Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 04 May 2016, 09:40

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

extensive housing construction is underway in Pataska Forest

Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 29 Sep 2008
Posts: 147
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 72 [0], given: 1

Show Tags

14 Oct 2012, 20:40
5
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

95% (hard)

Question Stats:

43% (02:36) correct 57% (01:25) wrong based on 340 sessions

HideShow timer Statictics

extensive housing construction is underway in Pataska Forest the habitant of a large population of deer.Because deer
feed at the edges of forests,there deer will be attracted to the spaces alongside the new roads being cut through the Patska forest to serve the new residential areas.Consequently,once the housing is occupied,the annual number of the forest's deer hit by cars will be much higher than before construction started.

which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

a)the number of deer hit by comercial vehicles will not increase significantly when the housing is occupied.

b)Deer will be as attracted to the forest edge around new houses as to the forest edge alongside roads.

c)In years past,the annual number of deer that have been hit by cars on existing roads through Pataska Forest has been very low.

d)the development will leave sufficient forest to sustain a significant population of deer

e)no deer hunting will be allowed in Pataska forest when the housing is occupied
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Moderator
Joined: 02 Jul 2012
Posts: 1230
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 105

Kudos [?]: 1142 [0], given: 116

Show Tags

14 Oct 2012, 21:04
A, B & C are out of scope. Finally boils down to either D or E. D gives a more direct reason as to why the deer population would still exist even after the constructions.

_________________

Did you find this post helpful?... Please let me know through the Kudos button.

Thanks To The Almighty - My GMAT Debrief

GMAT Reading Comprehension: 7 Most Common Passage Types

Manager
Joined: 06 Jun 2010
Posts: 161
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 151

Show Tags

15 Oct 2012, 01:04
What is the source? The question is written so badly.
Manager
Joined: 08 Apr 2012
Posts: 129
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 83 [0], given: 14

Show Tags

15 Oct 2012, 01:22
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
mrinal2100 wrote:
extensive housing construction is underway in Pataska Forest the habitant of a large population of deer.Because deer
feed at the edges of forests,there deer will be attracted to the spaces alongside the new roads being cut through the Patska forest to serve the new residential areas.Consequently,once the housing is occupied,the annual number of the forest's deer hit by cars will be much higher than before construction started.

which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

a)the number of deer hit by comercial vehicles will not increase significantly when the housing is occupied.

b)Deer will be as attracted to the forest edge around new houses as to the forest edge alongside roads.

c)In years past,the annual number of deer that have been hit by cars on existing roads through Pataska Forest has been very low.

d)the development will leave sufficient forest to sustain a significant population of deer

e)no deer hunting will be allowed in Pataska forest when the housing is occupied

Hi,

The best way to find underlying assumptions is to negate the answer choices to see which one threatens the conclusion the most.

A) If the number of commercial vehicles plying through the new roads increased, then more deers would be hit even irrespective of the fact that the housing would be occupied or not. Moreover, the conclusion leaves a huge void with the phrase."once the housing is occupied". This leads us to question: "what if the houses were not occupied?". That would lead us to answer A. Hence this seems to be correct. But let us go through the other statements before marking A.

B) If the deers were not as attracted to the forest edges near the houses as to the edges near the streets, it is not affecting the conclusion that strongly. It doesn't matter where the deers are getting hit, so long they are hit by cars going to the houses.

C) This choice is 'out of context'.

D) What if this were not true? There would not be sufficient forest left for the deers. Hence, negating this choice is, actually, strengthening the conclusion. This is an 'opposite answer choice'.

E) This choice is 'out of context'.

Regards,

Shouvik.
_________________

Shouvik
http://www.Edvento.com

SVP
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1926
Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Followers: 21

Kudos [?]: 711 [0], given: 1

Show Tags

15 Oct 2012, 03:14
mrinal2100 wrote:
extensive housing construction is underway in Pataska Forest the habitant of a large population of deer.Because deer
feed at the edges of forests,there deer will be attracted to the spaces alongside the new roads being cut through the Patska forest to serve the new residential areas.Consequently,once the housing is occupied,the annual number of the forest's deer hit by cars will be much higher than before construction started.

which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

a)the number of deer hit by comercial vehicles will not increase significantly when the housing is occupied.

b)Deer will be as attracted to the forest edge around new houses as to the forest edge alongside roads.

c)In years past,the annual number of deer that have been hit by cars on existing roads through Pataska Forest has been very low.

d)the development will leave sufficient forest to sustain a significant population of deer

e)no deer hunting will be allowed in Pataska forest when the housing is occupied

Very great question, guy!
it costs me 2:25 with a right shot.

A and E out right away because of "Out of scope"
A. deer hit by commercial vehicles
E. Dear hunting
B. The argument does not focus on the comparison BTW the number of deers attactedto the forest edge around new houses AND
the number of deers to the forest edge alongside roads, but ON the number hit by car before and after the development.
B out
C. The prediction is based on the current context, so C, in years past, does not work, C out
D remains.
_________________
Manager
Joined: 02 Jan 2011
Posts: 201
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 22

Show Tags

08 Nov 2012, 03:19
I chose D and I believe its correct
I am also convinced by the explanation given by Edvento.
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 7409
Followers: 699

Kudos [?]: 140 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

16 Aug 2014, 09:37
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Intern
Joined: 19 Jun 2013
Posts: 3
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 2

Show Tags

06 Sep 2014, 21:24
Hi,

I picked B. Would someone explain why B is wrong over D. Thank you!
Manager
Joined: 06 Jan 2014
Posts: 71
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 19 [1] , given: 78

Show Tags

07 Sep 2014, 00:41
1
KUDOS
In Option B

The argument is talking about the forest edges of houses and the forest edges of streets.However what we are looking for is forest edges and forest edges of streets.If we had in the option that the deers consider forest edges and forest edges of new roads similar than the option might be correct.

In Option D

Negating Option D, we get that the the development ll not leave sufficient deer population so sustain. Accordingly the deer population will fall. Hence the number of hits ll decline too
_________________

______________________________
Liked the Post !!!! KUDOs Plzzzzz

Senior Manager
Status: On a mountain of skulls, in the castle of pain, I sit on a throne of blood.
Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Posts: 322
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 102 [1] , given: 130

Show Tags

07 Sep 2014, 01:48
1
KUDOS
@sun1526: B is irrelevant to the argument. We are not concerned if deers are attracted to the edges near the houses (where they arguably have little danger) as much as they are attracted to the edges near the road (where they have the most danger). This option has no role to play in arriving at the conclusion.
Intern
Joined: 19 Jun 2013
Posts: 3
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 2

Show Tags

07 Sep 2014, 07:36
Thank you very much "dream21" and " AmoyV "!
Re: extensive housing construction is underway in Pataska Forest   [#permalink] 07 Sep 2014, 07:36
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
After our extensive enquiry 0 11 Oct 2014, 05:27
In an extensive study of the reading habits of magazine 2 21 Oct 2012, 14:57
Rhetorical Constructions 0 03 Jan 2012, 11:11
10 Bardis: Extensive research shows that television 6 15 Mar 2011, 22:54
5 CR: If the forest continues to disappear 12 21 Mar 2008, 05:07
Display posts from previous: Sort by