Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

For every integers K from 1 to 10 inclusive, the K th term of a certail sequence is given by [(-1)^(K+1)](1 / (2^K). What is the sum of first 10 terms of the sequence ?

a. Greater than 2 b. Between 1 and 2 c. Between 1/2 and 1 d.Between 1/4 and 1/2 e.Less than 1/4

For every integers K from 1 to 10 inclusive, the K th term of a certail sequence is given by [(-1)^(K+1)](1 / (2^K). What is the sum of first 10 terms of the sequence ?

a. Greater than 2 b. Between 1 and 2 c. Between 1/2 and 1 d.Between 1/4 and 1/2 e.Less than 1/4

I answer this question in my second attempt, but it takes a lot of times around 4 minutes. Please explain a shorter way to do this ?

Here we need to find a pattern \(\frac{1}{2},-\frac{1}{4},\frac{1}{8},...\) as you see the sign changes every term. The first and bigger is 0,5 and then we subtract and sum smaller and smaller terms. We can eliminate any option that gives us a upper limit greater than 1/2. We are down to D and E. Is the sum less than 1/4? Take the sum of pair of terms : the first 2 give us 1/4, the second pair is 1/8-1/16 positive so we add value to 1/4, so the sum will be greater.(this is true also for the next pairs, so we add to 1/ 4 a positive value for each pair) D

Hope its clear, let me know

Hi Zarro ,

Very clear. But how to approach this kind of problems in GMAT without taking much time. Even though you explanation look very simple and time saving , i am not sure how i respond to the question same way as you explained. Do you have any siggestions how can i approach these problems ?

Thanks in advance. _________________

Kabilan.K Kudos is a boost to participate actively and contribute more to the forum

Very clear. But how to approach this kind of problems in GMAT without taking much time. Even though you explanation look very simple and time saving , i am not sure how i respond to the question same way as you explained. Do you have any siggestions how can i approach these problems ?

Thanks in advance.

Hi kabilank87,

when we deal with a series (as in this case) the first and most important thing to do is find a pattern.

One you've found that you can continue the series with no limit ( the GMAT will never ask you the exact value of a seires such this one), but the role of patterns is crucial also in question where you're asked to find the \(N^t^h\) term of a sequence. _________________

It is beyond a doubt that all our knowledge that begins with experience.

For every integers K from 1 to 10 inclusive, the K th term of a certail sequence is given by [(-1)^(K+1)](1 / (2^K). What is the sum of first 10 terms of the sequence ?

a. Greater than 2 b. Between 1 and 2 c. Between 1/2 and 1 d.Between 1/4 and 1/2 e.Less than 1/4

I answer this question in my second attempt, but it takes a lot of times around 4 minutes. Please explain a shorter way to do this ?

Here we need to find a pattern \(\frac{1}{2},-\frac{1}{4},\frac{1}{8},...\) as you see the sign changes every term. The first and bigger is 0,5 and then we subtract and sum smaller and smaller terms. We can eliminate any option that gives us a upper limit greater than 1/2. We are down to D and E. Is the sum less than 1/4? Take the sum of pair of terms : the first 2 give us \(\frac{1}{4}\), the second pair is \(\frac{1}{8}-\frac{1}{16}\) positive so we add value to \(\frac{1}{4}\), so the sum will be greater.(this is true also for the next pairs, so we add to \(\frac{1}{4}\) a positive value for each pair) D

Hope its clear, let me know

Can you please elaborate more , Zarrou ? I still do not understand , and the line in red tricks me a lot .

Can you please elaborate more , Zarrou ? I still do not understand , and the line in red tricks me a lot .

Thanks in advance

The pattern: \(\frac{1}{2},-\frac{1}{4},\frac{1}{8},-\frac{1}{16},...\)

We have to sum those elements so: \(\frac{1}{2}-\frac{1}{4}+\frac{1}{8}-\frac{1}{16}+...\) The first term is \(\frac{1}{2}\), to this we subtract 1/4, to the result we add 1/8, and so on As you see the operations involve smaller and smaller term each time. The first thing to notice here is that the sum will be <1/2, we can easily see this: \(\frac{1}{2}-\frac{1}{4}=\frac{1}{4}\) and the operations will not produce a result >1/2. Hope it's clear here: the numbers decrease too rapidly to produce a result as big as the first term!

Now we are left with D and E: the only 2 option which result is <1/2. And the question is: will the sum be less than 1/4? We have to find an easy way to see this, consider this fact: \(\frac{1}{2},-\frac{1}{4},\frac{1}{8},-\frac{1}{16},...\) take the sum of couple of terms: 1st with 2nd, 3rd with 4th, and so on... The result will be positive for each couple, lets take a look:\(\frac{1}{2}-\frac{1}{4}=\frac{1}{4}\) for the first one, \(+\frac{1}{8}-\frac{1}{16}=\frac{1}{16}(>0)\) and so on.

The thing to take away here is: 1/4+(num>0)+(num>0)+... will NOT be less than 1/4, how could it be if all numbers are positive?

So the sum will be GREATER than 1/4 and LESSER than 1/4.

Hope everything is clear now, I have been as exhaustive as possible, let me know _________________

It is beyond a doubt that all our knowledge that begins with experience.

Can you please elaborate more , Zarrou ? I still do not understand , and the line in red tricks me a lot .

Thanks in advance

The pattern: \(\frac{1}{2},-\frac{1}{4},\frac{1}{8},-\frac{1}{16},...\)

We have to sum those elements so: \(\frac{1}{2}-\frac{1}{4}+\frac{1}{8}-\frac{1}{16}+...\) The first term is \(\frac{1}{2}\), to this we subtract 1/4, to the result we add 1/8, and so on As you see the operations involve smaller and smaller term each time. The first thing to notice here is that the sum will be <1/2, we can easily see this: \(\frac{1}{2}-\frac{1}{4}=\frac{1}{4}\) and the operations will not produce a result >1/2. Hope it's clear here: the numbers decrease too rapidly to produce a result as big as the first term!

Now we are left with D and E: the only 2 option which result is <1/2. And the question is: will the sum be less than 1/4? We have to find an easy way to see this, consider this fact: \(\frac{1}{2},-\frac{1}{4},\frac{1}{8},-\frac{1}{16},...\) take the sum of couple of terms: 1st with 2nd, 3rd with 4th, and so on... The result will be positive for each couple, lets take a look:\(\frac{1}{2}-\frac{1}{4}=\frac{1}{4}\) for the first one, \(+\frac{1}{8}-\frac{1}{16}=\frac{1}{16}(>0)\) and so on.

The thing to take away here is: 1/4+(num>0)+(num>0)+... will NOT be less than 1/4, how could it be if all numbers are positive?

So the sum will be GREATER than 1/4 and LESSER than 1/4.

Hope everything is clear now, I have been as exhaustive as possible, let me know

For every integers K from 1 to 10 inclusive, the K th term of a certail sequence is given by [(-1)^(K+1)](1 / (2^K). What is the sum of first 10 terms of the sequence ?

a. Greater than 2 b. Between 1 and 2 c. Between 1/2 and 1 d.Between 1/4 and 1/2 e.Less than 1/4

I answer this question in my second attempt, but it takes a lot of times around 4 minutes. Please explain a shorter way to do this ?

Here we need to find a pattern \(\frac{1}{2},-\frac{1}{4},\frac{1}{8},...\) as you see the sign changes every term. The first and bigger is 0,5 and then we subtract and sum smaller and smaller terms. We can eliminate any option that gives us a upper limit greater than 1/2. We are down to D and E. Is the sum less than 1/4? Take the sum of pair of terms : the first 2 give us \(\frac{1}{4}\), the second pair is \(\frac{1}{8}-\frac{1}{16}\) positive so we add value to \(\frac{1}{4}\), so the sum will be greater.(this is true also for the next pairs, so we add to \(\frac{1}{4}\) a positive value for each pair) D

Hope its clear, let me know

Can you please elaborate more , Zarrou ? I still do not understand , and the line in red tricks me a lot .

Re: For every integer k from 1 to 10, inclusive, the kth term of [#permalink]

Show Tags

11 Oct 2013, 13:22

Since I solved it from a different method than mentioned here, thought it to share.

I guess we all might have deudced there are 10 terms and alternately positive and negative.

I tried with GP sum formula and got lost in calculation.

Since we have alternately + - we can make use of it.

Take 1st term , 2nd term 1/2 and -1/4, add them to get 1/4 Similarly 3rd and 4rth term gives you 1/8 ( 1/8 + -1/16) 1/16 We see a multiplication pattern of 4 here so no need to calculate further.

1/4, 1/16, 1/64, 1/256, 1/1024

Add them to get 256+64+16+4+1= 341/1024

Clealry less than half so lies b/w 1/4 and 1/2

Not a very great method but I guess helps me avoid calculcation mistake if I go for GP sum.

Re: For every integer k from 1 to 10, inclusive, the kth term of [#permalink]

Show Tags

28 Feb 2014, 23:18

Question is written in such a way that it is difficult to comprehend but once it is then it is just a matter of few seconds to crack.Here my answer.

T(K) = (−1)^k+1 * 1/2^k

So, T(1) =1/2 T(2)= -1/4 T(3)= 1/8 T(4)= -1/16 .... and so on No need to calculate higher terms because they doesn't produce any significant increase in sum as answers are widely distributed.

Re: For every integer k from 1 to 10, inclusive, the kth term of [#permalink]

Show Tags

05 Nov 2014, 22:58

Bunuel wrote:

For every integer k from 1 to 10, inclusive the "k"th term of a certain sequence is given by \((-1)^{(k+1)}*(\frac{1}{2^k})\) if T is the sum of the first 10 terms in the sequence, then T is A. Greater than 2 B. Between 1 and 2 C. Between 1/2 and 1 D. Between 1/4 and 1/2 E. Less than 1/4

First of all we see that there is set of 10 numbers and every even term is negative.

Second it's not hard to get this numbers: \(\frac{1}{2}\), \(-\frac{1}{4}\), \(\frac{1}{8}\), \(-\frac{1}{16}\), \(\frac{1}{32}\)... enough for calculations, we see pattern now.

And now the main part: adding them up is quite a job, after calculations you'll get \(\frac{341}{1024}\). You can add them up by pairs but it's also time consuming. Once we've done it we can conclude that it's more than \(\frac{1}{4}\) and less than \(\frac{1}{2}\), so answer is D.

BUT there is shortcut:

Sequence \(\frac{1}{2}\), \(-\frac{1}{4}\), \(\frac{1}{8}\), \(-\frac{1}{16}\), \(\frac{1}{32}\)... represents geometric progression with first term \(\frac{1}{2}\) and the common ratio of \(-\frac{1}{2}\).

Now, the sum of infinite geometric progression with common ratio |r|<1[/m], is \(sum=\frac{b}{1-r}\), where \(b\) is the first term.

So, if the sequence were infinite then the sum would be: \(\frac{\frac{1}{2}}{1-(-\frac{1}{2})}=\frac{1}{3}\)

This means that no matter how many number (terms) we have their sum will never be more then \(\frac{1}{3}\) (A, B and C are out). Also this means that the sum of our sequence is very close to \(\frac{1}{3}\) and for sure more than \(\frac{1}{4}\) (E out). So the answer is D.

Re: For every integer k from 1 to 10, inclusive, the kth term of [#permalink]

Show Tags

06 Nov 2014, 06:46

Expert's post

vietnammba wrote:

Bunuel wrote:

For every integer k from 1 to 10, inclusive the "k"th term of a certain sequence is given by \((-1)^{(k+1)}*(\frac{1}{2^k})\) if T is the sum of the first 10 terms in the sequence, then T is A. Greater than 2 B. Between 1 and 2 C. Between 1/2 and 1 D. Between 1/4 and 1/2 E. Less than 1/4

First of all we see that there is set of 10 numbers and every even term is negative.

Second it's not hard to get this numbers: \(\frac{1}{2}\), \(-\frac{1}{4}\), \(\frac{1}{8}\), \(-\frac{1}{16}\), \(\frac{1}{32}\)... enough for calculations, we see pattern now.

And now the main part: adding them up is quite a job, after calculations you'll get \(\frac{341}{1024}\). You can add them up by pairs but it's also time consuming. Once we've done it we can conclude that it's more than \(\frac{1}{4}\) and less than \(\frac{1}{2}\), so answer is D.

BUT there is shortcut:

Sequence \(\frac{1}{2}\), \(-\frac{1}{4}\), \(\frac{1}{8}\), \(-\frac{1}{16}\), \(\frac{1}{32}\)... represents geometric progression with first term \(\frac{1}{2}\) and the common ratio of \(-\frac{1}{2}\).

Now, the sum of infinite geometric progression with common ratio |r|<1[/m], is \(sum=\frac{b}{1-r}\), where \(b\) is the first term.

So, if the sequence were infinite then the sum would be: \(\frac{\frac{1}{2}}{1-(-\frac{1}{2})}=\frac{1}{3}\)

This means that no matter how many number (terms) we have their sum will never be more then \(\frac{1}{3}\) (A, B and C are out). Also this means that the sum of our sequence is very close to \(\frac{1}{3}\) and for sure more than \(\frac{1}{4}\) (E out). So the answer is D.

For every integer k from 1 to 10, inclusive, the kth term of a c [#permalink]

Show Tags

20 Apr 2015, 18:42

1

This post received KUDOS

Expert's post

Hi All,

As complex as this question looks, it's got a great pattern-matching 'shortcut' built into it. When combined with the answer choices, you can avoid some of the calculations....

By plugging in the first few numbers (1, 2, 3, 4), you can see that a pattern emerges among the terms....

1st term = 1/2 2nd term = -1/4 3rd term = 1/8 4th term = -1/16

The terms follow a positive-negative-positive-negative pattern all the way to the 10th term and each term is the product of the prior term and 1/2. By "pairing up' the terms, another pattern emerges....

1/2 - 1/4 = 1/4

1/8 - 1/16 = 1/16

1/32 - 1/64 = 1/64

Etc.

The "pairs" get progressively smaller (notice how each is the product of the prior term and 1/4). This means that we're "starting with" 1/4 and adding progressively TINIER fractions to it. Since we're just adding 4 progressively smaller fractions to 1/4, this means that we're going to end up with a total that's just a LITTLE MORE than 1/4. Looking at the answer choices, there's only one answer that fits:

Re: For every integer k from 1 to 10, inclusive, the kth term of [#permalink]

Show Tags

10 May 2015, 19:00

I've never seen this term "geometric progression" in my studies thus far - is there a good overview of them somewhere and potential questions that might be asked in reference to them? Thanks!

Re: For every integer k from 1 to 10, inclusive, the kth term of [#permalink]

Show Tags

10 May 2015, 21:07

2

This post received KUDOS

Expert's post

healthjunkie wrote:

I've never seen this term "geometric progression" in my studies thus far - is there a good overview of them somewhere and potential questions that might be asked in reference to them? Thanks!

Re: For every integer k from 1 to 10, inclusive, the kth term of [#permalink]

Show Tags

11 May 2015, 11:17

Expert's post

Hi healthjunkie,

Geometric progressions are rather rare on the GMAT (while you will see at least 1 sequence question on Test Day, it is not likely to be a Geometric sequence), so you shouldn't be putting too much effort into this concept just yet.

How are you performing on the Quant section overall? How about in the 'big' categories (Algebra, Arithmetic, Number Properties, DS, etc.)? That's where you're going to find the bulk of the points.

Re: For every integer k from 1 to 10, inclusive, the kth term of [#permalink]

Show Tags

12 Oct 2015, 21:33

2

This post received KUDOS

Expert's post

VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:

prathns wrote:

For every integer k from 1 to 10, inclusive, the kth term of a certain sequence is given by (-1)^(k+1) *(1/2^k). If T is the sum of the first 10 terms in the sequence then T is

a)greater than 2 b)between 1 and 2 c)between 1/2 and 1 d)between 1/4 and 1/2 e)less than 1/4.

I have no clue what info has been given and how to use it to derive T.

Kindly post a detailed explanation.

Thanks. Prath.

Using some keen observation, you can quickly arrive at the answer... Terms will be: \(\frac{1}{2} - \frac{1}{4} + \frac{1}{8} - \frac{1}{16} + \frac{1}{32} - ... - \frac{1}{1024}\) For every pair of values: \(\frac{1}{2} - \frac{1}{4} = \frac{1}{4}\)

So this series is actually just \(\frac{1}{4} + \frac{1}{16} + ... + \frac{1}{1024}\)

So the sum is definitely greater than 1/4. When you add an infinite GP with 1/16 as first term and 1/4 as common ratio, the sum will be \(\frac{\frac{1}{16}}{1-\frac{1}{4}} = 1/12\). Here, the sum of terms 1/16 + 1/64 + ... 1/1024 is definitely less than 1/12. Hence the sum is definitely less than 1/2. Answer is (D).

Quote:

Hi Karishma

The first term in this example is 1/2. Can you kindly explain how to calculate the sum of all terms of a GP with constant ratio >1 ?

Thanks

Sum of n terms of a GP = a(1 - r^n)/(1 - r)

The formula is the same whether |r| is more than 1 or less than 1.

You can find the sum of an infinite GP by the formula a/(1 - r) only when |r| < 1. You cannot find the sum of an infinite GP when |r| > 1 because the sum will be infinite. e.g. 3 + 9 + 27 + 81 ...... infinite terms - The sum will be infinite since you keep adding larger and larger terms. _________________

Post your Blog on GMATClub We would like to invite all applicants who are applying to BSchools this year and are documenting their application experiences on their blogs to...

Since the value of the NZ Dollar is much lower than the Pound, foreign currency exchange rates and how to pay MBA tuition fees are obviously of much concern...