Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 16 Sep 2014, 19:59

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

For-profit Social Organizations serve far fewer citizens

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

What is the difficulty level of this question

You may select 1 option
Author Message
TAGS:
Expert Post
4 KUDOS received
Current Student
User avatar
Status: Making every effort to create original content for you!!
Joined: 23 Dec 2010
Posts: 490
Location: United States
Concentration: Healthcare, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V34
GMAT 2: 750 Q49 V42
Followers: 252

Kudos [?]: 929 [4] , given: 82

GMAT ToolKit User GMAT Tests User Premium Member
For-profit Social Organizations serve far fewer citizens [#permalink] New post 14 Mar 2013, 20:24
4
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  75% (hard)

Question Stats:

57% (02:16) correct 43% (02:09) wrong based on 264 sessions
For-profit Social Organizations serve far fewer citizens whom they serve than either public or private non-profit ones. At the same time, relative to non-profit Social Organizations, for-profit Social Organizations draw a disproportionate share of federal and state financial aid, such as food grants and guaranteed loans, for the people they serve. It must be, then, that for-profit Social Organizations cater to a greater proportion of financially disadvantaged citizens than do non-profit Social Organizations.

The conclusion above depends on which of the following assumptions?

A) Public non-profit Social Organizations and private non-profit Social Organizations serve a similar proportion of financially disadvantaged citizens.
B) For-profit Social Organizations do not engage in fraudulent practices to obtain unneeded federal and state financial aid in order to in help the people they serve.
C) The number of citizens that get benefited from federal and state financial aid at for-profit Social Organizations is greater than the number of citizens that get benefited from federal and state financial aid at non-profit Social Organizations.
D) For-profit Social Organizations are of similar residential and educational quality as non-profit Social Organizations.
E) The majority of citizens that are served at for-profit Social Organizations do not have a past criminal record or a bad credit history.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Press Kudos if you want to say thanks

Ultimate Reading Comprehension Encyclopedia | Ultimate Sentence Correction Encyclopedia | GMAT Prep Software Analysis and What If Scenarios -- VERBAL | GMAT Prep Software Analysis and What If Scenarios -- IR

Please Read and Follow the 9 Rules of Posting in Verbal Forum

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 136
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 3

Premium Member
Re: For-profit Social Organizations serve far fewer citizens who [#permalink] New post 14 Mar 2013, 20:47
my take C
for if C is not true then conclusion that proportion of people catered by for profit is more will fall apart
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 26 Jul 2011
Posts: 131
Location: India
WE: Marketing (Manufacturing)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 15

Re: For-profit Social Organizations serve far fewer citizens who [#permalink] New post 15 Mar 2013, 04:12
B for me..

IMO it is assumed that whatever funds for profit organization draws from Federal and state aids is spent to serve financially weak citizen, that is they do not draw unneeded funds through frauds, and hence since they draw more they serve more....I am not clear with the word disproportionate here...It could be vice versa of what I assumed...
3 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 15 Aug 2012
Posts: 47
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 19 [3] , given: 2

Re: For-profit Social Organizations serve far fewer citizens who [#permalink] New post 15 Mar 2013, 04:18
3
This post received
KUDOS
Vercules wrote:
For-profit Social Organizations serve far fewer citizens whom they serve than either public or private non-profit ones. At the same time, relative to non-profit Social Organizations, for-profit Social Organizations draw a disproportionate share of federal and state financial aid, such as food grants and guaranteed loans, for the people they serve. It must be, then, that for-profit Social Organizations cater to a greater proportion of financially disadvantaged citizens than do non-profit Social Organizations.

The conclusion above depends on which of the following assumptions?

A) Public non-profit Social Organizations and private non-profit Social Organizations serve a similar proportion of financially disadvantaged citizens.
B) For-profit Social Organizations do not engage in fraudulent practices to obtain unneeded federal and state financial aid in order to in help the people they serve.
C) The number of citizens that get benefited from federal and state financial aid at for-profit Social Organizations is greater than the number of citizens that get benefited from federal and state financial aid at non-profit Social Organizations.
D) For-profit Social Organizations are of similar residential and educational quality as non-profit Social Organizations.
E) The majority of citizens that are served at for-profit Social Organizations do not have a past criminal record or a bad credit history.


Conclusion :- for-profit Social Organizations cater to a greater proportion of financially disadvantaged citizens than do non-profit Social Organizations

Premise :-
1. For-profit Social Organizations serve far fewer citizens than either public or private non-profit ones
2. for-profit Social Organizations draw a disproportionate share of federal and state financial aid than non-profit Social Organizations do

Prethinking :- The aid used by for-profit is used only for catering the citizens they serve and not for other purposes.

POE :-
Option A :- talks about only non profit organizations
Option B :- Correct
Option C :- talks about people benefited, the scope of the passage is people catered
Option D :- talks about quality for some segments between for-profit and non-profit organizations
Option E :- talks about the background of citizens catered by for-profit organizations.

IMO :- B
1 KUDOS received
VP
VP
User avatar
Status: Far, far away!
Joined: 02 Sep 2012
Posts: 1125
Location: Italy
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.8
Followers: 112

Kudos [?]: 1148 [1] , given: 219

GMAT ToolKit User GMAT Tests User
Re: For-profit Social Organizations serve far fewer citizens who [#permalink] New post 15 Mar 2013, 06:15
1
This post received
KUDOS
IMO B.

Facts:
For-profit Social Organizations serve fewer citizens than non-profit.
For-profit Social Organizations draw a disproportionate share of federal and state financial aid.

Conclusion:
For-profit Social Organizations cater to a greater proportion of financially disadvantaged citizens.

A) Not relevant to the conclusion. Actually this option weakens the conclusion.
B) CORRECT.
C) The passage says: "For-profit Social Organizations draw a disproportionate share".
If "The number of citizens that get benefited from federal and state financial aid at for-profit Social Organizations is greater than the number of citizens that get benefited from federal and state financial aid at non-profit Social Organizations.", the share would not be disproportionate.
D) Out of scope.
E) Out of scope as well.
_________________

It is beyond a doubt that all our knowledge that begins with experience.

Kant , Critique of Pure Reason

Tips and tricks: Inequalities , Mixture | Review: MGMAT workshop
Strategy: SmartGMAT v1.0 | Questions: Verbal challenge SC I-II- CR New SC set out !! , My Quant

Rules for Posting in the Verbal Forum - Rules for Posting in the Quant Forum[/size][/color][/b]

VP
VP
avatar
Status: Final Lap Up!!!
Affiliations: NYK Line
Joined: 21 Sep 2012
Posts: 1096
Location: India
GMAT 1: 410 Q35 V11
GMAT 2: 530 Q44 V20
GMAT 3: 630 Q45 V31
GPA: 3.84
WE: Engineering (Transportation)
Followers: 31

Kudos [?]: 263 [0], given: 67

Re: For-profit Social Organizations serve far fewer citizens who [#permalink] New post 15 Mar 2013, 07:40
Hi
The argument presents a relative comparision between profit and profit social org. serving older citizens. In its conclusion author concludes that since profit social org draws more funds from govt. they must be serving greater no of financially disadvantaged citizens.

So the answer must be B.
Expert Post
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 2402
Followers: 287

Kudos [?]: 2414 [0], given: 693

Re: For-profit Social Organizations serve far fewer citizens who [#permalink] New post 16 Mar 2013, 03:17
Expert's post
Expert Post
2 KUDOS received
Current Student
User avatar
Status: Making every effort to create original content for you!!
Joined: 23 Dec 2010
Posts: 490
Location: United States
Concentration: Healthcare, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V34
GMAT 2: 750 Q49 V42
Followers: 252

Kudos [?]: 929 [2] , given: 82

GMAT ToolKit User GMAT Tests User Premium Member
Re: For-profit Social Organizations serve far fewer citizens [#permalink] New post 22 Mar 2013, 13:56
2
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
Vercules wrote:
For-profit Social Organizations serve far fewer citizens whom they serve than either public or private non-profit ones. At the same time, relative to non-profit Social Organizations, for-profit Social Organizations draw a disproportionate share of federal and state financial aid, such as food grants and guaranteed loans, for the people they serve. It must be, then, that for-profit Social Organizations cater to a greater proportion of financially disadvantaged citizens than do non-profit Social Organizations.

The conclusion above depends on which of the following assumptions?

A) Public non-profit Social Organizations and private non-profit Social Organizations serve a similar proportion of financially disadvantaged citizens.
B) For-profit Social Organizations do not engage in fraudulent practices to obtain unneeded federal and state financial aid in order to in help the people they serve.
C) The number of citizens that get benefited from federal and state financial aid at for-profit Social Organizations is greater than the number of citizens that get benefited from federal and state financial aid at non-profit Social Organizations.
D) For-profit Social Organizations are of similar residential and educational quality as non-profit Social Organizations.
E) The majority of citizens that are served at for-profit Social Organizations do not have a past criminal record or a bad credit history.


Hi Guys,

Updating the post with OA and OE

The argument concludes that for-profit Social Organizations serve a greater proportion of financially disadvantaged citizens than do non-profit Social Organizations. This conclusion is based on the fact that citizens at for-profit Social Organizations draw a disproportionate share of federal and state financial aid. The argument assumes a link between the proportion of aid received and the proportion of financially disadvantaged citizens enrolled. In so doing, it assumes that there are not other possible reasons for the disproportionate aid distribution.

A) Public non-profit Social Organizations and private non-profit Social Organizations serve a similar proportion of financially disadvantaged citizens.

The conclusion makes a claim about the differences between for-profit and non-profit Social Organizations. Differences among non-profit Social Organizations – such as public vs. private – are irrelevant to the argument.

B) For-profit Social Organizations do not engage in fraudulent practices to obtain unneeded federal and state financial aid in order to in help the people they serve.

Correct. One alternative reason that might explain the disproportionate aid distribution is that for-profit Social Organizations engaged in fraudulent practices to obtain unneeded financial assistance for the citizens they serve. If this were true, then much of the aid was distributed based not on the actual financial situation of the citizens but on the ability of Social Organizations to defraud federal and state governments. This answer choice asserts that this was NOT in fact the case, thereby eliminating this alternative explanation and highlighting a key assumption on which the argument rests.

C) The number of citizens that get benefited from federal and state financial aid at for-profit Social Organizations is greater than the number of citizens that get benefited from federal and state financial aid at non-profit Social Organizations.

The argument's claim is centered on proportions. The actual number of citizens receiving aid at for-profit vs. non-profit Social Organizations is irrelevant to the conclusion.

D) For-profit Social Organizations are of similar residential and educational quality as non-profit Social Organizations.

The relative residential or educational quality of for-profit vs. non-profit Social Organizations lies outside the scope of the argument, which is focused solely on differences in financial aid distribution.

E) The majority of citizens that are served at for-profit Social Organizations do not have a past criminal record or a bad credit history.

The issue addressed by the argument is the amount of financial aid distributed to citizens at two types of institutions. Whether citizens have a bad credit history or a criminal record is immaterial to the claim made in the argument.


Vercules
_________________

Press Kudos if you want to say thanks

Ultimate Reading Comprehension Encyclopedia | Ultimate Sentence Correction Encyclopedia | GMAT Prep Software Analysis and What If Scenarios -- VERBAL | GMAT Prep Software Analysis and What If Scenarios -- IR

Please Read and Follow the 9 Rules of Posting in Verbal Forum

Expert Post
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 2402
Followers: 287

Kudos [?]: 2414 [0], given: 693

Re: For-profit Social Organizations serve far fewer citizens [#permalink] New post 22 Mar 2013, 15:30
Expert's post
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Dec 2012
Posts: 117
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 57

Re: For-profit Social Organizations serve far fewer citizens [#permalink] New post 02 Jun 2013, 21:57
I had a tough time negating C and chose C instead of B during the exam. Can anyone please point out why C is out of scope?

Wouldn't proportions be based on numbers?

I disagree that "cater" and "benefited" are different from each other. :x
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: Working & 1st GMAT 750
Joined: 01 Dec 2012
Posts: 85
Location: United States (OH)
Concentration: General Management, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V42
GPA: 2.9
WE: Analyst (Consulting)
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 50 [0], given: 57

Re: For-profit Social Organizations serve far fewer citizens [#permalink] New post 04 Jun 2013, 05:23
btg9788 wrote:
I had a tough time negating C and chose C instead of B during the exam. Can anyone please point out why C is out of scope?

Wouldn't proportions be based on numbers?

I disagree that "cater" and "benefited" are different from each other. :x



I was completely on the Option C bandwagon while taking the test, but I now see that C lacks one very important piece of info - "Financially Disadvantaged citizens"

The conclusion is based on this sub-section of the overall population of citizens and option C does not really help say that this is the case. Since I had the same doubt you had, I could explain this as being the reason.

Regards,
Vishnu
_________________

Regards,
Vishnu

Article --> http://www.topmba.com/blog/could-mba-de ... ay-forward

3 KUDOS received
Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 15 Jun 2012
Posts: 1066
Location: United States
Followers: 121

Kudos [?]: 1276 [3] , given: 119

Premium Member
Re: For-profit Social Organizations serve far fewer citizens [#permalink] New post 07 Jun 2013, 01:25
3
This post received
KUDOS
Premise 1: For-profit Social Organizations serve far fewer citizens
Premise 2: But for-profit Social Organizations draw a disproportionate share of federal and state financial aid for the people they serve.
Conclusion: For-profit Social Organizations cater to a greater proportion of financially disadvantaged citizens than do non-profit Social Organizations.

We need to find a defender assumption here that closes any gap in the conclusion. [to distinguish between “denfender assumption and “supporter assumption”, please read CR power score – Bible]

we connect premise 1 and 2:

For profit social organizations (FP-Org) serve fewer citizens, but draw a disproportionate share of financial aid ==> Conclude: FP-orgs serve more financially disadvantaged citizens. [Because NO new information in the conclusion, so we realize that the defender assumption will be asked.]

Clearly, we see a big GAP. What if those citizens are NOT financially disadvantaged, but they still try to get financial aid from Federal? If that’s true, the conclusion above fails. To close this gap, we need to assume financial aid will be used properly.

ANALYZE EACH ANSWER:

A) Public non-profit Social Organizations and private non-profit Social Organizations serve a similar proportion of financially disadvantaged citizens.
Wrong. Similar proportion ==> cannot conclude FP-org serve more financially disadvantaged citizens.

B) For-profit Social Organizations do not engage in fraudulent practices to obtain unneeded federal and state financial aid in order to in help the people they serve.
Correct. B closes the Gap by assuming that financial aid is used properly.

C) The number of citizens that get benefited from federal and state financial aid at for-profit Social Organizations is greater than the number of citizens that get benefited from federal and state financial aid at non-profit Social Organizations.
Wrong. SHELL GAME.More people get financial aid DOES NOT mean more financially disadvantaged people. C is only correct if those citizens are REAL financially disadvantaged. What if they engage in fraud? ==> The conclusion is broken.

D) For-profit Social Organizations are of similar residential and educational quality as non-profit Social Organizations.
Wrong. Out of scope.

E) The majority of citizens that are served at for-profit Social Organizations do not have a past criminal record or a bad credit history.
Wrong. Out of scope.

Hope it helps.
_________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMV Chief of Design.

Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 14 Oct 2013
Posts: 5
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 16

Re: For-profit Social Organizations serve far fewer citizens [#permalink] New post 09 May 2014, 08:55
pqhai wrote:
Premise 1: For-profit Social Organizations serve far fewer citizens
Premise 2: But for-profit Social Organizations draw a disproportionate share of federal and state financial aid for the people they serve.
Conclusion: For-profit Social Organizations cater to a greater proportion of financially disadvantaged citizens than do non-profit Social Organizations.

We need to find a defender assumption here that closes any gap in the conclusion. [to distinguish between “denfender assumption and “supporter assumption”, please read CR power score – Bible]

we connect premise 1 and 2:

For profit social organizations (FP-Org) serve fewer citizens, but draw a disproportionate share of financial aid ==> Conclude: FP-orgs serve more financially disadvantaged citizens. [Because NO new information in the conclusion, so we realize that the defender assumption will be asked.]

Clearly, we see a big GAP. What if those citizens are NOT financially disadvantaged, but they still try to get financial aid from Federal? If that’s true, the conclusion above fails. To close this gap, we need to assume financial aid will be used properly.

ANALYZE EACH ANSWER:

A) Public non-profit Social Organizations and private non-profit Social Organizations serve a similar proportion of financially disadvantaged citizens.
Wrong. Similar proportion ==> cannot conclude FP-org serve more financially disadvantaged citizens.

B) For-profit Social Organizations do not engage in fraudulent practices to obtain unneeded federal and state financial aid in order to in help the people they serve.
Correct. B closes the Gap by assuming that financial aid is used properly.

C) The number of citizens that get benefited from federal and state financial aid at for-profit Social Organizations is greater than the number of citizens that get benefited from federal and state financial aid at non-profit Social Organizations.
Wrong. SHELL GAME.More people get financial aid DOES NOT mean more financially disadvantaged people. C is only correct if those citizens are REAL financially disadvantaged. What if they engage in fraud? ==> The conclusion is broken.

D) For-profit Social Organizations are of similar residential and educational quality as non-profit Social Organizations.
Wrong. Out of scope.

E) The majority of citizens that are served at for-profit Social Organizations do not have a past criminal record or a bad credit history.
Wrong. Out of scope.

Hope it helps.




Seriously what does
in order to in help the people they serve.
means. None of the options are valid.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 25 Sep 2012
Posts: 209
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 59 [0], given: 139

GMAT ToolKit User CAT Tests
Re: For-profit Social Organizations serve far fewer citizens [#permalink] New post 09 May 2014, 22:34
That's a really nice way to find the difficulty level of a question!
I think it is around 700
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Jul 2012
Posts: 126
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 46 [0], given: 93

Re: For-profit Social Organizations serve far fewer citizens [#permalink] New post 10 May 2014, 08:05
P1:For-profit Social Organizations serve far fewer citizens whom they serve than either public or private non-profit ones.
P2:At the same time, relative to non-profit Social Organizations, for-profit Social Organizations draw a disproportionate share of federal and state financial aid, such as food grants and guaranteed loans, for the people they serve.
Conclusion: It must be, then, that for-profit Social Organizations cater to a greater proportion of financially disadvantaged citizens than do non-profit Social Organizations.

the reason behind drawing disproportionate share of federal and state financial aid is that for-profit Social Organizations cater to a greater proportion of financially disadvantaged citizens

in cause and effect reasoning it is assumed that the cause is the only possible cause. here it means that there is no reason other that catering to greater proportion of disadvantaged citizens.

The conclusion above depends on which of the following assumptions?

A) Public non-profit Social Organizations and private non-profit Social Organizations serve a similar proportion of financially disadvantaged citizens. the conclusion is about for-profit Social Organization

B) For-profit Social Organizations do not engage in fraudulent practices to obtain unneeded federal and state financial aid in order to in help the people they serve.

C) The number of citizens that get benefited from federal and state financial aid at for-profit Social Organizations is greater than the number of citizens that get benefited from federal and state financial aid at non-profit Social Organizations.the type of aid citizens received at these Organizations are irrelevant

D) For-profit Social Organizations are of similar residential and educational quality as non-profit Social Organizations.

E) The majority of citizens that are served at for-profit Social Organizations do not have a past criminal record or a bad credit history.
Re: For-profit Social Organizations serve far fewer citizens   [#permalink] 10 May 2014, 08:05
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
5 Experts publish their posts in the topic There are far fewer kidneys available for transplants cssk 9 26 Nov 2013, 09:35
2 There are far fewer independent bookstores waltiebikkiebal 4 12 Oct 2013, 01:46
For-profit colleges serve far fewer students than either ashiima 2 03 Dec 2011, 16:20
4 For-profit colleges serve far fewer students than either hogann 16 14 Oct 2009, 05:37
For-profit colleges serve far fewer students than either applecrisp 5 08 Dec 2007, 20:46
Display posts from previous: Sort by

For-profit Social Organizations serve far fewer citizens

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.