Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Five peices of wood have an average length of 124 inches and [#permalink]

Show Tags

20 Nov 2011, 04:49

3

This post received KUDOS

13

This post was BOOKMARKED

00:00

A

B

C

D

E

Difficulty:

35% (medium)

Question Stats:

69% (02:22) correct
31% (01:43) wrong based on 563 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

5 peices of wood have an average length of 124 inches and a median of 140 inches. What is the MAX possible length of the shortest piece of wood? A. 90 B. 100 C. 110 D. 130 E. 140

Apologies blink005, if I am getting this wrong. But how did you get this?

The minimum possible values of L4 and L5 could be 140, hence the L1+L2 = 620 - 420 = 200.

Below is step by step analysis of this question. Hope it helps.

5 peices of wood have an average length of 124 inches and a median of 140 inches. What is the MAX possible length of the shortest piece of wood? A. 90 B. 100 C. 110 D. 130 E. 140

Given: 5 peices of wood have an average length of 124 inches --> total length = 124*5=620. Also median = 140.

If a set has odd number of terms the median of a set is the middle number when arranged in ascending or descending order; If a set has even number of terms the median of a set is the average of the two middle terms when arranged in ascending or descending order.

As we have odd # of pieces then 3rd largest piece \(x_3=median=140\).

So if we consider the pieces in ascending order of their lengths we would have \(x_1+x_2+140+x_4+x_5=620\).

Question: what is the MAX possible length of the shortest piece of wood? Or \(max(x_1)=?\)

General rule for such kind of problems: to maximize one quantity, minimize the others; to minimize one quantity, maximize the others.

So to maximize \(x_1\) we should minimize \(x_2\), \(x_4\) and \(x_5\). Min length of the second largest piece of wood, \(x_2\) could be equal to \(x_1\) and the min lengths of \(x_4\) and \(x_5\) could be equal to 140 --> \(x_1+x_1+140+140+140=620\) --> \(x_1=100\).

Re: Five peices of wood have an average length of 124 inches and [#permalink]

Show Tags

25 Aug 2013, 02:21

Bunuel wrote:

enigma123 wrote:

Apologies blink005, if I am getting this wrong. But how did you get this?

The minimum possible values of L4 and L5 could be 140, hence the L1+L2 = 620 - 420 = 200.

Below is step by step analysis of this question. Hope it helps.

5 peices of wood have an average length of 124 inches and a median of 140 inches. What is the MAX possible length of the shortest piece of wood? A. 90 B. 100 C. 110 D. 130 E. 140

Given: 5 peices of wood have an average length of 124 inches --> total length = 124*5=620. Also median = 140.

If a set has odd number of terms the median of a set is the middle number when arranged in ascending or descending order; If a set has even number of terms the median of a set is the average of the two middle terms when arranged in ascending or descending order.

As we have odd # of pieces then 3rd largest piece \(x_3=median=140\).

So if we consider the pieces in ascending order of their lengths we would have \(x_1+x_2+140+x_4+x_5=620\).

Question: what is the MAX possible length of the shortest piece of wood? Or \(max(x_1)=?\)

General rule for such kind of problems: to maximize one quantity, minimize the others; to minimize one quantity, maximize the others.

So to maximize \(x_1\) we should minimize \(x_2\), \(x_4\) and \(x_5\). Min length of the second largest piece of wood, \(x_2\) could be equal to \(x_1\) and the min lengths of \(x_4\) and \(x_5\) could be equal to 140 --> \(x_1+x_1+140+140+140=620\) --> \(x_1=100\).

Answer: B.

Why couldn't x4 and x5 be bigger than 140 and thus making x1 and x2 even smaller?

Apologies blink005, if I am getting this wrong. But how did you get this?

The minimum possible values of L4 and L5 could be 140, hence the L1+L2 = 620 - 420 = 200.

Below is step by step analysis of this question. Hope it helps.

5 peices of wood have an average length of 124 inches and a median of 140 inches. What is the MAX possible length of the shortest piece of wood? A. 90 B. 100 C. 110 D. 130 E. 140

Given: 5 peices of wood have an average length of 124 inches --> total length = 124*5=620. Also median = 140.

If a set has odd number of terms the median of a set is the middle number when arranged in ascending or descending order; If a set has even number of terms the median of a set is the average of the two middle terms when arranged in ascending or descending order.

As we have odd # of pieces then 3rd largest piece \(x_3=median=140\).

So if we consider the pieces in ascending order of their lengths we would have \(x_1+x_2+140+x_4+x_5=620\).

Question: what is the MAX possible length of the shortest piece of wood? Or \(max(x_1)=?\)

General rule for such kind of problems: to maximize one quantity, minimize the others; to minimize one quantity, maximize the others.

So to maximize \(x_1\) we should minimize \(x_2\), \(x_4\) and \(x_5\). Min length of the second largest piece of wood, \(x_2\) could be equal to \(x_1\) and the min lengths of \(x_4\) and \(x_5\) could be equal to 140 --> \(x_1+x_1+140+140+140=620\) --> \(x_1=100\).

Answer: B.

Why couldn't x4 and x5 be bigger than 140 and thus making x1 and x2 even smaller?

We want to maximize \(x_1\), not to minimize.

Next, \(x_4\) and \(x_5\) cannot be less than the median, which is 140.
_________________

Re: Five peices of wood have an average length of 124 inches and [#permalink]

Show Tags

12 Jul 2014, 11:22

We can find the total length to be as 620 a+b+c+d+e = 620 Since the number of pipes is 5, the median is the middle number ie c. (c=140) a+b+d+e = 480 to find the max length of the smallest pipe. we should look to find the minimum length of other 3 pipes (we are already given length of one of the pipes ,c=140). d=e=140 ( we assume d and e to be 140 as it is given the median is 140 )

Re: Five peices of wood have an average length of 124 inches and [#permalink]

Show Tags

06 Aug 2015, 03:29

Bunuel wrote:

enigma123 wrote:

Apologies blink005, if I am getting this wrong. But how did you get this?

The minimum possible values of L4 and L5 could be 140, hence the L1+L2 = 620 - 420 = 200.

Below is step by step analysis of this question. Hope it helps.

5 peices of wood have an average length of 124 inches and a median of 140 inches. What is the MAX possible length of the shortest piece of wood? A. 90 B. 100 C. 110 D. 130 E. 140

Given: 5 peices of wood have an average length of 124 inches --> total length = 124*5=620. Also median = 140.

If a set has odd number of terms the median of a set is the middle number when arranged in ascending or descending order; If a set has even number of terms the median of a set is the average of the two middle terms when arranged in ascending or descending order.

As we have odd # of pieces then 3rd largest piece \(x_3=median=140\).

So if we consider the pieces in ascending order of their lengths we would have \(x_1+x_2+140+x_4+x_5=620\).

Question: what is the MAX possible length of the shortest piece of wood? Or \(max(x_1)=?\)

General rule for such kind of problems: to maximize one quantity, minimize the others; to minimize one quantity, maximize the others.

So to maximize \(x_1\) we should minimize \(x_2\), \(x_4\) and \(x_5\). Min length of the second largest piece of wood, \(x_2\) could be equal to \(x_1\) and the min lengths of \(x_4\) and \(x_5\) could be equal to 140 --> \(x_1+x_1+140+140+140=620\) --> \(x_1=100\).

Apologies blink005, if I am getting this wrong. But how did you get this?

The minimum possible values of L4 and L5 could be 140, hence the L1+L2 = 620 - 420 = 200.

The set could consist of pieces of wood that are L1, L2, 140, 140, 140. In this case, 140 would be the median (and mode). Similarly, the set could consist of pieces of wood that are lengths 100, 100, 140, 140, 140 - which maximizes the lengtth of the shortest piece.
_________________

Re: Five peices of wood have an average length of 124 inches and [#permalink]

Show Tags

22 Aug 2016, 11:09

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

It’s quickly approaching two years since I last wrote anything on this blog. A lot has happened since then. When I last posted, I had just gotten back from...

Since my last post, I’ve got the interview decisions for the other two business schools I applied to: Denied by Wharton and Invited to Interview with Stanford. It all...

Marketing is one of those functions, that if done successfully, requires a little bit of everything. In other words, it is highly cross-functional and requires a lot of different...