Emily Dickinsons letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were : GMAT Sentence Correction (SC) - Page 5
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 23 Jan 2017, 11:14

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Emily Dickinsons letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 08 Apr 2004
Posts: 133
Location: Corea
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 651 [13] , given: 0

Emily Dickinsons letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Sep 2004, 15:54
13
KUDOS
102
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Emily Dickinson’s letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering her letters to anyone else.

(A) Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering

(B) Dickinson were written over a period that begins a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ended shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber

(C) Dickinson, written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and that ends shortly before Emily’s death in 1886 and outnumbering

(D) Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother, ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, and outnumbering

(E) Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber
Manager
Joined: 10 Sep 2010
Posts: 133
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 7

Re: Emily Dickinsons letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Nov 2010, 13:58
B. "begins" and "ended" are not parallel
C. "beginning" and "That ends" are not parallel
D. Placing "and" before "outnumbering" makes it parallel to "beginning" and "ending". This is wrong.
E. "outnumber" is in present tense and refers to "letters", however "were" in the past tense.

This leaves us with "A".

What is OA?
Manager
Joined: 10 Sep 2010
Posts: 133
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 7

Re: Emily Dickinsons letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Nov 2010, 14:50
arunrajak wrote:
E

You are right: E is OA.

http://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/post24246.html
Retired Moderator
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 3635
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Followers: 716

Kudos [?]: 5579 [0], given: 322

Re: Emily Dickinsons letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Nov 2010, 23:19
Let us appreciate, that the gist of the passage is that Emily Dickinson’s letters to Susan outnumber Emily’s letters to any one else (even today-so we use the present tense verb - outnumber) and the writing of the letters over some period is just an incidental factor to the main action. If you remove the parenthetical and inessential content, then the main purpose will pop up. This will facilitate dropping all the choices containing – outnumbering i.e A ,C and D

Between B and E, B is awful with out a conjunction to connect the verb - outnumber -with the first part of the passage, turning the sentence into a run-on. E is the choice.
_________________

“Better than a thousand days of diligent study is one day with a great teacher” – a Japanese proverb.
9884544509

Manager
Joined: 10 Sep 2010
Posts: 133
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 7

Re: Emily Dickinsons letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Nov 2010, 07:41
daagh wrote:
Let us appreciate, that the gist of the passage is that Emily Dickinson’s letters to Susan outnumber Emily’s letters to any one else (even today-so we use the present tense verb - outnumber) and the writing of the letters over some period is just an incidental factor to the main action. If you remove the parenthetical and inessential content, then the main purpose will pop up. This will facilitate dropping all the choices containing – outnumbering i.e A ,C and D

Between B and E, B is awful with out a conjunction to connect the verb - outnumber -with the first part of the passage, turning the sentence into a run-on. E is the choice.

This is a nice trick for long sentences like this one.
I guess I was misled by lack of commas (which are always very helpful for dropping unnecessary parts of the clause). Thus, I though that "were" was the main verb of the clause, while "outnumbering" is the consequence.
Intern
Joined: 11 Mar 2011
Posts: 5
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 2

Re: Emily Dickinsons letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Mar 2011, 14:32
why is "outnumbering " wrong in A

kissthegmat wrote:
amolsk11 wrote:
Emily Dickinson’s letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years
before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering

her letters to anyone else.

A.Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and
ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering

B.Dickinson were written over a period that beginsa few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother
and ended shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber

C.Dickinson, written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and that
ends shortly before Emily’s death in 1886and outnumbering

D.Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s
brother, ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, and outnumbering

E.Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s
brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber

I solved it in different manner, I didn't bothered much about "Which". As "outnumbering" doesn't make sense we are left with only B and E option.

In Option B check out the highlighted portion above, the portion which makes this choice wrong. The highlighted portions needs to be in same tense. So we are left with only choice E.

Also, I think this questions is from OGs as this questions seems familiar!
Intern
Joined: 05 Jul 2011
Posts: 14
Schools: Ohio State University
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 2

Re: Emily Dickinsons letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Jul 2011, 01:10
OA is E...for A, outnumbering can't be the result of "were written over a period...", so here it's a logic problem, rather than a grammatical problem...

But I dont understand why in E we can use "outnumber", which is a present tense...should we use past tense here because "were written" appears in this sentence? Thx!
Manager
Status: Mission GMAT
Joined: 20 Apr 2011
Posts: 96
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 39

Re: Emily Dickinsons letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Aug 2011, 10:59
got the 'which' part. so both A and E are grammatically correct.
So the issue now remains that of meaning.
Choice A emphasizes on the period during which the letters were written.
Choice E emphasizes on the fact that the letters outnumber her letters to anyone else.

Usually if there is nothing wrong with the meaning in A, we stick to it assuming that it is the author's intended meaning.

Why do we switch to the meaning in E here?

Thanks!
_________________

Hope this post helps!
Your kudos will let me know.

Manager
Status: Mission GMAT
Joined: 20 Apr 2011
Posts: 96
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 39

Re: Emily Dickinsons letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Aug 2011, 03:41
So both A and E are grammatically correct.
However, according to me meaning in A is correct.
also A seems more concise than E which adds a 'which' modifier unnecessarily. A clearly says ..were written.

Any specific views?
_________________

Hope this post helps!
Your kudos will let me know.

Retired Moderator
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 3635
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Followers: 716

Kudos [?]: 5579 [0], given: 322

Re: Emily Dickinsons letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Aug 2011, 05:09
The switch in the focus of the meaning in E is necessitated because, the important thing here is not that the letters were written over some period, but the fact that in terms of sheer quantity, they are unprecedented even as of today and perhaps for ever after these days of digital and electronic revolution, some kind of unbreakable world record. That is the reason that these letters are valued. This is also the reason for using a present tense verb outnumber rather than outnumbered

I agree A and E are grammatically correct but haven't we accepted that GMAT is beyond just grammar
_________________

“Better than a thousand days of diligent study is one day with a great teacher” – a Japanese proverb.
9884544509

Manager
Status: Mission GMAT
Joined: 20 Apr 2011
Posts: 96
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 39

Re: Emily Dickinsons letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Aug 2011, 11:00
Thanks daagh.

I agree that Sentence correction is more than the grammar rules.

I totally understand how E is correct.

I am more concerned about why A is incorrect. Can you explain more clearly what is wrong with A's meaning. To me, A's meaning totally makes sense. So why not stick to the meaning in the original sentence? How do you know that the intended focus is the one in E? I had initially eliminated E for the which modifier issue discussed above. Am clear with that but stuck on the meaning part now.

I find nothing wrong with A's meaning. How do we know that the focus is meant to be on the letters and not the period?
_________________

Hope this post helps!
Your kudos will let me know.

Retired Moderator
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 3635
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Followers: 716

Kudos [?]: 5579 [0], given: 322

Re: Emily Dickinsons letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Aug 2011, 04:33
IMO, when you focus on writing the letters or the period during which they were written that is no great matter. That they outnumber others’ letter is something that the passage tries to impress. This is an inference; but this perception may vary from person to person and there is bound to be a difference of opinion
_________________

“Better than a thousand days of diligent study is one day with a great teacher” – a Japanese proverb.
9884544509

Manager
Status: Mission GMAT
Joined: 20 Apr 2011
Posts: 96
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 39

Re: Emily Dickinsons letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Aug 2011, 03:01
there is also a grammar issue in A. 'outnumbering' acts as a modifier of the clause that precedes it. it implies that the 'outnumbering of letters' is either a direct consuquence of the clause or simultaneously occurs with the clause. Neither makes sense. so the choice is incorrect grammatically.
_________________

Hope this post helps!
Your kudos will let me know.

Manager
Joined: 21 Oct 2007
Posts: 204
GRE 1: 1250 Q780 V540
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 69 [0], given: 16

Re: Emily Dickinsons letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Sep 2011, 10:18
Nice explanations papillon86...

Think kissthegmat way is also a better one, avoids the conflicts...

+1 to both of you...
_________________

If you like my post, please press Kudos+1

Manager
Joined: 21 May 2011
Posts: 240
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 205 [0], given: 8

Re: Emily Dickinsons letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Sep 2011, 10:52
E.

Letter is the subject here. X outnumber Y.
Manager
Joined: 23 Jul 2011
Posts: 195
Concentration: Finance, Technology
Schools: UCSD (D)
GMAT 1: 640 Q44 V34
GPA: 2.99
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 166 [0], given: 66

Re: Emily Dickinsons letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Jan 2012, 17:08
Emily Dickinson’s letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering her letters to anyone else.
A. Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering
B. Dickinson were written over a period that begins a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ended shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber
C. Dickinson, written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and that ends shortly before Emily’s death in 1886 and outnumbering
D. Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother, ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, and outnumbering
E. Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber

Can Someone break down Each Answer Choice.
Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Mar 2010
Posts: 384
Concentration: Marketing, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 170 [0], given: 87

Re: Emily Dickinsons letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Jan 2012, 20:45
I thought the usage of which is wrong in E...Please clarify?
Manager
Joined: 06 Jun 2011
Posts: 157
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 59 [0], given: 15

Re: Emily Dickinsons letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Jan 2012, 09:49
wsage of which is wrong in E. I will go with A
Director
Status: Enjoying the GMAT journey....
Joined: 26 Aug 2011
Posts: 735
Location: India
GMAT 1: 620 Q49 V24
Followers: 72

Kudos [?]: 504 [0], given: 264

Re: Emily Dickinsons letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Jan 2012, 10:22
emily-dickinsons-letters-to-susan-huntington-dickinson-were-53522.html?fl=similar
_________________

Fire the final bullet only when you are constantly hitting the Bull's eye, till then KEEP PRACTICING.

A WAY TO INCREASE FROM QUANT 35-40 TO 47 : http://gmatclub.com/forum/a-way-to-increase-from-q35-40-to-q-138750.html

Q 47/48 To Q 50 + http://gmatclub.com/forum/the-final-climb-quest-for-q-50-from-q47-129441.html#p1064367

Three good RC strategies http://gmatclub.com/forum/three-different-strategies-for-attacking-rc-127287.html

Manager
Joined: 23 Jul 2011
Posts: 195
Concentration: Finance, Technology
Schools: UCSD (D)
GMAT 1: 640 Q44 V34
GPA: 2.99
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 166 [0], given: 66

Re: Emily Dickinsons letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Jan 2012, 11:20
I understand what the other posts are saying on the other thread. It can be summarized as follows: As long as the which clearly refers to the subject of the sentence, not the object of the preposition, the use of which is absolutely correct.

Does anyone have anymore questions like this???

What better way to learn then to practice on similar questions.
Manager
Joined: 25 Sep 2010
Posts: 85
Schools: HBS, LBS, Wharton, Kelloggs, Booth
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 15

Re: Emily Dickinsons letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Jan 2012, 05:15
Emily Dickinson’s letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering her letters to anyone else.

A. Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering. Distorts the meaning.
B. Dickinson were written over a period that begins a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ended shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber
C. Dickinson, written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and that ends shortly before Emily’s death in 1886 and outnumbering
D. Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother, ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, and outnumbering. This sentence does not has a main Verb. It is a fragment.
E. Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber......Correct.

What this sentence is saying is, Emily Dickinson's letters to Susan Huntington outnumber her letters to anyone else.
Re: Emily Dickinsons letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were   [#permalink] 25 Jan 2012, 05:15

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10    Next  [ 183 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Emily Dickinsons letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were 0 15 Jun 2012, 20:02
Emily Dickinsons letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were 0 23 Mar 2012, 13:29
Emily Dickinson's letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were 0 14 Jun 2009, 04:48
Emily Dickinsons letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were 0 21 Mar 2012, 01:01
Emily Dickinsons letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were 0 01 Aug 2007, 15:43
Display posts from previous: Sort by