Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 24 Oct 2014, 22:39

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Faulty voting equipment, confusing ballots, voter error, and

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 14 Jul 2006
Posts: 281
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Faulty voting equipment, confusing ballots, voter error, and [#permalink] New post 24 Aug 2006, 23:32
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Faulty voting equipment, confusing ballots, voter error, and problems at polling places have been cited by a new study of the 2000 United States presidential election, which estimated that they did not count 4 million to 6 million of the 100 million votes cast.
A. Faulty voting equipment, confusing ballots, voter error, and problems at polling places have been cited by a new study of the 2000 United States presidential election, which estimated that they did not count 4 million to 6 million of the 100 million votes cast.
B. Citing faulty voting equipment, confusing ballots, voter error, and problems at polling places, a new study of the 2000 United States presidential election has estimated that 4 million to 6 million of the 100 million votes cast were not counted.
C. Citing faulty voting equipment, confusing ballots, voter error, and problems at polling places, 4 million to 6 million of the 100 million votes cast were not counted in the 2000 United States presidential election, a new study estimates.
D. A new study has cited faulty voting equipment, confusing ballots, voter error, and problems at polling places in estimating that 4 million to 6 million of the 100 million votes that were cast had not been counted in the 2000 United States presidential election.
E. A new study of the 2000 United States presidential election, citing faulty voting equipment, confusing ballots, voter error, and problems at polling places, has estimated 4 million to 6 million votes had not been counted of the 100 million votes cast.


My answer came down to either b or D why is D wrong?

Last edited by apollo168 on 25 Aug 2006, 02:06, edited 1 time in total.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 15 Aug 2004
Posts: 329
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Re: SC US elections [#permalink] New post 25 Aug 2006, 01:43
apollo168 wrote:

My answer came down to either b or D why is b wrong?


Well it should be between B and D...

I also chose B... so I am not teh right person to comment...

Lets wait for others. :oops:
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 13 Jul 2006
Posts: 327
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 25 Aug 2006, 02:04
I think (B) is wrong coz (citing.......,a new study has estimated) does not say that the citation waz for the estimate.Only (D) says that the new study has cited in estimating....And god please dont make such mistakes.This can potentially embarrass people
|
|
|
\/:)).Srry guyz

Last edited by sangarelli on 25 Aug 2006, 03:02, edited 1 time in total.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 14 Jul 2006
Posts: 281
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 25 Aug 2006, 02:06
Hi sorry for the confusion. OA is B My mistake
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 15 Aug 2004
Posts: 329
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 25 Aug 2006, 02:45
apollo168 wrote:
Hi sorry for the confusion. OA is B My mistake


Hurray...Now comes the explanation...

B. Citing faulty voting equipment, confusing ballots, voter error, and problems at polling places, a new study of the 2000 United States presidential election has estimated that 4 million to 6 million of the 100 million votes cast were not counted.

D. A new study has cited faulty voting equipment, confusing ballots, voter error, and problems at polling places in estimating that 4 million to 6 million of the 100 million votes that were cast had not been counted in the 2000 United States presidential election.

--> D seems as if the new study is giving an excuse in estimating the loss of votes ( or rather the count of them).

--> B Shows - But instead the new study states that it has estimated a loss of 4-6 million votes on account of X,Y,Z reasons...
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 19 Nov 2007
Posts: 228
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 93 [0], given: 1

Re: SC US elections [#permalink] New post 05 Nov 2009, 03:39
IMO "estimated" should be the main verb rather than "cited". And more over the past perfect tense may not be required.

SO I would go with B
Re: SC US elections   [#permalink] 05 Nov 2009, 03:39
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
9 Experts publish their posts in the topic Faulty voting equipment, confusing ballots, voter error, adn eybrj2 7 03 May 2012, 21:37
SC: VOting equipment hbs2012 4 24 Dec 2008, 14:53
The actual votes cast by incumbent can provide voters with a neeshpal 8 13 Jul 2008, 07:07
5 Faulty voting equipment, confusing ballots, voter error, and suntaurian 5 05 Feb 2008, 09:10
In a school election, if each of the 900 voters voted for johnbaker 3 26 Oct 2007, 17:58
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Faulty voting equipment, confusing ballots, voter error, and

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.