Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 350,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Re: Rounding integers [#permalink]
15 May 2011, 19:19

I think statment 1 is sufficient. Cause While rounding off ABCD to the nearest hundred digit should take it to A(B+1)00 eg: 4950 But here we see a case where it becomes CD00 ==> (A+1)000 eg: 5000 The thousand digit is also changing means B=9 and A=C+1 and D=0 Hence it can be implied that B has to be 9

Stament 2 alone does not give any information on B _________________

If you liked my post, please consider a Kudos for me. Thanks!

Re: Rounding integers [#permalink]
15 May 2011, 22:15

amit2k9 wrote:

Does unique digits mean different digits ?

However, Considering the digits are not different.

a ABCD = 1212 | 2727 | 2930 will give different values for B. not sufficient.

b no values for B>C+D can be 3421 or 4741 . not sufficient.

a+b gives 2930 | 8970 or so where the B = 9 always.

Hence C.

Hi Amit, Are you sure 2930 rounds off to 3000 for nearest 100? I think it will round off to 2900. and it cant 8970 .. it has to be 8990( in your example) but its not a good number because b> c+d The numbers should be 4950, 5960, 6970 and 7980

Re: Rounding integers [#permalink]
13 Aug 2011, 11:55

I HOPE I GOT IT RIGHT: C MUST BE BIGGER THAN 5 AND D must be 0.(cd=50, 60, 70, 80, 90) A MUST BE ONE NUMBER BELOW C TO MAKE THE ROUNDING C-D-0-0 FORM. SO: 4950 IS ROUNDED TO 5-0-0-0 5960 to 6-0-0-0 6970 to 7-0-0-0 7980 to 8-0-0-0 and 8990 to 9-0-0-0. B will allways be 9

Re: Rounding integers [#permalink]
13 Aug 2011, 13:59

dimri10 wrote:

I HOPE I GOT IT RIGHT: C MUST BE BIGGER THAN 5 AND D must be 0.(cd=50, 60, 70, 80, 90) A MUST BE ONE NUMBER BELOW C TO MAKE THE ROUNDING C-D-0-0 FORM. SO: 4950 IS ROUNDED TO 5-0-0-0 5960 to 6-0-0-0 6970 to 7-0-0-0 7980 to 8-0-0-0 and 8990 to 9-0-0-0. B will allways be 9

Yes thats right.. Even i had this clarification but later got it right..

Re: Rounding integers [#permalink]
24 Aug 2011, 09:14

Statement 1 seems to be the solution if we take it at its face value. However, if we really read it closely, it provides no limits on direction. Most here are rounding up only. The statement is open ended, thus we can round down as well (e.g. 3110 = 3100) . Therefore multiple solutions are available,NOT Sufficient . The answer should be E….

Re: Rounding integers [#permalink]
25 Aug 2011, 03:43

2

This post received KUDOS

Expert's post

fluke wrote:

For the four-digit number ABCD, where A, B, C, and D all represent unique digits, what is the value of B?

(1) ABCD rounded to the nearest hundred is CD00. (2) B > C + D

Good question! This is how I arrived at the answer:

ABCD - a four digit number so A is not 0. Statement 1: ABCD is rounded to the nearest hundred. It could become AB00 - round to the lower value or (AB+1)00 - round to the upper value. It is given that it becomes CD00. Since AB is not equal to CD (distinct digits), it must have been rounded up. You added 1 to AB and both the digits changed. This means when you added 1 to B, there was a carryover to change A to C. So B must have been 9! Sufficient.

For the four-digit number ABCD, where A, B, C, and D all represent unique digits, what is the value of B?

(1) ABCD rounded to the nearest hundred is CD00. (2) B > C + D

From statement 1 Considering that when ABCD is rounded to nearest hundred, it becomes CD00... C>5 and B has to be 9 because the thousand-digit changed value as well. ---> Sufficient.

From statement 2 Doesn't give us any value to work with. ---> Insufficient.

Answer: A _________________

"The best day of your life is the one on which you decide your life is your own. No apologies or excuses. No one to lean on, rely on, or blame. The gift is yours - it is an amazing journey - and you alone are responsible for the quality of it. This is the day your life really begins." - Bob Moawab

Re: For the four-digit number ABCD , where A, B, C, and D all [#permalink]
18 Oct 2014, 06:02

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email. _________________

I´ve done an interview at Accepted.com quite a while ago and if any of you are interested, here is the link . I´m through my preparation of my second...

It’s here. Internship season. The key is on searching and applying for the jobs that you feel confident working on, not doing something out of pressure. Rotman has...