Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 25 Jul 2014, 03:44

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

For a trade embargo against a particular country to succeed,

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 20 Apr 2005
Posts: 586
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
For a trade embargo against a particular country to succeed, [#permalink] New post 02 May 2005, 14:24
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  45% (medium)

Question Stats:

54% (02:12) correct 46% (01:33) wrong based on 158 sessions
16. For a trade embargo against a particular country to succeed, a high degree of both international accord and ability to prevent goods from entering or leaving that country must be sustained. A total blockade of Patria’s ports is necessary to an embargo, but such an action would be likely to cause international discord over the embargo.

The claims above, if true, most strongly support which of the following conclusions?

(A) The balance of opinion is likely to favor Patria in the event of a blockade.
(B) As long as international opinion is unanimously against Patria, a trade embargo is likely to succeed.
(C) A naval blockade of Patria’s ports would ensure that no goods enter or leave Patria.
(D) Any trade embargo against Patria would be likely to fail at some time.
(E) For a blockade of Patria’s ports to be successful, international opinion must be unanimous.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
2 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Status: Done!
Joined: 22 Mar 2012
Posts: 10
Location: India
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V35
GPA: 3
WE: Operations (Manufacturing)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 11 [2] , given: 4

Re: For a trade embargo against a particular country to succeed, [#permalink] New post 27 Nov 2012, 00:22
2
This post received
KUDOS
First of all, we need to know that it is an infer question. (Yippe! Half way done!) :-D

Premise1: Two actions (international accord + preventing goods from moving in or out of banned country) are NECESSARY for success of embargo.
Premise2: The actions will result in an outcome that will defeat one of the two action which is necessary for the outcome.

Read as: The actions will result in an outcome (total blockade) that (by causing international discord) will defeat one of the two action (international accord) which is necessary for the outcome.

Use 'Prethinking for CR' (a term coined by e-gmat)
Logic says that when the prerequisites for an action is killed by outcome of the action, the action may not survive. So, an Embargo which is defeating its NECESSARY requisites will be eventually fail. :idea:

We already know the answer at this stage. Still let us check the options

A. 'Shell game' (a term coined by GMAT CR Bible Book)
This is tempting. Our real world knowledge sways away to think that embargo is bad. So, if an embargo fails, it may be favouring Patria!
Wait! Wait ! Wait! What if embargo caused a regime change in Patria and this event paved way for a meritocratic system of governance influence by theory of Übermensch! And then like Germany, Patria became a powerful nation! In this case, embargo might help Patria!! :panel

Am I introducing my personal judgement that embargo is bad? If yes... that is bad habit for CR. Beware! :peek

B. P2 says that international discord will arise. This option negates my P2. At the most, this option create a P3. But in that case also, the argument is left bare without any conclusion/inference. :idea:

C. At the most, the option can serve as definition of embargo and may serve as Premise3. Still no sign of conclusion 'shore' for my 'logic ship'. :(

D. Logical syllogism says that Embargo will fail. This is exactly what we want! :yes

E. In the light of premise1 and 2, this option is self defeating. P2: If blockade is successful, international discord will arise. So, international opinion can never be unanimous. :beat
1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 15 Mar 2005
Posts: 425
Location: Phoenix
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [1] , given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR: Trade Embargo [#permalink] New post 02 May 2005, 15:21
1
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
I'd go with D. Its because the statement should be a conclusion. The argument is
1. Complete blockage required for trade embargo to succeed.
2. Trying to enforce a complete blockage is likely to create a discorm amongst nations.

The only logical conclusion is that "therefore, a trade embargo against Patria is likely to fail".

Stmts B and E are suggestions for the embargo to succeed, not conclusions.
Stmt A is wrong because the passage doesn't mention that international discord would help Patria.
C is simply a fact. already stated in the arguments, not a conclusion.
_________________

Who says elephants can't dance?

1 KUDOS received
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5253
Followers: 23

Kudos [?]: 120 [1] , given: 0

GMAT Tests User Reviews Badge
 [#permalink] New post 03 May 2005, 08:08
1
This post received
KUDOS
In E, unanimous agreement does not necessarily mean a high degree of cooperation.

Therefore, D.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 04 Jul 2004
Posts: 905
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 03 May 2005, 15:10
(D). Blockade will cause international discord. => trade embargo will fail (first sentence)
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 20 Apr 2005
Posts: 586
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Answer [#permalink] New post 04 May 2005, 05:46
The OA is D.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 01 Aug 2008
Posts: 770
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 77 [0], given: 99

GMAT Tests User
For a trade embargo against a particular country to succeed, [#permalink] New post 23 Mar 2009, 05:37
For a trade embargo against a particular country to succeed, a high degree of both international accord and ability to prevent goods from entering or leaving that country must be sustained. A total blockade of Patria’s ports is necessary to an embargo, but such an action would be likely to cause international discord over the embargo.
The claims above, if true, most strongly support which of the following conclusions?
(A) The balance of opinion is likely to favor Patria in the event of a blockade.
(B) As long as international opinion is unanimously against Patria, a trade embargo is likely to succeed.
(C) A naval blockade of Patria’s ports would ensure that no goods enter or leave Patria.
(D) Any trade embargo against Patria would be likely to fail at some time.
(E) For a blockade of Patria’s ports to be successful, international opinion must be unanimous.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 04 Jan 2008
Posts: 919
Followers: 43

Kudos [?]: 151 [0], given: 17

GMAT Tests User
Re: 1000 CR --- trade embargo [#permalink] New post 23 Mar 2009, 10:18
D IMO

just take it this way..

A-->embargo

B-->condn 1(a high degree of both international accord )
and
C-->condn 2(ability to prevent goods from entering or leaving that country)

As per the passage
For A(embargo) to happen we need both B and C

Now which one strongly supports it?
Obviously D.

(A) The balance of opinion is likely to favor Patria in the event of a blockade.
(B) As long as international opinion is unanimously against Patria, a trade embargo is likely to succeed.
(C) A naval blockade of Patria’s ports would ensure that no goods enter or leave Patria.
(D) Any trade embargo against Patria would be likely to fail at some time.
(E) For a blockade of Patria’s ports to be successful, international opinion must be unanimous.
_________________

math-polygons-87336.html
competition-for-the-best-gmat-error-log-template-86232.html

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 01 Aug 2008
Posts: 770
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 77 [0], given: 99

GMAT Tests User
Re: 1000 CR --- trade embargo [#permalink] New post 23 Mar 2009, 11:57
nitya34 wrote:
D IMO

just take it this way..

A-->embargo

B-->condn 1(a high degree of both international accord )
and
C-->condn 2(ability to prevent goods from entering or leaving that country)

As per the passage
For A(embargo) to happen we need both B and C

Now which one strongly supports it?
Obviously D.

(A) The balance of opinion is likely to favor Patria in the event of a blockade.
(B) As long as international opinion is unanimously against Patria, a trade embargo is likely to succeed.
(C) A naval blockade of Patria’s ports would ensure that no goods enter or leave Patria.
(D) Any trade embargo against Patria would be likely to fail at some time.
(E) For a blockade of Patria’s ports to be successful, international opinion must be unanimous.


nitya34,
Thanks for explanation but I am not able to relate your conditions with option D. Can you be a bit more elaborative?

I chose E.. and if possible, can you explain why E is wrong? (E option may be very strong (unanimous opinion) ..?)

Thanks.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 01 Aug 2008
Posts: 770
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 77 [0], given: 99

GMAT Tests User
Re: 1000 CR --- trade embargo [#permalink] New post 24 Mar 2009, 06:58
Hey thanks nitya34 for the link.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 22 Aug 2010
Posts: 1
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Trade Embargo [#permalink] New post 31 Aug 2010, 15:27
I'm for D also. but,

'Any trade embargo' in D is still problematic.

Given article (ports, such an action, 'the' embargo) is limited to 'naval' trade.
It seemingly cannot jump to 'Any trade embargo', which includes 'air' or 'land' trade as well.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 07 Oct 2010
Posts: 3
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 3

Re: For a trade embargo against a particular country to succeed, [#permalink] New post 22 Oct 2012, 06:37
ugimba wrote:
For a trade embargo against a particular country to succeed, a high degree of both international accord and ability to prevent goods from entering or leaving that country must be sustained. A total blockade of Patria’s ports is necessary to an embargo, but such an action would be likely to cause international discord over the embargo.
The claims above, if true, most strongly support which of the following conclusions?
(A) The balance of opinion is likely to favor Patria in the event of a blockade.
(B) As long as international opinion is unanimously against Patria, a trade embargo is likely to succeed.
(C) A naval blockade of Patria’s ports would ensure that no goods enter or leave Patria.
(D) Any trade embargo against Patria would be likely to fail at some time.
(E) For a blockade of Patria’s ports to be successful, international opinion must be unanimous.


My explanation:
A> Out of scope
B>no mention about the blockade is given. Thus, insufficient
C>1. this cannot be a conclusion
2.'naval'-->additional info introduced in a must be true question. Not allowed
D> focus on[color=#ff0000] 'likely'
. Stimulus says that a total blockade is 'likely' to cause discord.Thus, any trade embargo would be likely to fail. Notice, 'at some time' is only given to confuse you folks! :wink:
E> 2 conditions are necessary. therefore, this option is clearly insufficient.
cheers[/color]
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 1420
Followers: 204

Kudos [?]: 42 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: For a trade embargo against a particular country to succeed, [#permalink] New post 20 Jun 2014, 10:18
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: For a trade embargo against a particular country to succeed,   [#permalink] 20 Jun 2014, 10:18
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
For a trade embargo against a particular country to succeed, ugimba 0 27 Nov 2012, 00:22
For a trade embargo against a particular country to succeed, remgeo 15 07 Apr 2006, 02:59
For a trade embargo against a particular country to succeed, andy_gr8 6 24 Jan 2006, 18:36
For a trade embargo against a particular country to succeed, sushom101 13 19 Oct 2005, 02:56
For a trade embargo against a particular country to succeed, sgrover 7 02 Oct 2005, 21:12
Display posts from previous: Sort by

For a trade embargo against a particular country to succeed,

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.