Findings from several studies on corporate mergers and : GMAT Reading Comprehension (RC)
Check GMAT Club App Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

It is currently 09 Dec 2016, 04:55
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Findings from several studies on corporate mergers and

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 25 Sep 2012
Posts: 12
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Findings from several studies on corporate mergers and [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 May 2013, 19:26
Question 1
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Question Stats:

65% (03:19) correct 35% (01:28) wrong based on 26

HideShow timer Statistics




Question 2
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Question Stats:

46% (02:09) correct 54% (02:03) wrong based on 28

HideShow timer Statistics




Findings from several studies on corporate mergers and acquisitions during the 1970s and 1980s raise questions about why firms initiate and consummate such transactions. One study showed, for example, that acquiring firms were on average unable to maintain acquired firms' pre-merger levels of profitability. A second study concluded that post acquisition gains to most acquiring firms were not adequate to cover the premiums paid to obtain acquired firms. A third demonstrated that, following the announcement of a prospective merger, the stock of the prospective acquiring firm tends to increase in value much less than does that of the firm for which it bids. Yet mergers and acquisitions remain common, and bidders continue to assert that their objectives are economic ones. Acquisitions may well have the desirable effect of channeling a nation's resources efficiently from less to more efficient sectors of its economy, but the individual acquisitions executives arranging these deals must see them as advancing either their own or their companies' private economic interests. It seems that factors having little to do with corporate economic interests explain acquisitions. These factors may include the incentive compensation of executives, lack of monitoring by boards of directors, and managerial error in estimating the value of firms targeted for acquisition. Alternatively, the acquisition acts of bidders may derive from modeling: a manager does what other managers do.
Q11:According to the passage, during the 1970’s and 1980’s bidding firms differed from the firms for which they bid in that bidding firms
A. tended to be more profitable before a merger than after a merger
B. were more often concerned about the impact of acquisitions on national economies
C. were run by managers whose actions were modeled on those of other managers
D. anticipated greater economic advantages from prospective mergers
E. experienced less of an increase in stock value when a prospective merger was announced
[Reveal] Spoiler:
E


Q12:It can inferred from the passage that the author would be most likely to agree with which of the following statements about corporate acquisitions?
A. Their known benefits to national economies explain their appeal to individual firms during the 1970’s and 1980’s.
B. Despite their adverse impact on some firms, they are the best way to channel resources from less to more productive sectors of a nation’s economy.
C. They are as likely to occur because of poor monitoring by boards of directors as to be caused by incentive compensation for managers.
D. They will be less prevalent in the future, since their actual effects will gain wider recognition.
E. Factors other than economic benefit to the acquiring firm help to explain the frequency with which they occur.
[Reveal] Spoiler:
E


Q13:The author of the passage implies that which of the following is a possible partial explanation for acquisition behavior during the 1970’s and 1980’s?
A. Managers wished to imitate other managers primarily because they saw how financially beneficial other firms’ acquisitions were.
B. Managers miscalculated the value of firms that were to be acquired.
C. Lack of consensus within boards of directors resulted in their imposing conflicting goals on managers.
D. Total compensation packages for managers increased during that period.
E. The value of bidding firms’ stock increased significantly when prospective mergers were announced.


[Reveal] Spoiler:
B




For Q12, B is clearly stated in line no 17 but I am surprised to see the answer as E/

PLease explain
[Reveal] Spoiler: Question #1 OA
[Reveal] Spoiler: Question #2 OA
Request Expert Reply
If you have any questions
you can ask an expert
New!
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Posts: 10
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 7

Re: Confused between B/E [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 May 2013, 21:55
RP:

Just to answer to your query first:

B. is too strong a statement. although line no 17 says, "Acquisitions may well have the desirable effect of channeling a nation's resources efficiently from less to more efficientsectors of its economy", it does not mean "they are the best way to channel resources....". Here the word "best way" in my opinion has negated that option.

coming back to the rest of the options.

A. there is no such mention of "benefit to national economies", its just a relative comparison of national and self interests.

C. I have my doubts on this answer. i went with this.

D. clearly NOT.

E. i opted out of this answer because there in no mention in the passage about the "frequency of acquisition".

IMO C.

please someone explain why E ??
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 27 Aug 2011
Posts: 16
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 60

Re: Confused between B/E [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 May 2013, 23:09
C is incorrect since while both the reasons are the causes of mergers and acquisitions no mention is given of the equal likelihood. E correctly states the crux of the passage that factors other economics are responsible for the popularity of mergers and acquisitions
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 27 Aug 2011
Posts: 16
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 60

Re: Confused between B/E [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 May 2013, 23:18
C is incorrect since while both the reasons are the causes of mergers and acquisitions no mention is given of the equal likelihood. E correctly states the crux of the passage that factors other economics are responsible for the popularity of mergers and acquisitions
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 14 Aug 2012
Posts: 13
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 11

Re: Confused between B/E [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 May 2013, 23:05
rajmatthew wrote:
C is incorrect since while both the reasons are the causes of mergers and acquisitions no mention is given of the equal likelihood. E correctly states the crux of the passage that factors other economics are responsible for the popularity of mergers and acquisitions


I am still confused between C and E. while C refers to likelihood which is not directly mentioned in the passage anywhere, E talks about frequency of acquisitions, which is also not directly mentioned in the passage. How does E stand correct then?
Even the explanation given in OG does not seems satisfactory.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 27 Aug 2011
Posts: 16
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 60

Re: Confused between B/E [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 May 2013, 06:00
The term common is used in the passage which refers to frequency Hope this clarifies why E.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 09 Sep 2014
Posts: 10
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 3

Re: Findings from several studies on corporate mergers and [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Nov 2016, 20:23
Well, the passage seemed easy to me even though I am terrible at 700+ RCs.

Q11:According to the passage, during the 1970’s and 1980’s bidding firms differed from the firms for which they bid in that bidding firms
A. tended to be more profitable before a merger than after a merger
B. were more often concerned about the impact of acquisitions on national economies
C. were run by managers whose actions were modeled on those of other managers
D. anticipated greater economic advantages from prospective mergers
E. experienced less of an increase in stock value when a prospective merger was announced
It's obvious because the author states:
A third demonstrated that, following the announcement of a prospective merger, the stock of the prospective acquiring firm tends to increase in value much less than does that of the firm for which it bids.



Q12:It can inferred from the passage that the author would be most likely to agree with which of the following statements about corporate acquisitions?
A. Their known benefits to national economies explain their appeal to individual firms during the 1970’s and 1980’s.
B. Despite their adverse impact on some firms, they are the best way to channel resources from less to more productive sectors of a nation’s economy.
C. They are as likely to occur because of poor monitoring by boards of directors as to be caused by incentive compensation for managers.
D. They will be less prevalent in the future, since their actual effects will gain wider recognition.
E. Factors other than economic benefit to the acquiring firm help to explain the frequency with which they occur.
An easy one too. According the passage:
It seems that factors (the author means economic factors, stated in the previous sentence) having little to do with corporate economic interests explain acquisitions. These factors may include the incentive compensation of executives, lack of monitoring by boards of directors, and managerial error in estimating the value of firms targeted for acquisition.


Q13:The author of the passage implies that which of the following is a possible partial explanation for acquisition behavior during the 1970’s and 1980’s?
A. Managers wished to imitate other managers primarily because they saw how financially beneficial other firms’ acquisitions were.
B. Managers miscalculated the value of firms that were to be acquired.
According to the passage:
These factors may include the incentive compensation of executives, lack of monitoring by boards of directors, and managerial error in estimating the value of firms targeted for acquisition.
managerial error in estimating the value of firms targeted for acquisition = Managers miscalculated the value of firms that were to be acquired
C. Lack of consensus within boards of directors resulted in their imposing conflicting goals on managers.
D. Total compensation packages for managers increased during that period.
E. The value of bidding firms’ stock increased significantly when prospective mergers were announced.
Re: Findings from several studies on corporate mergers and   [#permalink] 13 Nov 2016, 20:23
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
14 Experts publish their posts in the topic Findings from several studies on corporate mergers daagh 14 12 Oct 2013, 10:50
4 In corporate purchasing, competitive scrutiny is typically ankit0411 4 30 Sep 2012, 01:19
32 Experts publish their posts in the topic The modern multinational corporation is described as having kraizada84 23 01 Apr 2012, 18:50
8 As the economic role of multinational, global corporations anilnandyala 16 07 Nov 2010, 18:57
multinational corporation nevergiveup 1 29 Jul 2009, 17:45
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Findings from several studies on corporate mergers and

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.