Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 01 Aug 2015, 00:08
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Five women are to be seated around a table. Then five men

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Jun 2003
Posts: 91
Location: Moscow
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Five women are to be seated around a table. Then five men [#permalink] New post 08 Aug 2003, 00:05
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
This topic is locked. If you want to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum.

Five women are to be seated around a table. Then five men are to be assigned positions next to a woman. In how many ways can couples thus be arranged, if only the relative order around the table is of importance?
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 03 Feb 2003
Posts: 1607
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 94 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 08 Aug 2003, 02:06
if only the relative order around the table is of importance...

I assume that we do not need to eliminate a rotation factor
5!*5!
GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2003
Posts: 770
Location: New York NY 10024
Schools: Haas, MFE; Anderson, MBA; USC, MSEE
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 77 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 08 Aug 2003, 14:15
stolyar wrote:
if only the relative order around the table is of importance...

I assume that we do not need to eliminate a rotation factor
5!*5!


First, if "only the relative order around the table is of importance" then you must surely eliminate the rotation factors.

Second, even if your assumption was correct, your answer would be wrong. You have only considered the number of permutations should the women be in the odd (or even) position and the men in the other, even (or odd) positions. You need to multiply this by 2 in order to get them all.

Then if you need to eliminate the rotations, divide by 10. You will end up with 5! x 4!, the same result you would get if you were to pick one person as an anchor.
_________________

Best,

AkamaiBrah
Former Senior Instructor, Manhattan GMAT and VeritasPrep
Vice President, Midtown NYC Investment Bank, Structured Finance IT
MFE, Haas School of Business, UC Berkeley, Class of 2005
MBA, Anderson School of Management, UCLA, Class of 1993

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 25 Apr 2003
Posts: 228
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 57 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 08 Aug 2003, 21:57
4! *5! is right when we need to place men and women ALTERNATELY around the table. However, the question as is worded is not perhaps clear on this account and only says that every man should be beside a woman. Therefore a circular combo like ...wwwmmwmmwm... will also be ok . Are we missing something Aka ?
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 25 Apr 2003
Posts: 228
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 57 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 09 Aug 2003, 01:09
No Stolyar - You ARE our angel ! Please revert on the question I had posed.
GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2003
Posts: 770
Location: New York NY 10024
Schools: Haas, MFE; Anderson, MBA; USC, MSEE
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 77 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 09 Aug 2003, 02:51
anupag wrote:
4! *5! is right when we need to place men and women ALTERNATELY around the table. However, the question as is worded is not perhaps clear on this account and only says that every man should be beside a woman. Therefore a circular combo like ...wwwmmwmmwm... will also be ok . Are we missing something Aka ?


You are right, that is a possibility. There are so many typos that I tend to assume more that the question poses at times.
_________________

Best,

AkamaiBrah
Former Senior Instructor, Manhattan GMAT and VeritasPrep
Vice President, Midtown NYC Investment Bank, Structured Finance IT
MFE, Haas School of Business, UC Berkeley, Class of 2005
MBA, Anderson School of Management, UCLA, Class of 1993

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 24 Jun 2003
Posts: 146
Location: India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 09 Aug 2003, 05:00
AkamaiBrah wrote:
anupag wrote:
4! *5! is right when we need to place men and women ALTERNATELY around the table. However, the question as is worded is not perhaps clear on this account and only says that every man should be beside a woman. Therefore a circular combo like ...wwwmmwmmwm... will also be ok . Are we missing something Aka ?


You are right, that is a possibility. There are so many typos that I tend to assume more that the question poses at times.


Here's my answer:

There are five couples to be seated. Fix one. Then the rest can be arranged in 4! ways around the table. Each couple itself can be arranged in 2! ways.

Therefore the answer is 4!*2!=48 ways.

Konstantin, comments ?
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 24 Jun 2003
Posts: 146
Location: India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 18 Aug 2003, 20:29
anupag wrote:
4! *5! is right when we need to place men and women ALTERNATELY around the table. However, the question as is worded is not perhaps clear on this account and only says that every man should be beside a woman. Therefore a circular combo like ...wwwmmwmmwm... will also be ok . Are we missing something Aka ?


KL, are you sure this is the solution? I ask because anupag's point is still unanswered - "....a circular combo like ...wwwmmwmmwm... will also be ok ...."
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Jun 2003
Posts: 91
Location: Moscow
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

answer [#permalink] New post 19 Aug 2003, 09:02
Well... the book says it is 5!*4!
answer   [#permalink] 19 Aug 2003, 09:02
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Five women are to be seated around a table. Then five men

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.