Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 25 Oct 2014, 15:42

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Emily Dickinsons letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
4 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Apr 2004
Posts: 137
Location: Corea
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 100 [4] , given: 0

Emily Dickinsons letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were [#permalink] New post 23 Sep 2004, 15:54
4
This post received
KUDOS
12
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Emily Dickinson’s letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering her letters to anyone else.

(A) Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering
(B) Dickinson were written over a period that begins a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ended shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber
(C) Dickinson, written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and that ends shortly before Emily’s death in 1886 and outnumbering
(D) Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother, ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, and outnumbering
(E) Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 220
Location: India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 17

Re: emily [#permalink] New post 02 Jun 2009, 06:05
Please post question in proper format and with underline. Not able to read and find out the problematic part easily.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 10 Dec 2008
Posts: 484
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.9
Followers: 29

Kudos [?]: 121 [0], given: 12

Re: emily [#permalink] New post 02 Jun 2009, 09:03
humans wrote:
Please post question in proper format and with underline. Not able to read and find out the problematic part easily.


+1 ... this is a common problem and is starting to get annoying to read.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 16 Jan 2009
Posts: 362
Concentration: Technology, Marketing
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3
WE: Sales (Telecommunications)
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 73 [0], given: 16

Re: emily [#permalink] New post 02 Jun 2009, 10:13
Emily Dickinson’s letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years
before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering

her letters to anyone else.

A.Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and
ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering

B.Dickinson were written over a period that begins a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother
and ended shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber

C.Dickinson, written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and that
ends shortly before Emily’s death in 1886and outnumbering

D.Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s
brother, ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, and outnumbering

E.Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s
brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber
_________________

Lahoosaher

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 16 Jan 2009
Posts: 362
Concentration: Technology, Marketing
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3
WE: Sales (Telecommunications)
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 73 [0], given: 16

Re: emily [#permalink] New post 02 Jun 2009, 10:25
IMO E.

Emily Dickinson’s letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years
before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering

her letters to anyone else.

A.Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and
ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering
The parallel structure is not correct and therefore " outnumbering " sounds correct , which is not.
B.Dickinson were written over a period that begins a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother
and ended shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber
written over a period that begins ......and ended shortly - not parallel
C.Dickinson, written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and that
ends shortly before Emily’s death in 1886and outnumbering
written over a period beginning ......and that ends- not parallel
D.Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s
brother, ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, and outnumbering
Since "and" is ommitted , "ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886" modifies "Emily’s
brother" which is absurd

E.Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s
brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber
_________________

Lahoosaher

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 15 Jan 2008
Posts: 295
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 3

Re: emily [#permalink] New post 03 Jun 2009, 07:11
E has the famous Which problem..

Which doesnt refer to the letters..


I would go with A..becoz when compared to others.. it luks better..
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 31 Oct 2007
Posts: 58
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Re: emily [#permalink] New post 03 Jun 2009, 13:46
B

It's not A because letters... outnumber is the correct form.
Current Student
avatar
Joined: 13 Jan 2009
Posts: 374
Location: India
Followers: 19

Kudos [?]: 69 [0], given: 1

Re: emily [#permalink] New post 04 Jun 2009, 13:44
amolsk11 wrote:
Emily Dickinson’s letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years
before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering

her letters to anyone else.

A.Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and
ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering

B.Dickinson were written over a period that begins a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother
and ended shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber

C.Dickinson, written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and that
ends shortly before Emily’s death in 1886and outnumbering- incomplete sentence

D.Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s
brother, ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, and outnumbering

E.Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s
brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber


All choice are wrong :(

I will still go with A.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 08 Feb 2009
Posts: 147
Schools: Anderson
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 3

Re: Emily's letter [#permalink] New post 11 Jun 2009, 17:23
vaivish1723 wrote:
24. Emily Dickinson's letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and ending shortly before Emily's death in 1886, outnumbering her letters to anyone else.
A. Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and ending shortly before Emily's death in 1886, outnumbering
B. Dickinson were written over a period that begins a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and ended shortly before Emily's death in 1886, outnumber
C. Dickinson, written over a period beginning a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and that ends shortly before Emily's death in 1886and outnumbering
D. Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother, ending shortly before Emily's death in 1886, and outnumbering
E. Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and ending shortly before Emily's death in 1886, outnumber

Please explain



B - "....that begins...." has to be began as it is past tense
C - "...that ends..." has to be ended.
D - "beginning....ending....outnumbering" are all parallel and mentioned in the clause, leaving the main sentence incomplete.

A and E are very close.
I chose E over A because in A, outnumbering is a modifier that needs to modify the subject "letters" and is placed very far from it.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 05 Apr 2007
Posts: 267
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 1

Re: Emily's letter [#permalink] New post 13 Jun 2009, 23:30
D and E are having pronoun reference error...B and C are having parallelism error...So A is the correct answer...
I totally disagree with E..."which" is having a reference error in E....
_________________

Choose Life

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 17 Jul 2008
Posts: 251
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 57 [0], given: 29

Re: Emily's letter [#permalink] New post 14 Jun 2009, 04:25
trainspotting wrote:
D and E are having pronoun reference error...B and C are having parallelism error...So A is the correct answer...
I totally disagree with E..."which" is having a reference error in E....


I totaly agree which modifies Dickinson so wrong.
_________________

Please give kudos if you enjoy the explanations that I have given. Thanks :)

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 05 Jun 2009
Posts: 852
WE 1: 7years (Financial Services - Consultant, BA)
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 189 [0], given: 106

Re: Emily's letter [#permalink] New post 14 Jun 2009, 04:42
perfectstranger wrote:
trainspotting wrote:
D and E are having pronoun reference error...B and C are having parallelism error...So A is the correct answer...
I totally disagree with E..."which" is having a reference error in E....


I totaly agree which modifies Dickinson so wrong.


IMO
'which' is referring to "Emily Dickinson's letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson" ==> *subject of the main clause.
how can 'which' refers to a person? it should be 'who' to refer to a person.
_________________

Consider kudos for the good post ... :beer
My debrief : journey-670-to-720-q50-v36-long-85083.html

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 08 Feb 2009
Posts: 147
Schools: Anderson
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 3

Re: Emily's letter [#permalink] New post 14 Jun 2009, 04:48
perfectstranger wrote:
trainspotting wrote:
D and E are having pronoun reference error...B and C are having parallelism error...So A is the correct answer...
I totally disagree with E..."which" is having a reference error in E....


I totaly agree which modifies Dickinson so wrong.


I'm assuming you disagree with E, because "which" doesn't refer to "letters" but it refers to "dickinson".

Think about it this way - If the sentence were like this:

Emily Dickinson's letters, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and ending shortly before Emily's death in 1886, to Susan Huntington Dickinson outnumber her letters to anyone else.


that would change the meaning of the sentence altogether. In such case, "which" refers to all the letters written by Emily.

I think in answer E, "which" correctly refers to "letters written to dickinson" and not any other letters.

please comment this view.
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1634
Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Followers: 31

Kudos [?]: 279 [0], given: 2

Re: emily [#permalink] New post 27 Jun 2010, 04:04
Neochronic wrote:
E has the famous Which problem..

Which doesnt refer to the letters..


I would go with A..becoz when compared to others.. it luks better..


Actually it does.
Which refers to the previous noun, which is Letters to SHD.


Another example:

The car of my brother, which is blue, has only 2 doors.

In the sentence above which refers to the car, not to my brother.

That helped?
_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit


Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

5 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 09 Jun 2009
Posts: 231
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 56 [5] , given: 6

Re: emily [#permalink] New post 09 Jul 2010, 22:33
5
This post received
KUDOS
Yes even i chose A because of the 'WHICH' in E though E looked better.

For those of you who are still confused with this question, heres something i gathered from manhattan:

First of all, 'WHICH' refers to previous noun no doubt but in sentences as clear as these, 'which' can in no way refer to Dickinson, who is a person. So it should refer to subject of the first part that is 'letters written'.

"
occasionally, when it is completely unambiguous, "which" can refer to a whole NOUN PHRASE that immediately precedes the comma.
in this case, this noun phrase is "X's letters to Y". (note that this noun phrase, as a unit, does immediately precede the comma.)

also, note the complete lack of grammatical ambiguity: "which" can't refer to dickinson, who is a person, and it's also followed by a plural verb. both of these pieces of evidence point to the noun phrase "X's letters to Y".

--

here's the basic summary:
if you have "X of Y, which..."
then:
* if Y works as the antecedent of "which", then "which" should stand for Y.
* if Y doesn't work as the antecedent, but "X of Y" DOES work, then "which" can stand for "X of Y"....."


Also, use of participle 'outnumbering' is not required here....it's not the period over which the letters were written that outnumber but it is the letters that outnumber letters to anyone else.

"...using a present participle phrase to express the (direct/indirect) result of the preceding clause is not allowed when the preceding clause is in a passive voice...."
--> from manhattan

Verbal is full of exceptions... :wall
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Status: Nothing comes easy: neither do I want.
Joined: 12 Oct 2009
Posts: 2794
Location: Malaysia
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship
Schools: ISB '15 (M)
GMAT 1: 670 Q49 V31
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35
Followers: 182

Kudos [?]: 989 [0], given: 235

Reviews Badge
Re: emily [#permalink] New post 24 Sep 2010, 23:26
wow !!! nice question. I dropped the last two options after reading 'which'.
:-D
_________________

Fight for your dreams :For all those who fear from Verbal- lets give it a fight

Money Saved is the Money Earned :)

Jo Bole So Nihaal , Sat Shri Akaal

:thanks Support GMAT Club by putting a GMAT Club badge on your blog/Facebook :thanks

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Gmat test review :
670-to-710-a-long-journey-without-destination-still-happy-141642.html

Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Keep fighting!
Affiliations: IIT Madras
Joined: 31 Jul 2010
Posts: 238
WE 1: 2+ years - Programming
WE 2: 3+ years - Product developement,
WE 3: 2+ years - Program management
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 182 [0], given: 104

Re: emily [#permalink] New post 28 Sep 2010, 02:29
I like E. It clearly refers to the letters.
What is the OA?
2 KUDOS received
Retired Moderator
User avatar
Status: I wish!
Joined: 21 May 2010
Posts: 788
Followers: 108

Kudos [?]: 236 [2] , given: 33

Re: emily [#permalink] New post 28 Sep 2010, 05:59
2
This post received
KUDOS
amolsk11 wrote:
Emily Dickinson’s letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years
before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering

her letters to anyone else.

A.Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and
ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering

B.Dickinson were written over a period that beginsa few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother
and ended shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber

C.Dickinson, written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and that
ends shortly before Emily’s death in 1886and outnumbering

D.Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s
brother, ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, and outnumbering

E.Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s
brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber



Answer is E definitely!

I solved it in different manner, I didn't bothered much about "Which". As "outnumbering" doesn't make sense we are left with only B and E option.

In Option B check out the highlighted portion above, the portion which makes this choice wrong. The highlighted portions needs to be in same tense. So we are left with only choice E.

Also, I think this questions is from OGs as this questions seems familiar!
_________________

Funny, Interesting and Crazy Facts, Photos and Videos!
http://funnyinterestingcrazy.blogspot.co.uk/

Retired Moderator
User avatar
Status: I wish!
Joined: 21 May 2010
Posts: 788
Followers: 108

Kudos [?]: 236 [0], given: 33

Re: emily [#permalink] New post 28 Sep 2010, 06:02
Also, "which" in choice E is not wrong and clearly refers to Emily Dickinson's letters --> subject of the sentence.
_________________

Funny, Interesting and Crazy Facts, Photos and Videos!
http://funnyinterestingcrazy.blogspot.co.uk/

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 04 Jun 2010
Posts: 113
Concentration: General Management, Technology
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2013
GMAT 1: 670 Q47 V35
GMAT 2: 730 Q49 V41
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 108 [0], given: 43

Re: emily [#permalink] New post 30 Sep 2010, 10:43
Nice explanation papillon86. Kudos!
_________________

Consider Kudos if my post helped you. Thanks!
--------------------------------------------------------------------
My TOEFL Debrief: http://gmatclub.com/forum/my-toefl-experience-99884.html
My GMAT Debrief: http://gmatclub.com/forum/670-730-10-luck-20-skill-15-concentrated-power-of-will-104473.html

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 26 Apr 2010
Posts: 124
Concentration: Strategy, Entrepreneurship
Schools: Fuqua '14 (M)
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 54

GMAT ToolKit User
Emily Dickinsons letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were [#permalink] New post 10 Oct 2010, 14:43
Emily Dickinson’s letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering her letters to anyone else.

(A) Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering

(B) Dickinson were written over a period that begins a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ended shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber

(C) Dickinson, written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and that ends shortly before Emily’s death in 1886 and outnumbering

(D) Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother, ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, and outnumbering

(E) Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber

[Reveal] Spoiler:
I ended up with A, after concluding that "which" in E refers to "Susan Huntington Dickinson" rather than to "letters." I was following the general rule that ", which" needs to refer to the object just before the comma.

Can someone please clarify the use of ", whcih" please?

Thanks in advance.
_________________

I appreciate the kudos if you find this post helpful! +1

Emily Dickinsons letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were   [#permalink] 10 Oct 2010, 14:43
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Emily Dickinsons letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were dtaneja 0 23 Mar 2012, 13:29
Emily Dickinson's letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were vaivish1723 0 14 Jun 2009, 04:48
Emily Dickinsons letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were gluon 0 21 Mar 2012, 01:01
Emily Dickinsons letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were stevegt 0 01 Aug 2007, 15:43
Emily Dickinsons letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were johnycute 0 09 Jan 2007, 20:28
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Emily Dickinsons letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8    Next  [ 147 posts ] 



cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.