Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 24 May 2013, 03:40
Customize  |  Hide

Extensive research has shown that the effects of short-term

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  
Author Message
TAGS:
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 31 Oct 2011
Posts: 334
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 18

GMAT Tests User
Extensive research has shown that the effects of short-term [#permalink] New post 13 Apr 2012, 18:17
Extensive research has shown
that the effects of short-term price
promotions on sales are themselves
Line short-term. Companies’ hopes that
(5) promotions might have a positive
aftereffect have not been borne
out for reasons that researchers
have been able to identify. A price
promotion entices only a brand’s
(10) long-term or “loyal” customers;
people seldom buy an unfamiliar
brand merely because the price is
reduced. They simply avoid paying
more than they have to when one of
(15) their customary brands is temporar-
ily available at a reduced price. A
price promotion does not increase
the number of long-term customers
of a brand, as it attracts virtually
(20) no new customers in the first place.
Nor do price promotions have linger-
ing aftereffects for a brand, even
negative ones such as damage to
a brand’s reputation or erosion of
(25) customer loyalty, as is often feared.
So why do companies spend so
much on price promotions? Clearly
price promotions are generally run
at a loss, otherwise there would
(30) be more of them. And the bigger
the increase in sales at promotion
prices, the bigger the loss. While
short-term price promotions can
have legitimate uses, such as
(35) reducing excess inventory, it is the
recognizable increase in sales that
is their main attraction to manage-
ment, which is therefore reluctant
to abandon this strategy despite
its effect on the bottom line.


It can be inferred from the passage that if a company ceased to run short-term price promotions for a particular product, an effect of this change would be to

A. reduce excess inventory of the product
B. lose some of the product’s long-term customers
C. reduce the product’s overall sales
D. inhibit growth in the number of the product’s customers
E. threaten the product’s profitability







Why not b?
Manager
Manager
Status: I will not stop until i realise my goal which is my dream too
Joined: 25 Feb 2010
Posts: 247
Schools: Johnson '15
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 16

GMAT Tests User
Re: GWD #4 V 6 [#permalink] New post 15 Apr 2012, 08:58
eybrj2 wrote:
Extensive research has shown
that the effects of short-term price
promotions on sales are themselves
Line short-term. Companies’ hopes that
(5) promotions might have a positive
aftereffect have not been borne
out for reasons that researchers
have been able to identify. A price
promotion entices only a brand’s
(10) long-term or “loyal” customers;
people seldom buy an unfamiliar
brand merely because the price is
reduced. They simply avoid paying
more than they have to when one of
(15) their customary brands is temporar-
ily available at a reduced price. A
price promotion does not increase
the number of long-term customers
of a brand, as it attracts virtually
(20) no new customers in the first place.
Nor do price promotions have linger-
ing aftereffects for a brand, even
negative ones such as damage to
a brand’s reputation or erosion of
(25) customer loyalty, as is often feared.
So why do companies spend so
much on price promotions? Clearly
price promotions are generally run
at a loss, otherwise there would
(30) be more of them. And the bigger
the increase in sales at promotion
prices, the bigger the loss. While
short-term price promotions can
have legitimate uses, such as
(35) reducing excess inventory, it is the
recognizable increase in sales that
is their main attraction to manage-
ment, which is therefore reluctant
to abandon this strategy despite
its effect on the bottom line.


It can be inferred from the passage that if a company ceased to run short-term price promotions for a particular product, an effect of this change would be to

A. reduce excess inventory of the product
B. lose some of the product’s long-term customers
C. reduce the product’s overall sales
D. inhibit growth in the number of the product’s customers
E. threaten the product’s profitability







Why not b?


Indeed the last lines finalizes the answer C
_________________

Regards,
Harsha

Note: Give me kudos if my approach is right , else help me understand where i am missing.. I want to bell the GMAT Cat ;)

Satyameva Jayate - Truth alone triumphs

Manager
Manager
Status: Bunuel's fan!
Joined: 08 Jul 2011
Posts: 213
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 47

CAT Tests
Re: GWD #4 V 6 [#permalink] New post 06 May 2012, 03:34
price promotion does not increase
the number of long-term customers

of a brand, as it attracts virtually
(20) no new customers in the first place.Nor do price promotions have linger-
ing aftereffects for a brand, even
negative ones such as damage to
a brand’s reputation or erosion of
(25) customer loyalty,
as is often feared.

Price promotion does nothing (either negative or positive) except for reducing inventories
Re: GWD #4 V 6   [#permalink] 06 May 2012, 03:34
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts Extensive research has shown that the effects of short-term abhijit_sen 8 15 Jul 2008, 18:09
Popular new posts 1 Extensive research has shown that the effects of short-term ankur55 10 22 Jul 2009, 20:52
Popular new posts 6 Research has shown that the ancient Mesoamerican ballgame conmisdosmanos 24 16 Jul 2010, 17:02
Popular new posts Market research has shown that the newest model of E-Phone aiming4mba 11 22 Jul 2010, 11:39
New posts EXPERTS_POSTS_IN_THIS_TOPIC Research has shown that impoverished people in this country targetgmatchotu 4 18 Jan 2013, 21:48
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Extensive research has shown that the effects of short-term

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.