Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 23 Jul 2016, 22:49
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

For a trade embargo against a particular country to succeed,

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Posts: 659
Location: London
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

For a trade embargo against a particular country to succeed, [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Apr 2006, 03:59
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (01:47) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

For a trade embargo against a particular country to succeed, a high degree of both international accord and ability to prevent goods from entering or leaving that country must be sustained. A total blockade of Patria’s ports is necessary to an embargo, but such an action would be likely to cause international discord over the embargo.

The claims above, if true, most strongly support which of the following conclusions?

(A) The balance of opinion is likely to favor Patria in the event of a blockade.
(B) As long as international opinion is unanimously against Patria, a trade embargo is likely to succeed.
(C) A naval blockade of Patria’s ports would ensure that no goods enter or leave Patria.
(D) Any trade embargo against Patria would be likely to fail at some time.
(E) For a blockade of Patria’s ports to be successful, international opinion must be unanimous.
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 29 Apr 2003
Posts: 1403
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Apr 2006, 04:26
Ans is .... D
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Mar 2006
Posts: 352
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 1

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Apr 2006, 20:23
Beween A and D,i would choose D but can someone please explain why can't A be a possibility.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 328
Location: London
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Apr 2006, 23:07
D it is.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 20 Feb 2006
Posts: 46
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Apr 2006, 01:41
D.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 13 Dec 2005
Posts: 224
Location: Milwaukee,WI
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Apr 2006, 04:09
D . international accord and ..... is required for a trade embargo ....if there is an internation discord over the embargo then embargo will eventually fall.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 08 Jun 2004
Posts: 498
Location: Europe
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 61 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Apr 2006, 13:07
One more for 'D'.
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 21 Mar 2006
Posts: 1134
Location: Bangalore
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Apr 2006, 23:39
Clear D. It cant be A because we(and the passage) are not concerned with what is favourable to Patria. So that puts A out of scope.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 10 Oct 2005
Posts: 720
Location: Madrid
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Apr 2006, 00:20
I ll go with A
For a trade embargo against a particular country to succeed, a high degree of both international accord and ability to prevent goods from entering or leaving that country must be sustained. A total blockade of Patria?s ports is necessary to an embargo
But such an action would be likely to cause international discord over the embargo. ----->because The balance of opinion is likely to favor Patria in the event of a blockade.
_________________

IE IMBA 2010

VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 29 Apr 2003
Posts: 1403
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Apr 2006, 00:24
I will still stick with D.


Whats the OA?
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Posts: 659
Location: London
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Apr 2006, 02:25
The OA is D.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Posts: 659
Location: London
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Apr 2006, 02:29
Yurik79 wrote:
I ll go with A
For a trade embargo against a particular country to succeed, a high degree of both international accord and ability to prevent goods from entering or leaving that country must be sustained. A total blockade of Patria?s ports is necessary to an embargo
But such an action would be likely to cause international discord over the embargo. ----->because The balance of opinion is likely to favor Patria in the event of a blockade.


A discord means - some FOR and some AGAINST isnt it. So, we cannot say for sure that the opinion is likely to favour Patria.

Hope I'm talking sense :)
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 10 Oct 2005
Posts: 720
Location: Madrid
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Apr 2006, 12:07
remgeo wrote:
Yurik79 wrote:
I ll go with A
For a trade embargo against a particular country to succeed, a high degree of both international accord and ability to prevent goods from entering or leaving that country must be sustained. A total blockade of Patria?s ports is necessary to an embargo
But such an action would be likely to cause international discord over the embargo. ----->because The balance of opinion is likely to favor Patria in the event of a blockade.


A discord means - some FOR and some AGAINST isnt it. So, we cannot say for sure that the opinion is likely to favour Patria.

Hope I'm talking sense :)

10x a tone pal))Now I am getting this one
My problem in verbal is that English is not my native language!So I have hard times with some words))
_________________

IE IMBA 2010

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 20 Jun 2005
Posts: 148
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 85 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - trade embargo [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Apr 2006, 03:39
Answer Explanation

Situation If an embargo against Patria’s ports were released then it would trigger an international discord over the embargo.

Reasoning What is being suggested as a conclusion for this argument? The argument implies a variance between world countries regarded to Patria’s ports embargo. It is reasonable to assume that eventually the embargo would be canceled because it is need to have at least international agreement in such issues.

A. The passage does not discuss about balance of opinion and even what kind of opinion related to Patria’s ports embargo exists here.

B. The stimulus doesn’t concern about international agreement against Patria. That could be true but it is out of our scope. Because it is predicted that an controversy would be happened .

C. The statement could be true, but the embargo is not realistic in terms international discord over the embargo. So it can not be considered as a main conclusion.

D. Correct. Here we have the exact result from the passage information.

E. It is not conclusion, i.e. it just states again the condition of successful embargo.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 18 Feb 2006
Posts: 10
Location: Zurich
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - trade embargo [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Apr 2006, 14:28
D
remgeo wrote:
For a trade embargo against a particular country to succeed, a high degree of both international accord and ability to prevent goods from entering or leaving that country must be sustained. A total blockade of Patria’s ports is necessary to an embargo, but such an action would be likely to cause international discord over the embargo.

The claims above, if true, most strongly support which of the following conclusions?

(A) The balance of opinion is likely to favor Patria in the event of a blockade.
(B) As long as international opinion is unanimously against Patria, a trade embargo is likely to succeed.
(C) A naval blockade of Patria’s ports would ensure that no goods enter or leave Patria.
(D) Any trade embargo against Patria would be likely to fail at some time.
(E) For a blockade of Patria’s ports to be successful, international opinion must be unanimous.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 20 Feb 2006
Posts: 213
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Apr 2006, 08:22
Guys, what is wrong with B? B and D mean the same to me.
  [#permalink] 16 Apr 2006, 08:22
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
5 For a trade embargo guhabhishek 3 11 Dec 2015, 21:09
8 For a trade embargo against a particular country to succeed, TomB 9 28 Feb 2012, 12:16
31 Experts publish their posts in the topic For a trade embargo against a particular country to succeed, courtdancer 17 07 Dec 2010, 00:27
1 For a trade embargo against a particular country to succeed, mojorising800 8 18 Jan 2010, 12:57
For a trade embargo against a particular country to succeed, ugimba 0 27 Nov 2012, 01:22
Display posts from previous: Sort by

For a trade embargo against a particular country to succeed,

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.