Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!
Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club
Registration gives you:
Tests
Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.
Applicant Stats
View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more
Books/Downloads
Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Re: Awkward DS.... [#permalink]
26 Nov 2010, 14:15
2
This post received KUDOS
Statement A: Tells you that k is somewhere between 5 and 6. Based on the definition of the question stem /k/ is thus 5, which is not evently divisible by 2.
=> Sufficient
Statement B:Tells you that the following inequality has to hold: 7 < k + 2.3 < 8 => 4.7 < k < 5.7 => /k/ has to equal 5, which is not evenly divisible.
Re: Awkward DS.... [#permalink]
26 Nov 2010, 14:26
4
This post received KUDOS
1
This post was BOOKMARKED
Thanks for the reply stanford2012.
Looking at statement b... Slight correction in your inequality: 4.7 ≤ k < 5.7. With this inequality, we see that k can be 4.7, 4.8, 4.9, etc. Hence, if k < 5 then //k// = 4, which is divisible by 2. However, if k = 5.2, then //k// = 5, which is not divisible by 2.
Hence insufficient.
Correct answer is A. Updated post with OA. _________________
I appreciate the kudos if you find this post helpful! +1
Re: Awkward DS.... [#permalink]
26 Nov 2010, 22:25
krishnasty wrote:
martie11 wrote:
Source: Knewton
For all numbers t, let //t// be defined as the greatest integer less than or equal to t. Is //k// evenly divisible by 2?
a) 5 < k < 6 b) //k + 2.3// = 7
Solution to follow...interested to see how people interrupt this question.
Can somebody please explain me what '//' symbol implies over here??
----------------------------------------------------------------- Consider KUDOS if you like my post!
It's my interpretation that this is equivalent to the "floor" of the number.
In this case, say you have x = 11.3. Now the question tries to confuse you: // x // is equal to the greatest integer less than or equal to x, in other words:
// x // --> the largest integer <= x
In this case x = 11.3, so the largest number that is <= 11.3 is 11. So // x // = 11. Note, if x = 11, then by definition, // x // = 11.
I think the concept itself is fairly straightforward, it's the wording that is awkward....
HTHs. _________________
I appreciate the kudos if you find this post helpful! +1
Re: Awkward DS.... [#permalink]
27 Nov 2010, 19:39
martie11 wrote:
Source: Knewton
For all numbers t, let //t// be defined as the greatest integer less than or equal to t. Is //k// evenly divisible by 2?
a) 5 < k < 6 b) //k + 2.3// = 7
Solution to follow...interested to see how people interrupt this question.
S1: 5< k < 6 means //k// = 5. Not divisible by 2. Sufficient. S2: //k+2.3// = 7 means 8 > k+2.3 >= 7. therefore 5.7 > k >=4.7 and //k// = 4 or 5. Not Sufficient.
Re: For all numbers t, let //t// be defined as the greatest [#permalink]
18 Dec 2012, 00:29
Rule: //t// is the greatest integer less than or equal to t Problem: Is //k// evenly divisible by 2?
(1) 5 < k < 6 //k// = 5 which is not divisible by 2 SUFFICIENT. (2) //k + 2.3// = 7 8 > k + 2.3 >= 7 5.7 > k > 4.7 if k = 4, YES if not, NO INSUFFICIENT.
Re: For all numbers t, let //t// be defined as the greatest [#permalink]
31 Jan 2014, 10:25
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!
Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).
Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email. _________________
Re: For all numbers t, let //t// be defined as the greatest [#permalink]
04 Oct 2015, 19:05
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!
Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).
Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email. _________________
As I’m halfway through my second year now, graduation is now rapidly approaching. I’ve neglected this blog in the last year, mainly because I felt I didn’...
Perhaps known best for its men’s basketball team – winners of five national championships, including last year’s – Duke University is also home to an elite full-time MBA...
Hilary Term has only started and we can feel the heat already. The two weeks have been packed with activities and submissions, giving a peek into what will follow...