nuclear accidents at power plants is justified by the need to protect the nuclear industry from the threat of bankruptcy. But even the government says that unlimited liability poses such a threat only if injury claims can be sustained against the industry; and the government admits that for such claims to be sustained, injury must result from nuclear accident. The public's fear, therefore, is well founded.

If all the statements offered in support of the editorial's conclusion correctly describe the government's position, which one of the following must also be true on the basis of those statements?

a. The government's claim about the safety of the country's nuclear power plant is false.
b. The government's position on nuclear power plants is inconsistent.
c. The government misrepresented its reasons for acting to limit the nuclear industry's liability.
d. Unlimited financial liability in the case of nuclear accidents poses no threat to the financial security of the country's nuclear industry.
e. The only serious threat posed by a nuclear accident would be to the financial security of the nuclear industry.

Pls explain..... I know OA but reveal l8r
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

If you know what you're worth, then go out and get what you're worth. But you gotta be willing to take the hits, and not pointing fingers saying you ain't where you wanna be because of anybody! Cowards do that and You're better than that!
The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short; the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.

Fire the final bullet only when you are constantly hitting the Bull's eye, till then KEEP PRACTICING.
Failure establishes only this, that our determination to succeed was not strong enough.
Getting defeated is just a temporary notion, giving it up is what makes it permanent.

1000-sc-notes-at-one-place-in-one-document-with-best-of-explanations-192961.html

Press +1 Kudos, if you think my post gave u a tiny tip.


Last edited by dentobizz on 07 Nov 2013, 19:32, edited 1 time in total.
Adding OA
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 26 Dec 2011
Posts: 117
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 17

Re: Editorial: The government claims that the country's nuclear [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Jul 2012, 07:43
D; according to me that's the only statement that can be inferred based on the information given
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 29 Oct 2008
Posts: 410
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, Technology
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 219 [0], given: 34

Re: Editorial: The government claims that the country's nuclear [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Jul 2012, 15:16
pavanpuneet wrote:
D; according to me that's the only statement that can be inferred based on the information given


But, from the argument, we have a limiting factor, which government has said to be a threat, though in a singular case(if injury claims can be sustained against the industry):
Quote:
its recent action to limitthe nuclear industry's financial liability in the case of nuclear accidents at power plants is justified by the need to protect the nuclear industry from the threat of bankruptcy.

_________________

If you know what you're worth, then go out and get what you're worth. But you gotta be willing to take the hits, and not pointing fingers saying you ain't where you wanna be because of anybody! Cowards do that and You're better than that!
The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short; the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.

Fire the final bullet only when you are constantly hitting the Bull's eye, till then KEEP PRACTICING.
Failure establishes only this, that our determination to succeed was not strong enough.
Getting defeated is just a temporary notion, giving it up is what makes it permanent.

1000-sc-notes-at-one-place-in-one-document-with-best-of-explanations-192961.html

Press +1 Kudos, if you think my post gave u a tiny tip.

1 KUDOS received
BSchool Forum Moderator
User avatar
Status: Flying over the cloud!
Joined: 17 Aug 2011
Posts: 913
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: International Business, Marketing
GMAT Date: 06-06-2014
GPA: 3.07
Followers: 70

Kudos [?]: 499 [1] , given: 44

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Editorial: The government claims that the country's nuclear [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Jul 2012, 01:36
1
This post received
KUDOS
joshnsit wrote:
Editorial: The government claims that the country's nuclear power plants are entirely safe and hence that the public's fear of nuclear accidents at these plants is groundless. The government also contends that its recent action to limit the nuclear industry's financial liability in the case of nuclear accidents at power plants is justified by the need to protect the nuclear industry from the threat of bankruptcy. But even the government says that unlimited liability poses such a threat only if injury claims can be sustained against the industry; and the government admits that for such claims to be sustained, injury must result from nuclear accident. The public's fear, therefore, is well founded.

If all the statements offered in support of the editorial's conclusion correctly describe the government's position, which one of the following must also be true on the basis of those statements?

a. The government's claim about the safety of the country's nuclear power plant is false.
b. The government's position on nuclear power plants is inconsistent.
c. The government misrepresented its reasons for acting to limit the nuclear industry's liability.
d. Unlimited financial liability in the case of nuclear accidents poses no threat to the financial security of the country's nuclear industry.
e. The only serious threat posed by a nuclear accident would be to the financial security of the nuclear industry.

Pls explain..... I know OA but reveal l8r

Scope of the argument:
G: NCP (nuclear power plant) is safe => fear at these plant is grounless
G: Recent actions to limit the N's industry financial liability in case the nuclear accidents at power plants is justified by the need to protect the nuclear industry from the threat of bankruptcy
G: But even the government says that unlimited liability poses such a threat only if injury claims can be sustained against the industry; and the government admits that for such claims to be sustained, injury must result from nuclear accident.

The boldface shows the choice D is the most sustainable choice.

Choice E is totally wrong because of the extreme word "only"
_________________

Rules for posting in verbal gmat forum, read it before posting anything in verbal forum
Giving me + 1 kudos if my post is valuable with you :)

The more you like my post, the more you share to other's need

CR: Focus of the Week: Must be True Question

4 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 10 Apr 2012
Posts: 30
Location: Venezuela
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GPA: 3.07
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 40 [4] , given: 5

Re: Editorial: The government claims that the country's nuclear [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Jul 2012, 19:37
4
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
I beg to differ!
The correct answer choice is B.

a. The government's claim about the safety of the country's nuclear power plant is false. To strong to claim that its claim is false. INCORRECT
b. The government's position on nuclear power plants is inconsistent. The government is certainly being inconsistent in its position. First it says that public's concern is groundless and then it makes a claim about liability and its threat, concluding that public's concern is well founded. CORRECT!
c. The government misrepresented its reasons for acting to limit the nuclear industry's liability. Irrelevant. INCORRECT
d. Unlimited financial liability in the case of nuclear accidents poses no threat to the financial security of the country's nuclear industry. This cannot be deduced from the argument. It contradicts the argument. INCORRECT
e. The only serious threat posed by a nuclear accident would be to the financial security of the nuclear industry. Public worried about safety, not financial security. INCORRECT
Expert Post
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 2936
Followers: 678

Kudos [?]: 5380 [0], given: 941

Re: Editorial: The government claims that the country's nuclear [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Jul 2012, 02:07
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Editorial: The government claims that the country's nuclear power plants are entirely safe and hence that the public's fear of nuclear accidents at these plants is groundless. The government also contends that its recent action to limit the nuclear industry's financial liability in the case of nuclear accidents at power plants is justified by the need to protect the nuclear industry from the threat of bankruptcy. But even the government says that unlimited liability poses such a threat only if injury claims can be sustained against the industry; and the government admits that for such claims to be sustained, injury must result from nuclear accident. The public's fear, therefore, is well founded.

If all the statements offered in support of the editorial's conclusion correctly describe the government's position, which one of the following must also be true on the basis of those statements?

a. The government's claim about the safety of the country's nuclear power plant is false.
b. The government's position on nuclear power plants is inconsistent.
c. The government misrepresented its reasons for acting to limit the nuclear industry's liability.
d. Unlimited financial liability in the case of nuclear accidents poses no threat to the financial security of the country's nuclear industry.
e. The only serious threat posed by a nuclear accident would be to the financial security of the nuclear industry.

B is the only choice that makes sense.

Theother are wrong, without think so much. Not so tough
_________________

COLLECTION OF QUESTIONS AND RESOURCES
Quant: 1. ALL GMATPrep questions Quant/Verbal 2. Bunuel Signature Collection - The Next Generation 3. Bunuel Signature Collection ALL-IN-ONE WITH SOLUTIONS 4. Veritas Prep Blog PDF Version 5. MGMAT Study Hall Thursdays with Ron Quant Videos
Verbal:1. Verbal question bank and directories by Carcass 2. MGMAT Study Hall Thursdays with Ron Verbal Videos 3. Critical Reasoning_Oldy but goldy question banks 4. Sentence Correction_Oldy but goldy question banks 5. Reading-comprehension_Oldy but goldy question banks

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Nov 2009
Posts: 312
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 399 [0], given: 20

Re: Editorial: The government claims that the country's nuclear [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Jul 2012, 06:42
A. The government’s claim about the safety of the country’s nuclear power plants is false.
Maybe the claim is true, and the government has other reasons to limit liability.
B. The government’s position on nuclear power plants is inconsistent
Whatever the explanation might be, the government is certainly being inconsistent in its position. Correct
C. The government misrepresented its reason for acting to limit the nuclear industry’s liability
The reason could be valid, maybe the claim about the safety of nuclear plants is unfounded.
D. Unlimited financial liability in the case of nuclear accidents poses no threat to the financial security of the country’s nuclear industry
Cannot deduce this from the above passage.
E. The only serious threat posed by a nuclear accident would be to the financial security of the nuclear industry
Cannot deduce this from the passage.
1 KUDOS received
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 29 Oct 2008
Posts: 410
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, Technology
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 219 [1] , given: 34

Re: Editorial: The government claims that the country's nuclear [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Jul 2012, 06:27
1
This post received
KUDOS
santivilla wrote:
I beg to differ!
The correct answer choice is B.

a. The government's claim about the safety of the country's nuclear power plant is false. To strong to claim that its claim is false. INCORRECT
b. The government's position on nuclear power plants is inconsistent. The government is certainly being inconsistent in its position. First it says that public's concern is groundless and then it makes a claim about liability and its threat, concluding that public's concern is well founded. CORRECT!
c. The government misrepresented its reasons for acting to limit the nuclear industry's liability. Irrelevant. INCORRECT
d. Unlimited financial liability in the case of nuclear accidents poses no threat to the financial security of the country's nuclear industry. This cannot be deduced from the argument. It contradicts the argument. INCORRECT
e. The only serious threat posed by a nuclear accident would be to the financial security of the nuclear industry. Public worried about safety, not financial security. INCORRECT

Nice explanation. Thanks for reinforcing my thoughts. +1 Kudos :-D

B is OA here.
_________________

If you know what you're worth, then go out and get what you're worth. But you gotta be willing to take the hits, and not pointing fingers saying you ain't where you wanna be because of anybody! Cowards do that and You're better than that!
The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short; the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.

Fire the final bullet only when you are constantly hitting the Bull's eye, till then KEEP PRACTICING.
Failure establishes only this, that our determination to succeed was not strong enough.
Getting defeated is just a temporary notion, giving it up is what makes it permanent.

1000-sc-notes-at-one-place-in-one-document-with-best-of-explanations-192961.html

Press +1 Kudos, if you think my post gave u a tiny tip.

3 KUDOS received
Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 23 Jul 2010
Posts: 532
GPA: 3.34
WE: General Management (Non-Profit and Government)
Followers: 95

Kudos [?]: 763 [3] , given: 287

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Editorial: The government claims that the country's nuclear [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Nov 2013, 05:44
3
This post received
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Bumping for Review and Discussion**
New Gmat club Project Click here


_________________

How to CHOOSE your Business School
Thanks = Kudos. Kudos are appreciated

Rules for posting on the verbal forum
When you post a question Pls. Provide its source & TAG your questions
Avoid posting from unreliable sources such as 1000 series.

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2012
Posts: 115
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
GMAT 1: Q V
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 58 [0], given: 90

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Editorial: The government claims that the country's nuclear [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Jan 2014, 01:00
joshnsit wrote:
Editorial: The government claims that the country's nuclear power plants are entirely safe and hence that the public's fear of nuclear accidents at these plants is groundless. The government also contends that its recent action to limit the nuclear industry's financial liability in the case of nuclear accidents at power plants is justified by the need to protect the nuclear industry from the threat of bankruptcy. But even the government says that unlimited liability poses such a threat only if injury claims can be sustained against the industry; and the government admits that for such claims to be sustained, injury must result from nuclear accident. The public's fear, therefore, is well founded.

If all the statements offered in support of the editorial's conclusion correctly describe the government's position, which one of the following must also be true on the basis of those statements?

a. The government's claim about the safety of the country's nuclear power plant is false.
b. The government's position on nuclear power plants is inconsistent.
c. The government misrepresented its reasons for acting to limit the nuclear industry's liability.
d. Unlimited financial liability in the case of nuclear accidents poses no threat to the financial security of the country's nuclear industry.
e. The only serious threat posed by a nuclear accident would be to the financial security of the nuclear industry.

Pls explain..... I know OA but reveal l8r


------> "the country's nuclear power plants are entirely safe" is inconsistent with "for such claims to be sustained, injury must result from nuclear accident". Hence B

Kudos.. If u like :)
_________________

Impossibility is a relative concept!!

2 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 11 Aug 2011
Posts: 196
Location: United States
Concentration: Economics, Finance
GMAT Date: 10-16-2013
GPA: 3
WE: Analyst (Computer Software)
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 152 [2] , given: 886

Reviews Badge
Re: Editorial: The government claims that the country's nuclear [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Jan 2014, 06:49
2
This post received
KUDOS
joshnsit wrote:
Editorial: The government claims that the country's nuclear power plants are entirely safe and hence that the public's fear of nuclear accidents at these plants is groundless. The government also contends that its recent action to limit the nuclear industry's financial liability in the case of nuclear accidents at power plants is justified by the need to protect the nuclear industry from the threat of bankruptcy. But even the government says that unlimited liability poses such a threat only if injury claims can be sustained against the industry; and the government admits that for such claims to be sustained, injury must result from nuclear accident. The public's fear, therefore, is well founded.

If all the statements offered in support of the editorial's conclusion correctly describe the government's position, which one of the following must also be true on the basis of those statements?

a. The government's claim about the safety of the country's nuclear power plant is false.
b. The government's position on nuclear power plants is inconsistent.
c. The government misrepresented its reasons for acting to limit the nuclear industry's liability.
d. Unlimited financial liability in the case of nuclear accidents poses no threat to the financial security of the country's nuclear industry.
e. The only serious threat posed by a nuclear accident would be to the financial security of the nuclear industry.

Pls explain..... I know OA but reveal l8r



To understand why B is correct we have to understand why the author makes a conclusion that the peoples fear are well founded.
The first part of the passage states that the Govt has told people that they need not fear nuclear accidents as the nuclear power plants are absolutely safe.
In the second part of the passage , the Govt states that it has provided protection to the nuclear power companies in case of liability because these organizations might fall into bankruptcy in case of nuclear accidents and if the injury caused to people is a result of this nuclear accident.
Hence the govt is on one side telling that they need not fear any nuclear accident and on the second hand telling the people that this financial security is provided in case of any nuclear accident.
Hence its position is inconsistent.
_________________

Kudos me if you like my post !!!!

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 24 Oct 2013
Posts: 181
Location: Canada
Schools: LBS '18
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V38
WE: Design (Transportation)
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 83

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Editorial: The government claims that the country's nuclear [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Jul 2014, 20:50
santivilla wrote:
I beg to differ!
The correct answer choice is B.

a. The government's claim about the safety of the country's nuclear power plant is false. To strong to claim that its claim is false. INCORRECT
b. The government's position on nuclear power plants is inconsistent. The government is certainly being inconsistent in its position. First it says that public's concern is groundless and then it makes a claim about liability and its threat, concluding that public's concern is well founded. CORRECT!
c. The government misrepresented its reasons for acting to limit the nuclear industry's liability. Irrelevant. INCORRECT
d. Unlimited financial liability in the case of nuclear accidents poses no threat to the financial security of the country's nuclear industry. This cannot be deduced from the argument. It contradicts the argument. INCORRECT
e. The only serious threat posed by a nuclear accident would be to the financial security of the nuclear industry. Public worried about safety, not financial security. INCORRECT


Government claims that people's fear is groundless. The Editorial claims that the claim is well founded. so how is government inconsistent?
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 30 Oct 2011
Posts: 48
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 13

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Editorial: The government claims that the country's nuclear [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Jul 2014, 02:24
I understand that B is correct but I don't understand why A is wrong. Please explain what's wrong with A. Thank you.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 8076
Followers: 739

Kudos [?]: 152 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: Editorial: The government claims that the country's nuclear [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Sep 2015, 02:31
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 01 Mar 2015
Posts: 19
Location: India
GPA: 4
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 23

CAT Tests
Re: Editorial: The government claims that the country's nuclear [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Sep 2015, 03:24
joshnsit wrote:
Editorial: The government claims that the country's nuclear power plants are entirely safe and hence that the public's fear of nuclear accidents at these plants is groundless. The government also contends that its recent action to limit the nuclear industry's financial liability in the case of nuclear accidents at power plants is justified by the need to protect the nuclear industry from the threat of bankruptcy. But even the government says that unlimited liability poses such a threat only if injury claims can be sustained against the industry; and the government admits that for such claims to be sustained, injury must result from nuclear accident. The public's fear, therefore, is well founded.

If all the statements offered in support of the editorial's conclusion correctly describe the government's position, which one of the following must also be true on the basis of those statements?

a. The government's claim about the safety of the country's nuclear power plant is false.
b. The government's position on nuclear power plants is inconsistent.
c. The government misrepresented its reasons for acting to limit the nuclear industry's liability.
d. Unlimited financial liability in the case of nuclear accidents poses no threat to the financial security of the country's nuclear industry.
e. The only serious threat posed by a nuclear accident would be to the financial security of the nuclear industry.

Pls explain..... I know OA but reveal l8r


Prephrase –
1. Govt. Claims – nuclear plan = ENTIRELY safe. Public Fear is groundless.
2. Govt. Limited financial liability of Nuclear industry (NI) to protect NI.
3. Unlimited liability = threat only in case of accidents.
4. Hence, public fear is well founded.
Govt. Is inconsistent about its position.

A – claim is false – too stretch.
B – correct answer
C – misrepresented – there is no evidence
D – unlimited liability is a threat to NI as stated in question. (see prephrase point 3)
E – ‘Only’ restricts the scope. Wrong answer.


Kudos please!
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 14 Sep 2015
Posts: 1
Concentration: General Management
WE: Information Technology (Other)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 11

Re: Editorial: The government claims that the country's nuclear [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Nov 2015, 21:02
akhil911 wrote:
joshnsit wrote:
Editorial: The government claims that the country's nuclear power plants are entirely safe and hence that the public's fear of nuclear accidents at these plants is groundless. The government also contends that its recent action to limit the nuclear industry's financial liability in the case of nuclear accidents at power plants is justified by the need to protect the nuclear industry from the threat of bankruptcy. But even the government says that unlimited liability poses such a threat only if injury claims can be sustained against the industry; and the government admits that for such claims to be sustained, injury must result from nuclear accident. The public's fear, therefore, is well founded.

If all the statements offered in support of the editorial's conclusion correctly describe the government's position, which one of the following must also be true on the basis of those statements?

a. The government's claim about the safety of the country's nuclear power plant is false.
b. The government's position on nuclear power plants is inconsistent.
c. The government misrepresented its reasons for acting to limit the nuclear industry's liability.
d. Unlimited financial liability in the case of nuclear accidents poses no threat to the financial security of the country's nuclear industry.
e. The only serious threat posed by a nuclear accident would be to the financial security of the nuclear industry.

Pls explain..... I know OA but reveal l8r



To understand why B is correct we have to understand why the author makes a conclusion that the peoples fear are well founded.
The first part of the passage states that the Govt has told people that they need not fear nuclear accidents as the nuclear power plants are absolutely safe.
In the second part of the passage , the Govt states that it has provided protection to the nuclear power companies in case of liability because these organizations might fall into bankruptcy in case of nuclear accidents and if the injury caused to people is a result of this nuclear accident.
Hence the govt is on one side telling that they need not fear any nuclear accident and on the second hand telling the people that this financial security is provided in case of any nuclear accident.
Hence its position is inconsistent.



The government claims that the country's nuclear power plants are ENTIRELY safe and hence that the public's fear of nuclear accidents at these plants is groundless. The government also contends that its recent action to limit the nuclear industry's financial liability in the case of nuclear accidents at power plants is justified by the need to protect the nuclear industry from the threat of bankruptcy. But even the government says that unlimited liability poses such a threat only if injury claims can be sustained against the industry; and the government admits that for such claims to be sustained, injury must result from nuclear accident. The public's fear, therefore, is well founded.

These bold faces segment forced me to select A, which I know is a strong statement but word "entirely" seems to be a strong word as well. Thus i believe A is quiet close.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 07 Apr 2012
Posts: 51
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 25

Editorial: The government claims that the country's nuclear [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Jan 2016, 02:06
joshnsit wrote:
Editorial: The government claims that the country's nuclear power plants are entirely safe and hence that the public's fear of nuclear accidents at these plants is groundless. The government also contends that its recent action to limit the nuclear industry's financial liability in the case of nuclear accidents at power plants is justified by the need to protect the nuclear industry from the threat of bankruptcy. But even the government says that unlimited liability poses such a threat only if injury claims can be sustained against the industry; and the government admits that for such claims to be sustained, injury must result from nuclear accident. The public's fear, therefore, is well founded.

If all the statements offered in support of the editorial's conclusion correctly describe the government's position, which one of the following must also be true on the basis of those statements?

a. The government's claim about the safety of the country's nuclear power plant is false.
b. The government's position on nuclear power plants is inconsistent.
c. The government misrepresented its reasons for acting to limit the nuclear industry's liability.
d. Unlimited financial liability in the case of nuclear accidents poses no threat to the financial security of the country's nuclear industry.
e. The only serious threat posed by a nuclear accident would be to the financial security of the nuclear industry.

Pls explain..... I know OA but reveal l8r


a. The government's claim about the safety of the country's nuclear power plant is false.
It's not about the safety but about the liability that the nuclear plant might owe to the public in case of a nuclear accident.

b. The government's position on nuclear power plants is inconsistent.
This is the correct answer. It is pretty clear that the two positions that the government maintains is not consistent with each other. If there is liability, the recent action limits the liability and at the same time, the liability claims are sustained only in the event of a nuclear liability.

c. The government misrepresented its reasons for acting to limit the nuclear industry's liability.
There is no such thing being talked about.

d. Unlimited financial liability in the case of nuclear accidents poses no threat to the financial security of the country's nuclear industry.
Financial liability is only limited. What the limit is is not being talked about explicitly. So, it may pose some threat to the financial security.

e. The only serious threat posed by a nuclear accident would be to the financial security of the nuclear industry.
Again the word 'only' is going too far.
Editorial: The government claims that the country's nuclear   [#permalink] 08 Jan 2016, 02:06
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Editorial: It is clear that if this country s universities rohitgoel15 5 14 Jul 2010, 07:19
10 It is repeatedly claimed that the dumping of nuclear waste lahoosaher 14 20 Sep 2009, 06:59
2 It is repeatedly claimed that the dumping of nuclear waste Nihit 28 06 Aug 2009, 07:05
It is repeatedly claimed that the dumping of nuclear waste bhatiagp 8 25 Jun 2008, 11:56
Claim: Country Xs government lowered tariff barriers because mailtheguru 7 05 Oct 2006, 08:34
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Editorial: The government claims that the country's nuclear

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.