For the first time in history, more televisions than people : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club App Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 08 Dec 2016, 23:32

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# For the first time in history, more televisions than people

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Director
Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 931
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 173 [1] , given: 0

For the first time in history, more televisions than people [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Oct 2007, 11:39
1
KUDOS
8
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

65% (hard)

Question Stats:

56% (02:26) correct 44% (01:37) wrong based on 306 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

For the first time in history, more televisions than people can be found in American households. According to recent research, the average household has 2.55 residents and contains 2.73 televisions. However, by employing such costly manufacturing processes as plasma technology and flat screens, televisions are becoming too expensive for the typical consumer. As a result, the average number of residents per household will again surpass the number of televisions.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the argument above?

1) House parties at which numerous individuals gather to view popular television shows on one television set have increased three hundred percent during the past year.

2) More than one million legal immigrants enter the United States each year.

3) New devices such as video-enabled personal digital assistants and music players are increasingly purchased for use as a primary source of information and entertainment.

4) As new technologies become more commonplace, manufacturing and retail costs normally decline.

5) As a result of technological advances, new televisions are increasingly enabled with some features, such as Internet browsing, traditionally associated with other household devices.

i don't agree with the OA or OE! (forces us to make additional assumption)
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
If you have any questions
New!
Manager
Joined: 09 Jul 2007
Posts: 178
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 86 [0], given: 0

Re: For the first time in history, more televisions than people [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Oct 2007, 11:47
beckee529 wrote:
For the first time in history, more televisions than people can be found in American households. According to recent research, the average household has 2.55 residents and contains 2.73 televisions. However, by employing such costly manufacturing processes as plasma technology and flat screens, televisions are becoming too expensive for the typical consumer. As a result, the average number of residents per household will again surpass the number of televisions.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the argument above?

1) House parties at which numerous individuals gather to view popular television shows on one television set have increased three hundred percent during the past year.

2) More than one million legal immigrants enter the United States each year.

3) New devices such as video-enabled personal digital assistants and music players are increasingly purchased for use as a primary source of information and entertainment.

4) As new technologies become more commonplace, manufacturing and retail costs normally decline.

5) As a result of technological advances, new televisions are increasingly enabled with some features, such as Internet browsing, traditionally associated with other household devices.

i don't agree with the OA or OE! (forces us to make additional assumption)

i think its E..cuz E only establishes some connection of tv wid technology...others r irrelevant
Manager
Joined: 22 May 2007
Posts: 115
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Re: For the first time in history, more televisions than people [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Oct 2007, 11:51
I would go for 3 (or C)
If you consider television a primary source of information and entertainment , handheld devices can be considered a subsitute for televisions

It's far fetched but is the only acceptable answer to me

1-people from houseparties are not residents
2-no support for argument
4-weakens argument, lower cost, higher demand
5-no support

What's the source of this question?
Manager
Joined: 22 May 2007
Posts: 115
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Re: For the first time in history, more televisions than people [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Oct 2007, 11:55
12345678 wrote:
i think its E..cuz E only establishes some connection of tv wid technology...others r irrelevant

how would this support the decrease of the ratio (number of tv)/( numbers of residents)?
VP
Joined: 10 Jun 2007
Posts: 1459
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 251 [0], given: 0

Re: For the first time in history, more televisions than people [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Oct 2007, 11:59
beckee529 wrote:
For the first time in history, more televisions than people can be found in American households. According to recent research, the average household has 2.55 residents and contains 2.73 televisions. However, by employing such costly manufacturing processes as plasma technology and flat screens, televisions are becoming too expensive for the typical consumer. As a result, the average number of residents per household will again surpass the number of televisions.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the argument above?

1) House parties at which numerous individuals gather to view popular television shows on one television set have increased three hundred percent during the past year.

2) More than one million legal immigrants enter the United States each year.

3) New devices such as video-enabled personal digital assistants and music players are increasingly purchased for use as a primary source of information and entertainment.

4) As new technologies become more commonplace, manufacturing and retail costs normally decline.

5) As a result of technological advances, new televisions are increasingly enabled with some features, such as Internet browsing, traditionally associated with other household devices.

i don't agree with the OA or OE! (forces us to make additional assumption)

C from me
My assumption: not many people will not buy new TV as much
B is irrelevant
D and E is actually weakens the argument
A is irrelevant.
Manager
Joined: 09 Jul 2007
Posts: 178
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 86 [0], given: 0

Re: For the first time in history, more televisions than people [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Oct 2007, 12:01
ronron wrote:
I would go for 3 (or C)
If you consider television a primary source of information and entertainment , handheld devices can be considered a subsitute for televisions

It's far fetched but is the only acceptable answer to me

1-people from houseparties are not residents
2-no support for argument
4-weakens argument, lower cost, higher demand
5-no support

What's the source of this question?

ahh..realized my mistake..good explanation
Director
Joined: 17 Sep 2005
Posts: 924
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 72 [0], given: 0

Re: For the first time in history, more televisions than people [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Oct 2007, 12:10
Among all options given, only C makes sense though it has an underlying assumption that TV were the primary source of information and entertainment.

So C.

- Brajesh
CEO
Joined: 29 Mar 2007
Posts: 2583
Followers: 19

Kudos [?]: 409 [0], given: 0

Re: For the first time in history, more televisions than people [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Oct 2007, 12:18
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
beckee529 wrote:
For the first time in history, more televisions than people can be found in American households. According to recent research, the average household has 2.55 residents and contains 2.73 televisions. However, by employing such costly manufacturing processes as plasma technology and flat screens, televisions are becoming too expensive for the typical consumer. As a result, the average number of residents per household will again surpass the number of televisions.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the argument above?

1) House parties at which numerous individuals gather to view popular television shows on one television set have increased three hundred percent during the past year.

2) More than one million legal immigrants enter the United States each year.

3) New devices such as video-enabled personal digital assistants and music players are increasingly purchased for use as a primary source of information and entertainment.

4) As new technologies become more commonplace, manufacturing and retail costs normally decline.

5) As a result of technological advances, new televisions are increasingly enabled with some features, such as Internet browsing, traditionally associated with other household devices.

i don't agree with the OA or OE! (forces us to make additional assumption)

I say C.

We are tryin to support the conclusion that ppl will again outnumber tvs.

A: Irrelevant. People could still own lots of TVs
B: Irrelevant. These immigrants could buy TVs. and whose to say these immigrants are apart of the offical population etc...
D: This weakens the conclusion.
E: Irrelevant. Doesn't say anything about drop in TVs.

C says that people will turn to other forms of electronics for entertainment, thus probably dropping the % of TV's.

It does require some bit of an additional assumption, but it supports the argument the best.
Senior Manager
Joined: 18 Jun 2007
Posts: 294
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 56 [0], given: 0

Re: For the first time in history, more televisions than people [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Oct 2007, 13:20
I find A as the best option.

Reason: The argument behind conclusion is that less ppl are purchasing TV 'cause TV' has become too costly to purchase for a typical consumer.
televisions are becoming too expensive for the typical consumer. As a result, the average number of residents per household will again surpass the number of televisions.

So to strenghten the argument, correct answer will suggest that ppl are unwillingly refraining from purchasing new TV set ( not by choice).

Now look at options:

B. Too weak. At best it suggests that number of resident is increasing, nothing else. OUT

C. Eyecatcher for sure BUT..
First, it doesn't suggest that ppl are getting same kind of entertainment and information services as they get on TV.
TV word isn't even mentioned in this option.
Second, C suggest that ppl are not buying TV sets by choice not because they cant afford it ( money factor).
Apart from that it doesn't mention that increase in the sale of new devices will continue in future and question ask you to prove that in future number of viewers will surpass number of TV set.

D. Crap.

E. Again crap.

Now my selection, A.

Number of household parties has increased 300%.To me, It is too large an increase to assume that this is because of some trend. It suggests that ppl are very much willing to watch shows on TV sets but since they dont have one they are attending such household parties.

Anyway, this is my reasoning. If OA isn't A, and if I encounter this question on GMAT then I would surely have atleast one wrong that means no 800 :p
Director
Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 931
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 173 [0], given: 0

Re: For the first time in history, more televisions than people [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Oct 2007, 11:37
hi guys.. the OA is C. I didn't like any of their answer choices. I got this from MGMAT crit reasoning question bank. here is the OE they give (which I do not agree with)

Although televisions currently outnumber residents in the average American household, the argument concludes that this fact will soon be reversed. The correct answer choice must strengthen the conclusion that the average household will again contain more residents than television sets. <- agreed

(A) This choice is irrelevant to the conclusion. The fact that individuals increasingly enjoy watching popular shows in the company of others does not affect how many televisions these individuals possess in their places of residence.

(B) This choice simply expresses a fact about U.S. demographics. However, nothing indicates that these immigrants alter the purchasing behavior of televisions by American consumers.

(C) CORRECT. This choice indicates that new devices are replacing the main function of the television: a primary source of information and entertainment. This fact, in combination with the increasing expense of television sets, supports the conclusion that fewer televisions will be purchased in the future. <- i don't agree with that bold part

(D) This choice weakens the conclusion by undermining a premise on which the conclusion is based. If retail costs for televisions were to decline, consumers would not be less likely to purchase televisions in the future.

(E) This choice is irrelevant to the argument. Even if televisions take on some roles associated with other household devices, we cannot claim that there will be fewer television sets per household as a result; indeed, there may be more television sets per household, if television sets can do a greater variety of tasks.

i guess C is the best out of the bunch =\
Senior Manager
Joined: 25 Nov 2011
Posts: 261
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GPA: 3.95
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 160 [1] , given: 20

Re: For the first time in history, more televisions than people [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Jan 2012, 09:02
1
KUDOS
beckee529 wrote:
hi guys.. the OA is C. I didn't like any of their answer choices. I got this from MGMAT crit reasoning question bank. here is the OE they give (which I do not agree with)

(C) CORRECT. This choice indicates that new devices are replacing the main function of the television: a primary source of information and entertainment. This fact, in combination with the increasing expense of television sets, supports the conclusion that fewer televisions will be purchased in the future. <- i don't agree with that bold part

It is absolutely fine because the question stem states "which of the following, IF TRUE..." meaning, you can assume they are FACTS and can take for granted.
_________________

-------------------------
-Aravind Chembeti

Senior Manager
Status: D-Day is on February 10th. and I am not stressed
Affiliations: American Management association, American Association of financial accountants
Joined: 12 Apr 2011
Posts: 270
Location: Kuwait
Schools: Columbia university
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 261 [0], given: 52

Re: For the first time in history, more televisions than people [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Jan 2012, 12:37
+1 for C. if other devices are used for intertainment and information, then number of televisions used will decline and eventually number of people per house will increase
_________________

Sky is the limit

Intern
Joined: 04 May 2012
Posts: 3
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: For the first time in history, more televisions than people [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 May 2012, 12:15
I still think it should be E

whole point is "employing costly manufacturing processes like plasma technology and flat screens, televisions are becoming too expensive for the typical consumer".

Now E suggests,
As a result of technological advances, new televisions are increasingly enabled with some features, such as Internet browsing, traditionally associated with other household devices.

new features in the TV can make it more expensive and leads to lower purchase by the customers.

this looks more close to the argument at hand than C..
What say??
Manager
Joined: 06 Feb 2010
Posts: 175
Schools: University of Dhaka - Class of 2010
GMAT 1: Q0 V0
GPA: 3.63
Followers: 60

Kudos [?]: 1132 [1] , given: 182

Re: For the first time in history, more televisions than people [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Nov 2013, 06:10
1
KUDOS
C for me. It supports by adding additional information that people will not buy TV more becaz New devices such as video-enabled personal digital assistants and music players are increasingly purchased.
_________________

Practice Makes a Man Perfect. Practice. Practice. Practice......Perfectly

Critical Reasoning: http://gmatclub.com/forum/best-critical-reasoning-shortcuts-notes-tips-91280.html

Collections of MGMAT CAT: http://gmatclub.com/forum/collections-of-mgmat-cat-math-152750.html

MGMAT SC SUMMARY: http://gmatclub.com/forum/mgmat-sc-summary-of-fourth-edition-152753.html

Sentence Correction: http://gmatclub.com/forum/sentence-correction-strategies-and-notes-91218.html

Arithmatic & Algebra: http://gmatclub.com/forum/arithmatic-algebra-93678.html

I hope these will help to understand the basic concepts & strategies. Please Click ON KUDOS Button.

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10443
Followers: 886

Kudos [?]: 191 [0], given: 0

Re: For the first time in history, more televisions than people [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Nov 2015, 17:37
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Math Forum Moderator
Joined: 13 Apr 2015
Posts: 1130
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Followers: 34

Kudos [?]: 513 [0], given: 562

Re: For the first time in history, more televisions than people [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jul 2016, 09:01
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
beckee529 wrote:
For the first time in history, more televisions than people can be found in American households. According to recent research, the average household has 2.55 residents and contains 2.73 televisions. However, by employing such costly manufacturing processes as plasma technology and flat screens, televisions are becoming too expensive for the typical consumer. As a result, the average number of residents per household will again surpass the number of televisions.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the argument above?

1) House parties at which numerous individuals gather to view popular television shows on one television set have increased three hundred percent during the past year.

2) More than one million legal immigrants enter the United States each year.

3) New devices such as video-enabled personal digital assistants and music players are increasingly purchased for use as a primary source of information and entertainment.

4) As new technologies become more commonplace, manufacturing and retail costs normally decline.

5) As a result of technological advances, new televisions are increasingly enabled with some features, such as Internet browsing, traditionally associated with other household devices.

i don't agree with the OA or OE! (forces us to make additional assumption)

1) House parties at which numerous individuals gather to view popular television shows on one television set have increased three hundred percent during the past year. - Incorrect. Out of context

2) More than one million legal immigrants enter the United States each year. - Incorrect. Out of scope

3) New devices such as video-enabled personal digital assistants and music players are increasingly purchased for use as a primary source of information and entertainment. - Correct. If new devices (other than televisions) flood the market and become popular, the number of televisions purchased will decrease and the ratio of number of people to number of televisions will increase.

4) As new technologies become more commonplace, manufacturing and retail costs normally decline. - Incorrect. Weakener

5) As a result of technological advances, new televisions are increasingly enabled with some features, such as Internet browsing, traditionally associated with other household devices. - Incorrect. Out of context

Re: For the first time in history, more televisions than people   [#permalink] 30 Jul 2016, 09:01
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Toddlers are watching television more than twice as much as they did 2 26 Aug 2015, 09:04
7 A recent study showed that more than 50 percent of people 4 09 Oct 2012, 17:30
13 For the first time in history, more televisions than people 13 11 May 2012, 23:20
9 Seeing is much more complicated than most people realize. In 15 03 Dec 2010, 10:26
1 Q16: Soaring television costs accounted for more than half 2 08 Sep 2010, 14:40
Display posts from previous: Sort by