Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 23 Oct 2014, 14:14

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Editorial: The government claims that the country's nuclear

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Apr 2004
Posts: 157
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

Editorial: The government claims that the country's nuclear [#permalink] New post 01 Aug 2005, 07:02
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Editorial: The government claims that the country's nuclear power plants are entirely safe and hence the public's fear of nuclear accidents at these plants is groundless. The government also contends that its recent action to limit nuclear industry's financial liability in the case of nuclear accidents at these plants is justified by the need to protect the nuclear industry from the threat of bankruptcy. But even the government says that unlimited liability poses such a threat only if injury claims can be sustained against the industry; and if the government admits that for such claims to be sustained, injury must result from nuclear accident. The public's fear, therefore, is well founded.

Which one of the following principles, if valid, most helps to justify the editorial's argumentation?

(a) if government claims that something is unsafe then, in the absence of overwhelming evidence to the contrary, that thing should be assumed to be unsafe
(b) fear that a certain kind of event will occur is well founded if those who have control over the occurrence of events of that kind stand to benefit financially from such an occurrence
(c) If a potentially dangerous thing is safe only because the financial security of those responsible for its operation depends on its being safe, then eliminating that dependence is not in the best interest of the public
(d) The government sometimes makes unsupported claims about what situations will arise, but it does not act to prevent certain kinds of situation from arising unless there is real danger that such a situation will arise
(e) If a real financial threat to a major industry exists, then government action to limit that threat is justified
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Apr 2005
Posts: 377
Location: India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 01 Aug 2005, 08:10
Picked D.

If nuclear plants were indeed safe(in absolute terms) , the gov wouldn't bother about potential insurance claims due to accidents.

HMTG.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Jun 2005
Posts: 403
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 01 Aug 2005, 08:30
Hope it is D, but very unsure
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Apr 2004
Posts: 157
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 03 Aug 2005, 08:37
OA is D.

However, why is C incorrect?
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Apr 2005
Posts: 377
Location: India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 03 Aug 2005, 08:53
C is incorrect because , it conveys that the financial liability is a deterrent for maintaining safety as nuclear stations. Even if we assume this, it does not justify the fears of the ppl , for there may be a very ethical management at the company which has the public's interest at heart.

HMTG.
  [#permalink] 03 Aug 2005, 08:53
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
15 Experts publish their posts in the topic Editorial: The government claims that the country's nuclear joshnsit 12 07 Jul 2012, 16:57
Editorial: It is clear that if this country s universities rohitgoel15 5 14 Jul 2010, 06:19
Claim: Country Xs government lowered tariff barriers because mailtheguru 7 05 Oct 2006, 07:34
13 Experts publish their posts in the topic Editorial: It is clear that if this country s universities WinWinMBA 14 30 May 2005, 10:59
1 An editorial in the Grandburg Daily Herald claims that chunjuwu 15 16 Mar 2005, 04:27
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Editorial: The government claims that the country's nuclear

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.