Five years ago, as part of a plan to encourage citizens of : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR) - Page 2
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 23 Jan 2017, 09:33

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Five years ago, as part of a plan to encourage citizens of

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 30 Sep 2008
Posts: 36
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 1

Re: Five years ago, as part of a plan to encourage citizens of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Aug 2009, 09:27
D for me too.

It weaken the statement by showing that the money in the special account came from the saving account that are already in the bank, it's not the new deposit money. So the saving money is not increase, it only transfer to a new account.
Senior Manager
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 261
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 325 [0], given: 3

Re: Five years ago, as part of a plan to encourage citizens of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Aug 2009, 07:36
IMO D as it correctly weaken the argument that it is the govt plan that has led to the increase in savings amongst people of Lavaska..
Manager
Joined: 21 May 2009
Posts: 142
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 50

Re: Five years ago, as part of a plan to encourage citizens of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Sep 2009, 07:36
D for sure
Manager
Joined: 21 May 2009
Posts: 142
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 50

Re: Five years ago, as part of a plan to encourage citizens of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Sep 2009, 07:57
Yep D!
Manager
Joined: 30 Sep 2009
Posts: 124
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 183

Re: Five years ago, as part of a plan to encourage citizens of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Oct 2011, 08:10
Guys ... this is a Gmat prep 2 question... Marked D as an option and it was incorrect...

OA is B according to Gmat Prep.....
Manager
Status: One last try =,=
Joined: 11 Jun 2010
Posts: 141
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 81 [0], given: 32

Re: Five years ago, as part of a plan to encourage citizens of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Oct 2011, 06:34
abhi398 wrote:
Guys ... this is a Gmat prep 2 question... Marked D as an option and it was incorrect...

OA is B according to Gmat Prep.....

Hey

Can you check the OA again? B seems out of scope to me...
Premise: the government plans to increase the saving by introducing a special savings account
Premise: Millions of dollars have accumulated in the special accounts
Conclusion: so the government's plan is obviously working

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A. A substantial number of Levaskans have withdrawn at least some of the money they had invested in the special accounts. -- this choice does not undermine the conclusion. it focuses on the money withdrawing of the citizens --->irrelevant
B. Workers in Levaska who already save money in long-term tax-free accounts that are offered through their workplace cannot take advantage of the special savings accounts introduced by the government -- the fact that workers cannot take advantage of the special savings accounts can't weaken the conclusion; other people can still benefit from the government's plan!
C. The rate at which interest earned on money deposited in regular savings accounts is taxed depends on the income bracket of the account holder. -- the focus of this choice is interest rate, hence irrelevant
D. Many Levaskans who already had long-term savings have steadily been transferring those savings into the special accounts. -- this choice seems ok to me.
E. Many of the economists who now claim that the government's plan has been successful criticized it when it was introduced. --this choice doesn't have any impact on the conclusion
_________________

There can be Miracles when you believe

Manager
Joined: 18 Jun 2010
Posts: 148
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 2

Re: Five years ago, as part of a plan to encourage citizens of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Oct 2011, 11:50
Good question. +1 for D.
BSchool Forum Moderator
Status: Flying over the cloud!
Joined: 16 Aug 2011
Posts: 912
Location: Viet Nam
GMAT Date: 06-06-2014
GPA: 3.07
Followers: 73

Kudos [?]: 603 [0], given: 44

Re: Five years ago, as part of a plan to encourage citizens of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Nov 2011, 23:24
Quote:
Five years ago, as part of a plan to encourage citizens of Levaska to increase the amount of money they put into savings, Levaska’s government introduced special savings accounts in which up to $3,000 a year can be saved with no tax due on the interest unless money is withdrawn before the account holder reaches the age of sixty-five. Millions of dollars have accumulated in the special accounts, so the government’s plan is obviously working. Premise 1: 5 yrs ago, L's government plan to encourage L's citizens put more (increase) money in savings Premise 2: Special savings account in which$3,000 a year can be saved with no tax on interest
Premise 3: If the money is withdrawn before the account holder read 65 age, interest will be taxed
Premise 4: Special accounts got million dollar
Conclusion: The plan (encouraging to put more money in bank) is good

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A. A substantial number of Levaskans have withdrawn at least some of the money they had invested in the special accounts. => quite attack, but they do not withdraw all money. Savings accounts are still efficient in accumulate money
B. Workers in Levaska who already save money in long-term tax-free accounts that are offered through their workplace cannot take advantage of the special savings accounts introduced by the government. => totally irrelevant
C. The rate at which interest earned on money deposited in regular savings accounts is taxed depends on the income bracket of the account holder. => out of scope. We are talking about special ones
D. Many Levaskans who already had long-term savings have steadily been transferring those savings into the special accounts. => This one worked. It attack the plan, the money in banks did not increase significantly. Instead, it almost remained
E. Many of the economists who now claim that the government’s plan has been successful criticized it when it was introduced. => Strengthen and quite out of scope
_________________

Rules for posting in verbal gmat forum, read it before posting anything in verbal forum
Giving me + 1 kudos if my post is valuable with you

The more you like my post, the more you share to other's need

CR: Focus of the Week: Must be True Question

Manager
Joined: 08 Jul 2008
Posts: 148
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 1

Re: Five years ago, as part of a plan to encourage citizens of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Nov 2011, 14:14
I go with D
Manager
Joined: 16 Aug 2011
Posts: 97
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 3

Re: Five years ago, as part of a plan to encourage citizens of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Nov 2011, 17:26
D
Manager
Joined: 08 Jun 2011
Posts: 79
Schools: NUS
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 32

Re: Five years ago, as part of a plan to encourage citizens of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Nov 2011, 20:14
D...it is
Director
Joined: 28 Jul 2011
Posts: 563
Location: United States
GPA: 3.86
WE: Accounting (Commercial Banking)
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 212 [0], given: 16

Re: Five years ago, as part of a plan to encourage citizens of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Nov 2011, 20:52
Its D
_________________

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10542
Followers: 919

Kudos [?]: 204 [0], given: 0

Re: Five years ago, as part of a plan to encourage citizens of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Dec 2014, 03:28
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Manager
Status: In pursuit of excellence...
Joined: 26 Oct 2013
Posts: 154
Location: India
Schools: ISB '16 (M)
GMAT 1: 610 Q46 V28
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V40
WE: Project Management (Other)
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 55 [3] , given: 175

Re: Five years ago, as part of a plan to encourage citizens of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Dec 2014, 23:15
3
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
mymba99 wrote:
Five years ago, as part of a plan to encourage citizens of Levaska to increase the amount of money they put into savings, Levaska’s government introduced special savings accounts in which up to $3,000 a year can be saved with no tax due on the interest unless money is withdrawn before the account holder reaches the age of sixty-five. Millions of dollars have accumulated in the special accounts, so the government’s plan is obviously working. Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument? A. A substantial number of Levaskans have withdrawn at least some of the money they had invested in the special accounts. B. Workers in Levaska who already save money in long-term tax-free accounts that are offered through their workplace cannot take advantage of the special savings accounts introduced by the government. C. The rate at which interest earned on money deposited in regular savings accounts is taxed depends on the income bracket of the account holder. D. Many Levaskans who already had long-term savings have steadily been transferring those savings into the special accounts. E. Many of the economists who now claim that the government’s plan has been successful criticized it when it was introduced. To solve the question, we need to understand the situation first. If we read the argument, we can decipher that situation is A new Kind of savings account is introduced--> To increase savings. Fact--Millions of$ are flowing in -->Conclusion-- Govt.'s plan is working
Pre-thinking possible Assumptions-- People are depositing money in new accounts, money is not flowing in those accounts from anywhere else.

Solution will be any statement that can weaken the above assumtions or the conclusion i.e if we can find that people are not depositing money or money is flowing in the savings account from other sources or something on these lines.

Option A-- It states that some of the money is withdrawn from savings account. It might seem that it is weakening the conclusion that Govt's plan to increase savings is working..but in actual it is not. Even if some people have woithdrawn money from those accounts..it can quite be possible that a lot more is submitted...hence, in nutshell there is an increase. Also, the statement Millions of $are flowing in is mentioned as a fact, unless we know for sure that withdrawn amount is equal or more than deposited, we can't weaken the net conclusion. Option B-- The plan was for citizens, but it talks about workers. We don't know what part of population are workers. So the effect on the savings and hence conclusion can't eb fully determined. Option C-- Irrelevant. In absence of any demographic data, we can't determine the effect of tax rates on savings Option D-- This is the one we're trying to find here. IF the money in the tax saving accounts is coming from other savings accounts, then net savings are not increasing. This weakens the assumption that people are depositing fresh money in tax saving accounts. Consider this-- Let's say-- Money in prev Saving accounts--100, In new from prev--40 Remaining in prev saving accounts-60.. So net savings-- still 100.. so Govt's plan is not working. Hence this is the solution Option E--This option if anything is strengthening the argument. If critics are praising the plan, that means somehow it must be working. We have to find a weakener. Hope this helps --------------------------- Dj Director Joined: 07 Aug 2011 Posts: 581 Concentration: International Business, Technology GMAT 1: 630 Q49 V27 Followers: 3 Kudos [?]: 406 [0], given: 75 Re: Five years ago, as part of a plan to encourage citizens of [#permalink] ### Show Tags 07 Mar 2015, 21:27 mymba99 wrote: Five years ago, as part of a plan to encourage citizens of Levaska to increase the amount of money they put into savings, Levaska’s government introduced special savings accounts in which up to$3,000 a year can be saved with no tax due on the interest unless money is withdrawn before the account holder reaches the age of sixty-five. Millions of dollars have accumulated in the special accounts, so the government’s plan is obviously working.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A. A substantial number of Levaskans have withdrawn at least some of the money they had invested in the special accounts.
B. Workers in Levaska who already save money in long-term tax-free accounts that are offered through their workplace cannot take advantage of the special savings accounts introduced by the government.
C. The rate at which interest earned on money deposited in regular savings accounts is taxed depends on the income bracket of the account holder.
E. Many of the economists who now claim that the government’s plan has been successful criticized it when it was introduced.

what is the source of this question ? i have noticed a large incidents of confusing answers whenever the question is not from an official source.
_________________

Thanks,
Lucky

_______________________________________________________
Kindly press the to appreciate my post !!

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10542
Followers: 919

Kudos [?]: 204 [0], given: 0

Re: Five years ago, as part of a plan to encourage citizens of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Jun 2016, 09:38
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Math Forum Moderator
Joined: 13 Apr 2015
Posts: 1221
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Followers: 38

Kudos [?]: 582 [0], given: 593

Re: Five years ago, as part of a plan to encourage citizens of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Jul 2016, 22:10
mymba99 wrote:
Five years ago, as part of a plan to encourage citizens of Levaska to increase the amount of money they put into savings, Levaska’s government introduced special savings accounts in which up to $3,000 a year can be saved with no tax due on the interest unless money is withdrawn before the account holder reaches the age of sixty-five. Millions of dollars have accumulated in the special accounts, so the government’s plan is obviously working. Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument? A. A substantial number of Levaskans have withdrawn at least some of the money they had invested in the special accounts. B. Workers in Levaska who already save money in long-term tax-free accounts that are offered through their workplace cannot take advantage of the special savings accounts introduced by the government. C. The rate at which interest earned on money deposited in regular savings accounts is taxed depends on the income bracket of the account holder. D. Many Levaskans who already had long-term savings have steadily been transferring those savings into the special accounts. E. Many of the economists who now claim that the government’s plan has been successful criticized it when it was introduced. A. A substantial number of Levaskans have withdrawn at least some of the money they had invested in the special accounts. - Incorrect. Irrelevant B. Workers in Levaska who already save money in long-term tax-free accounts that are offered through their workplace cannot take advantage of the special savings accounts introduced by the government. - Incorrect. We already know that millions of dollars have accumulated in the special accounts. The fact that workers cannot take advantage of the special account does not weaken the fact that millions of dollars are already saved in the special accounts. C. The rate at which interest earned on money deposited in regular savings accounts is taxed depends on the income bracket of the account holder. - Incorrect. Irrelevant D. Many Levaskans who already had long-term savings have steadily been transferring those savings into the special accounts. - Correct. Millions of dollars were already saved in different accounts. Now, the amount is just transferred from different accounts to special account. The plan was to encourage savings. But here the savings are just transferred and the net savings has not increased. E. Many of the economists who now claim that the government’s plan has been successful criticized it when it was introduced - Incorrect. Irrelevant Answer: D Intern Joined: 03 Dec 2012 Posts: 12 Concentration: Finance, International Business GPA: 3.57 Followers: 1 Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 43 Re: Five years ago, as part of a plan to encourage citizens of [#permalink] ### Show Tags 30 Jul 2016, 10:29 mymba99 wrote: Five years ago, as part of a plan to encourage citizens of Levaska to increase the amount of money they put into savings, Levaska’s government introduced special savings accounts in which up to$3,000 a year can be saved with no tax due on the interest unless money is withdrawn before the account holder reaches the age of sixty-five. Millions of dollars have accumulated in the special accounts, so the government’s plan is obviously working.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A. A substantial number of Levaskans have withdrawn at least some of the money they had invested in the special accounts.
B. Workers in Levaska who already save money in long-term tax-free accounts that are offered through their workplace cannot take advantage of the special savings accounts introduced by the government.
C. The rate at which interest earned on money deposited in regular savings accounts is taxed depends on the income bracket of the account holder.
E. Many of the economists who now claim that the government’s plan has been successful criticized it when it was introduced.

My answer choices were down to B and D.

In B it says that the workers who already had savings were no longer are eligible for the special accounts' benefits. Hence workers would no longer bother to move the money. No usage of special accounts means this statement is irrelevant.

In D workers are using the special accounts but they are just transferring their previous savings to special accounts to get the benefits. Hence the Government's plan is not the reason for the workers' savings.

D is the answer choice for me.
Re: Five years ago, as part of a plan to encourage citizens of   [#permalink] 30 Jul 2016, 10:29

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 38 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
5 RATT RACE: Five years ago 7 20 Apr 2016, 07:14
Twelve years ago and again five years ago, there were 2 19 Jan 2012, 22:27
Twelve years ago and again five years ago, there were 3 27 Aug 2011, 23:46
25 Twelve years ago and again five years ago, there were 28 06 Apr 2008, 04:44
Twelve years ago and again five years ago, there were 13 28 Feb 2007, 23:57
Display posts from previous: Sort by