Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 20 Oct 2014, 02:16

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

For a local government to outlaw all strikes by its workers

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Aug 2003
Posts: 258
Location: Bangalore
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

For a local government to outlaw all strikes by its workers [#permalink] New post 26 Sep 2003, 06:23
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
For a local government to outlaw all strikes by its workers is a costly mistake, because all its labor disputes must then be settled by binding arbitration, without any negotiated public-sector labor settlements guiding the arbitrators. Strikes should be outlawed only for categories of public-sector workers for whose services no acceptable substitute exists.
The statements above best support which of the following conclusions?
(A) Where public-service workers are permitted to strike, contract negotiations with those workers are typically settled without a strike.
(B) Where strikes by all categories of pubic-sector workers are outlawed, no acceptable substitutes for the services provided by any of those workers are available.
(C) Binding arbitration tends to be more advantageous for public-service workers where it is the only available means of settling labor disputes with such workers.
(D) Most categories of public-sector workers have no counterparts in the private sector.
(E) A strike by workers in a local government is unlikely to be settled without help from an arbitrator.
Kindly explain your answer.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 25 Jun 2003
Posts: 96
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 26 Sep 2003, 06:44
C

Author's point is if you outlaw a strike by a category of workers where there exists a substitute, local goverment may lose on settling the arbitration. Since Public sector workers can not be substituted, arbitration is only the way.
_________________

Brainless

SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 03 Feb 2003
Posts: 1613
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 26 Sep 2003, 09:58
A hard one...

B is temptive, but I agree with C.
CEO
CEO
avatar
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Posts: 3470
Followers: 60

Kudos [?]: 674 [0], given: 781

 [#permalink] New post 26 Sep 2003, 12:41
C is best ...First line...outlawing strikes are a "costly mistake".... This suggests that arbritration will go the workers way.

A ... goes too far..

B ... is directly mentioned in the passage..nothing to conclude

D... The argument never mentions private workers..nothing to do with private workers

E.... We cant say that , because we dont know if strikes are actually outlawed or not... Depends on what the local government decides to implement.

thanks
praetorian
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Aug 2003
Posts: 258
Location: Bangalore
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 26 Sep 2003, 20:31
C is correct.
nice explaination praet.
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5252
Followers: 23

Kudos [?]: 139 [0], given: 0

Reviews Badge
 [#permalink] New post 26 Aug 2006, 05:51
Agreed, arbitration is prohibitively expensive, thus the government would incur huge deficits were it to outlaw strikes for all public workers.

(C)

2:12
  [#permalink] 26 Aug 2006, 05:51
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
For a local government to outlaw all strikes by its workers fanatico 3 09 Mar 2011, 21:50
For a local government to outlaw all strikes by its workers mailtheguru 0 10 Jul 2008, 12:45
For a local government to outlaw all strikes by its workers remgeo 0 06 Apr 2006, 06:44
For a local government to outlaw all strikes by its workers nakib77 0 04 Nov 2005, 21:19
For a local government to outlaw all strikes by its workers wild_desperado 0 17 Jun 2005, 11:52
Display posts from previous: Sort by

For a local government to outlaw all strikes by its workers

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.