Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 18 May 2013, 19:38
Customize  |  Hide

Fossilized teeth of an extinct species of herbivorous great

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  
Author Message
TAGS:
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 10 Nov 2010
Posts: 169
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 24 [1] , given: 6

Fossilized teeth of an extinct species of herbivorous great [#permalink] New post 06 Apr 2011, 07:22
1
This post received
KUDOS
00:00

Question Stats:

54% (02:29) correct 45% (01:25) wrong based on 2 sessions
Fossilized teeth of an extinct species of herbivorous great
ape have on them phytoliths, which are microscopic
petrified remains of plants. Since only phytoliths from
certain species of plants are found on the teeth, the apes'
diet must have consisted only of those plants.

The argument assumes which one of the following?

(A) None of the plant species that left phytoliths on the
apes' teeth has since become extinct.
(B) Plants of every type eaten by the apes left phytoliths on
their teeth.
(C) Each of the teeth examined had phytoliths of the same
plant species on it as all the other teeth.
(D) Phytoliths have also been found on the fossilized teeth
of apes of other extinct species.
(E) Most species of great ape alive today have diets that
consist of a fairly narrow range of plants.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by vjsharma25 on 06 Apr 2011, 13:46, edited 1 time in total.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 03 Jun 2010
Posts: 192
Location: United States (MI)
Concentration: Marketing, General Management
WE: Business Development (Consumer Products)
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 40

GMAT ToolKit User GMAT Tests User
Re: Fossilized teeth [#permalink] New post 06 Apr 2011, 12:17
It's clearly (B)
Consider: apes might have eaten other plants, but scientists can't find any evidences, because these plants didn't leave phytoliths. So the conclusion will be flawed in this case.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 24 Mar 2010
Posts: 49
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 3

Re: Fossilized teeth [#permalink] New post 06 Apr 2011, 12:35
I agree with the post above,
[Reveal] Spoiler:
B
.

Argument summary;

x has been found on the fossilized teeth of an ape. Only certain variation of x are found on the teeth. Thus, the ape only ate those variations of x.

What is the argument assuming? Many things but more notably,
- All plants the ape ate would have left x.
- Wear and tear would not cause some x to fall off.
- X wasn't added to the apes teeth after he died.
etc...

(A) is wrong. If the plants became extinct or not is irrelevant. They could still have left x.
(B) is correct. This is the same as one of the assumption I wrote above ("All plants the ape ate would have left x).
(C) is wrong. Which x were on which teeth is irrelevant.
(D) is wrong. This would actually provide evidence that the conclusion is incorrect, so, obviously the author is not assuming it. Assumption are things that must be true to make teh conclusion true.
(E) is wrong. It is irrelevant what ape species today eat. The authoer is talkinga bout ancient apes, not modern ones.

If anything I wrote above is unclear, please ask me to clarify.

Thanks,

Jared
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 10 Nov 2010
Posts: 169
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 6

Re: Fossilized teeth [#permalink] New post 06 Apr 2011, 12:39
ulm wrote:
It's clearly (B)
Consider: apes might have eaten other plants, but scientists can't find any evidences, because these plants didn't leave phytoliths. So the conclusion will be flawed in this case.

The argument says that plants of "certain types" but the answer says that "plant of every type". I got confused by this.Thogh we can reach the answer by POE as none of the other options presents a reasonable/strong assumption.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 18 Jan 2011
Posts: 244
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 4

GMAT Tests User
Re: Fossilized teeth [#permalink] New post 06 Apr 2011, 12:48
b - eliminates the possibility that could weaken the conclusion

Posted from my mobile device Image
_________________

Good Luck!!!

***Help and be helped!!!****

Manager
Manager
Status: Prepping for the last time....
Joined: 28 May 2010
Posts: 202
Location: Australia
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GPA: 3.2
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 21

GMAT Tests User
Re: Fossilized teeth [#permalink] New post 15 Sep 2011, 22:44
B helps the argument stand by stating that all plans eaten by apes left phytoliths on teeth. If only some plants ate by apes have phytoliths, the argument will not be valid.

This is a defender type assumption question.
_________________

Two great challenges: 1. Guts to Fail and 2. Fear to Succeed

Manager
Manager
Joined: 01 Jun 2011
Posts: 177
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 6

GMAT Tests User
Re: Fossilized teeth [#permalink] New post 15 Sep 2011, 22:54
ulm wrote:
It's clearly (B)
Consider: apes might have eaten other plants, but scientists can't find any evidences, because these plants didn't leave phytoliths. So the conclusion will be flawed in this case.



agree with you
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Status: 2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 1756
Location: Peru
Schools: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs
Followers: 50

Kudos [?]: 145 [0], given: 108

GMAT Tests User
Re: Fossilized teeth of an extinct species of herbivorous great [#permalink] New post 18 Apr 2012, 10:14
+1 B

If some plants don't leave residues, we cannot conclude that there were the only plants consumed.
_________________

"Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can."

My Integrated Reasoning Logbook / Diary: my-ir-logbook-diary-133264.html

Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates

Intern
Intern
Joined: 29 Feb 2012
Posts: 12
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 1

Re: Fossilized teeth of an extinct species of herbivorous great [#permalink] New post 07 May 2012, 06:52
Clearly after B ..one stops looking at other options
Manager
Manager
Joined: 12 Mar 2012
Posts: 171
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GMAT Date: 07-23-2012
WE: Programming (Telecommunications)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 4

Re: Fossilized teeth of an extinct species of herbivorous great [#permalink] New post 22 May 2012, 11:44
easier one but time taking for me..but i got it right..B it is!
_________________

FOCUS..this is all I need!

Ku-Do!

Re: Fossilized teeth of an extinct species of herbivorous great   [#permalink] 22 May 2012, 11:44
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Popular new posts Compared to a carnivore, an herbivore needs relatively few Paul 12 30 Jun 2004, 19:56
New posts To many environmentalists, the extinction of plants kedar1972 8 24 Aug 2004, 16:01
New posts CR: extinction of dinosaurs WinWinMBA 7 07 Jun 2005, 17:11
New posts RC - Species Extinction (Short Passage) priyankur_saha@ml.com 9 10 Apr 2009, 03:11
New posts mammoth's teeth vjsharma25 7 24 Mar 2011, 12:06
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Fossilized teeth of an extinct species of herbivorous great

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.