Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

For every integer k from 1 to 10, inclusive the [#permalink]
01 Jan 2010, 18:46

4

This post was BOOKMARKED

00:00

A

B

C

D

E

Difficulty:

65% (hard)

Question Stats:

57% (02:33) correct
43% (01:37) wrong based on 114 sessions

For every integer k from 1 to 10, inclusive the "k"th term of a certain sequence is given by (-1)^{(k+1)}*(\frac{1}{2^k}) if T is the sum of the first 10 terms in the sequence, then T is

A. greater than 2 B. between 1 and 2 C. between 1/2 and 1 D. between 1/4 and 1/2 E. less than 1/4

i don't know how to solve it. it goes as (1/2)-(1/2^2)+(1/2^3)- ... -(1/2^10)=T

Re: Sequence: can anyone help with this question [#permalink]
01 Jan 2010, 19:23

4

This post received KUDOS

Expert's post

For every integer k from 1 to 10, inclusive the "k"th term of a certain sequence is given by (-1)^{(k+1)}*(\frac{1}{2^k}) if T is the sum of the first 10 terms in the sequence, then T is A. Greater than 2 B. Between 1 and 2 C. Between 1/2 and 1 D. Between 1/4 and 1/2 E. Less than 1/4

First of all we see that there is set of 10 numbers and every even term is negative.

Second it's not hard to get this numbers: \frac{1}{2}, -\frac{1}{4}, \frac{1}{8}, -\frac{1}{16}, \frac{1}{32}... enough for calculations, we see pattern now.

And now the main part: adding them up is quite a job, after calculations you'll get \frac{341}{1024}. You can add them up by pairs but it's also time consuming. Once we've done it we can conclude that it's more than \frac{1}{4} and less than \frac{1}{2}, so answer is D.

BUT there is shortcut:

Sequence \frac{1}{2}, -\frac{1}{4}, \frac{1}{8}, -\frac{1}{16}, \frac{1}{32}... represents geometric progression with first term \frac{1}{2} and the common ratio of -\frac{1}{2}.

Now, the sum of infinite geometric progression with common ratio |r|<1[/m], is sum=\frac{b}{1-r}, where b is the first term.

So, if the sequence were infinite then the sum would be: \frac{\frac{1}{2}}{1-(-\frac{1}{2})}=\frac{1}{3}

This means that no matter how many number (terms) we have their sum will never be more then \frac{1}{3} (A, B and C are out). Also this means that the sum of our sequence is very close to \frac{1}{3} and for sure more than \frac{1}{4} (E out).

Re: Sequence: can anyone help with this question [#permalink]
01 Jan 2010, 21:25

bekbek wrote:

Thank you very much guys..

Any formula for this question:

For every integer k from 1 to 10, inclusive the "k"th term of a certain sequence is given by (-1)^{(k+1)}*(\frac{1}{2^k}) if T is the sum of the first 10 terms in the sequence, then T is

a) greater than 2 b) between 1 and 2 c) between 1/2 and 1 d) between 1/4 and 1/2 e) less than 1/4

OA is D but i don't know how to solve it. it goes as (1/2)-(1/2^2)+(1/2^3)- ... -(1/2^10)=T

Agree with Bunuel.. Use the Geometric Series formual to get the answer.

S = a+ ar + ar^2+.....ar^n when 0<r<1 and series is infinte n=infinite a = a(1-r^n)/(1-r) = a/1-r

S=(1/2)-(1/2^2)+(1/2^3)- ... -(1/2^10) = 1/2 (1+(-1/2) +(-1/2)^2 +(-1/2)^3)....) = 1/2 ( 1/(1-(-1/2)) =1/3 So Values is near to 1/3 and slightly less than 1/3

D is the correct answer. _________________

Your attitude determines your altitude Smiling wins more friends than frowning

Re: Sequence: can anyone help with this question [#permalink]
02 Jan 2010, 02:39

the way i saw it is this way, the first two terms are 1/2 and -1/4, added together will give you 1/4. the rest of the term pairs will only be added to this, so there's no way that the end result will be less than 1/4. you now have your lower-bound...

-----> if you're pressed for time, you'll have a pretty good idea of the answer because D is the only one that has greater than 1/4, you can intelligently guess that... if you do have more time, press on...

if you look at the other term pairs, they'll be: 1/8, 1/16, 1/32 ... even if this goes on forever, the sequence will keep on halving itself...

now you do some quick calculations:

1/4 =2/8 = 4/16 = 8/32 .... etc. + 1/8 = 2/16 = 4/32 .... etc. + 1/16 = 2/32 .... etc. + 1/32 .... etc. _____________________________ --- add each column up = 1/4 3/8 7/16 15/32 .... etc.

what you'll notice is that the sums keep getting closer and closer to 1/2 but will never actually get there (if you graph this, it will be asymptotic to 1/2). you now have your upper-bound... 1/2

Re: Sequence: can anyone help with this question [#permalink]
18 Feb 2011, 12:09

5

This post received KUDOS

1

This post was BOOKMARKED

A few things here:

* I've never seen a real GMAT question that requires one to know any geometric sequence formulas. Of course there are questions where you might use such formulas, but there will always be a different approach available;

* In any sequence question which gives an expression for each term, you'll always want to write down the first few terms using the given expression to work out what the sequence looks like. Here we have:

* Now, adding all of these fractions together would take a long time to do. The GMAT *never* requires you to perform any crazy calculations, so there must be a different way to answer the question. Notice the answer choices are only estimates, so we only need to estimate the sum of the first 10 terms. When we want to estimate the value of a sum, we ignore terms that make only a tiny contribution to the sum. The last few terms in our sequence are minuscule compared to the first few, so to get a good estimate, we can completely ignore them; adding, say, the first four terms will give a perfectly good approximation of the sum here (you get 5/16, which is enough to choose the right answer).

* The sequence in this question is what is known as an 'alternating sequence' -- that is, the terms alternate between positive and negative values. When adding an alternating sequence, you most often want to add your terms in pairs first, grouping one positive and one negative (add the 1st and 2nd term, the 3rd and 4th, and so on). One doesn't need to do this for this question, but it does make the answer a bit easier to see - we'd find our sum is

from which you can instantly see the sum is greater than 1/4. Since every term here is tiny after the first two, the sum is certainly less than 1/2. _________________

Nov 2011: After years of development, I am now making my advanced Quant books and high-level problem sets available for sale. Contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com for details.

Since we have understood the pattern, we can write the remaining numbers which are (1/2-1/4)+(1/8-1/16)+(1/32-1/64)+(1/128-1/256)+(1/512-1/1024)

Step 2: The initially value is 0.5 . From 0.5 we are subtracting 0.25. Then the remaining value is 0.25. Then we are adding 0.125 which gives 0.375 then we are subtracting 0.0625 which gives 0.3125. So, if we add further numbers also, the total will not cross 0.5 for the 10 numbers

So the clear option is (D)

Last edited by mba4viplav on 25 May 2011, 09:54, edited 1 time in total.

Re: Sequence: can anyone help with this question [#permalink]
26 May 2011, 10:27

The first term is (-1)^2*1/(2)^1 = 1/2

The second term is = -1/4

The third term is = 1/8

Looking at the answer choices, you don't need to continue. Since the denominator is increasing exponentially, the terms added and subtracted are becoming closer to 0. From the first term, we know we will never go above 1/2 After subtracting the second term, we know we will never go below ¼. Ans. D. _________________

Re: For every integer k from 1 to 10, inclusive the [#permalink]
27 Oct 2013, 16:08

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email. _________________

Re: Sequence: can anyone help with this question [#permalink]
27 Oct 2013, 22:41

Bunuel wrote:

This means that no matter how many number (terms) we have their sum will never be more then \frac{1}{3}

So the answer is D.

To nitpick, this is actually incorrect. The series converges to 1/3 but not necessarily from the bottom. For example, a sum of 1 term (i.e. 1/2) is larger than 1/3, and so is sum of 3 terms. In fact it oscillates around 1/3.

The real shortcut is to imagine a stretch from 0 to 1, and mark (mentally or with a pencil) where the sum with each additional term falls:

Re: Sequence: can anyone help with this question [#permalink]
08 Jun 2014, 06:54

Bunuel wrote:

For every integer k from 1 to 10, inclusive the "k"th term of a certain sequence is given by (-1)^{(k+1)}*(\frac{1}{2^k}) if T is the sum of the first 10 terms in the sequence, then T is A. Greater than 2 B. Between 1 and 2 C. Between 1/2 and 1 D. Between 1/4 and 1/2 E. Less than 1/4

First of all we see that there is set of 10 numbers and every even term is negative.

Second it's not hard to get this numbers: \frac{1}{2}, -\frac{1}{4}, \frac{1}{8}, -\frac{1}{16}, \frac{1}{32}... enough for calculations, we see pattern now.

And now the main part: adding them up is quite a job, after calculations you'll get \frac{341}{1024}. You can add them up by pairs but it's also time consuming. Once we've done it we can conclude that it's more than \frac{1}{4} and less than \frac{1}{2}, so answer is D.

BUT there is shortcut:

Sequence \frac{1}{2}, -\frac{1}{4}, \frac{1}{8}, -\frac{1}{16}, \frac{1}{32}... represents geometric progression with first term \frac{1}{2} and the common ratio of -\frac{1}{2}.

Now, the sum of infinite geometric progression with common ratio |r|<1[/m], is sum=\frac{b}{1-r}, where b is the first term.

So, if the sequence were infinite then the sum would be: \frac{\frac{1}{2}}{1-(-\frac{1}{2})}=\frac{1}{3}

This means that no matter how many number (terms) we have their sum will never be more then \frac{1}{3} (A, B and C are out). Also this means that the sum of our sequence is very close to \frac{1}{3} and for sure more than \frac{1}{4} (E out).

So the answer is D.

Is there another way? Do we need to know the geometric series equation for the GMAT?

Re: Sequence: can anyone help with this question [#permalink]
08 Jun 2014, 10:05

Expert's post

ronr34 wrote:

Bunuel wrote:

For every integer k from 1 to 10, inclusive the "k"th term of a certain sequence is given by (-1)^{(k+1)}*(\frac{1}{2^k}) if T is the sum of the first 10 terms in the sequence, then T is A. Greater than 2 B. Between 1 and 2 C. Between 1/2 and 1 D. Between 1/4 and 1/2 E. Less than 1/4

First of all we see that there is set of 10 numbers and every even term is negative.

Second it's not hard to get this numbers: \frac{1}{2}, -\frac{1}{4}, \frac{1}{8}, -\frac{1}{16}, \frac{1}{32}... enough for calculations, we see pattern now.

And now the main part: adding them up is quite a job, after calculations you'll get \frac{341}{1024}. You can add them up by pairs but it's also time consuming. Once we've done it we can conclude that it's more than \frac{1}{4} and less than \frac{1}{2}, so answer is D.

BUT there is shortcut:

Sequence \frac{1}{2}, -\frac{1}{4}, \frac{1}{8}, -\frac{1}{16}, \frac{1}{32}... represents geometric progression with first term \frac{1}{2} and the common ratio of -\frac{1}{2}.

Now, the sum of infinite geometric progression with common ratio |r|<1[/m], is sum=\frac{b}{1-r}, where b is the first term.

So, if the sequence were infinite then the sum would be: \frac{\frac{1}{2}}{1-(-\frac{1}{2})}=\frac{1}{3}

This means that no matter how many number (terms) we have their sum will never be more then \frac{1}{3} (A, B and C are out). Also this means that the sum of our sequence is very close to \frac{1}{3} and for sure more than \frac{1}{4} (E out).

So the answer is D.

Is there another way? Do we need to know the geometric series equation for the GMAT?

For every integer k from 1 to 10, inclusive the [#permalink]
02 Jul 2014, 18:17

IanStewart wrote:

A few things here:

* I've never seen a real GMAT question that requires one to know any geometric sequence formulas. Of course there are questions where you might use such formulas, but there will always be a different approach available;

* In any sequence question which gives an expression for each term, you'll always want to write down the first few terms using the given expression to work out what the sequence looks like. Here we have:

* Now, adding all of these fractions together would take a long time to do. The GMAT *never* requires you to perform any crazy calculations, so there must be a different way to answer the question. Notice the answer choices are only estimates, so we only need to estimate the sum of the first 10 terms. When we want to estimate the value of a sum, we ignore terms that make only a tiny contribution to the sum. The last few terms in our sequence are minuscule compared to the first few, so to get a good estimate, we can completely ignore them; adding, say, the first four terms will give a perfectly good approximation of the sum here (you get 5/16, which is enough to choose the right answer).

* The sequence in this question is what is known as an 'alternating sequence' -- that is, the terms alternate between positive and negative values. When adding an alternating sequence, you most often want to add your terms in pairs first, grouping one positive and one negative (add the 1st and 2nd term, the 3rd and 4th, and so on). One doesn't need to do this for this question, but it does make the answer a bit easier to see - we'd find our sum is