Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 25 Oct 2014, 13:24

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Ethicist: In a recent judicial decision, a contractor was

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Apr 2010
Posts: 98
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 1

Ethicist: In a recent judicial decision, a contractor was [#permalink] New post 09 May 2010, 07:09
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

37% (02:52) correct 63% (02:00) wrong based on 25 sessions
Ethicist: In a recent judicial decision, a contractor was ordered to make restitution to a company because of a bungled construction job, even though the company had signed a written agreement prior to entering into the contract that the contractor would not be financially liable should the task not be adequately performed. Thus, it was morally wrong for the company to change its mind and seek restitution.
Which one of the following principles, if valid, most helps to justify the ethicist’s reasoning?
(A) It is morally wrong for one party not to abide by its part of an agreement only if the other party abides by its part of the agreement.
(B) It is morally wrong to seek a penalty for an action for which the agent is unable to make restitution.
(C) It is morally wrong for one person to seek to penalize another person for an action that the first person induced the other person to perform.
(D) It is morally wrong to ignore the terms of an agreement that was freely undertaken only if there is clear evidence that the agreement was legally permissible.
(E) It is morally wrong to seek compensation for an action performed in the context of a promise to forgo such compensation.

answer is :
[Reveal] Spoiler:
B


But i do not agree. I think it should be
[Reveal] Spoiler:
E
.

What's your take?
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 05 Mar 2008
Posts: 1477
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 202 [0], given: 31

Re: Of Ethics and principles [#permalink] New post 09 May 2010, 07:35
ohfred wrote:
Ethicist: In a recent judicial decision, a contractor was ordered to make restitution to a company because of a bungled construction job, even though the company had signed a written agreement prior to entering into the contract that the contractor would not be financially liable should the task not be adequately performed. Thus, it was morally wrong for the company to change its mind and seek restitution.
Which one of the following principles, if valid, most helps to justify the ethicist’s reasoning?
(A) It is morally wrong for one party not to abide by its part of an agreement only if the other party abides by its part of the agreement.
(B) It is morally wrong to seek a penalty for an action for which the agent is unable to make restitution.
(C) It is morally wrong for one person to seek to penalize another person for an action that the first person induced the other person to perform.
(D) It is morally wrong to ignore the terms of an agreement that was freely undertaken only if there is clear evidence that the agreement was legally permissible.
(E) It is morally wrong to seek compensation for an action performed in the context of a promise to forgo such compensation.

answer is :
[Reveal] Spoiler:
B


But i do not agree. I think it should be
[Reveal] Spoiler:
E
.

What's your take?


I agree with B. That was my guess. The reason the contract was entered into was because restitution, in the form of fixing a job, could not be done, or would not be done, once the project is completed. The company should have stopped construction if the job was not satisfactory prior to completion.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Jul 2009
Posts: 298
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 73 [0], given: 0

Re: Of Ethics and principles [#permalink] New post 09 May 2010, 08:19
Somehow i don't agree with B.
I think the answer should be E.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 01 Apr 2008
Posts: 909
Schools: IIM Lucknow (IPMX) - Class of 2014
Followers: 15

Kudos [?]: 236 [0], given: 18

Re: Of Ethics and principles [#permalink] New post 09 May 2010, 11:02
cant be B. There is no clue in the premise about the ability of the contractor to make restitution.
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 05 Mar 2008
Posts: 1477
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 202 [0], given: 31

Re: Of Ethics and principles [#permalink] New post 09 May 2010, 11:45
Economist wrote:
cant be B. There is no clue in the premise about the ability of the contractor to make restitution.


I can't say you guys are necessarily wrong. Honestly, if the question is not from OG, there is always the possibility an answer is incorrect.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 14 Apr 2010
Posts: 230
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 1

Re: Of Ethics and principles [#permalink] New post 06 Jul 2010, 23:31
What is the source?? E clearly seems the right answer. :-(
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 1560
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 227 [0], given: 6

Re: Of Ethics and principles [#permalink] New post 16 Jul 2010, 05:45
my pick is E too.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Jan 2010
Posts: 164
Location: India
Schools: ISB
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 14

Re: Of Ethics and principles [#permalink] New post 16 Jul 2010, 09:34
Even I agree with E, lagomez, what is the OA?
_________________

_________________
If you like my post, consider giving me a kudos. THANKS!

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 09 Jul 2010
Posts: 150
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 3

Re: Of Ethics and principles [#permalink] New post 16 Jul 2010, 20:36
(E) It is morally wrong to seek compensation for an action performed in the context of a promise to forgo such compensation--it is wrong 4 the company seeking compensation 4 an action performed in what context ? in the context of a promise where the company is to forgo(do without) such compensation.--this is absurd, OOS

B my pick
_________________

consider cudos if you like my post

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2010
Posts: 120
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 169 [0], given: 169

Re: Of Ethics and principles [#permalink] New post 17 Jan 2011, 06:55
OA is E

LSAT question

http://www.lawschooldiscussion.org/stud ... uestion-2/
_________________

I will greatly appreciate your KUDOS my friends!

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2010
Posts: 101
Location: Hanoi, Vietnam
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 18

Re: Of Ethics and principles [#permalink] New post 17 Jan 2011, 07:32
This is really really hard question.
_________________

Hung M.Tran
Faculty of Banking and Finance,
National Economics University of Vietnam


Follow me on Twitter : http://twitter.com/AndyTranHung

Re: Of Ethics and principles   [#permalink] 17 Jan 2011, 07:32
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Experts publish their posts in the topic decision sidworld 4 30 Oct 2013, 11:03
Ethicist: In a recent judicial decision, a contractor was ohfred 4 18 May 2010, 09:31
Experts publish their posts in the topic Working as a Contractor shellarun 5 16 May 2010, 19:38
Ethicist: In a recent judicial decision, a contractor was skg 19 10 Oct 2009, 05:35
2 Experts publish their posts in the topic A contractor combined -GMATPrep shobuj40 5 30 Jan 2009, 11:10
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Ethicist: In a recent judicial decision, a contractor was

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.