Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 350,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

For everyone interested in modulus practices, I have listed, [#permalink]
03 Dec 2006, 04:22

2

This post received KUDOS

12

This post was BOOKMARKED

For everyone interested in modulus practices, I have listed, at the bottom of this topic, several threads of modulus in a graduated level of difficulty.

Keep in mind that it's for trainning purposes and that the most advanced posts are not reprensative of the real GMAT.

FOR THE THIRD PROBLEM , I BELIEVE THE ANSWER MISS THE RANGE

-2<X<1

I'm ok thanks... it follows the way

Great catch .... Yes, I did a "silly" mistake 2-4 = 6 and ended up with a wrong x^2 + x + 6 .... I have corrected my post following your catch... very good :D

o If x < 3, then the inequation becomes: -(x-3)<2x-4 <=> 7 < 3x <x> 7/3 => 7/3 < x <3>= 3, then the inequation becomes:[/b] x-3<2x-4 <x> 1 => x >= 3

Finally, we have : x > 7/3

Hi Fig,

Why have you mentioned that x >=3 and not that x > 3.. I see absolute Questions which sometimes have the >= sign and sometimes the > sign only.. Might be a very mindless question but hope you would answer..

o If x < 3, then the inequation becomes: -(x-3)<2x-4 <=> 7 < 3x <x> 7/3 => 7/3 < x <3>= 3, then the inequation becomes:[/b] x-3<2x-4 <x> 1 => x >= 3

Finally, we have : x > 7/3

Hi Fig,

Why have you mentioned that x >=3 and not that x > 3.. I see absolute Questions which sometimes have the >= sign and sometimes the > sign only.. Might be a very mindless question but hope you would answer..

Not meaningless but rather precised question ...

Actually, it's just to avoid adding 1 solution alone from another interval... and so to meet a higher degree of "perfection" by making it a smoother way to the final solution and a straightforward simplicity to understand

Note that nothing is wrong if we say > or >= as soon as we do not miss to consider all values of x, especially here the ones that limit 2 intervals

As we are working positive value and as the function f(x) = 1/x decreases when x increases on the domain of x > 0, we can imply that:

|x-2| =< 1/4

can someone please explain why this happens. Why can't I just use |1/x-2| >=4. However, when x<2, I get x<=7/4. Also I agree with everyone else as the range include 2, doesn't lie outside of our limitations.

Since the sign of a*x^2+b*x+c is that of a for any values of x not between the 2 roots, solutions of the equation a*x^2+b*x+c = 0 if they exist.

Thus, o Sign((x+2)(x-2)) > 0 when x > 2 or x < -2 o Sign((x+2)(x-2)) < 0 when -2 < x < 2

Trying hard to grasp this concept, but don't think I'm understanding what you're trying to convey here. Ideally, I would try to solve this as such:

Given that |x^2 - 4| is same as |(x+2)(x-2)|

Solving for x in |x^2 - 4| > x + 2 in the following two scenarios: 1. When (x+2)(x-2) >= 0 ==> x^2 - 4 > x + 2 ==> x>-1 and x>2

2. When (x+2)(x-2) < 0 ==> -(x^2 - 4) > x + 2 ==> 4 - x^2 > x + 2 ==> x<1 and x<-2

Does the combination of these solutions for x represent the final answer? Am I missing a step?

First of all you won't see such equation on the GMAT, but anyway:

\(|x^2-4|>x+2\).

We should consider the cases when \(x^2-4<0\) and \(x^2-4\geq{0}\):

\(x^2-4<0\) for \(-2<x<2\) --> \(-(x^2-4)>x+2\) --> \(x^2+x-2<0\) --> \((x+2)(x-1)<0\)--> \(-2<x<1\). Since we are considering the range \(-2<x<2\) then the solution for this case will be intersections of these two (common part): \(-2<x<1\);

\(x^2-4\geq{0}\) for \(x\leq{-2}\) or \(x\geq{2}\) --> \((x^2-4)>x+2\) --> \(x^2-x-6>0\) --> \((x+2)(x-3)>0\)--> \(x<-2\) or \(x>3\). Since we are considering the range \(x\leq{-2}\) or \(x\geq{2}\) then the solution for this case will be intersections of these four (common parts): \(x<-2\) or \(x>3\);

Finally the ranges of \(x\) for which \(|x^2-4|>x+2\) true are: \(x<-2\), \(-2<x<1\) and \(x>3\).

Re: For everyone interested in modulus practices, I have listed, [#permalink]
27 Aug 2014, 03:40

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email. _________________

On September 6, 2015, I started my MBA journey at London Business School. I took some pictures on my way from the airport to school, and uploaded them on...

When I was growing up, I read a story about a piccolo player. A master orchestra conductor came to town and he decided to practice with the largest orchestra...

I’ll start off with a quote from another blog post I’ve written : “not all great communicators are great leaders, but all great leaders are great communicators.” Being...