Editorial: The government claims that the country's nuclear : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 22 Jan 2017, 16:39

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Editorial: The government claims that the country's nuclear

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 22 Apr 2004
Posts: 157
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 0

Editorial: The government claims that the country's nuclear [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Aug 2005, 07:02
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Editorial: The government claims that the country's nuclear power plants are entirely safe and hence the public's fear of nuclear accidents at these plants is groundless. The government also contends that its recent action to limit nuclear industry's financial liability in the case of nuclear accidents at these plants is justified by the need to protect the nuclear industry from the threat of bankruptcy. But even the government says that unlimited liability poses such a threat only if injury claims can be sustained against the industry; and if the government admits that for such claims to be sustained, injury must result from nuclear accident. The public's fear, therefore, is well founded.

Which one of the following principles, if valid, most helps to justify the editorial's argumentation?

(a) if government claims that something is unsafe then, in the absence of overwhelming evidence to the contrary, that thing should be assumed to be unsafe
(b) fear that a certain kind of event will occur is well founded if those who have control over the occurrence of events of that kind stand to benefit financially from such an occurrence
(c) If a potentially dangerous thing is safe only because the financial security of those responsible for its operation depends on its being safe, then eliminating that dependence is not in the best interest of the public
(d) The government sometimes makes unsupported claims about what situations will arise, but it does not act to prevent certain kinds of situation from arising unless there is real danger that such a situation will arise
(e) If a real financial threat to a major industry exists, then government action to limit that threat is justified
If you have any questions
New!
Senior Manager
Joined: 17 Apr 2005
Posts: 375
Location: India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

01 Aug 2005, 08:10
Picked D.

If nuclear plants were indeed safe(in absolute terms) , the gov wouldn't bother about potential insurance claims due to accidents.

HMTG.
Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Jun 2005
Posts: 403
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

01 Aug 2005, 08:30
Hope it is D, but very unsure
Manager
Joined: 22 Apr 2004
Posts: 157
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

03 Aug 2005, 08:37
OA is D.

However, why is C incorrect?
Senior Manager
Joined: 17 Apr 2005
Posts: 375
Location: India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

03 Aug 2005, 08:53
C is incorrect because , it conveys that the financial liability is a deterrent for maintaining safety as nuclear stations. Even if we assume this, it does not justify the fears of the ppl , for there may be a very ethical management at the company which has the public's interest at heart.

HMTG.
03 Aug 2005, 08:53
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
35 Editorial: The government claims that the country's nuclear 17 07 Jul 2012, 16:57
Editorial: It is clear that if this country s universities 5 14 Jul 2010, 06:19
10 It is repeatedly claimed that the dumping of nuclear waste 14 20 Sep 2009, 05:59
2 It is repeatedly claimed that the dumping of nuclear waste 28 06 Aug 2009, 06:05
It is repeatedly claimed that the dumping of nuclear waste 8 25 Jun 2008, 10:56
Display posts from previous: Sort by