Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 23 May 2013, 04:06
Customize  |  Hide

Fish currently costs about the same at seafood stores

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 155
WE 1: 4 years in IT
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 7

Fish currently costs about the same at seafood stores [#permalink] New post 10 Oct 2010, 04:55
00:00

Question Stats:

66% (02:53) correct 33% (02:31) wrong based on 0 sessions
Fish currently costs about the same at seafood stores throughout Eastville and its
surrounding suburbs. Seafood stores buy fish from the same wholesalers and at the
same prices, and other business expenses have also been about the same. But new tax
breaks will substantially lower the cost of doing business within the city. Therefore, in
the future, profit margins will be higher at seafood stores within the city than at
suburban seafood stores.
For the purposes of evaluating the argument, it would be most useful to know
whether.
(A)more fish wholesalers are located within the city than in the surrounding suburbs.
(B) Any people who currently own seafood stores in the suburbs surrounding Eastville
will relocate their businesses nearer to the city
(C) The wholesale price of fish is likely to fall in the future
(D)Fish has always cost about the same at seafood stores throughout Eastville and its
surrounding suburbs.
(E) Seafood stores within the city will in the future set prices that are lower than those
at suburban seafood stores.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Status: Time to step up the tempo
Joined: 24 Jun 2010
Posts: 420
Location: Milky way
Schools: ISB, Tepper - CMU, Chicago Booth, LSB
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 75 [0], given: 50

GMAT Tests User
Re: evaluate the argument [#permalink] New post 10 Oct 2010, 08:05
raghavs wrote:
Fish currently costs about the same at seafood stores throughout Eastville and its
surrounding suburbs. Seafood stores buy fish from the same wholesalers and at the
same prices, and other business expenses have also been about the same. But new tax
breaks will substantially lower the cost of doing business within the city. Therefore, in
the future, profit margins will be higher at seafood stores within the city than at
suburban seafood stores.
For the purposes of evaluating the argument, it would be most useful to know
whether.
(A)more fish wholesalers are located within the city than in the surrounding suburbs.
(B) Any people who currently own seafood stores in the suburbs surrounding Eastville
will relocate their businesses nearer to the city
(C) The wholesale price of fish is likely to fall in the future
(D)Fish has always cost about the same at seafood stores throughout Eastville and its
surrounding suburbs.
(E) Seafood stores within the city will in the future set prices that are lower than those
at suburban seafood stores.


Conclusion: In the future, profit margins will be higher at seafood stores within the city than at
suburban seafood stores.

Narrowed down between option C and E. Option C statement if true will impact both the city and suburban seafood stores equally. Only option E brings in additional information that helps us further evaluate the argument put forth.
_________________

:good Support GMAT Club by putting a GMAT Club badge on your blog :thanks

Manager
Manager
Joined: 17 Apr 2010
Posts: 115
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 12

GMAT ToolKit User GMAT Tests User
Re: evaluate the argument [#permalink] New post 10 Oct 2010, 10:49
Agree with E

Posted from my mobile device Image
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 25 Feb 2010
Posts: 457
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 5

GMAT Tests User
Re: evaluate the argument [#permalink] New post 10 Oct 2010, 13:12
I'd go E...
The fluctuation of earnings and costs affect profit margin.
The stimulus makes a comparison between a suburban fish business and urban fish business and states that their costs are equal. However, a tax break substantially lowers cost of business in the city, which widens the profit margin for the city seafood store.
The conclusion affirms, "in the future profit margins will be higher in the city" but that's only if city restaurants do nothing to affect their earnings. Lowering price could close the differential margin that the tax break creates for the city business. So we'd need to ascertain that the city fish restaurant does not do that in the future.
_________________

GGG (Gym / GMAT / Girl) -- Be Serious

Its your duty to post OA afterwards; some one must be waiting for that...

Re: evaluate the argument   [#permalink] 10 Oct 2010, 13:12
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Popular new posts 2 EXPERTS_POSTS_IN_THIS_TOPIC A store currently charges the same price for each towel that chiragr 30 15 Jun 2006, 17:36
Popular new posts Fish currently costs about the same at seafood stores rkatl 15 23 Sep 2006, 08:36
Popular new posts 7 Fish currently costs about the same at seafood stores goalsnr 48 27 May 2008, 19:09
Popular new posts 5 To meet the rapid rising market demand for fish and seafood, judokan 40 03 Aug 2008, 00:07
New posts EXPERTS_POSTS_IN_THIS_TOPIC A store currently charges the same price for each towel that Walkabout 1 27 Dec 2012, 05:47
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Fish currently costs about the same at seafood stores

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.