Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 16 Apr 2014, 00:09

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Findings from several studies on corporate mergers and

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
Joined: 04 Dec 2005
Posts: 79
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Findings from several studies on corporate mergers and [#permalink] New post 18 Oct 2006, 05:32
This passage is discussed in details at the below mentioned link
findings-from-several-studies-on-corporate-mergers-and-acqui-151985.html#p1219391


Findings from several studies on
corporate mergers and acquisitions
during the 1970’s and 1980’s raise
Line questions about why firms initiate and
(5) consummate such transactions. One
study showed, for example, that acquiring
firms were on average unable to
maintain acquired firms’ pre-merger
levels of profitability. A second study
(10) concluded that post-acquisition gains
to most acquiring firms were not adequate
to cover the premiums paid
to obtain acquired firms. A third
demonstrated that, following the
(15) announcement of a prospective
merger, the stock of the prospective
acquiring firm tends to increase in
value much less than does that of
the firm for which it bids. Yet merg-
(20) ers and acquisitions remain common,
and bidders continue to assert that
their objectives are economic ones.
Acquisitions may well have the desirable
effect of channeling a nation’s
23
(25) resources efficiently from less to
more efficient sectors of its economy,
but the individual acquisitions executives
arranging these deals must see
them as advancing either their own or
(30) their companies’ private economic
interests. It seems that factors having
little to do with corporate economic
interests explain acquisitions. These
factors may include the incentive
(35) compensation of executives, lack
of monitoring by boards of directors,
and managerial error in estimating the
value of firms targeted for acquisition.
Alternatively, the acquisition acts of
(40) bidders may derive from modeling:
a manager does what other managers
do.

Q11:
According to the passage, during the 1970’s and 1980’s bidding firms differed from the
firms for which they bid in that bidding firms
A. tended to be more profitable before a merger than after a merger
B. were more often concerned about the impact of acquisitions on national
economies
C. were run by managers whose actions were modeled on those of other managers
D. anticipated greater economic advantages from prospective mergers
E. experienced less of an increase in stock value when a prospective merger was
announced
Answer:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q12:
It can inferred from the passage that the author would be most likely to agree with which
of the following statements about corporate acquisitions?
A. Their known benefits to national economies explain their appeal to individual
firms during the 1970’s and 1980’s.
B. Despite their adverse impact on some firms, they are the best way to channel
resources from less to more productive sectors of a nation’s economy.
C. They are as likely to occur because of poor monitoring by boards of directors as
to be caused by incentive compensation for managers.
D. They will be less prevalent in the future, since their actual effects will gain wider
recognition.
E. Factors other than economic benefit to the acquiring firm help to explain the
frequency with which they occur.
23
Answer:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q13:
The author of the passage implies that which of the following is a possible partial
explanation for acquisition behavior during the 1970’s and 1980’s?
A. Managers wished to imitate other managers primarily because they saw how
financially beneficial other firms’ acquisitions were.
B. Managers miscalculated the value of firms that were to be acquired.
C. Lack of consensus within boards of directors resulted in their imposing
conflicting goals on managers.
D. Total compensation packages for managers increased during that period.
E. The value of bidding firms’ stock increased significantly when prospective
mergers were announced.
Answer:

*****I do not know what i was thinking or what i understood, but got all the selected answers wrong.******
Kaplan GMAT Prep Discount CodesKnewton GMAT Discount CodesVeritas Prep GMAT Discount Codes
Director
Director
Joined: 17 Jul 2006
Posts: 716
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 18 Oct 2006, 12:54
Q11 C

Q12 B

Q13 C
Intern
Intern
Joined: 02 Sep 2006
Posts: 14
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 18 Oct 2006, 16:28
D, E, B
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 13 Jul 2006
Posts: 327
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 18 Oct 2006, 16:38
E---->isn't that explicitly stated in the passage.
E--->the whole passage is meant to convy that.
B---->one of the reasons given by the author of the passage
_________________

A well-balanced person is one who has a drink in each of his hands.

Director
Director
Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 847
GMAT 1: 740 Q48 V42
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 1

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 18 Oct 2006, 16:48
Q11: E
Q12: E
Q13: B

Q11
A. tended to be more profitable before a merger than after a merger
- not mentioned in the paragraph.
B. were more often concerned about the impact of acquisitions on national
economies
- not directly mentioned.
C. were run by managers whose actions were modeled on those of other managers
- same as B
D. anticipated greater economic advantages from prospective mergers
- they *only* say that they expect economic advantages from mergers.
E. experienced less of an increase in stock value when a prospective merger was announced
- this is the result of the third study cited. MY CHOICE

Q12:
It can inferred from the passage that the author would be most likely to agree with which
of the following statements about corporate acquisitions?
A. Their known benefits to national economies explain their appeal to individual firms during the 1970’s and 1980’s.
-Lines 23-26 actually argue against this claim. OUT

B. Despite their adverse impact on some firms, they are the best way to channel resources from less to more productive sectors of a nation’s economy.

- It may be one of the ways but nowhere does it say it is the *best* way. OUT

C. They are as likely to occur because of poor monitoring by boards of directors as to be caused by incentive compensation for managers.
- these are likely causes, but are NOT compared in the paragraph OUT

D. They will be less prevalent in the future, since their actual effects will gain wider recognition.
-no such conclusion is provided OUT

E. Factors other than economic benefit to the acquiring firm help to explain the frequency with which they occur.
-Lines 31-33 clearly state this. MY CHOICE

Q13

Lines 37 & 38 clearly state this.
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 25 Jun 2006
Posts: 1180
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 18 Oct 2006, 17:59
E
C
B.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 13 May 2010
Posts: 124
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 4

GMAT Tests User
Re: Findings from several studies on corporate mergers and [#permalink] New post 21 Feb 2012, 18:28
In last question # 13 which is about the partial explanation for acquisition behavior; I really don't don't understand this one. OA is B.....why can't it be d?

Are findings of studies (listed in the passage) possible explanations of Mergers or are these findings possible objections to the mergers?

"possible partial explanation" - does this refer to economic reasons or non- economic reasons mentioned by the author in the end of the passage?
Re: Findings from several studies on corporate mergers and   [#permalink] 21 Feb 2012, 18:28
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts Unlike the most corporate mergers, which are driven by the peergmatclub 1 28 Jun 2008, 11:29
Popular new posts 1 A recent study of epidemiological data from the past several angel2009 10 19 Sep 2009, 08:17
Popular new posts 7 Experts publish their posts in the topic Large corporations use several strategies to minimize their carcass 20 02 Apr 2013, 14:14
New posts Findings from several studies on corporate mergers and RuturajPatil 5 01 May 2013, 19:26
New posts 1 Experts publish their posts in the topic Findings from several studies on corporate mergers daagh 4 12 Oct 2013, 10:50
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Findings from several studies on corporate mergers and

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.