Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 25 May 2013, 05:04
Customize  |  Hide

For a local government to outlaw all strikes by its workers

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  
Author Message
TAGS:
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 1741
Location: Dhaka
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
For a local government to outlaw all strikes by its workers [#permalink] New post 02 Nov 2005, 14:10
00:00

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
20. For a local government to outlaw all strikes by its workers is a costly mistake, because all its labor disputes must then be settled by binding arbitration, without any negotiated public-sector labor settlements guiding the arbitrators. Strikes should be outlawed only for categories of public-sector workers for whose services no acceptable substitute exists.
The statements above best support which of the following conclusions?
(A) Where public-service workers are permitted to strike, contract negotiations with those workers are typically settled without a strike.
(B) Where strikes by all categories of pubic-sector workers are outlawed, no acceptable substitutes for the services provided by any of those workers are available.
(C) Binding arbitration tends to be more advantageous for public-service workers where it is the only available means of settling labor disputes with such workers.
(D) Most categories of public-sector workers have no counterparts in the private sector.
(E) A strike by workers in a local government is unlikely to be settled without help from an arbitrator.
_________________

hey ya......

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 04 Sep 2005
Posts: 142
Location: Fringes of the Boreal, Canada
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 02 Nov 2005, 17:43
I'm awful at these but I like C in this case.

The passage states that it would be costly for a local government to disallow the striking rights of public sector workers because there is no governmental entity involved in the binding arbitration process. This suggests that there is better representation on the public workers side creating an advantage in arbitration process.....please God be right :roll:
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 503
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 02 Nov 2005, 20:04
I vote for C.

A - Out of scope. Contract negotiations??
B - Incorrect. This only a suggestion in the argument.
C - Costly mistake for local goverment.Hence correct.
D - Incorrect. Argument is not talking og the public sector
E - Incorrect. Assumes that the local goverment has already outlawed the strikes.

What is the OA??
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 04 Sep 2005
Posts: 142
Location: Fringes of the Boreal, Canada
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 03 Nov 2005, 20:23
Are we going to get an answer for this?
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Jul 2005
Posts: 405
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 03 Nov 2005, 23:25
a) Out of scope
b)
c) No
d) Out of scope
e) Out of scope

Best answer is B. The stimulus concludes that strikes should be outlawed for public sector workers who have no substitutes. The extension to this conclusion is B.
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 13 Jun 2004
Posts: 1135
Location: London, UK
Schools: Tuck'08
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 03 Nov 2005, 23:30
Between A and B for me
I would go for A
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 13 Jun 2004
Posts: 1135
Location: London, UK
Schools: Tuck'08
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 03 Nov 2005, 23:31
double post..sorry
Manager
Manager
Joined: 08 Aug 2005
Posts: 102
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 04 Nov 2005, 02:21
I would go for C
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1957
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 04 Nov 2005, 09:50
C

"Costly Mistake" is the key here. It means that the other party benefits.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 1741
Location: Dhaka
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 04 Nov 2005, 22:19
good job once again OA is C.
_________________

hey ya......

  [#permalink] 04 Nov 2005, 22:19
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts For a local government to outlaw all strikes by its workers wild_desperado 3 17 Jun 2005, 04:33
New posts For a local government to outlaw all strikes by its workers mailtheguru 9 24 Jul 2006, 09:56
New posts For a local government to outlaw all strikes by its workers huoguo 5 02 Mar 2007, 08:05
New posts For a local government to outlaw all strikes by its workers dynamo 3 25 Feb 2008, 16:29
New posts For a local government to outlaw all strikes by its workers spriya 7 24 Jul 2008, 12:03
Display posts from previous: Sort by

For a local government to outlaw all strikes by its workers

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.