Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 22 Sep 2014, 21:05

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

extensive housing construction is underway in Pataska Forest

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Sep 2008
Posts: 154
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 1

GMAT Tests User
extensive housing construction is underway in Pataska Forest [#permalink] New post 14 Oct 2012, 19:40
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  95% (hard)

Question Stats:

42% (02:30) correct 58% (01:18) wrong based on 240 sessions
extensive housing construction is underway in Pataska Forest the habitant of a large population of deer.Because deer
feed at the edges of forests,there deer will be attracted to the spaces alongside the new roads being cut through the Patska forest to serve the new residential areas.Consequently,once the housing is occupied,the annual number of the forest's deer hit by cars will be much higher than before construction started.

which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

a)the number of deer hit by comercial vehicles will not increase significantly when the housing is occupied.

b)Deer will be as attracted to the forest edge around new houses as to the forest edge alongside roads.

c)In years past,the annual number of deer that have been hit by cars on existing roads through Pataska Forest has been very low.

d)the development will leave sufficient forest to sustain a significant population of deer

e)no deer hunting will be allowed in Pataska forest when the housing is occupied
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 02 Jul 2012
Posts: 1228
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 66

Kudos [?]: 685 [0], given: 116

Premium Member
Re: assumption [#permalink] New post 14 Oct 2012, 20:04
A, B & C are out of scope. Finally boils down to either D or E. D gives a more direct reason as to why the deer population would still exist even after the constructions.

D is the answer.
_________________

Did you find this post helpful?... Please let me know through the Kudos button.

Thanks To The Almighty - My GMAT Debrief

GMAT Reading Comprehension: 7 Most Common Passage Types

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Jun 2010
Posts: 161
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 151

Re: assumption [#permalink] New post 15 Oct 2012, 00:04
What is the source? The question is written so badly.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 08 Apr 2012
Posts: 129
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 56 [0], given: 14

Re: assumption [#permalink] New post 15 Oct 2012, 00:22
mrinal2100 wrote:
extensive housing construction is underway in Pataska Forest the habitant of a large population of deer.Because deer
feed at the edges of forests,there deer will be attracted to the spaces alongside the new roads being cut through the Patska forest to serve the new residential areas.Consequently,once the housing is occupied,the annual number of the forest's deer hit by cars will be much higher than before construction started.

which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

a)the number of deer hit by comercial vehicles will not increase significantly when the housing is occupied.

b)Deer will be as attracted to the forest edge around new houses as to the forest edge alongside roads.

c)In years past,the annual number of deer that have been hit by cars on existing roads through Pataska Forest has been very low.

d)the development will leave sufficient forest to sustain a significant population of deer

e)no deer hunting will be allowed in Pataska forest when the housing is occupied



Hi,

The best way to find underlying assumptions is to negate the answer choices to see which one threatens the conclusion the most.

A) If the number of commercial vehicles plying through the new roads increased, then more deers would be hit even irrespective of the fact that the housing would be occupied or not. Moreover, the conclusion leaves a huge void with the phrase."once the housing is occupied". This leads us to question: "what if the houses were not occupied?". That would lead us to answer A. Hence this seems to be correct. But let us go through the other statements before marking A.

B) If the deers were not as attracted to the forest edges near the houses as to the edges near the streets, it is not affecting the conclusion that strongly. It doesn't matter where the deers are getting hit, so long they are hit by cars going to the houses.

C) This choice is 'out of context'.

D) What if this were not true? There would not be sufficient forest left for the deers. Hence, negating this choice is, actually, strengthening the conclusion. This is an 'opposite answer choice'.

E) This choice is 'out of context'.

Hence, the answer is A.

Regards,

Shouvik.
_________________

Shouvik
http://www.Edvento.com
admin@edvento.com

SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1941
Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Followers: 17

Kudos [?]: 286 [0], given: 1

Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: assumption [#permalink] New post 15 Oct 2012, 02:14
mrinal2100 wrote:
extensive housing construction is underway in Pataska Forest the habitant of a large population of deer.Because deer
feed at the edges of forests,there deer will be attracted to the spaces alongside the new roads being cut through the Patska forest to serve the new residential areas.Consequently,once the housing is occupied,the annual number of the forest's deer hit by cars will be much higher than before construction started.

which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

a)the number of deer hit by comercial vehicles will not increase significantly when the housing is occupied.

b)Deer will be as attracted to the forest edge around new houses as to the forest edge alongside roads.

c)In years past,the annual number of deer that have been hit by cars on existing roads through Pataska Forest has been very low.

d)the development will leave sufficient forest to sustain a significant population of deer

e)no deer hunting will be allowed in Pataska forest when the housing is occupied


Very great question, guy!
it costs me 2:25 with a right shot.

A and E out right away because of "Out of scope"
A. deer hit by commercial vehicles
E. Dear hunting
B. The argument does not focus on the comparison BTW the number of deers attactedto the forest edge around new houses AND
the number of deers to the forest edge alongside roads, but ON the number hit by car before and after the development.
B out
C. The prediction is based on the current context, so C, in years past, does not work, C out
D remains.
_________________

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Jan 2011
Posts: 201
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 22

GMAT Tests User
Re: extensive housing construction is underway in Pataska Forest [#permalink] New post 08 Nov 2012, 02:19
I chose D and I believe its correct
I am also convinced by the explanation given by Edvento.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 1938
Followers: 261

Kudos [?]: 58 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: extensive housing construction is underway in Pataska Forest [#permalink] New post 16 Aug 2014, 08:37
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 19 Jun 2013
Posts: 3
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 2

Re: extensive housing construction is underway in Pataska Forest [#permalink] New post 06 Sep 2014, 20:24
Hi,

I picked B. Would someone explain why B is wrong over D. Thank you!
1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 06 Jan 2014
Posts: 25
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 16 [1] , given: 26

Re: extensive housing construction is underway in Pataska Forest [#permalink] New post 06 Sep 2014, 23:41
1
This post received
KUDOS
In Option B

The argument is talking about the forest edges of houses and the forest edges of streets.However what we are looking for is forest edges and forest edges of streets.If we had in the option that the deers consider forest edges and forest edges of new roads similar than the option might be correct.

In Option D

Negating Option D, we get that the the development ll not leave sufficient deer population so sustain. Accordingly the deer population will fall. Hence the number of hits ll decline too :)
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: On a mountain of skulls, in the castle of pain, I sit on a throne of blood.
Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Posts: 81
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 39 [1] , given: 63

Re: extensive housing construction is underway in Pataska Forest [#permalink] New post 07 Sep 2014, 00:48
1
This post received
KUDOS
@sun1526: B is irrelevant to the argument. We are not concerned if deers are attracted to the edges near the houses (where they arguably have little danger) as much as they are attracted to the edges near the road (where they have the most danger). This option has no role to play in arriving at the conclusion.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 19 Jun 2013
Posts: 3
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 2

Re: extensive housing construction is underway in Pataska Forest [#permalink] New post 07 Sep 2014, 06:36
Thank you very much "dream21" and " AmoyV "!
Re: extensive housing construction is underway in Pataska Forest   [#permalink] 07 Sep 2014, 06:36
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
These extensive forest reserves must be defended from the gmacvik 6 28 Jan 2007, 17:55
The single-family house constructed by the Yana, a Native vic 4 18 Jan 2006, 08:31
The single-family house constructed by the Yana, a Native okdongdong 3 11 Aug 2005, 06:18
Todd's construction company is capable of building 4 houses tbetten 5 18 Jun 2005, 10:31
3 The single-family house constructed by the Yana, a Native chunjuwu 29 17 Feb 2005, 05:58
Display posts from previous: Sort by

extensive housing construction is underway in Pataska Forest

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.