Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 21 Sep 2014, 12:23

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Following the destruction of the space shuttle Challenger,

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 13 Jun 2009
Posts: 108
Location: Tu
Schools: Chicago b.
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 150 [0], given: 92

Following the destruction of the space shuttle Challenger, [#permalink] New post 16 Oct 2009, 07:40
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  55% (hard)

Question Stats:

46% (02:17) correct 54% (01:03) wrong based on 116 sessions
Following the destruction of the space shuttle Challenger, investigators concluded that many key people employed by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and its contractors work an excessive amount of overtime that has the potential of causing errors in judgment.

(A) overtime that has the potential of causing
(B) overtime that has the potential to cause
(C) overtime that potentially can cause
(D) overtime, a practice that has the potential for causing
(E) overtime, a practice that can, potentially, cause
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

The greatest pleasure in life is doing what people say you cannot do...

1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 26 Sep 2009
Posts: 43
Location: Los Angeles
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 11 [1] , given: 4

Re: 1000 sc - 300 [#permalink] New post 16 Oct 2009, 15:36
1
This post received
KUDOS
IMO this is not a very good question.

In answers A, B, and C it's implied that "overtime" has the potential to cause errors, when logically it needs to be the "practice of overtime" that has the potential to cause errors.

In solution D, "causing" is not parallel to "work"

Answer E is the only solution remaining.

Some might argue that in answer E, the words "can" and "potentially" create a redundancy error. But I suppose all of the other errors are grammatical mistakes, whereas redundancy is more of a stylistic error.


HTH!
_________________

Paul

Focused GMAT Prep
http://www.thegmatbootcamp.com

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 19 Jul 2009
Posts: 53
Schools: McIntire, Fuqua, Villanova, Vandy, WashingtonU
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 4

GMAT Tests User
Re: 1000 sc - 300 [#permalink] New post 16 Oct 2009, 19:27
GMATBootcamp wrote:
In solution D, "causing" is not parallel to "work"

Please elaborate :)

I got E also, but want to know what's wrong with D.
_________________

12/23 GMATPrep #1: 730 q50 v38
12/26 MGMAT CAT #1: 730 q50 v40
01/01 MGMAT CAT #2: 710 q51 v36
01/12 Real GMAT #1: 690... WTF?!?!?!?!?!?!
...
02/28 Real GMAT #2: ...

Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 26 Sep 2009
Posts: 43
Location: Los Angeles
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 4

Re: 1000 sc - 300 [#permalink] New post 20 Oct 2009, 19:52
its preferable to have verbs in the same tense.

Contractors work....this can cause

contractors working...problems causing



HTH!
_________________

Paul

Focused GMAT Prep
http://www.thegmatbootcamp.com

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 20 Aug 2009
Posts: 42
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 5

Re: 1000 sc - 300 [#permalink] New post 21 Oct 2009, 02:30
'C' is wrong because it syas that 'Overtime' causes errors in the judgement. It is the practice of excessive working that causes errors in judgement.

IMO potential for is unidiomatic in D

IMO E
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Affiliations: PMP
Joined: 13 Oct 2009
Posts: 313
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 99 [0], given: 37

GMAT Tests User
Re: 1000 sc - 300 [#permalink] New post 21 Oct 2009, 06:35
IMO E too.

A,b,c are out because its not overtime that causes ..... its the practice so D,E

in D, potential for is not idiomatic
_________________

Thanks, Sri
-------------------------------
keep uppp...ing the tempo...

Press +1 Kudos, if you think my post gave u a tiny tip

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Aug 2009
Posts: 84
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Re: 1000 sc - 300 [#permalink] New post 22 Oct 2009, 08:10
IMO B is correct option.
I think by Overtime we do not need to explicitly state that it is a practice.
We are making the sentence more wordy...any comments??
pls correct me...if i ma wrong..

OA pls..
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 1561
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 211 [0], given: 6

Re: 1000 sc - 300 [#permalink] New post 16 Aug 2010, 07:26
OA is E.

D is incorrect for wordiness.
4 KUDOS received
Manhattan GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Affiliations: ManhattanGMAT
Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Posts: 354
Location: San Francisco
Followers: 335

Kudos [?]: 720 [4] , given: 11

Re: 1000 sc - 300 [#permalink] New post 16 Aug 2010, 16:25
4
This post received
KUDOS
Hey All,

There's been plenty of good discussion on this one, but just to put it all in one place, I'm stepping in. Also, lots of people mentioned concision on this one. There is not a single concision issue here. Concision is a SHOCKINGLY rare issue on the GMAT. Only fall back on it as a last resort.

300.Following the destruction of the space shuttle Challenger, investigators concluded that many key people employed by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and its contractors work an excessive amount of overtime that has the potential of causing errors in judgment.

(A) overtime that has the potential of causing
PROBLEM: The relative pronoun "that" is opening up a modifier on "overtime" which is problematic from a meaning perspective. What the sentence wants is for the modifier to modify "an excessive amount of overtime", but right now it reads as modifying "overtime". In other words, the sentence sounds like the contracts are working an excessive amount of a SPECIFIC (essential) kind of overtime, the kind that has the potential of causing errors in judgment. This is incorrect. Also, "of" is the wrong idiom with potential.

(B) overtime that has the potential to cause
PROBLEM: Same as above, though it fixed the idiom issue.

(C) overtime that potentially can cause
PROBLEM: Same as above. The adverb "potentially" is okay, though the placement is incorrect. We need to place it after "can" if we don't get any commas. Consider these examples: "He is potentially the greatest boxer of all time" is better than "He potentially is the greatest boxer of all time."

(D) overtime, a practice that has the potential for causing
PROBLEM: Now we are using an appositive modifier (modifying a noun with a noun "a practice..."), which is clearer. The "practice" is the entire phrase "work(ing) an excessive amount of overtime". Unfortunately, the idiom is correct after "potential" (should be "to").

(E) overtime, a practice that can, potentially, cause
ANSWER: People don't like picking things with too many commas. BUT COMMAS ARE GREAT! Commas are not bad or wordy. They are how we separate ideas in English. The more commas, often, the better. "potentially" is modifying "can cause", and we often set off modifiers with commas on either side.

Hope that helps!

-t
_________________


Tommy Wallach | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | San Francisco


Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Reviews

1 KUDOS received
Director
Director
avatar
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: Chicago Booth Class of 2015
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 995
Followers: 14

Kudos [?]: 401 [1] , given: 36

GMAT Tests User
Re: 1000 sc - 300 [#permalink] New post 16 Aug 2010, 21:59
1
This post received
KUDOS
Clearly the case of resumptive modifier. hence E and D are left. D is unidiomatic. Hence E.
_________________

Please press kudos if you like my post.

Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
avatar
Joined: 31 Jan 2010
Posts: 500
WE 1: 4 years Tech
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 72 [0], given: 149

GMAT Tests User
Re: 1000 sc - 300 [#permalink] New post 22 Aug 2010, 02:48
TommyWallach wrote:
Hey All,

There's been plenty of good discussion on this one, but just to put it all in one place, I'm stepping in. Also, lots of people mentioned concision on this one. There is not a single concision issue here. Concision is a SHOCKINGLY rare issue on the GMAT. Only fall back on it as a last resort.

300.Following the destruction of the space shuttle Challenger, investigators concluded that many key people employed by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and its contractors work an excessive amount of overtime that has the potential of causing errors in judgment.


(C) overtime that potentially can cause
PROBLEM: Same as above. The adverb "potentially" is okay, though the placement is incorrect. We need to place it after "can" if we don't get any commas. Consider these examples: "He is potentially the greatest boxer of all time" is better than "He potentially is the greatest boxer of all time."

-t

Hi tommy ,
Please Consider the sentence that you have given as an example.
In
1)"He is potentially the greatest boxer of all time" is better than
2)"He potentially is the greatest boxer of all time."
In sentence 1, potentially is an adverb and needs to modify a verb .There is no verb after potentially in sentence 1
In sentence 2 potentially modifies "is" verb
So how can sentence 1 be better than sentence 2?
I must be missing something.Tommy can you resolve this issue
_________________

My Post Invites Discussions not answers
Try to give back something to the Forum.I want your explanations, right now !
Please let me know your opinion about the Chandigarh Gmat Centrehttp://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-experience-at-chandigarh-india-centre-111830.html

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Dec 2009
Posts: 122
Location: india
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 10

GMAT Tests User
Re: 1000 sc - 300 [#permalink] New post 22 Aug 2010, 12:19
thanks tommy very well explained..
2 KUDOS received
Manhattan GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Affiliations: ManhattanGMAT
Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Posts: 354
Location: San Francisco
Followers: 335

Kudos [?]: 720 [2] , given: 11

Re: 1000 sc - 300 [#permalink] New post 23 Aug 2010, 10:46
2
This post received
KUDOS
Hey Munda,

I think the issue you're having is that a modifier should come before the thing it modifies, but this is actually the opposite of the case. Most modifiers come after. For example.

The man in the house. [in the house]
The man running from the law. [running from the law]
The dog, a purebred, is pretty. [a purebred]

See? In general, modifiers come AFTER the thing they modify. This isn't a hard and fast rule or anything (For example "By the time you read this, I'll be gone. [by the time you read this]", but it CERTAINLY doesn't make a sentence wrong if the adverbial modifier comes after the verb/adverb/adjective being modified.

-t
_________________


Tommy Wallach | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | San Francisco


Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Reviews

Director
Director
avatar
Status: Apply - Last Chance
Affiliations: IIT, Purdue, PhD, TauBetaPi
Joined: 17 Jul 2010
Posts: 693
Schools: Wharton, Sloan, Chicago, Haas
WE 1: 8 years in Oil&Gas
Followers: 14

Kudos [?]: 71 [0], given: 15

GMAT Tests User
Re: 1000 sc - 300 [#permalink] New post 23 Aug 2010, 12:31
but Tommy what I dnt understand is that when we say overtime, is that not sufficient? Why do I have to clarify the practice? Also in C if the potentially were to be correctly placed would you pass it?

TommyWallach wrote:
Hey All,

There's been plenty of good discussion on this one, but just to put it all in one place, I'm stepping in. Also, lots of people mentioned concision on this one. There is not a single concision issue here. Concision is a SHOCKINGLY rare issue on the GMAT. Only fall back on it as a last resort.

300.Following the destruction of the space shuttle Challenger, investigators concluded that many key people employed by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and its contractors work an excessive amount of overtime that has the potential of causing errors in judgment.

(A) overtime that has the potential of causing
PROBLEM: The relative pronoun "that" is opening up a modifier on "overtime" which is problematic from a meaning perspective. What the sentence wants is for the modifier to modify "an excessive amount of overtime", but right now it reads as modifying "overtime". In other words, the sentence sounds like the contracts are working an excessive amount of a SPECIFIC (essential) kind of overtime, the kind that has the potential of causing errors in judgment. This is incorrect. Also, "of" is the wrong idiom with potential.

(B) overtime that has the potential to cause
PROBLEM: Same as above, though it fixed the idiom issue.

(C) overtime that potentially can cause
PROBLEM: Same as above. The adverb "potentially" is okay, though the placement is incorrect. We need to place it after "can" if we don't get any commas. Consider these examples: "He is potentially the greatest boxer of all time" is better than "He potentially is the greatest boxer of all time."

(D) overtime, a practice that has the potential for causing
PROBLEM: Now we are using an appositive modifier (modifying a noun with a noun "a practice..."), which is clearer. The "practice" is the entire phrase "work(ing) an excessive amount of overtime". Unfortunately, the idiom is correct after "potential" (should be "to").

(E) overtime, a practice that can, potentially, cause
ANSWER: People don't like picking things with too many commas. BUT COMMAS ARE GREAT! Commas are not bad or wordy. They are how we separate ideas in English. The more commas, often, the better. "potentially" is modifying "can cause", and we often set off modifiers with commas on either side.

Hope that helps!

-t


Posted from my mobile device Image
_________________

Consider kudos, they are good for health

Manhattan GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Affiliations: ManhattanGMAT
Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Posts: 354
Location: San Francisco
Followers: 335

Kudos [?]: 720 [0], given: 11

Re: 1000 sc - 300 [#permalink] New post 28 Aug 2010, 10:10
Hey All,

2 issues. First Mainhoon's.

The problem is that it isn't overtime on its own that is causing problems, it's the practice of WORKING AN EXCESSIVE AMOUNT of overtime. This is why we need to add the stuff about practice.

I was also asked a different question by PM, printed here:

With respect to the below sentences
1)"He is potentially the greatest boxer of all time" is better than
2)"He potentially is the greatest boxer of all time."

Can you please tell what is the adverb potentially modifying in sentence 1) and 2)

Really, it's modifying the same thing, but it's a question of how we say it. Consider an adjective use.

I have a green house.
I have a house green.

The second one is just wrong, because we don't write it that way. Technically, I suppose, it's still modifying the "house", but who cares? It's wrong. Sames goes with example 2 up above.

-t
_________________


Tommy Wallach | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | San Francisco


Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Reviews

SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1634
Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Followers: 31

Kudos [?]: 242 [0], given: 2

GMAT Tests User
Re: 1000 sc - 300 [#permalink] New post 04 Sep 2010, 09:44
Tommy, can potentially is not redundant?
I think I have read that in Manhattan SC...
Thanks.
_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit


Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Manhattan GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Affiliations: ManhattanGMAT
Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Posts: 354
Location: San Francisco
Followers: 335

Kudos [?]: 720 [0], given: 11

Re: 1000 sc - 300 [#permalink] New post 06 Sep 2010, 11:31
Hey Noburu,

Well, I'd agree with you, but there's no better choice. Remember, any issue relating to concision/redundancy should be the ABSOLUTE LAST thing you think about on the GMAT. Those issues are always secondary to GRAMMAR and even CLARITY.

-t
_________________


Tommy Wallach | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | San Francisco


Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Reviews

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 14 Jun 2010
Posts: 7
Location: India
Schools: Kellogg
WE 1: Engineer
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Re: 1000 sc - 300 [#permalink] New post 19 Apr 2011, 22:10
Option - E is wrong
because 'can potentially' is redundant.

Refer to Q-159, OG-10
--------------------------------------

While depressed property values can hurt some large investors, they are potentially devastating for home-owners. whose equity--in many cases representing a life's savings--can plunge or even disappear.
(A) they are potentially devastating for homeowners, whose
(B) they can potentially devastate homeowners in that their
(C) for homeowners they are potentially devastating, because their
(D) for homeowners, it is potentially devastating in that their
(E) it can potentially devastate homeowners, whose
----
Explanation - "... can potentially is redundant in B and E. ..."
--------------------------------------

Its an OG-10 Solution.

Experts please reply.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 1931
Followers: 261

Kudos [?]: 58 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: Following the destruction of the space shuttle Challenger, [#permalink] New post 07 Aug 2014, 12:11
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: Following the destruction of the space shuttle Challenger,   [#permalink] 07 Aug 2014, 12:11
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Following the destruction of the space shuttle Challenger, shahnandan 9 21 Oct 2005, 09:35
Following the destruction of the space shuttle Challenger, Antmavel 5 28 Sep 2005, 06:40
Following the destruction of the space shuttle Challenger, macca 6 20 Sep 2005, 06:12
Following the destruction of the space shuttle Challenger, WinWinMBA 4 09 Jun 2005, 16:12
Following the destruction of the space shuttle Challenger, HIMALAYA 19 01 Jun 2005, 19:52
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Following the destruction of the space shuttle Challenger,

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.