Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 23 Jul 2014, 08:32

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Emily Dickinsons letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
3 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Apr 2004
Posts: 137
Location: Corea
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 35 [3] , given: 0

Emily Dickinsons letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were [#permalink] New post 23 Sep 2004, 15:54
3
This post received
KUDOS
6
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Emily Dickinson’s letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering her letters to anyone else.

(A) Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering
(B) Dickinson were written over a period that begins a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ended shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber
(C) Dickinson, written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and that ends shortly before Emily’s death in 1886 and outnumbering
(D) Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother, ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, and outnumbering
(E) Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 05 Jun 2009
Posts: 852
WE 1: 7years (Financial Services - Consultant, BA)
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 173 [0], given: 106

GMAT Tests User
Re: Emily's letter [#permalink] New post 14 Jun 2009, 04:42
perfectstranger wrote:
trainspotting wrote:
D and E are having pronoun reference error...B and C are having parallelism error...So A is the correct answer...
I totally disagree with E..."which" is having a reference error in E....


I totaly agree which modifies Dickinson so wrong.


IMO
'which' is referring to "Emily Dickinson's letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson" ==> *subject of the main clause.
how can 'which' refers to a person? it should be 'who' to refer to a person.

_________________

Consider kudos for the good post ... :beer
My debrief : journey-670-to-720-q50-v36-long-85083.html

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 08 Feb 2009
Posts: 147
Schools: Anderson
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 3

Re: Emily's letter [#permalink] New post 14 Jun 2009, 04:48
perfectstranger wrote:
trainspotting wrote:
D and E are having pronoun reference error...B and C are having parallelism error...So A is the correct answer...
I totally disagree with E..."which" is having a reference error in E....


I totaly agree which modifies Dickinson so wrong.


I'm assuming you disagree with E, because "which" doesn't refer to "letters" but it refers to "dickinson".

Think about it this way - If the sentence were like this:

Emily Dickinson's letters, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and ending shortly before Emily's death in 1886, to Susan Huntington Dickinson outnumber her letters to anyone else.


that would change the meaning of the sentence altogether. In such case, "which" refers to all the letters written by Emily.

I think in answer E, "which" correctly refers to "letters written to dickinson" and not any other letters.

please comment this view.
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1634
Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Followers: 30

Kudos [?]: 205 [0], given: 2

GMAT Tests User
Re: emily [#permalink] New post 27 Jun 2010, 04:04
Neochronic wrote:
E has the famous Which problem..

Which doesnt refer to the letters..


I would go with A..becoz when compared to others.. it luks better..


Actually it does.
Which refers to the previous noun, which is Letters to SHD.


Another example:

The car of my brother, which is blue, has only 2 doors.

In the sentence above which refers to the car, not to my brother.

That helped?

_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit


Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

CEO
CEO
User avatar
Status: Nothing comes easy: neither do I want.
Joined: 12 Oct 2009
Posts: 2793
Location: Malaysia
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship
Schools: ISB '15 (M)
GMAT 1: 670 Q49 V31
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35
Followers: 175

Kudos [?]: 890 [0], given: 235

GMAT Tests User Reviews Badge
Re: emily [#permalink] New post 24 Sep 2010, 23:26
wow !!! nice question. I dropped the last two options after reading 'which'.
:-D

_________________

Fight for your dreams :For all those who fear from Verbal- lets give it a fight

Money Saved is the Money Earned :)

Jo Bole So Nihaal , Sat Shri Akaal

:thanks Support GMAT Club by putting a GMAT Club badge on your blog/Facebook :thanks

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Gmat test review :
670-to-710-a-long-journey-without-destination-still-happy-141642.html

Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Keep fighting!
Affiliations: IIT Madras
Joined: 31 Jul 2010
Posts: 238
WE 1: 2+ years - Programming
WE 2: 3+ years - Product developement,
WE 3: 2+ years - Program management
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 146 [0], given: 104

Re: emily [#permalink] New post 28 Sep 2010, 02:29
I like E. It clearly refers to the letters.
What is the OA?
Retired Moderator
User avatar
Status: I wish!
Joined: 21 May 2010
Posts: 788
Followers: 102

Kudos [?]: 204 [0], given: 33

GMAT Tests User
Re: emily [#permalink] New post 28 Sep 2010, 06:02
Also, "which" in choice E is not wrong and clearly refers to Emily Dickinson's letters --> subject of the sentence.

_________________

RC videos rc-through-videos-99566.html
CR videos cr-through-videos-99033.html
SC videos sc-through-videos-98340.html
Quant videos quant-through-videos-102525.html

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 04 Jun 2010
Posts: 113
Concentration: General Management, Technology
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2013
GMAT 1: 670 Q47 V35
GMAT 2: 730 Q49 V41
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 90 [0], given: 43

GMAT Tests User
Re: emily [#permalink] New post 30 Sep 2010, 10:43
Nice explanation papillon86. Kudos!

_________________

Consider Kudos if my post helped you. Thanks!
--------------------------------------------------------------------
My TOEFL Debrief: http://gmatclub.com/forum/my-toefl-experience-99884.html
My GMAT Debrief: http://gmatclub.com/forum/670-730-10-luck-20-skill-15-concentrated-power-of-will-104473.html

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 26 Apr 2010
Posts: 126
Concentration: Strategy, Entrepreneurship
Schools: Fuqua '14 (M)
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 54

GMAT ToolKit User GMAT Tests User
Emily Dickinsons letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were [#permalink] New post 10 Oct 2010, 14:43
Emily Dickinson’s letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering her letters to anyone else.

(A) Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering

(B) Dickinson were written over a period that begins a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ended shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber

(C) Dickinson, written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and that ends shortly before Emily’s death in 1886 and outnumbering

(D) Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother, ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, and outnumbering

(E) Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber

[Reveal] Spoiler:
I ended up with A, after concluding that "which" in E refers to "Susan Huntington Dickinson" rather than to "letters." I was following the general rule that ", which" needs to refer to the object just before the comma.

Can someone please clarify the use of ", whcih" please?

Thanks in advance.

_________________

I appreciate the kudos if you find this post helpful! +1

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Apr 2010
Posts: 109
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 50 [0], given: 12

GMAT ToolKit User GMAT Tests User
Re: OG 12 SC #26 [#permalink] New post 10 Oct 2010, 18:40
Even I struggled to decide between a and e and finally ended up opting for e. OA pls

Posted from my mobile device Image
Expert Post
Retired Moderator
avatar
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 2266
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Followers: 252

Kudos [?]: 1424 [0], given: 245

Re: OG 12 SC #26 [#permalink] New post 10 Oct 2010, 22:08
Expert's post
E for me for the reason that the logical predication needs outnumber as the main verb, pushing the writing and ending to play the secondary part.

_________________

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 26 Apr 2010
Posts: 126
Concentration: Strategy, Entrepreneurship
Schools: Fuqua '14 (M)
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 54

GMAT ToolKit User GMAT Tests User
Re: OG 12 SC #26 [#permalink] New post 11 Oct 2010, 07:32
daagh wrote:
E for me for the reason that the logical predication needs outnumber as the main verb, pushing the writing and ending to play the secondary part.

Why doesn't "outnumber" have to be parallel to "writing" and "ending"?

Thanks.

_________________

I appreciate the kudos if you find this post helpful! +1

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 26 Apr 2010
Posts: 126
Concentration: Strategy, Entrepreneurship
Schools: Fuqua '14 (M)
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 54

GMAT ToolKit User GMAT Tests User
Re: OG 12 SC #26 [#permalink] New post 11 Oct 2010, 07:34
Fremontian wrote:
Nice catch on the "comma which" rule. Just referred to Ron's explanation in the MGMAT forum

Copy+paste of his summary

if you have "X of Y, which..."
then:
* if Y works as the antecedent of "which", then "which" should stand for Y.
* if Y doesn't work as the antecedent, but "X of Y" DOES work, then "which" can stand for "X of Y".

Interesting...in this case then, "letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson" stand for "X of Y"?

Hmm, this would be a very hard catch for me on the exam...

Thanks for all your replies.

_________________

I appreciate the kudos if you find this post helpful! +1

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Jun 2010
Posts: 212
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 12

Re: OG 12 SC #26 [#permalink] New post 11 Oct 2010, 07:45
rules of SC are kind of limited, their applications are broad though.
practice makes perfect, guys?
every now and then I get disappointed :/
Expert Post
Retired Moderator
avatar
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 2266
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Followers: 252

Kudos [?]: 1424 [0], given: 245

Re: OG 12 SC #26 [#permalink] New post 11 Oct 2010, 07:49
Expert's post
martie11:Why is the concern about writing , which is not a part of
any of the choices.?

_________________

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 26 Apr 2010
Posts: 126
Concentration: Strategy, Entrepreneurship
Schools: Fuqua '14 (M)
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 54

GMAT ToolKit User GMAT Tests User
Re: OG 12 SC #26 [#permalink] New post 11 Oct 2010, 08:39
daagh wrote:
martie11:Why is the concern about writing , which is not a part of
any of the choices.?

Hey daagh,

I'm referring to choices D and E, which begin with "Dickinson, which"...

Conicidentally, even in the line that I wrote above ", which" refers to "D and E"...where as in the correct answer (E), ", which" does not refer to Dickenson, but rather to "letters"...that's what's throwing me off. :)

I think the point for me is that within the first 10 seconds of reading the question I discounted D and E incorrectly due to the ", which" rule of thumb.

...I'm over analyzing...time to move on. Thanks.

_________________

I appreciate the kudos if you find this post helpful! +1

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Aug 2010
Posts: 193
Location: Finland
Schools: Admitted: IESE($$),HEC, RSM,Esade
WE 1: 3.5 years international
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 60 [0], given: 18

GMAT Tests User
Re: OG 12 SC #26 [#permalink] New post 11 Oct 2010, 09:13
tiruraju wrote:
Even I struggled to decide between a and e and finally ended up opting for e. OA pls

Posted from my mobile device Image

The reason the answer ie E because the which rule can be voilated in case of mission critical modifiers. In this case, letters to Susan Huntington Dickenson acts as a mission critical modifier because if you remove this phrase, the whole sentence will become meaningless.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 26 Apr 2010
Posts: 126
Concentration: Strategy, Entrepreneurship
Schools: Fuqua '14 (M)
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 54

GMAT ToolKit User GMAT Tests User
Re: OG 12 SC #26 [#permalink] New post 11 Oct 2010, 13:20
Fremontian wrote:
Nice catch on the "comma which" rule. Just referred to Ron's explanation in the MGMAT forum

Copy+paste of his summary

if you have "X of Y, which..."
then:
* if Y works as the antecedent of "which", then "which" should stand for Y.
* if Y doesn't work as the antecedent, but "X of Y" DOES work, then "which" can stand for "X of Y".

Fremontian, thanks for the link to MGMAT forum...for others, the MGMAT thread explains in great DETAIL the solution...excellent reply by Ron of MGMAT...

+1

Thanks again.

_________________

I appreciate the kudos if you find this post helpful! +1

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 08 Oct 2010
Posts: 31
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Emily Dickinsons letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were [#permalink] New post 04 Nov 2010, 12:14
Emily Dickinson’s letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering her letters to anyone else.
A. Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering
B. Dickinson were written over a period that begins a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ended shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber
C. Dickinson, written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and that ends shortly before Emily’s death in 1886 and outnumbering
D. Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother, ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, and outnumbering
E. Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 10 Sep 2010
Posts: 133
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 7

Re: Emily Dickinson [#permalink] New post 04 Nov 2010, 13:58
B. "begins" and "ended" are not parallel
C. "beginning" and "That ends" are not parallel
D. Placing "and" before "outnumbering" makes it parallel to "beginning" and "ending". This is wrong.
E. "outnumber" is in present tense and refers to "letters", however "were" in the past tense.

This leaves us with "A".

What is OA?
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 10 Sep 2010
Posts: 133
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 7

Re: Emily Dickinson [#permalink] New post 04 Nov 2010, 14:50
arunrajak wrote:
E


You are right: E is OA.

http://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/post24246.html
Re: Emily Dickinson   [#permalink] 04 Nov 2010, 14:50
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Emily Dickinson s letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were buffaloboy 0 22 Nov 2012, 19:00
Emily Dickinsons letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were suhi 0 05 Nov 2010, 07:41
Emily Dickinsons letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were martie11 0 15 Jun 2012, 20:02
Emily Dickinson's letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were vaivish1723 0 14 Jun 2009, 04:48
Emily Dickinsons letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were stevegt 0 01 Aug 2007, 15:43
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Emily Dickinsons letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8    Next  [ 142 posts ] 



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.