Friends, I got this from the LSAT website. Premiums for : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 19 Jan 2017, 04:01

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Friends, I got this from the LSAT website. Premiums for

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 07 Mar 2003
Posts: 1
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Friends, I got this from the LSAT website. Premiums for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Feb 2006, 13:39
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 15 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Friends,

I got this from the LSAT website.

Premiums for automobile accident insurance are often
higher for red cars than for cars of other colors. To
justify these higher charges, insurance companies claim
that, overall, a greater percentage of red cars are
involved in accidents than are cars of any other color. If
this claim is true, then lives could undoubtedly be saved
by banning red cars from the roads altogether.

The reasoning in the argument is flawed because
the argument

(A) accepts without question that insurance
companies have the right to charge higher
premiums for higher-risk clients

(B) fails to consider whether red cars cost the same to
repair as cars of other colors

(C) ignores the possibility that drivers who drive
recklessly have a preference for red cars

(D) does not specify precisely what percentage of red
cars are involved in accidents

(E) makes an unsupported assumption that every
automobile accident results in some loss of life

I think the answer is E.

But they say it is C.

Am I missing something ?

Thanks,

avi
If you have any questions
you can ask an expert
New!
Manager
Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Posts: 136
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

14 Feb 2006, 13:50
I got C too.
... if red cars are banned then also careless drivers will still drive some other colored cars. The no. of accidents will not go down and people will still lose lives.

I think E uses an assumption also that loss of life is propotional to the number of accidents but I think the assumption in C is "more" incorrect.

....actually on second thoughts...the statment in E is not really an assumption of the argument. The argument does not say that that EVERY accident will lead to a death.
Manager
Joined: 27 Jan 2006
Posts: 104
Location: Barcelona
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

14 Feb 2006, 15:15
E seemed to be the best on the first glance;however, E streches the assumption that "every" accident results in loss of life which is not exactly the assumption.

The assumption is that accidents results in loss of life and not every accident.

After jumping over easy trap set in E, I find that C is right answer.
_________________

...................................................................
reloading NEURON JELLY to reach another galaxy.

Intern
Joined: 18 Jan 2006
Posts: 27
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

14 Feb 2006, 16:39
C is the right answer.

Conclusion: Life will be saved by banning red cars.

What is the reasoning that will weaken the above conclusion.

(C) ignores the possibility that drivers who drive recklessly have a preference for red cars --> By banning red cars, we wont be keeping the reckless drivers off the road. Hence life is still at stake every after banning red cars.

(E) makes an unsupported assumption that every automobile accident results in some loss of life --> every automobile accident doesnot lead to loss. But every accident involving red car MAY lead to death. This reasoning is not strong enough to weaken the above conclusion.
Current Student
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5238
Followers: 25

Kudos [?]: 377 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

17 Feb 2006, 21:49
This is a cause and effect CR. Only (C) suggests some other legitimate and plausible cause to weaken the argument.
Senior Manager
Joined: 23 Apr 2015
Posts: 339
Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, International Business
WE: Engineering (Consulting)
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 70 [0], given: 36

Re: Friends, I got this from the LSAT website. Premiums for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Aug 2016, 06:24
This is the explanation from Manhattan by noah. Hope this clears

Quote:
The core of this conclusion is:

red cars are in greater % of accidents --> lives saved by banning red cars

Read like a debater. Why might it be that lives would NOT be saved by banning the red cars? As you stated, perhaps those drivers will simply go and drive recklessly in their blue cars. That's the flaw in this argument, as (C) notes.

(A) is out of scope. Premiums is not part of the core.

(B) is out of scope. Cost?

(D) is too picky! Why does the argument need a specific percentage? It's enough to say that it's greater.

(E) is untrue. The argument does not assume that every car accident results in someone dieing. Perhaps there's an assumption that at least some accidents result in death, but not ALL.

You need to stand your ground with flaw answer choices and ask "Did the argument really do that?"
Re: Friends, I got this from the LSAT website. Premiums for   [#permalink] 17 Aug 2016, 06:24
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Where do I find LSAT CR practice 2 02 Jun 2012, 22:02
101 A bunch of CR questions I got from a local GMAT club 700 8 28 Apr 2012, 19:56
All, I thought I'll share that Powerscore website has 6 14 Jul 2011, 08:37
1 three CR's from Lsat 3 03 Sep 2009, 01:24
friends...I happen to come across this one through LSAT CR. 0 23 Apr 2008, 10:48
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Friends, I got this from the LSAT website. Premiums for

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.