|
Author |
Message |
|
Manager
Joined: 26 May 2004
Posts: 81
Location: knoxville
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
203.With a total population of less than two hundred and fewer breeding females than ever before, the American crocodile seemed a decade ago to be in danger of disappearing.
(A) of less than two hundred and fewer
(B) lower than two hundred and less
(C) lesser than two hundred and fewer
(D) fewer than two hundred and less
(E) of fewer than two hundred and of fewer
In this question population and breeding females both are countable nouns so how to go about this question ....can anyone plz explain ...
thanks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1963
Location: NewJersey USA
Followers: 3
Kudos [?]:
25
[0], given: 0
|
I believe A is right.
Population of less than 100 - correct usage
Fewer than 100 people - correct usage
You cannot always apply the countable vs fewer and
non countable vs less than
English is weird laguage. Just remember the rules of usage.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 25 May 2004
Posts: 308
Location: Ukraine
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
2
[0], given: 0
|
A is right. The total population here is a statistical figure and is used with "less." "Females" is a regular count noun, used in plural. Therefore, it should go with "fewer."
In general, when introducing statistical data, use "less."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
metallicafan, rajeevrks27, Zarrolou, souvik101990, PTK, MacFauz, noboru, kissthegmat, carcass, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, doe007, Vercules, Legendaddy, tuanquang269, RaviChandra, Marcab
|
close
