Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square [#permalink]

Show Tags

23 Sep 2013, 05:10

5

This post received KUDOS

19

This post was BOOKMARKED

00:00

A

B

C

D

E

Difficulty:

15% (low)

Question Stats:

78% (02:11) correct
22% (01:18) wrong based on 283 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square layers. Each layer consists of cubic boxes arranged in rows that form a square, and each layer has 1 fewer row and 1 fewer box in each remaining row than the layer directly below it. If the bottom of the layer has 81 boxes and the top of the layer has only 1 box, how many boxes are in display?

Re: For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square [#permalink]

Show Tags

23 Sep 2013, 06:23

15

This post received KUDOS

Expert's post

12

This post was BOOKMARKED

imhimanshu wrote:

For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square layers. Each layer consists of cubic boxes arranged in rows that form a square, and each layer has 1 fewer row and 1 fewer box in each remaining row than the layer directly below it. If the bottom of the layer has 81 boxes and the top of the layer has only 1 box, how many boxes are in display?

A. 236 B. 260 C. 269 D. 276 E. 285

Basically we have a 9-layer pyramid as shown below:

Attachment:

pyramid_with_corner_cube_from_istock.jpg [ 9.94 KiB | Viewed 19557 times ]

(Actually this pyramid 8-layer, couldn't find 9-layer one image)

The number of boxes would be: 9^2 + 8^2 + 7^2 + 6^2 + 5^2 + 4^2 + 3^2 + 2^2 + 1 = 285.

You can use the sum of the first n perfect squares formula to calculate: \(\frac{n(n+1)(2n+1)}{6}=\frac{9*(9+1)(2*9+1)}{6}=285\).

Re: For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square [#permalink]

Show Tags

23 Sep 2013, 14:46

Thanks bunuel but how did you manage to understand that? I read the question again and cannot imagine the picture you uploaded in my head at all. Thanks! _________________

Re: For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square [#permalink]

Show Tags

24 Sep 2013, 00:56

13

This post received KUDOS

Expert's post

1

This post was BOOKMARKED

roygush wrote:

Thanks bunuel but how did you manage to understand that? I read the question again and cannot imagine the picture you uploaded in my head at all. Thanks!

I read the stem carefully. We are told that: Cubic boxes are stacked in square layers --> each layer is a square; The bottom of the layer has 81 boxes --> the bottom layer has 9 rows and each row has 9 boxes. Each layer has 1 fewer row and 1 fewer box in each remaining row than the layer directly below it --> the second layer has 8 rows and each row has 8 boxes. ...

Re: For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square [#permalink]

Show Tags

24 Sep 2013, 08:58

1

This post received KUDOS

Bunuel wrote:

roygush wrote:

Thanks bunuel but how did you manage to understand that? I read the question again and cannot imagine the picture you uploaded in my head at all. Thanks!

I read the stem carefully. We are told that: Cubic boxes are stacked in square layers --> each layer is a square; The bottom of the layer has 81 boxes --> the bottom layer has 9 rows and each row has 9 boxes. Each layer has 1 fewer row and 1 fewer box in each remaining row than the layer directly below it --> the second layer has 8 rows and each row has 8 boxes. ...

Hope it helps.

I got confused (and I still am) by the line which says "Each layer has 1 fewer row and 1 fewer box in each remaining row than the layer directly below it"

I got that the bottom layer will have 9 x 9 boxes I also understand that the next level up will have 8 rows of boxes and since this layer also has to form a square hence it needs 8 boxes in the column as well.

What is elusive for me is "and 1 fewer box in each remaining row[/color] than the layer directly below it". Can you please explain again.

Re: For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square [#permalink]

Show Tags

24 Sep 2013, 15:04

1

This post received KUDOS

Expert's post

violetsplash wrote:

Bunuel wrote:

roygush wrote:

Thanks bunuel but how did you manage to understand that? I read the question again and cannot imagine the picture you uploaded in my head at all. Thanks!

I read the stem carefully. We are told that: Cubic boxes are stacked in square layers --> each layer is a square; The bottom of the layer has 81 boxes --> the bottom layer has 9 rows and each row has 9 boxes. Each layer has 1 fewer row and 1 fewer box in each remaining row than the layer directly below it --> the second layer has 8 rows and each row has 8 boxes. ...

Hope it helps.

I got confused (and I still am) by the line which says "Each layer has 1 fewer row and 1 fewer box in each remaining row than the layer directly below it"

I got that the bottom layer will have 9 x 9 boxes I also understand that the next level up will have 8 rows of boxes and since this layer also has to form a square hence it needs 8 boxes in the column as well.

What is elusive for me is "and 1 fewer box in each remaining row[/color] than the layer directly below it". Can you please explain again.

Each layer has 1 fewer row and 1 fewer box in each remaining row than the layer directly below it:

1st layer has 9 rows and 9 boxes in each of them. 2nd row has 1 fewer, so 8 rows and each of the remaining 8 rows has 1 fewer box, so 8 boxes in it.

Re: For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square [#permalink]

Show Tags

04 Apr 2015, 17:42

Bunuel wrote:

imhimanshu wrote:

For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square layers. Each layer consists of cubic boxes arranged in rows that form a square, and each layer has 1 fewer row and 1 fewer box in each remaining row than the layer directly below it. If the bottom of the layer has 81 boxes and the top of the layer has only 1 box, how many boxes are in display?

A. 236 B. 260 C. 269 D. 276 E. 285

Basically we have a 9-layer pyramid as shown below:

Attachment:

pyramid_with_corner_cube_from_istock.jpg

(Actually this pyramid 8-layer, couldn't find 9-layer one image)

The number of boxes would be: 9^2 + 8^2 + 7^2 + 6^2 + 5^2 + 4^2 + 3^2 + 2^2 + 1 = 285.

You can use the sum of the first n perfect squares formula to calculate: \(\frac{n(n+1)(2n+1)}{6}=\frac{9*(9+1)(2*9+1)}{6}=285\).

Answer: E.

Hope it's clear.

Is there any chance you can apply why that 6 is there? I want to make sure I can apply this formula in more complicated cases.

Re: For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square [#permalink]

Show Tags

11 Oct 2015, 19:42

Here's where non-native speakers could have trouble. By display I kept thinking of a computer display and I tried to visualize boxes arranged within the TV, and jumped into the conclusion that this was similar to a problem in the OG (13th Ed. PS 124). Now, if you don't know the formula for the sum of the first n perfect squares (I actually forgot it on a second attempt), it is just nonsense to sum each square result. plaverbach's approach is the appropriate one. After taking a look at the answers and noticing that only two of them have the same units number, you pray that those are wrong and go ahead and find that unit.

Re: For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square [#permalink]

Show Tags

03 Jan 2016, 10:17

I liked plaverbach approach, as I couldn't understand the question in the first place and choose random wrong answer. But when I saw the picture posted, I could use the plaverbach approach.

gmatclubot

Re: For a display, identical cubic boxes are stacked in square
[#permalink]
03 Jan 2016, 10:17

Part 2 of the GMAT: How I tackled the GMAT and improved a disappointing score Apologies for the month gap. I went on vacation and had to finish up a...

Cal Newport is a computer science professor at GeorgeTown University, author, blogger and is obsessed with productivity. He writes on this topic in his popular Study Hacks blog. I was...

So the last couple of weeks have seen a flurry of discussion in our MBA class Whatsapp group around Brexit, the referendum and currency exchange. Most of us believed...