GMATNinja wrote:
warriorguy wrote:
Hello
GMATNinja,
I have a query for this one. Among all the choices, A seems correct but what is the role of -ing modifier in the end.
Doesn't the phrase 'greasing' refer back to the subject M government?
I think the confusing thing about this question is that it's not totally clear who is doing the palm-greasing. And that's just a flaw in the question, unfortunately. (And most of you have seen my disclaimer: GMAC spends between $1500 and $3000 developing every official question, and it's ridiculous to think that even the best test-prep companies could possibly write anything of similar quality.)
In theory, though, the "-ing" modifier ("greasing the palms of government officials for basic services") could modify the entire preceding clause. It's just not clear whether the sentence is trying to say that "the Mubarak government turned a blind eye... greasing the palms of government officials" or whether it's trying to say that "Sudanese refugees built homes without permission... greasing the palms of government officials..." Neither of those makes perfect sense to me, because I'm not sure how, exactly, the officials ended up with greased palms from a bunch of poor refugees.
But from a grammatical perspective, the "-ing" modifier could, in principle, modify either of those clauses without any trouble.
And please don't lose sleep over the exact meaning of this particular question, since it leaves some room for debate, and you'd never see that on an official question.
I hope this helps!
Thanks for the reply
GMATNinja.
The question was in reference to an article by
e-gmat, if I recollect correctly, wherein it was mentioned that the -ing after the comma modifies the entire preceding clause but refers back to the subject.
e.g. used --> John became the CEO of a company, increasing his pay.
the -ing clause after the comma provides extra information but refers back to the subject John. So it was not John who increased his pay but the event or his new job or HR (
) did that.
But I found an
OG question:
Employing many different techniques throughout his career, Michelangelo produced a great variety of art works,
including paintings, for example, in the Sistine Chapel, to sculpture, for example, the statue of David.
(A) including paintings, for example, in the Sistine Chapel, to sculpture, for example,
(B) including paintings, for example, in the Sistine Chapel, to sculpture, like
(C) including paintings, such as those in the Sistine Chapel, and sculpture, as
(D) ranging from paintings, such as those in the Sistine Chapel, to sculpture, such as
(E) ranging from paintings, such as in the Sistine Chapel, and sculpture, such as
OA=D, so here ideally ranging should refer back to Michelangelo but that meaning would be absurd.
So should we disregard the rule that -ing after a comma should refer back to the subject as doer of the action.
Note: there was an exception mentioned to this rule but is not applicable in this case.