Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 07 Jul 2015, 20:43

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Five women are to be seated around a table. Then five men

 Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Joined: 24 Jun 2003
Posts: 91
Location: Moscow
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Five women are to be seated around a table. Then five men [#permalink]  08 Aug 2003, 00:05
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Five women are to be seated around a table. Then five men are to be assigned positions next to a woman. In how many ways can couples thus be arranged, if only the relative order around the table is of importance?
SVP
Joined: 03 Feb 2003
Posts: 1607
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 87 [0], given: 0

[#permalink]  08 Aug 2003, 02:06
if only the relative order around the table is of importance...

I assume that we do not need to eliminate a rotation factor
5!*5!
GMAT Instructor
Joined: 07 Jul 2003
Posts: 770
Location: New York NY 10024
Schools: Haas, MFE; Anderson, MBA; USC, MSEE
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 71 [0], given: 0

[#permalink]  08 Aug 2003, 14:15
stolyar wrote:
if only the relative order around the table is of importance...

I assume that we do not need to eliminate a rotation factor
5!*5!

First, if "only the relative order around the table is of importance" then you must surely eliminate the rotation factors.

Second, even if your assumption was correct, your answer would be wrong. You have only considered the number of permutations should the women be in the odd (or even) position and the men in the other, even (or odd) positions. You need to multiply this by 2 in order to get them all.

Then if you need to eliminate the rotations, divide by 10. You will end up with 5! x 4!, the same result you would get if you were to pick one person as an anchor.
_________________

Best,

AkamaiBrah
Former Senior Instructor, Manhattan GMAT and VeritasPrep
Vice President, Midtown NYC Investment Bank, Structured Finance IT
MFE, Haas School of Business, UC Berkeley, Class of 2005
MBA, Anderson School of Management, UCLA, Class of 1993

Manager
Joined: 25 Apr 2003
Posts: 228
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 55 [0], given: 0

[#permalink]  08 Aug 2003, 21:57
4! *5! is right when we need to place men and women ALTERNATELY around the table. However, the question as is worded is not perhaps clear on this account and only says that every man should be beside a woman. Therefore a circular combo like ...wwwmmwmmwm... will also be ok . Are we missing something Aka ?
Manager
Joined: 25 Apr 2003
Posts: 228
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 55 [0], given: 0

[#permalink]  09 Aug 2003, 01:09
No Stolyar - You ARE our angel ! Please revert on the question I had posed.
GMAT Instructor
Joined: 07 Jul 2003
Posts: 770
Location: New York NY 10024
Schools: Haas, MFE; Anderson, MBA; USC, MSEE
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 71 [0], given: 0

[#permalink]  09 Aug 2003, 02:51
anupag wrote:
4! *5! is right when we need to place men and women ALTERNATELY around the table. However, the question as is worded is not perhaps clear on this account and only says that every man should be beside a woman. Therefore a circular combo like ...wwwmmwmmwm... will also be ok . Are we missing something Aka ?

You are right, that is a possibility. There are so many typos that I tend to assume more that the question poses at times.
_________________

Best,

AkamaiBrah
Former Senior Instructor, Manhattan GMAT and VeritasPrep
Vice President, Midtown NYC Investment Bank, Structured Finance IT
MFE, Haas School of Business, UC Berkeley, Class of 2005
MBA, Anderson School of Management, UCLA, Class of 1993

Manager
Joined: 24 Jun 2003
Posts: 146
Location: India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

[#permalink]  09 Aug 2003, 05:00
AkamaiBrah wrote:
anupag wrote:
4! *5! is right when we need to place men and women ALTERNATELY around the table. However, the question as is worded is not perhaps clear on this account and only says that every man should be beside a woman. Therefore a circular combo like ...wwwmmwmmwm... will also be ok . Are we missing something Aka ?

You are right, that is a possibility. There are so many typos that I tend to assume more that the question poses at times.

There are five couples to be seated. Fix one. Then the rest can be arranged in 4! ways around the table. Each couple itself can be arranged in 2! ways.

Therefore the answer is 4!*2!=48 ways.

Manager
Joined: 24 Jun 2003
Posts: 146
Location: India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

[#permalink]  18 Aug 2003, 20:29
anupag wrote:
4! *5! is right when we need to place men and women ALTERNATELY around the table. However, the question as is worded is not perhaps clear on this account and only says that every man should be beside a woman. Therefore a circular combo like ...wwwmmwmmwm... will also be ok . Are we missing something Aka ?

KL, are you sure this is the solution? I ask because anupag's point is still unanswered - "....a circular combo like ...wwwmmwmmwm... will also be ok ...."
Manager
Joined: 24 Jun 2003
Posts: 91
Location: Moscow
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Well... the book says it is 5!*4!
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
The ration of the number of women to the number of men to 2 05 Jul 2008, 09:51
12 The ratio of the number of women to the number of men to the 12 28 Apr 2008, 12:24
The ratio of the number of women to the number of men to the 8 30 Oct 2007, 17:31
The ratio of the number of women to the number of men to the 2 29 Sep 2007, 23:59
There are five consecutive integers. The product of five 5 26 Dec 2006, 10:30
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Five women are to be seated around a table. Then five men

 Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.