Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 04 May 2015, 04:07

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

For several years, per capita expenditure on prescription

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Expert Post
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 5453
Location: Pune, India
Followers: 1333

Kudos [?]: 6777 [0], given: 177

Re: For several years, per capita expenditure on prescription [#permalink] New post 11 Apr 2012, 09:56
Expert's post
Lstadt wrote:
Is this a Weaken or resolve the paradox question?

It seems to me that it is a resolve since we have two contradicting sets of facts. But what makes this a possibility for a weaken question is that it has a conclusion.

Any help to explain what question type this is?


It is a 'resolve the paradox' question. There is a paradox here:
There is price freeze and more medicine is not being sold. Still, per capita expenditure is increasing.
You have to explain the paradox.
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Veritas Prep GMAT course is coming to India. Enroll in our weeklong Immersion Course that starts March 29!

Veritas Prep Reviews

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 05 Jun 2012
Posts: 1
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 4

Re: For several years, per capita expenditure on prescription [#permalink] New post 02 Jul 2012, 10:32
"the ministry of health prohibited drug manufacturers from raising any of their products’ prices."

That one word, "raising", hold the key to this question. They can't RAISE the price, but they can make new ones at a higher price.
Thus, answer choice A.
Sneaky b@$t@rd$.

facebook/testprepster
Director
Director
User avatar
Status: Final Countdown
Joined: 17 Mar 2010
Posts: 564
Location: India
GPA: 3.82
WE: Account Management (Retail Banking)
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 165 [0], given: 75

Re: For several years, per capita expenditure on prescription [#permalink] New post 02 Jul 2012, 10:47
Govt.banned the price hike on(say 100 ) medicines ....manufacturers found that the sales will not give them a substantial profit margin which has been around 15% every year SO, THEY STARTED manufacturing new medicines, not listed in those 100 medicines list and hence the per capita expenditure on prescription kept increasing.
+1 for (A)
_________________

" Make more efforts "
Press Kudos if you liked my post

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 05 Jun 2012
Posts: 129
Schools: IIMA
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 66

GMAT ToolKit User CAT Tests
For several years, per capita expenditure on prescription [#permalink] New post 31 Jul 2014, 03:09
I think A and C are good options

But if you look at last line :per capita expenditure for prescription drugs continued to increase by a substantial percentage each year.

Continued increase is possible by bringing new product and by improving technology(* technology can be improved to at some level)

So A is correct!!!
_________________

If you are not over prepared then you are under prepared !!!

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: Please do not forget to give kudos if you like my post
Joined: 19 Sep 2008
Posts: 129
Location: United States (CA)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 257

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: For several years, per capita expenditure on prescription [#permalink] New post 30 Nov 2014, 18:31
D is wrong for following reason.
If the price of prescription drugs did not change how would prescribing generic drug increase the per capita expenditure? actually it will decrease significantly because these are generally cheaper, but one must not bring in this generic and premium concept here, but the point is it will not increase so the statement does nothing.

A says that manufacturer did not raise prices of existing drugs as prohibited by law but instead came up with different drugs which replaced existing for which no law existed now since argument says per capita expenditure increase (take that as a must be true conclusion) these drugs were expensive then existing ones.

remember in these kind of question we do not have to look for 100% likely even 5% likelihood is enough for the answer to be correct. GMAC is awesome in coming up with these kinds of question.

Answer: A

cialit0506 wrote:
For several years, per capita expenditure on prescription drugs in Voronia rose by fifteen percent or more annually. In order to curb these dramatic increases, the ministry of health prohibited drug manufacturers from raising any of their products’ prices. Even though use of prescription drugs did not expand after this price freeze, per capita expenditure for prescription drugs continued to increase by a substantial percentage each year.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain why the ministry’s action did not achieve its goal?

A. After price increases were prohibited, drug manufacturers concentrated on producing new medications to replace existing products
B. The population of Voronia rose steadily throughout the period
C. Improvements in manufacturing processes enable drug manufacturers to maintain high profit levels on drugs despite the price freeze.
D. In addition to imposing a price freeze, the government encouraged doctors to prescribe generic versions of common drugs instead of the more expensive brand-name versions
E. After price increases were prohibited, some foreign manufacturers of expensive drugs ceased marketing them in Voronia.

I cannot get my head round the reasonings of the OA. No matter how I look at it, D seems the best answer. If D is true, wouldn’t per capita expenditure of drugs increase?

_________________

Please Help with Kudos, if you like my post.


Re: For several years, per capita expenditure on prescription   [#permalink] 30 Nov 2014, 18:31

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3   [ 45 posts ] 

    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
10 Experts publish their posts in the topic Last year, the number of traffic violations per capita guerrero25 2 27 Jan 2014, 11:18
1 Experts publish their posts in the topic For several years, per capita expenditure on prescription Shawshank 5 21 Aug 2012, 23:36
12 For several years, per capita expenditure on prescription naruphanp 10 09 Aug 2012, 01:10
For several years, per capita expenditure on prescription eybrj2 3 28 Nov 2011, 22:57
For several years, per capita expenditure on prescription tennis_ball 7 27 Nov 2006, 05:12
Display posts from previous: Sort by

For several years, per capita expenditure on prescription

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.