Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 29 Aug 2014, 20:50

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Editorial: The government claims that the country's nuclear

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
2 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 29 Oct 2008
Posts: 388
Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, Technology
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 74 [2] , given: 32

CAT Tests
Editorial: The government claims that the country's nuclear [#permalink] New post 07 Jul 2012, 16:57
2
This post received
KUDOS
6
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  55% (hard)

Question Stats:

50% (03:04) correct 50% (02:24) wrong based on 366 sessions
Editorial: The government claims that the country's nuclear power plants are entirely safe and hence that the public's fear of nuclear accidents at these plants is groundless. The government also contends that its recent action to limit the nuclear industry's financial liability in the case of nuclear accidents at power plants is justified by the need to protect the nuclear industry from the threat of bankruptcy. But even the government says that unlimited liability poses such a threat only if injury claims can be sustained against the industry; and the government admits that for such claims to be sustained, injury must result from nuclear accident. The public's fear, therefore, is well founded.

If all the statements offered in support of the editorial's conclusion correctly describe the government's position, which one of the following must also be true on the basis of those statements?

a. The government's claim about the safety of the country's nuclear power plant is false.
b. The government's position on nuclear power plants is inconsistent.
c. The government misrepresented its reasons for acting to limit the nuclear industry's liability.
d. Unlimited financial liability in the case of nuclear accidents poses no threat to the financial security of the country's nuclear industry.
e. The only serious threat posed by a nuclear accident would be to the financial security of the nuclear industry.

Pls explain..... I know OA but reveal l8r
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

If you know what you're worth, then go out and get what you're worth. But you gotta be willing to take the hits, and not pointing fingers saying you ain't where you wanna be because of anybody! Cowards do that and You're better than that!
The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short; the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.

Fire the final bullet only when you are constantly hitting the Bull's eye, till then KEEP PRACTICING.
Failure establishes only this, that our determination to succeed was not strong enough.
Getting defeated is just a temporary notion, giving it up is what makes it permanent.

Press +1 Kudos, if you think my post gave u a tiny tip.


Last edited by dentobizz on 07 Nov 2013, 18:32, edited 1 time in total.
Adding OA
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 26 Dec 2011
Posts: 117
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 17

Re: Editorial: The government claims that the country's nuclear [#permalink] New post 09 Jul 2012, 06:43
D; according to me that's the only statement that can be inferred based on the information given
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 29 Oct 2008
Posts: 388
Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, Technology
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 74 [0], given: 32

CAT Tests
Re: Editorial: The government claims that the country's nuclear [#permalink] New post 09 Jul 2012, 14:16
pavanpuneet wrote:
D; according to me that's the only statement that can be inferred based on the information given


But, from the argument, we have a limiting factor, which government has said to be a threat, though in a singular case(if injury claims can be sustained against the industry):
Quote:
its recent action to limitthe nuclear industry's financial liability in the case of nuclear accidents at power plants is justified by the need to protect the nuclear industry from the threat of bankruptcy.

_________________

If you know what you're worth, then go out and get what you're worth. But you gotta be willing to take the hits, and not pointing fingers saying you ain't where you wanna be because of anybody! Cowards do that and You're better than that!
The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short; the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.

Fire the final bullet only when you are constantly hitting the Bull's eye, till then KEEP PRACTICING.
Failure establishes only this, that our determination to succeed was not strong enough.
Getting defeated is just a temporary notion, giving it up is what makes it permanent.

Press +1 Kudos, if you think my post gave u a tiny tip.

1 KUDOS received
Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
Status: Flying over the cloud!
Joined: 16 Aug 2011
Posts: 817
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: International Business, Marketing
Schools: Ross '17, Duke '16
GMAT Date: 06-06-2014
GPA: 3.07
Followers: 36

Kudos [?]: 207 [1] , given: 42

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: Editorial: The government claims that the country's nuclear [#permalink] New post 10 Jul 2012, 00:36
1
This post received
KUDOS
joshnsit wrote:
Editorial: The government claims that the country's nuclear power plants are entirely safe and hence that the public's fear of nuclear accidents at these plants is groundless. The government also contends that its recent action to limit the nuclear industry's financial liability in the case of nuclear accidents at power plants is justified by the need to protect the nuclear industry from the threat of bankruptcy. But even the government says that unlimited liability poses such a threat only if injury claims can be sustained against the industry; and the government admits that for such claims to be sustained, injury must result from nuclear accident. The public's fear, therefore, is well founded.

If all the statements offered in support of the editorial's conclusion correctly describe the government's position, which one of the following must also be true on the basis of those statements?

a. The government's claim about the safety of the country's nuclear power plant is false.
b. The government's position on nuclear power plants is inconsistent.
c. The government misrepresented its reasons for acting to limit the nuclear industry's liability.
d. Unlimited financial liability in the case of nuclear accidents poses no threat to the financial security of the country's nuclear industry.
e. The only serious threat posed by a nuclear accident would be to the financial security of the nuclear industry.

Pls explain..... I know OA but reveal l8r

Scope of the argument:
G: NCP (nuclear power plant) is safe => fear at these plant is grounless
G: Recent actions to limit the N's industry financial liability in case the nuclear accidents at power plants is justified by the need to protect the nuclear industry from the threat of bankruptcy
G: But even the government says that unlimited liability poses such a threat only if injury claims can be sustained against the industry; and the government admits that for such claims to be sustained, injury must result from nuclear accident.

The boldface shows the choice D is the most sustainable choice.

Choice E is totally wrong because of the extreme word "only"
_________________

Rules for posting in verbal gmat forum, read it before posting anything in verbal forum
Giving me + 1 kudos if my post is valuable with you :)

The more you like my post, the more you share to other's need

CR: Focus of the Week: Must be True Question

2 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 10 Apr 2012
Posts: 30
Location: Venezuela
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GPA: 3.07
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 23 [2] , given: 5

Re: Editorial: The government claims that the country's nuclear [#permalink] New post 10 Jul 2012, 18:37
2
This post received
KUDOS
I beg to differ!
The correct answer choice is B.

a. The government's claim about the safety of the country's nuclear power plant is false. To strong to claim that its claim is false. INCORRECT
b. The government's position on nuclear power plants is inconsistent. The government is certainly being inconsistent in its position. First it says that public's concern is groundless and then it makes a claim about liability and its threat, concluding that public's concern is well founded. CORRECT!
c. The government misrepresented its reasons for acting to limit the nuclear industry's liability. Irrelevant. INCORRECT
d. Unlimited financial liability in the case of nuclear accidents poses no threat to the financial security of the country's nuclear industry. This cannot be deduced from the argument. It contradicts the argument. INCORRECT
e. The only serious threat posed by a nuclear accident would be to the financial security of the nuclear industry. Public worried about safety, not financial security. INCORRECT
Expert Post
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 2378
Followers: 270

Kudos [?]: 2309 [0], given: 692

Re: Editorial: The government claims that the country's nuclear [#permalink] New post 11 Jul 2012, 01:07
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Editorial: The government claims that the country's nuclear power plants are entirely safe and hence that the public's fear of nuclear accidents at these plants is groundless. The government also contends that its recent action to limit the nuclear industry's financial liability in the case of nuclear accidents at power plants is justified by the need to protect the nuclear industry from the threat of bankruptcy. But even the government says that unlimited liability poses such a threat only if injury claims can be sustained against the industry; and the government admits that for such claims to be sustained, injury must result from nuclear accident. The public's fear, therefore, is well founded.

If all the statements offered in support of the editorial's conclusion correctly describe the government's position, which one of the following must also be true on the basis of those statements?

a. The government's claim about the safety of the country's nuclear power plant is false.
b. The government's position on nuclear power plants is inconsistent.
c. The government misrepresented its reasons for acting to limit the nuclear industry's liability.
d. Unlimited financial liability in the case of nuclear accidents poses no threat to the financial security of the country's nuclear industry.
e. The only serious threat posed by a nuclear accident would be to the financial security of the nuclear industry.

B is the only choice that makes sense.

Theother are wrong, without think so much. Not so tough
_________________

COLLECTION OF QUESTIONS
Quant: 1. Bunuel Signature Collection - The Next Generation 2. Bunuel Signature Collection ALL-IN-ONE WITH SOLUTIONS 3. Veritas Prep Blog PDF Version
Verbal:1. Best EXTERNAL resources to tackle the GMAT Verbal Section 2. e-GMAT's ALL CR topics-Consolidated 3. New Critical Reasoning question bank by carcass 4. Meaning/Clarity SC Question Bank by Carcass_Souvik 5. e-GMAT's ALL SC topics-Consolidated-2nd Edition 6. The best reading to improve Reading Comprehension 7.Verbal question bank and Directories

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Nov 2009
Posts: 313
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 70 [0], given: 20

Re: Editorial: The government claims that the country's nuclear [#permalink] New post 11 Jul 2012, 05:42
A. The government’s claim about the safety of the country’s nuclear power plants is false.
Maybe the claim is true, and the government has other reasons to limit liability.
B. The government’s position on nuclear power plants is inconsistent
Whatever the explanation might be, the government is certainly being inconsistent in its position. Correct
C. The government misrepresented its reason for acting to limit the nuclear industry’s liability
The reason could be valid, maybe the claim about the safety of nuclear plants is unfounded.
D. Unlimited financial liability in the case of nuclear accidents poses no threat to the financial security of the country’s nuclear industry
Cannot deduce this from the above passage.
E. The only serious threat posed by a nuclear accident would be to the financial security of the nuclear industry
Cannot deduce this from the passage.
1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 29 Oct 2008
Posts: 388
Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, Technology
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 74 [1] , given: 32

CAT Tests
Re: Editorial: The government claims that the country's nuclear [#permalink] New post 12 Jul 2012, 05:27
1
This post received
KUDOS
santivilla wrote:
I beg to differ!
The correct answer choice is B.

a. The government's claim about the safety of the country's nuclear power plant is false. To strong to claim that its claim is false. INCORRECT
b. The government's position on nuclear power plants is inconsistent. The government is certainly being inconsistent in its position. First it says that public's concern is groundless and then it makes a claim about liability and its threat, concluding that public's concern is well founded. CORRECT!
c. The government misrepresented its reasons for acting to limit the nuclear industry's liability. Irrelevant. INCORRECT
d. Unlimited financial liability in the case of nuclear accidents poses no threat to the financial security of the country's nuclear industry. This cannot be deduced from the argument. It contradicts the argument. INCORRECT
e. The only serious threat posed by a nuclear accident would be to the financial security of the nuclear industry. Public worried about safety, not financial security. INCORRECT

Nice explanation. Thanks for reinforcing my thoughts. +1 Kudos :-D

B is OA here.
_________________

If you know what you're worth, then go out and get what you're worth. But you gotta be willing to take the hits, and not pointing fingers saying you ain't where you wanna be because of anybody! Cowards do that and You're better than that!
The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short; the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.

Fire the final bullet only when you are constantly hitting the Bull's eye, till then KEEP PRACTICING.
Failure establishes only this, that our determination to succeed was not strong enough.
Getting defeated is just a temporary notion, giving it up is what makes it permanent.

Press +1 Kudos, if you think my post gave u a tiny tip.

2 KUDOS received
Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
avatar
Joined: 23 Jul 2010
Posts: 484
Followers: 40

Kudos [?]: 417 [2] , given: 243

Premium Member
Re: Editorial: The government claims that the country's nuclear [#permalink] New post 08 Nov 2013, 04:44
2
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2012
Posts: 50
Schools: LBS '14
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 55

Re: Editorial: The government claims that the country's nuclear [#permalink] New post 17 Jan 2014, 00:00
joshnsit wrote:
Editorial: The government claims that the country's nuclear power plants are entirely safe and hence that the public's fear of nuclear accidents at these plants is groundless. The government also contends that its recent action to limit the nuclear industry's financial liability in the case of nuclear accidents at power plants is justified by the need to protect the nuclear industry from the threat of bankruptcy. But even the government says that unlimited liability poses such a threat only if injury claims can be sustained against the industry; and the government admits that for such claims to be sustained, injury must result from nuclear accident. The public's fear, therefore, is well founded.

If all the statements offered in support of the editorial's conclusion correctly describe the government's position, which one of the following must also be true on the basis of those statements?

a. The government's claim about the safety of the country's nuclear power plant is false.
b. The government's position on nuclear power plants is inconsistent.
c. The government misrepresented its reasons for acting to limit the nuclear industry's liability.
d. Unlimited financial liability in the case of nuclear accidents poses no threat to the financial security of the country's nuclear industry.
e. The only serious threat posed by a nuclear accident would be to the financial security of the nuclear industry.

Pls explain..... I know OA but reveal l8r


------> "the country's nuclear power plants are entirely safe" is inconsistent with "for such claims to be sustained, injury must result from nuclear accident". Hence B

Kudos.. If u like :)
2 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 Aug 2011
Posts: 120
Location: United States
Concentration: Economics, Finance
GMAT Date: 10-16-2013
GPA: 3
WE: Analyst (Computer Software)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 27 [2] , given: 354

Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: Editorial: The government claims that the country's nuclear [#permalink] New post 20 Jan 2014, 05:49
2
This post received
KUDOS
joshnsit wrote:
Editorial: The government claims that the country's nuclear power plants are entirely safe and hence that the public's fear of nuclear accidents at these plants is groundless. The government also contends that its recent action to limit the nuclear industry's financial liability in the case of nuclear accidents at power plants is justified by the need to protect the nuclear industry from the threat of bankruptcy. But even the government says that unlimited liability poses such a threat only if injury claims can be sustained against the industry; and the government admits that for such claims to be sustained, injury must result from nuclear accident. The public's fear, therefore, is well founded.

If all the statements offered in support of the editorial's conclusion correctly describe the government's position, which one of the following must also be true on the basis of those statements?

a. The government's claim about the safety of the country's nuclear power plant is false.
b. The government's position on nuclear power plants is inconsistent.
c. The government misrepresented its reasons for acting to limit the nuclear industry's liability.
d. Unlimited financial liability in the case of nuclear accidents poses no threat to the financial security of the country's nuclear industry.
e. The only serious threat posed by a nuclear accident would be to the financial security of the nuclear industry.

Pls explain..... I know OA but reveal l8r



To understand why B is correct we have to understand why the author makes a conclusion that the peoples fear are well founded.
The first part of the passage states that the Govt has told people that they need not fear nuclear accidents as the nuclear power plants are absolutely safe.
In the second part of the passage , the Govt states that it has provided protection to the nuclear power companies in case of liability because these organizations might fall into bankruptcy in case of nuclear accidents and if the injury caused to people is a result of this nuclear accident.
Hence the govt is on one side telling that they need not fear any nuclear accident and on the second hand telling the people that this financial security is provided in case of any nuclear accident.
Hence its position is inconsistent.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 24 Oct 2013
Posts: 143
Location: Canada
WE: Design (Transportation)
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 67

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: Editorial: The government claims that the country's nuclear [#permalink] New post 16 Jul 2014, 19:50
santivilla wrote:
I beg to differ!
The correct answer choice is B.

a. The government's claim about the safety of the country's nuclear power plant is false. To strong to claim that its claim is false. INCORRECT
b. The government's position on nuclear power plants is inconsistent. The government is certainly being inconsistent in its position. First it says that public's concern is groundless and then it makes a claim about liability and its threat, concluding that public's concern is well founded. CORRECT!
c. The government misrepresented its reasons for acting to limit the nuclear industry's liability. Irrelevant. INCORRECT
d. Unlimited financial liability in the case of nuclear accidents poses no threat to the financial security of the country's nuclear industry. This cannot be deduced from the argument. It contradicts the argument. INCORRECT
e. The only serious threat posed by a nuclear accident would be to the financial security of the nuclear industry. Public worried about safety, not financial security. INCORRECT


Government claims that people's fear is groundless. The Editorial claims that the claim is well founded. so how is government inconsistent?
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 30 Oct 2011
Posts: 30
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 9

Re: Editorial: The government claims that the country's nuclear [#permalink] New post 17 Jul 2014, 01:24
I understand that B is correct but I don't understand why A is wrong. Please explain what's wrong with A. Thank you.
Re: Editorial: The government claims that the country's nuclear   [#permalink] 17 Jul 2014, 01:24
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Editorial: It is clear that if this country s universities rohitgoel15 5 14 Jul 2010, 06:19
Claim: Country Xs government lowered tariff barriers because mailtheguru 7 05 Oct 2006, 07:34
Editorial: The government claims that the country's nuclear ronybtl 4 01 Aug 2005, 07:02
13 Experts publish their posts in the topic Editorial: It is clear that if this country s universities WinWinMBA 14 30 May 2005, 10:59
1 An editorial in the Grandburg Daily Herald claims that chunjuwu 15 16 Mar 2005, 04:27
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Editorial: The government claims that the country's nuclear

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.