Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 31 Aug 2014, 00:26

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Every element on the periodic chart is radioactive, although

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 19 Nov 2007
Posts: 477
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 49 [1] , given: 4

GMAT ToolKit User GMAT Tests User
Every element on the periodic chart is radioactive, although [#permalink] New post 10 Jan 2009, 22:55
1
This post received
KUDOS
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (02:28) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 3 sessions
Every element on the periodic chart is radioactive, although the most stable elements have half-lives which are thousands and thousands of years long. When an atom decays, it splits into two or more smaller atoms. Even considering the fusion taking place inside of stars, there is only a negligible tendency for smaller atoms to transmute into larger ones. Thus, the ratio of lighter to heavier atoms in the universe is increasing at a measurable rate.

Which of the following sentences provides the most logical continuation of this paragraph?

(A) Without radioactive decay of atoms, there could be no solar combustion and no life as we know it.
(B) Therefore, it is imperative that scientists begin developing ways to reverse the trend and restore the proper balance between the lighter and heavier elements.
(C) Consequently, it is possible to use a shifting ratio of light to heavy atoms to calculate the age of the universe.
(D) Therefore, there are now more light elements in the universe than heavy ones.
(E) As a result, the fusion taking place inside stars has to produce enough atoms of the heavy elements to offset the radioactive decay of large atoms elsewhere in the universe.
_________________

-Underline your question. It takes only a few seconds!
-Search before you post.

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 881
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 150 [0], given: 7

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR-radioactive [#permalink] New post 11 Jan 2009, 06:56
Pretty tough CR - I chose C.
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Posts: 1436
Followers: 33

Kudos [?]: 214 [0], given: 1

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR-radioactive [#permalink] New post 11 Jan 2009, 14:27
botirvoy wrote:
Pretty tough CR - I chose C.


Why C? How can you calculate the age of the universe? any explanation or POE?
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Nov 2008
Posts: 283
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 2

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR-radioactive [#permalink] New post 11 Jan 2009, 15:35
vscid wrote:
Every element on the periodic chart is radioactive, although the most stable elements have half-lives which are thousands and thousands of years long. When an atom decays, it splits into two or more smaller atoms. Even considering the fusion taking place inside of stars, there is only a negligible tendency for smaller atoms to transmute into larger ones. Thus, the ratio of lighter to heavier atoms in the universe is increasing at a measurable rate.

Which of the following sentences provides the most logical continuation of this paragraph?

(A) Without radioactive decay of atoms, there could be no solar combustion and no life as we know it.
(B) Therefore, it is imperative that scientists begin developing ways to reverse the trend and restore the proper balance between the lighter and heavier elements.
(C) Consequently, it is possible to use a shifting ratio of light to heavy atoms to calculate the age of the universe.
(D) Therefore, there are now more light elements in the universe than heavy ones.
(E) As a result, the fusion taking place inside stars has to produce enough atoms of the heavy elements to offset the radioactive decay of large atoms elsewhere in the universe.


This is how I came with C:
The paragraph ends talking about measurements so that's a clue
A - Solar combustion? this was never discussed
B - Imperative? Why is it imperative?
C- Looks ok
D - More light elements? We are only told about that the RATIO is increasing att a measurable rate
E - Fusion taking place?
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 01 Jan 2009
Posts: 7
Schools: UCB, UCLA
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: CR-radioactive [#permalink] New post 11 Jan 2009, 22:58
Should be C
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 428
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 70 [0], given: 14

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR-radioactive [#permalink] New post 11 Jan 2009, 23:26
realy tough......
I have a doubt b/w C & E.....
but i would choose E as my answer
2 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Stanford GSB
Joined: 02 Jun 2008
Posts: 102
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 68 [2] , given: 4

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR-radioactive [#permalink] New post 12 Jan 2009, 01:42
2
This post received
KUDOS
C is clearly the correct answer. My explanation is in RED.

Every element on the periodic chart is radioactive, although the most stable elements have half-lives which are thousands and thousands of years long. When an atom decays, it splits into two or more smaller atoms. Even considering the fusion taking place inside of stars, there is only a negligible tendency for smaller atoms to transmute into larger ones. Thus, the ratio of lighter to heavier atoms in the universe is increasing at a measurable rate.

Which of the following sentences provides the most logical continuation of this paragraph?

(A) Without radioactive decay of atoms, there could be no solar combustion and no life as we know it.
No mention of Solar Combustion in the question stem.We cannot have a new idea/information in a logical continuation.It should be deducted from the stem.
(B) Therefore, it is imperative that scientists begin developing ways to reverse the trend and restore the proper balance between the lighter and heavier
elements.
Does not sound logical. Nothing has been told why should they reverse the trend. Moreover "eliments" instead of "atom".
(C) Consequently, it is possible to use a shifting ratio of light to heavy atoms to calculate the age of the universe.
As "the ratio of lighter to heavier atoms in the universe is increasing at a measurable rate." we can use this trend to calculate the age of universe. For example If in 2009, heavy: light= 4:10 ; 2000 years back, heavy: light=3:10 ; 4000 years back, heavy:light=2:10. And the same ratio is 1:10 in a new universe, most probably(in case of straight line equation) it will be 6000 years old
(D) Therefore, there are now more light elements in the universe than heavy ones.
Cannot be concluded, only the ratio of lighter to heavy atoms is increasing. There can be more heavy atoms still now. "Elements" instead of "atom"
(E) As a result, the fusion taking place inside stars has to produce enough atoms of the heavy elements to offset the radioactive decay of large atoms elsewhere in the universe.
Not a logical continuation of the idea given in the question. As a result of what? It suggests, as a result of the increasing ratio??? Moreover,why the fusions will work to offset the radioactive decay
Retired Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 18 Jul 2008
Posts: 997
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 66 [0], given: 5

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR-radioactive [#permalink] New post 12 Jan 2009, 08:33
went with E. Will try to explain if correct.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 19 Nov 2007
Posts: 477
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 4

GMAT ToolKit User GMAT Tests User
Re: CR-radioactive [#permalink] New post 12 Jan 2009, 19:59
OA C.
good job explaining sandip. +1.
_________________

-Underline your question. It takes only a few seconds!
-Search before you post.

VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 18 May 2008
Posts: 1300
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 112 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR-radioactive [#permalink] New post 12 Jan 2009, 23:15
@Sandip, +1 from me too
Re: CR-radioactive   [#permalink] 12 Jan 2009, 23:15
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
5 A set S contains numbers such that every element in the set alphonsa 2 06 Aug 2014, 09:01
1 Experts publish their posts in the topic Although the losing party disapproves of every aspect of the MonSama 8 25 Nov 2012, 02:49
1 Experts publish their posts in the topic Every element on the periodic chart is radioactive, though gjg 14 19 Jul 2012, 20:31
Of the following, which is closest to the increase from 1975 yogachgolf 2 27 Nov 2007, 14:50
Sunflower...Radioactive cybera 4 14 Jul 2005, 06:43
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Every element on the periodic chart is radioactive, although

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.