Fish currently costs about the same at seafood stores : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR) - Page 2
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 19 Jan 2017, 10:05

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Fish currently costs about the same at seafood stores

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Director
Joined: 21 Dec 2009
Posts: 591
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Finance
Followers: 18

Kudos [?]: 662 [0], given: 20

### Show Tags

10 Jun 2010, 07:44
Currently, the profits are the same for stores both in the city and suburbs.
But for the tax breaks in the city, the margin would still remain the same since other expenses
are equal. To maintain the this edge in profit (while maintaining fixed expenses in other areas),
the prices at both locations need be the same;

If the price in the city is further reduced, then there is a guaranty that the profit margin would
remain higher in the city.
_________________

KUDOS me if you feel my contribution has helped you.

Intern
Joined: 21 May 2010
Posts: 2
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

10 Jun 2010, 07:45
mohansrinivas wrote:
My answer would be D. Profit margin is nothing but ( Profit / revenue ) * 100.
If the fish selling stores maintain the same price, then certainly profit margin increases.
I am not convinced with the answer choice 'E'.
Could anyone explain me why the answer is not 'D'.

I am convinced with your explanation. thanks.
Director
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 997
Location: Singapore
Followers: 22

Kudos [?]: 747 [0], given: 36

### Show Tags

13 Jun 2010, 10:44
Fish currently costs about the same at seafood stores throughout Eastville and its surrounding suburbs.

Only E talks about the SP not being same.
_________________

Please press kudos if you like my post.

Intern
Joined: 30 Aug 2009
Posts: 26
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 3

### Show Tags

14 Jun 2010, 08:08
D does not refer to the conclusion. It states facts about the past, while the conclusion refers to the future. Therefore, it would be interesting to know, if, in the future, prices in the city are lower than in the subs, which would tackle the conclusion directly.

=> E
SVP
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 1558
Followers: 19

Kudos [?]: 577 [0], given: 6

### Show Tags

19 Jun 2010, 15:27
If wholesale price was 100
and price set was 130 in the past then
profit margin was (price set - wholesale price) = 130 - 100 = 30

So if we bring the price set down (say 120) and wholesale price being same (100)
then that will be bring the profit down (120-100) = 20

Then how does bringing the prices down help with the profit margin?

Can someone please explain what I am misisng here?
Intern
Joined: 30 Aug 2009
Posts: 26
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 3

### Show Tags

24 Jun 2010, 01:48
(You're missing the tax deduction.)

But that's not really relevant. The conclusion is, that profit margins will be higher. To assess whether that's true, it would help to know if city stores reduce there prices to keep the profit margin the same (since they have lower costs). If they do, the conclusion is challenged in that profit margins won't be higher in the city.
Manager
Joined: 12 Jul 2010
Posts: 67
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 3

### Show Tags

13 Aug 2010, 03:06
It should be E!
Senior Manager
Status: Fighting on
Joined: 14 Mar 2010
Posts: 318
Schools: UCLA (R1 interview-WL), UNC(R2--interview-ding) Oxford(R2-Admit), Kelley (R2- Admit ), McCombs(R2)
WE 1: SE - 1
WE 2: Engineer - 3
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 3

### Show Tags

13 Aug 2010, 05:28
E for me as that's the only choice that is important to consider in evaluating the argument. If the price of fish lowers the profit margin will be impacted.

Posted from my mobile device
Manager
Joined: 24 Dec 2009
Posts: 224
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 3

### Show Tags

13 Aug 2010, 07:41
E for me.
Senior Manager
Joined: 14 Jun 2010
Posts: 333
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 7

### Show Tags

15 Aug 2010, 00:16
E it should be!
Manager
Joined: 29 Dec 2009
Posts: 122
Location: india
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 10

### Show Tags

18 Aug 2010, 01:38
E FOR ME
Manager
Joined: 29 Sep 2008
Posts: 146
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 105 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

09 Jun 2011, 07:34
E
Intern
Joined: 20 Apr 2011
Posts: 44
Location: United Kingdom
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 9

### Show Tags

10 Jun 2011, 02:28
E for me as well.
Good question realy.
Manager
Joined: 04 Apr 2010
Posts: 162
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 174 [0], given: 31

### Show Tags

10 Jun 2011, 05:50
E is the very clear answer.
_________________

Consider me giving KUDOS, if you find my post helpful.
If at first you don't succeed, you're running about average. ~Anonymous

Intern
Joined: 04 Jun 2011
Posts: 36
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 46 [0], given: 61

### Show Tags

10 Jun 2011, 06:17
great stuff all around. have a great friday everyone - lets all kill the GMAT prep this weekend. 20+ hours!
Manager
Joined: 09 Feb 2010
Posts: 70
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 89 [0], given: 4

### Show Tags

10 Jun 2011, 06:37
I don't get how E is the answer

Lets say cost in Eastville was 10$and also in suburbs Due to lower taxes cost became 9$ for the city and remained 10$for suburbs Now profit =Selling Price-Cost Price For city if Selling Price=20 then Profit would be 20-9=11 FOr suburbs Selling Price =20 then Profit would be 20-10=10 Hence Profit for city is higher even if the Selling Price is the same as suburbs Now if I decrease the Selling Price in the city Lets say is 19 then profit would be 19-9=10 so the profit will decrease Am i missing a point here ?? Math Forum Moderator Joined: 20 Dec 2010 Posts: 2021 Followers: 161 Kudos [?]: 1705 [3] , given: 376 Re: CR-Fish stores [#permalink] ### Show Tags 10 Jun 2011, 07:13 3 This post received KUDOS zest4mba wrote: I don't get how E is the answer Lets say cost in Eastville was 10$ and also in suburbs

Due to lower taxes cost became 9 $for the city and remained 10$ for suburbs

Now profit =Selling Price-Cost Price

For city if Selling Price=20 then Profit would be 20-9=11
FOr suburbs Selling Price =20 then Profit would be 20-10=10

Hence Profit for city is higher even if the Selling Price is the same as suburbs

Now if I decrease the Selling Price in the city

Lets say is 19 then profit would be 19-9=10 so the profit will decrease

Am i missing a point here ??

There is nothing wrong with your interpretation. Let's see what question is trying to ask:

Question is asking which option will help us weigh the authenticity of author's conclusion.

Author's conclusion:
Because the city's fish sellers will have to pay lower taxes than sub-urban fish sellers, doing business in the city will be more profitable.

E says: Let me check the validity of the conclusion:

Evaluation:
Whether the city sellers will be forced/obliged to set a price much lower than the sub-urban sellers' price?

Ans: Yes!! Really, the conclusion is baseless then because I know I won't make profit if I set up my business in the city, for I will have to sell my fishes at a much lower price. Even though I will pay lower taxes, what's the use if I make less profit on sale.

Ans: No!! Wow, that's wonderful. I will surely set up my shop in the city because the conclusion was indeed true. Now, I can sell the fishes at the same price as sub-urban sellers do. Plus, I pay less taxes than them. Surely, I will make more profits.

You saw how the evaluation question proposed in the statement E helped us validate author's conclusion.

E is the best answer choice.
_________________
Intern
Joined: 30 Jul 2009
Posts: 20
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 3

### Show Tags

10 Jun 2011, 07:36
Because it's all about the profit margin, answer explicitly has to state the difference in either price (taking cost to do business is same) or cost (taking price is same) for those 2 locations.

(A) More fish wholesalers are located within the city than in the surrounding suburbs. No Price or Cost
(B) Any people who currently own seafood stores in the suburbs surrounding Eastville will relocate their businesses nearer to the city. No Price or Cost
(C) The wholesale price of fish is likely to fall in the future Still NO
(D) Fish has always cost about the same at seafood stores throughout Eastville and its surrounding suburbs Still NO
(E) Seafood stores within the city will in the future set prices that are lower than those at suburban seafood stores BINGO!!!
Manager
Joined: 09 Feb 2010
Posts: 70
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 89 [0], given: 4

### Show Tags

10 Jun 2011, 10:24
thanks a lot fluke !! Your explanation is spot on !!

I am reading POWERSCORE BIBLE and i bet this way of approaching the questions must have come from there. I still have to read the chapter "Evaluate the argument"

thanks !!
Math Forum Moderator
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 2021
Followers: 161

Kudos [?]: 1705 [0], given: 376

### Show Tags

10 Jun 2011, 10:33
zest4mba wrote:
thanks a lot fluke !! Your explanation is spot on !!

I am reading POWERSCORE BIBLE and i bet this way of approaching the questions must have come from there. I still have to read the chapter "Evaluate the argument"

thanks !!

you won the bet buddy.... a lot of it is POWERSCORE CR BIBLE's gift indeed...
_________________
Re: CR-Fish stores   [#permalink] 10 Jun 2011, 10:33

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3    Next  [ 57 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
The fishing industry cannot currently be relied upon to help the gover 2 16 Dec 2016, 18:12
1 Seafood restaurants in Snare Island generally... 1 02 Oct 2013, 21:18
1 Fish currently costs about the same at seafood stores 5 10 Oct 2010, 03:55
1 Fresh potatoes generally cost about $2 for a 10-pound bag, 7 12 Jun 2008, 14:38 Fresh potatoes generally cost about$2 for a 10-pound bag, 6 09 Jan 2008, 10:48
Display posts from previous: Sort by