Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!
Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club
Registration gives you:
Tests
Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.
Applicant Stats
View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more
Books/Downloads
Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
It's a square with vertices at (5,0), (0,-5), (-5,0) and (0,5).
So the area = 4 * triangles (one of them : (0,0), (5,0), (0,5)) = 5*5/2 * 4 = 50 :)
Fig, I don't follow. Please explain the bolded portion.
To know the area, I build up it by using the area of 4 similar triangles .... Then, I calculate the area of one of them. This area is also the area of the 3 other triangles.
Have a look on the Fig 1, the triangle in flashy green is the one described in my calculation of the area.
I got ya'. but could we do the same with 1,4; -1,-4; -1,4; 1,-4 or 3,2; -3,-2; -3,2; 3,-2. I tried them cursorily. they didn't seem to work.
The 2 shapes u design like this are rectangles. ... Notice the x and y coordonates of the point u have built up : their absolute value is not equal (|1| != |4|) .... If they were equal, then we have a square
Notice also that sides of such rectangle are parallel to the X and Y axes
If gives a and b the absolute values of the x and y coordonaites of each vertex from a same rectangle, then we have:
The aera of such a rectangle = (2*a) * (2*b)
In your cases,
o Aera 1 = 2*1 * 2*4 = 16
o Aera 2 = 3*1 * 2*2 = 12
The 2 shapes u design like this are rectangles. ... Notice the x and y coordonates of the point u have built up : their absolute value is not equal (|1| != |4|
In the stem, we need the abs. val. of x and y to equal 5. Why would we need the abs. val. of x and y (|1| and |4| in this case) to be equal. Don't they just need to sum to 5?
The 2 shapes u design like this are rectangles. ... Notice the x and y coordonates of the point u have built up : their absolute value is not equal (|1| != |4|
In the stem, we need the abs. val. of x and y to equal 5. Why would we need the abs. val. of x and y (|1| and |4| in this case) to be equal. Don't they just need to sum to 5?
No .... It is 2 different things.... Your example are not equivalent to the problem
|x| + |y| = b (b>0) will always create a square such that it is shown on my Fig 1.
Your examples create rectangles with sides that are parellel to the X and Y axes .... Draw them, u will see what I mean
An equivalent system of equations for your examples is :
o |x| = c
o |y| = d