Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 20 Aug 2014, 12:44

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Fish currently costs about the same at seafood stores

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 21 Dec 2009
Posts: 588
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Finance
Followers: 15

Kudos [?]: 247 [0], given: 20

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR-Fish stores [#permalink] New post 10 Jun 2010, 07:44
Currently, the profits are the same for stores both in the city and suburbs.
But for the tax breaks in the city, the margin would still remain the same since other expenses
are equal. To maintain the this edge in profit (while maintaining fixed expenses in other areas),
the prices at both locations need be the same;

If the price in the city is further reduced, then there is a guaranty that the profit margin would
remain higher in the city.
_________________

KUDOS me if you feel my contribution has helped you.

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 21 May 2010
Posts: 2
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: CR-Fish stores [#permalink] New post 10 Jun 2010, 07:45
mohansrinivas wrote:
My answer would be D. Profit margin is nothing but ( Profit / revenue ) * 100.
If the fish selling stores maintain the same price, then certainly profit margin increases.
I am not convinced with the answer choice 'E'.
Could anyone explain me why the answer is not 'D'.



I am convinced with your explanation. thanks.
Director
Director
avatar
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: Chicago Booth Class of 2015
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 995
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 387 [0], given: 36

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR-Fish stores [#permalink] New post 13 Jun 2010, 10:44
Fish currently costs about the same at seafood stores throughout Eastville and its surrounding suburbs.

Only E talks about the SP not being same.
_________________

Please press kudos if you like my post.

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 30 Aug 2009
Posts: 26
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 3

Re: CR-Fish stores [#permalink] New post 14 Jun 2010, 08:08
D does not refer to the conclusion. It states facts about the past, while the conclusion refers to the future. Therefore, it would be interesting to know, if, in the future, prices in the city are lower than in the subs, which would tackle the conclusion directly.

=> E
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 1563
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 201 [0], given: 6

Re: CR-Fish stores [#permalink] New post 19 Jun 2010, 15:27
If wholesale price was 100
and price set was 130 in the past then
profit margin was (price set - wholesale price) = 130 - 100 = 30

So if we bring the price set down (say 120) and wholesale price being same (100)
then that will be bring the profit down (120-100) = 20

Then how does bringing the prices down help with the profit margin?

Can someone please explain what I am misisng here?
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 30 Aug 2009
Posts: 26
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 3

Re: CR-Fish stores [#permalink] New post 24 Jun 2010, 01:48
(You're missing the tax deduction.)

But that's not really relevant. The conclusion is, that profit margins will be higher. To assess whether that's true, it would help to know if city stores reduce there prices to keep the profit margin the same (since they have lower costs). If they do, the conclusion is challenged in that profit margins won't be higher in the city.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Jul 2010
Posts: 67
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 3

Re: CR-Fish stores [#permalink] New post 13 Aug 2010, 03:06
It should be E!
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Status: Fighting on
Joined: 14 Mar 2010
Posts: 318
Schools: UCLA (R1 interview-WL), UNC(R2--interview-ding) Oxford(R2-Admit), Kelley (R2- Admit $$), McCombs(R2)
WE 1: SE - 1
WE 2: Engineer - 3
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 3

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR-Fish stores [#permalink] New post 13 Aug 2010, 05:28
E for me as that's the only choice that is important to consider in evaluating the argument. If the price of fish lowers the profit margin will be impacted.

Posted from my mobile device Image
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Dec 2009
Posts: 227
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 3

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR-Fish stores [#permalink] New post 13 Aug 2010, 07:41
E for me.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 14 Jun 2010
Posts: 334
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 7

Re: CR-Fish stores [#permalink] New post 15 Aug 2010, 00:16
E it should be!
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Dec 2009
Posts: 122
Location: india
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 10

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR-Fish stores [#permalink] New post 18 Aug 2010, 01:38
E FOR ME
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Sep 2008
Posts: 154
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 1

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR-Fish stores [#permalink] New post 09 Jun 2011, 07:34
E
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 20 Apr 2011
Posts: 44
Location: United Kingdom
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 9

Re: CR-Fish stores [#permalink] New post 10 Jun 2011, 02:28
E for me as well.
Good question realy.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 04 Apr 2010
Posts: 166
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 51 [0], given: 31

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR-Fish stores [#permalink] New post 10 Jun 2011, 05:50
E is the very clear answer.
_________________

Consider me giving KUDOS, if you find my post helpful.
If at first you don't succeed, you're running about average. ~Anonymous

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 04 Jun 2011
Posts: 36
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 61

Re: CR-Fish stores [#permalink] New post 10 Jun 2011, 06:17
great stuff all around. have a great friday everyone - lets all kill the GMAT prep this weekend. 20+ hours!
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 09 Feb 2010
Posts: 71
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 4

Re: CR-Fish stores [#permalink] New post 10 Jun 2011, 06:37
I don't get how E is the answer

Lets say cost in Eastville was 10$ and also in suburbs

Due to lower taxes cost became 9 $ for the city and remained 10$ for suburbs

Now profit =Selling Price-Cost Price

For city if Selling Price=20 then Profit would be 20-9=11
FOr suburbs Selling Price =20 then Profit would be 20-10=10

Hence Profit for city is higher even if the Selling Price is the same as suburbs

Now if I decrease the Selling Price in the city

Lets say is 19 then profit would be 19-9=10 so the profit will decrease

Am i missing a point here ??
2 KUDOS received
Math Forum Moderator
avatar
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 2048
Followers: 128

Kudos [?]: 898 [2] , given: 376

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR-Fish stores [#permalink] New post 10 Jun 2011, 07:13
2
This post received
KUDOS
zest4mba wrote:
I don't get how E is the answer

Lets say cost in Eastville was 10$ and also in suburbs

Due to lower taxes cost became 9 $ for the city and remained 10$ for suburbs

Now profit =Selling Price-Cost Price

For city if Selling Price=20 then Profit would be 20-9=11
FOr suburbs Selling Price =20 then Profit would be 20-10=10

Hence Profit for city is higher even if the Selling Price is the same as suburbs

Now if I decrease the Selling Price in the city

Lets say is 19 then profit would be 19-9=10 so the profit will decrease

Am i missing a point here ??


There is nothing wrong with your interpretation. Let's see what question is trying to ask:

Question is asking which option will help us weigh the authenticity of author's conclusion.

Author's conclusion:
Because the city's fish sellers will have to pay lower taxes than sub-urban fish sellers, doing business in the city will be more profitable.

E says: Let me check the validity of the conclusion:

Evaluation:
Whether the city sellers will be forced/obliged to set a price much lower than the sub-urban sellers' price?

Ans: Yes!! Really, the conclusion is baseless then because I know I won't make profit if I set up my business in the city, for I will have to sell my fishes at a much lower price. Even though I will pay lower taxes, what's the use if I make less profit on sale.

Ans: No!! Wow, that's wonderful. I will surely set up my shop in the city because the conclusion was indeed true. Now, I can sell the fishes at the same price as sub-urban sellers do. Plus, I pay less taxes than them. Surely, I will make more profits.

You saw how the evaluation question proposed in the statement E helped us validate author's conclusion.

E is the best answer choice.
_________________

~fluke

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 30 Jul 2009
Posts: 20
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 3

Re: CR-Fish stores [#permalink] New post 10 Jun 2011, 07:36
Because it's all about the profit margin, answer explicitly has to state the difference in either price (taking cost to do business is same) or cost (taking price is same) for those 2 locations.

(A) More fish wholesalers are located within the city than in the surrounding suburbs. No Price or Cost
(B) Any people who currently own seafood stores in the suburbs surrounding Eastville will relocate their businesses nearer to the city. No Price or Cost
(C) The wholesale price of fish is likely to fall in the future Still NO
(D) Fish has always cost about the same at seafood stores throughout Eastville and its surrounding suburbs Still NO
(E) Seafood stores within the city will in the future set prices that are lower than those at suburban seafood stores BINGO!!!
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 09 Feb 2010
Posts: 71
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 4

Re: CR-Fish stores [#permalink] New post 10 Jun 2011, 10:24
thanks a lot fluke !! Your explanation is spot on !!

I am reading POWERSCORE BIBLE and i bet this way of approaching the questions must have come from there. I still have to read the chapter "Evaluate the argument"

thanks !!
Math Forum Moderator
avatar
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 2048
Followers: 128

Kudos [?]: 898 [0], given: 376

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR-Fish stores [#permalink] New post 10 Jun 2011, 10:33
zest4mba wrote:
thanks a lot fluke !! Your explanation is spot on !!

I am reading POWERSCORE BIBLE and i bet this way of approaching the questions must have come from there. I still have to read the chapter "Evaluate the argument"

thanks !!


you won the bet buddy..:).. a lot of it is POWERSCORE CR BIBLE's gift indeed...
_________________

~fluke

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Re: CR-Fish stores   [#permalink] 10 Jun 2011, 10:33
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
13 Experts publish their posts in the topic A store currently charges the same price for each towel that Walkabout 8 27 Dec 2012, 04:47
Fish currently costs about the same at seafood stores raghavs 3 10 Oct 2010, 03:55
7 To meet the rapid rising market demand for fish and seafood, judokan 43 02 Aug 2008, 23:07
Fish currently costs about the same at seafood stores rkatl 15 23 Sep 2006, 07:36
6 Experts publish their posts in the topic A store currently charges the same price for each towel that chiragr 30 15 Jun 2006, 16:36
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Fish currently costs about the same at seafood stores

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3    Next  [ 53 posts ] 



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.