Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!
Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club
Registration gives you:
Tests
Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.
Applicant Stats
View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more
Books/Downloads
Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Employees of a department store receive a 20% discount on [#permalink]
25 Aug 2006, 06:43
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
0% (00:00) correct
0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
This topic is locked. If you want to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum.
Employees of a department store receive a 20% discount on the discounted price of all store merchandise. As the holiday season is coming to an end, some of the socks in the menswear department have been marked down by 40%, and the rest have been marked down by only 10%. Sean, a department store employee bought 16 pairs of socks whose original price was $10.00 each. Were most of the pairs marked down by 40%?
(1) He paid for the socks with a $100 bill.
(2) If Sean were not a department store employee, he would have paid less than $120.
Last edited by kevincan on 25 Aug 2006, 07:38, edited 1 time in total.
IMO if he bought 8 pairs with 40% discount and 8 pairs with 10% discount , this would cost Shean 120$ for the 16 pairs.
A is sufficient to ans the question and so is B
D should be the ans
I am getting strange results with this problem. pls tell me where I am going wrong.
let m pairs be discounted 40%, and n pairs be discounted 10%
For each pair,
Original price = 10
Discounted price = 6 and 9 resp
Dicounted price for emps = 0.8 * discounted price
= 4.8 and 7.2 resp.
from st (1):
100 = 4.8m + 7.2n and m + n = 16
Solving for n, I get n = 29/3 = 10 (since m and n have to be integers)
hence, m = 6
from st (2):
6m + 9n < 120 and m + n = 16
Again solving for n, I get n < 8. Hence m >= 8.
I am wondering, are these 2 statements talking abt the same thing ? (since I am getting 2 completely diff ans for m from 1 and 2 _________________
I am getting strange results with this problem. pls tell me where I am going wrong.
let m pairs be discounted 40%, and n pairs be discounted 10% For each pair, Original price = 10 Discounted price = 6 and 9 resp Dicounted price for emps = 0.8 * discounted price = 4.8 and 7.2 resp.
from st (1): 100 = 4.8m + 7.2n and m + n = 16 Solving for n, I get n = 29/3 = 10 (since m and n have to be integers) hence, m = 6
from st (2): 6m + 9n < 120 and m + n = 16 Again solving for n, I get n < 8. Hence m >= 8.
I am wondering, are these 2 statements talking abt the same thing ? (since I am getting 2 completely diff ans for m from 1 and 2
In (1), where do you get that the socks cost $100?
In (1), where do you get that the socks cost $100?
(1) He paid for the socks with a $100 bill.
oops realized my mistake .. from st (1), we should get
100 >= 4.8m + 7.2n ( we don't know if change was given or not)
solving we get, n <= 10
so, m >= 6
so after applying the correction, (1) and (2) is still INSUFF .. hence (E) ?? _________________
I am getting strange results with this problem. pls tell me where I am going wrong.
let m pairs be discounted 40%, and n pairs be discounted 10% For each pair, Original price = 10 Discounted price = 6 and 9 resp Dicounted price for emps = 0.8 * discounted price = 4.8 and 7.2 resp.
from st (1): 100 = 4.8m + 7.2n and m + n = 16 Solving for n, I get n = 29/3 = 10 (since m and n have to be integers) hence, m = 6
from st (2): 6m + 9n < 120 and m + n = 16 Again solving for n, I get n < 8. Hence m >= 8. I am wondering, are these 2 statements talking abt the same thing ? (since I am getting 2 completely diff ans for m from 1 and 2
I don't understand the greater than or equal to sign here.
I am getting strange results with this problem. pls tell me where I am going wrong.
let m pairs be discounted 40%, and n pairs be discounted 10% For each pair, Original price = 10 Discounted price = 6 and 9 resp Dicounted price for emps = 0.8 * discounted price = 4.8 and 7.2 resp.
from st (1): 100 = 4.8m + 7.2n and m + n = 16 Solving for n, I get n = 29/3 = 10 (since m and n have to be integers) hence, m = 6
from st (2): 6m + 9n < 120 and m + n = 16 Again solving for n, I get n < 8. Hence m >= 8. I am wondering, are these 2 statements talking abt the same thing ? (since I am getting 2 completely diff ans for m from 1 and 2
I don't understand the greater than or equal to sign here.
oh no! another mistake.
solved for n and got n < 8. since m + n = 16, I took m >= 8.
but if m = 8, then n = 8 and 6m + 9n will be = 120.
thus m cannot be = 8.
so m > 8 and n < 8.
thus (B) is the answer.
thanx for the correction kevincan.
i am losing out due to such oversights all the time _________________
Statement 1 - with 8 sock sat 40% discount and 8 socks with 10% discount, it would cost Sean $96.00. So when he pays with $100 it is not sure if he bought more 10% discount socks or 40% discount socks. So
Statement 2 - will tell that if he paid less than 120 dollars then he bought 40% socks more...