Last visit was: 24 Apr 2024, 20:31 It is currently 24 Apr 2024, 20:31

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 31 Oct 2011
Posts: 201
Own Kudos [?]: 7797 [51]
Given Kudos: 18
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4452
Own Kudos [?]: 28569 [14]
Given Kudos: 130
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4452
Own Kudos [?]: 28569 [6]
Given Kudos: 130
General Discussion
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 12 Mar 2012
Posts: 66
Own Kudos [?]: 523 [0]
Given Kudos: 22
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V36
GPA: 3.2
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Send PM
Re: For farmers in the Salinas Valley, the vegetable growing business has [#permalink]
Option C is having "being" which should be avoided, it makes the sentence wordy.

Option D looks good. Them refers to "crops".
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 08 Jun 2010
Posts: 216
Own Kudos [?]: 196 [0]
Given Kudos: 13
Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GMAT 1: 680 Q50 V32
Send PM
Re: For farmers in the Salinas Valley, the vegetable growing business has [#permalink]
C: being caused by unfavorable weather that killed or ripened crops.
Being caused by doesn't make any sense, at all, if you think of it a little carefully.

Two possibilities:-
Being: A State of "Being", right? or..
Being: As in HUMAN BEING.

So, when you say "....usuallly being caused by" --> What it actually means is that Something is already in the state of being, or there is someother person who was caused by? both these meanings dont make sense.

Lastly, concision - Caused by is consice and nice looking, although it is passive, I guess in this sentence it is required. Because if you say "the downs....because of..." it sounds like a fragment. So, caused by completes the idea nicely in D.

PS: Please underline the portion correctly when posting questions just as you would see it in the Exam prompt.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 06 Jan 2012
Status:May The Force Be With Me (D-DAY 15 May 2012)
Posts: 165
Own Kudos [?]: 2093 [2]
Given Kudos: 33
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
Send PM
Re: For farmers in the Salinas Valley, the vegetable growing business has [#permalink]
2
Kudos
+1 D

You should avoid use being & try to generally look at it as a last option
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 25 Nov 2011
Status:Writing Essays
Posts: 126
Own Kudos [?]: 52 [0]
Given Kudos: 27
Location: Brazil
Concentration: Technology, Finance
GMAT 1: 720 Q44 V47
WE:Information Technology (Commercial Banking)
Send PM
Re: For farmers in the Salinas Valley, the vegetable growing business has [#permalink]
eybrj2 wrote:
For farmers in the Salinas Valley, the vegetale growing business has always been one of economic ups and downs, the downs usually because of ubfavorable weather that killed crops, or they ripened too quickly.

a)

b) because of unfavorable weather kinlling or ripening crops.

c) being caused by unfavorable weather that killed or ripened crops.

d) caused by unfavorable weather that kills crops or ripens them

e) caused by unfavorable weather killing crops, ot that they ripen


What's wrong with c?

And I think that "them" in d is redundant or awkward. Why is it ok?



"them" is necessary to refer to "crops", so D is right. Please underline the portion of the sentence as in the original question and if you're too lazy to do that at least retype this portion on A to help other people to help you.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 13 Mar 2012
Posts: 155
Own Kudos [?]: 473 [0]
Given Kudos: 48
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
Send PM
Re: For farmers in the Salinas Valley, the vegetable growing business has [#permalink]
stuck between B and D can someone throw some light on that please.

thnx
Manager
Manager
Joined: 13 Mar 2012
Posts: 155
Own Kudos [?]: 473 [0]
Given Kudos: 48
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
Send PM
Re: For farmers in the Salinas Valley, the vegetable growing business has [#permalink]
mikemcgarry wrote:
eybrj2 wrote:
What's wrong with c? And I think that "them" in d is redundant or awkward. Why is it ok?


For farmers in the Salinas Valley, the vegetable growing business has always been one of economic ups and downs, the downs usually because of unfavorable weather that killed crops, or they ripened too quickly.
(A) because of unfavorable weather that killed crops, or they ripened
(B) because of unfavorable weather killing or ripening crops
(C) being caused by unfavorable weather that killed or ripened crops
(D) caused by unfavorable weather that kills crops or ripens them
(E) caused by unfavorable weather killing crops, or that they ripen


Problem #1 with C
the phrase "being caused" is very awkward ---- the phrase "being" + participle of a verb is almost never correct on GMAT SC. Whenever you even see the word "being", your hackles should go up and you should be highly suspicious.
Problem #2 with C
by cramming the two verbs so close together, the adverb "too quickly" will apply to both of them. It is a problem that they ripen too quickly. The problem is not that that the crops are killed "too quickly", but simply that they were killed at all. The adverb "too quickly" should just modify the "ripen" verb, not the "kill" verb. (That's also a problem with B)

D is not redundant because there is a parallel structure between the two verbs, "kills" and "ripens" --- both are followed by direct object. It would be redundant, or awkwardly wordy, to say: ". . . that kills crops or ripens crops too quickly." In other words, it would sound funny to use the word "crops" twice. That's why it's perfectly acceptable to use the pronoun "them" for the crops after the second verb: ". . . that kills crops or ripens them too quickly." That's perfect. Grammatically correct, not awkward, not redundant.

Does all this make sense?

It's sounds like you need some help in understanding the rules of grammar and what constitutes redundant and/or awkward constructions. I would like to recommend Magoosh test prep. We have over 200 lesson videos that deliver all the content and strategy for the GMAT, as well as 800+ practice questions, each with it's own video explanation. Here's a sample lesson for SC.
https://gmat.magoosh.com/lessons/599-int ... correction
Here's a sample SC question:
https://gmat.magoosh.com/questions/1120
When you submit your answer, the following page will have the video explanation.

I hope all this helps. Please let me know if you have any questions.

Mike :)


@MIKE

Could you please comment on B. I cant differentiate between B and D.

THANX
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 25 Feb 2010
Status:I will not stop until i realise my goal which is my dream too
Posts: 105
Own Kudos [?]: 257 [0]
Given Kudos: 16
Schools: Johnson '15
Send PM
Re: For farmers in the Salinas Valley, the vegetable growing business has [#permalink]
+1 to Mike...i would go with D too for the same reason
Manager
Manager
Joined: 13 Mar 2012
Posts: 155
Own Kudos [?]: 473 [0]
Given Kudos: 48
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
Send PM
Re: For farmers in the Salinas Valley, the vegetable growing business has [#permalink]
mikemcgarry wrote:
kraizada84 wrote:
@MIKE

Could you please comment on B. I cant differentiate between B and D.

THANX


Well, it's subtle ---

(B) the downs usually because of unfavorable weather killing or ripening crops too quickly.

One problem is what I mentioned in my above post --- if the verbs ("killing" & "ripening") are this closely joined, then the adverb "quickly" applies to both them. The adverb "quickly" is only supposed to apply to the verb "ripening" --- while it's fine for plants to ripen, it's a problem if they ripen too quickly. The adverb "quickly" is not supposed to apply to "killing" --- it's bad for the weather to kill the plants, and whether it does so quickly or slowly doesn't matter. That is the biggest obvious problem with (B).

Even more subtle --- I can't quite explain why, but "the downs usually caused by unfavorable weather . . ." sounds more natural than the "downs usually because of unfavorable weather . . ." Using some form of the verb "cause" is usually more direct than using the words "because of."

In this sense, this question is not really a solid GMAT SC question, because aside from that relatively subtle thing about the adverb "quickly", there's no real glaring mistake with (B). Here, (D) is right because it has absolutely no mistake, but on the real GMAT, the wrong answers will be more obviously wrong.

Does this make sense? Let me know if you have any questions.

Mike :)


@ Mike,

That was helpful.

I think B and D also has a difference, please comment on the difference i have drawn out below:

My thoughts:

(B) because of unfavorable weather killing or ripening crops

--> Can we also say B is flawed because the use of -ing verb i.e. unfavorable weather is not restricted here. It just conveys if unfavorable weather--> crops killed and ripened ?

(D) caused by unfavorable weather that kills crops or ripens them

--> the use "that" here makes it more accurate by restricting the "unfavorable weather", i.e. not all 100 unfavorable weather kills/ripens but out of 100 some like 30-40 kills/ripens. Because its never true whenever there is unfavorable weather then crops get killed/ripened.
hence D goes best.

Am i correct in drawing out the difference? Is this difference worth differentiating the correct answer?

thanx
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 13 Feb 2012
Status:I will be back!
Posts: 44
Own Kudos [?]: 183 [0]
Given Kudos: 38
Location: India
Send PM
Re: For farmers in the Salinas Valley, the vegetable growing business has [#permalink]
Why I have eliminated D because it has construction "because of....or...."
i guess this is grammatically incorrect. it should be "because of....or because of....".

correct me if i am wrong.
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4452
Own Kudos [?]: 28569 [3]
Given Kudos: 130
Re: For farmers in the Salinas Valley, the vegetable growing business has [#permalink]
2
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
kraizada84 wrote:
I think B and D also has a difference, please comment on the difference i have drawn out below:

My thoughts:

(B) because of unfavorable weather killing or ripening crops

--> Can we also say B is flawed because the use of -ing verb i.e. unfavorable weather is not restricted here. It just conveys if unfavorable weather--> crops killed and ripened ?

(D) caused by unfavorable weather that kills crops or ripens them

--> the use "that" here makes it more accurate by restricting the "unfavorable weather", i.e. not all 100 unfavorable weather kills/ripens but out of 100 some like 30-40 kills/ripens. Because its never true whenever there is unfavorable weather then crops get killed/ripened.
hence D goes best.

Am i correct in drawing out the difference? Is this difference worth differentiating the correct answer?

thanx


Well, the -ing phrases in B are used correctly. I'm not sure what you mean by "restricted", but the noun "unfavorable weather" is correctly modified by the participles "killing" and "ripening". For example, in the sentence:

Unfavorable weather killing crops and giving livestock diseases is a big problem for farmers in the Midwest.

That sentence is perfectly correct grammatically, with the parallel participial phrases "killing crops" and "giving livestock diseases" both modifying the noun "unfavorable weather." Does that make sense?

In general, you can modify either with a participial phrase ("unfavorable weather killing crops") or a dependent clause ("unfavorable weather that kills crops"). Both are perfectly correct. In general, participial phrases are often a little shorter and less "clunky" then subordinate clauses, but it all depends on wording and context.

If the role of participial phrases vs. subordinate clauses is unfamiliar, I highly recommend Magoosh. We have 200+ lesson videos, including videos that explain all the grammar on the GMAT. Here's a sample lesson:

https://gmat.magoosh.com/lessons/615-modifiers-i

I hope that helps. Please let me know if you have any further questions.

Mike :)
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4452
Own Kudos [?]: 28569 [2]
Given Kudos: 130
Re: For farmers in the Salinas Valley, the vegetable growing business has [#permalink]
1
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
shadabkhaniet wrote:
Why I have eliminated D because it has construction "because of....or...."
i guess this is grammatically incorrect. it should be "because of....or because of....".

correct me if i am wrong.

First of all, did you mean that you eliminated B because of the "because of" construction? The words "because of" do not appear in D.

You don't need "because of....or because of...." ---- it's parallel structure, so you don't need to repeat every word of the grammatical construction. Here, it's just two parallel objects of a prepositional phrase, and each object is modified by a participial phrases. Examples:

I spend time in cities or the countryside.

The words "cities" and "countryside" are objects of the preposition "in." Now, I'll add participial phrases.

I spend time in cities bursting with energy or the countryside evoking simpler times.

The sentence is more complex, but the underlying grammatical structure is the same. The nouns "cities" and "countryside" are still objects of the preposition "in," and we don't need to add a second "in" before "the countryside", because those two nouns are still in parallel. Adding modifying clauses to both doesn't change the fact that they're in parallel.

Does this make sense? Please let me know if you have any further questions.

Mike :)
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 14 Feb 2012
Posts: 81
Own Kudos [?]: 1082 [0]
Given Kudos: 7
Send PM
Re: For farmers in the Salinas Valley, the vegetable growing business has [#permalink]
+1 D,
Is better than any other option
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 08 Apr 2013
Posts: 100
Own Kudos [?]: 70 [0]
Given Kudos: 27
Send PM
Re: For farmers in the Salinas Valley, the vegetable growing business has [#permalink]
because of something

is adverbial and so can not modifies the only preceding noun.

that is the reason why B is wrong.

is my thinking correct.

we can say

I fail gmat because of the laziness

I can not say

my failure because of the hard test is clear.
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 18 Jun 2013
Status:Time to wait :)
Posts: 69
Own Kudos [?]: 64 [0]
Given Kudos: 1186
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Strategy
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V40
WE:Consulting (Telecommunications)
Send PM
Re: For farmers in the Salinas Valley, the vegetable growing business has [#permalink]
eybrj2 wrote:
For farmers in the Salinas Valley, the vegetable growing business has always been one of economic ups and downs, the downs usually because of unfavorable weather that killed crops, or they ripened too quickly.

(A) because of unfavorable weather that killed crops, or they ripened
(B) because of unfavorable weather killing or ripening crops
(C) being caused by unfavorable weather that killed or ripened crops
(D) caused by unfavorable weather that kills crops or ripens them
(E) caused by unfavorable weather killing crops, or that they ripen


My Queries....

What's wrong with c?

And I think that "them" in d is redundant or awkward. Why is it ok?


If you would see the un-underlined part, and identify the tone of the sentence, you would notice that the sentence is in a "continuing tone", something which is happening / ongoing. For similar reasons, I started to look for the verb "kills" after reading the sentence. Also, that is the reason C gets eliminated, since it's tone is not similar to the un-underlined part of the sentence.
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4452
Own Kudos [?]: 28569 [1]
Given Kudos: 130
Re: For farmers in the Salinas Valley, the vegetable growing business has [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
vietmoi999 wrote:
because of something

is adverbial and so can not modifies the only preceding noun.

that is the reason why B is wrong.

is my thinking correct.

we can say: I fail gmat because of the laziness

I can not say: my failure because of the hard test is clear.

Dear vietmoi999,
I would like to clarify some things in response. The preposition "because of" introduces an prepositional phrase that may be adverbial (modifying a verb) or may be adjectival (modifying a noun). Here's a blog on adjectival & adverbial phrases & clauses:
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/gmat-gramm ... d-clauses/
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/gmat-gramm ... d-clauses/
Here's a blog about "because" vs. "because of"

In your first example sentence, it's awkward to have the definite article before "laziness" --- the construction "the laziness" makes no sense without further qualification. That one just should be:
I failed the GMAT because of laziness.
That's correct, and that's a use of the "because of" as an adverbial clause.
The second one is grammatically correct, but rhetorically a bit awkward --- it's awkward primarily because the causal relationship could be stated much more powerfully and compactly with a "because" clause. You see, the word "failure" is action word, but it's a noun --- the GMAT loves this construction for incorrect answers. Action words as nouns make for clunky awkward sentences, but action words as verbs make clear direct sentences. See:
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2013/active-verbs-on-the-gmat/
Original: "My failure because of the hard test is clear."
Improved: "I clearly failed because the test was hard."
With all due respect, you set up a paper tiger, an inherently flawed sentence, as your demonstration that "because of" could not be adjectival. In fact, it's perfectly possible for "because of" to modify a noun in a rhetorically sound sentence. For example
(1) The mudslides, because of heavy rain all winter, threatened the houses at the bottom of the hill.
(2) His success in the class because of a perfect score on the final lead to a prestigious scholarship.
In both of those, "because of" modifies a noun.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
Intern
Intern
Joined: 03 Aug 2015
Posts: 40
Own Kudos [?]: 61 [0]
Given Kudos: 113
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Finance
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V30
GMAT 2: 610 Q46 V28
GPA: 3.2
WE:Information Technology (Telecommunications)
Send PM
Re: For farmers in the Salinas Valley, the vegetable growing business has [#permalink]
For farmers in the Salinas Valley, the vegetable growing business has always been one of economic ups and downs, the downs usually because of unfavorable weather that killed crops, or they ripened too quickly.

(A) because of unfavorable weather that killed crops, or they ripened
(B) because of unfavorable weather killing or ripening crops
(C) being caused by unfavorable weather that killed or ripened crops
(D) caused by unfavorable weather that kills crops or ripens them
(E) caused by unfavorable weather killing crops, or that they ripen


Here the use of caused by is more justified as it is modifying the noun(subject) " the downs". Because of is generally used when the verb is modified or is used to present a reason.

This leaves us with D and E. Chose D as E is not parallel.

Please correct me if i am wrong.

Thanks.
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4452
Own Kudos [?]: 28569 [1]
Given Kudos: 130
Re: For farmers in the Salinas Valley, the vegetable growing business has [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
kamathimanshu wrote:
For farmers in the Salinas Valley, the vegetable growing business has always been one of economic ups and downs, the downs usually because of unfavorable weather that killed crops, or they ripened too quickly.

(A) because of unfavorable weather that killed crops, or they ripened
(B) because of unfavorable weather killing or ripening crops
(C) being caused by unfavorable weather that killed or ripened crops
(D) caused by unfavorable weather that kills crops or ripens them
(E) caused by unfavorable weather killing crops, or that they ripen


Here the use of caused by is more justified as it is modifying the noun(subject) " the downs". Because of is generally used when the verb is modified or is used to present a reason.

This leaves us with D and E. Chose D as E is not parallel.

Please correct me if i am wrong.

Thanks.

Dear kamathimanshu,
I'm happy to respond. :-)

The structure "the downs caused by" is very good, but the structure "the downs because of" would also work. Choice (C) is super-awkward, but we can't reject (A) & (B) purely on their beginnings. (A) & (E) have the same parallelism problem: that's a reason to reject them both. If you look at my post in this thread from Mar 22, 2012, you will see my discussion of what's wrong with (B).

Does this make sense?
Mike :-)
GMAT Club Bot
Re: For farmers in the Salinas Valley, the vegetable growing business has [#permalink]
 1   2   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6920 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne