Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!
Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club
Registration gives you:
Tests
Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.
Applicant Stats
View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more
Books/Downloads
Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Foodmart customers regularly buy at least one of the [#permalink]
27 Jan 2008, 22:20
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
0% (00:00) correct
0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions
Foodmart customers regularly buy at least one of the following products: milk, chicken, or apples. 60% of shoppers buy milk, 50% buy chicken, and 35% buy apples. If 10% of the customers buy all 3 products, what percentage of Foodmart customers purchase 2 of the above products? 5% 10% 15% 25% 30%
What is the right formula to apply? I used : x=3/5 x + ½ x +7/20 x - y (people with 2 purchases) – 2z (people with 3 purchases), considering that everybody bought smtg. Thus, substituting, we obtain that y=1/4 x
Re: Sets with >=3 elements [#permalink]
05 Feb 2008, 11:11
The explanation on the practice test to the problem goes...
Let bi denote the percentage of buyers who regularly buy i products, and bx the percentage of buyers who regularly purchase product x.
We can construct these equations: b1 + 2b2 + 3b3 = bm + bc + ba = 60% + 50% + 35% = 145% b1 + b2 + b3 = 100% b3 = 10%
Subtract the second one from the first one: b2 + 2b3 = 45% b2 = 25%
How does one explain the multipliers for terms in b1 + 2b2 + 3b3 above? Does that mean that if there are 4 products that the equation would read b1 + 2b2 + 3b3 + 4b4?
Re: Sets with >=3 elements [#permalink]
05 Feb 2008, 11:24
marcodonzelli wrote:
Foodmart customers regularly buy at least one of the following products: milk, chicken, or apples. 60% of shoppers buy milk, 50% buy chicken, and 35% buy apples. If 10% of the customers buy all 3 products, what percentage of Foodmart customers purchase 2 of the above products? 5% 10% 15% 25% 30%
What is the right formula to apply? I used : x=3/5 x + ½ x +7/20 x - y (people with 2 purchases) – 2z (people with 3 purchases), considering that everybody bought smtg. Thus, substituting, we obtain that y=1/4 x
P1 - one product, P2 - two poducts, P3 - three products
Re: Sets with >=3 elements [#permalink]
05 Feb 2008, 18:51
marcodonzelli wrote:
Foodmart customers regularly buy at least one of the following products: milk, chicken, or apples. 60% of shoppers buy milk, 50% buy chicken, and 35% buy apples. If 10% of the customers buy all 3 products, what percentage of Foodmart customers purchase 2 of the above products? 5% 10% 15% 25% 30%
What is the right formula to apply? I used : x=3/5 x + ½ x +7/20 x - y (people with 2 purchases) – 2z (people with 3 purchases), considering that everybody bought smtg. Thus, substituting, we obtain that y=1/4 x
Re: Sets with >=3 elements [#permalink]
11 Oct 2011, 14:12
maratikus wrote:
marcodonzelli wrote:
Foodmart customers regularly buy at least one of the following products: milk, chicken, or apples. 60% of shoppers buy milk, 50% buy chicken, and 35% buy apples. If 10% of the customers buy all 3 products, what percentage of Foodmart customers purchase 2 of the above products? 5% 10% 15% 25% 30%
What is the right formula to apply? I used : x=3/5 x + ½ x +7/20 x - y (people with 2 purchases) – 2z (people with 3 purchases), considering that everybody bought smtg. Thus, substituting, we obtain that y=1/4 x
P1 - one product, P2 - two poducts, P3 - three products
Re: Sets with >=3 elements [#permalink]
11 Oct 2011, 20:18
i'm also a bit confused by everyone else's work, this is the way I solved it
the equation is
P(A or B or C ) = P (A) + P (B) + P (C) - P(A & B) - P(A & C) - P(B & C) + P (A & B & C) also, the probability of A or B or C is 100% since A,B,C are the only sets in this space.
when you add up P(A), P(B), P(C), you are also over adding in case they have intersections of 2 or 3 *draw a venn diagram with 3 intersection circles and it can help make sense . Therefore you subtract out the places where two of them overlap. However, as you were subtracting the 2 set overlaps, each time you're subtracting any 3 set overlap as well. So you end up subtracting 3x for the 3-set overlap there, but recall in the beginning you added 3x for the 3-set overlap for A,B,C, so net is zero for that 3 set overlap. You can't ignore the 3-set overlap so you add it back in as the last component.
Anyway, the problem goes
60+50+35 - (2 set overlaps) + (3 set overlap) = 100 145 - (2 set overlaps) + 10 = 100 155 - (2 set overlaps) = 100 (2 set overlaps) = 55
That means that 2 set overlaps add up to 55%. Meaning P(A&B) + P(A&C) + P(C&B) = 55
What's important here is you're back to the same problem of over adding because there are probabilities where all 3 sets overlap. so if you notice you're actually adding the 3 set overlap 3x, once in each term obviously. Now normally you would think ok, I have to subtract the 3-set overlap out 2x, leaving just net 1. And that would be 100% correct if you are looking for Probability of people buying 2things AND 3 things. But the question asks for only people that buy both (in other words the two set overlaps).
Therefore you would subtract 55 - 3(3 set overlaps) = 25% getting rid of the 3 set overlaps entirely.
Re: Sets with >=3 elements [#permalink]
11 Oct 2011, 22:07
Expert's post
Some good methods have been discussed above. Let me add a small discussion on Venn diagrams
You will not have any confusion if you visualize it. The total number of people is 100 (assume it since numbers are in %). These 100 people are spread around in the 3 circles. One person can be in only one area.
Attachment:
Ques6.jpg [ 17.57 KiB | Viewed 1126 times ]
60+50+35 (= 145) is more than 100 because 60 = the entire left top circle = the left top red part + x + z + 10. 50 = the entire right top circle = the right top red part + x + y + 10 35 = the bottom circle = the bottom red part + y + z + 10 so x, y and z are counted twice and 10 is counted thrice
45 = x + y + z + 2*10 x+ y + z = 25 _________________
Re: Sets with >=3 elements [#permalink]
13 Oct 2011, 07:46
Expert's post
OptimusPrimea1 wrote:
@Karishma:
How did you get:
"45 = x + y + z + 2*10 x+ y + z = 25"
I lost the part here..
145 is 45 more than 100. Why is it 45 extra? Because x, y and z were counted twice (so they appear once extra) and 10 was counted thrice ( so it appears twice extra). check out the diagram. These extras make up the 45. In 100, there is no double/triple counting. It is equal to the actual number of people. That is why 45 = x + y + z + 2*10
You know what’s worse than getting a ding at one of your dreams schools . Yes its getting that horrid wait-listed email . This limbo is frustrating as hell . Somewhere...
As I’m halfway through my second year now, graduation is now rapidly approaching. I’ve neglected this blog in the last year, mainly because I felt I didn’...
Wow! MBA life is hectic indeed. Time flies by. It is hard to keep track of the time. Last week was high intense training Yeah, Finance, Accounting, Marketing, Economics...