|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 03 Feb 2003
Posts: 1683
Followers: 4
Kudos [?]:
16
[1] , given: 0
|
Federal legislation establishing a fund for the cleanup of [#permalink]
11 Nov 2003, 05:41
1
This post received KUDOS
Question Stats:
16% (01:48) correct
83% (01:20) wrong based on 0 sessions
Federal legislation establishing a fund for the cleanup of sites damaged by
toxic chemicals permits compensating state governments for damage to their natural resources but does not allow claims for injury to people.
(A) compensating state governments for damage to
(B) compensating state governments for the damaging of
(C) giving state governments compensation for damaging
(D) giving compensation to state governments for the damage of
(E) the giving of compensation to state governments for damaging
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 08 Jan 2003
Posts: 143
Location: Ukraine
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
weird and convolute,
seems that D makes a little sense
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 08 Jan 2003
Posts: 143
Location: Ukraine
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
OK,
A
damage FOR in D is stupid indeed
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 11 Nov 2003
Posts: 34
Location: CA
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
E ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 08 Aug 2003
Posts: 92
Location: Moscow, Russia
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
2
[0], given: 0
|
I think that A is the answer
Parallelism:
permits compensating ... FOR damage TO natural resourses
but does not allow claims FOR injury TO people
Am I right?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Status: Completed GMAT on 22 Nov 2011
Joined: 08 Nov 2010
Posts: 167
Followers: 6
Kudos [?]:
32
[0], given: 12
|
Re: SC: Legislation [#permalink]
27 May 2011, 04:44
Most of the old sentence correction questions looks like bouncers (in cricket)  Got stuck between A and D
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Status: 2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 1756
Location: Peru
Schools: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs
Followers: 50
Kudos [?]:
145
[0], given: 108
|
Re: SC: Legislation [#permalink]
27 May 2011, 15:11
+1 A It is more concise. "Giving compensations" is wordy.
_________________
"Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can."
My Integrated Reasoning Logbook / Diary: my-ir-logbook-diary-133264.html
Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: SC: Legislation
[#permalink]
27 May 2011, 15:11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
metallicafan, rajeevrks27, souvik101990, PTK, MacFauz, noboru, kissthegmat, carcass, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, doe007, Vercules, Legendaddy, tuanquang269, Marcab, Narenn, GetThisDone
|