Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 23 Oct 2014, 23:05

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

From an analysis of broken pottery and statuary,

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1941
Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Followers: 18

Kudos [?]: 322 [0], given: 1

Premium Member
From an analysis of broken pottery and statuary, [#permalink] New post 26 May 2009, 03:03
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
From an analysis of broken pottery and statuary, archaeologists have estimated that an ancient settlement in southwestern Arabia was established around 1000 B.C. However, new evidence suggests that the settlement is considerably older: tests show that a piece of building timber recently uncovered at the site is substantially older than the pottery and statuary.
Which one of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the conclusion drawn from the new evidence?
(A) The building timber bore marks suggesting that it had been salvaged from an earlier settlement.
(B) The pieces of pottery and fragments of statues that were analyzed come from several parts of the site.
(C) The tests used to determine the age of the pottery and statuary had been devised more recently than those used to determine the age of the building timber.
(D) The site has yielded many more samples of pottery and statuary than of building timber.
(E) The type of pottery found at the site is similar to a type of pottery associated with civilizations that existed before 1000 B.C
_________________

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 30 Mar 2009
Posts: 258
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 72 [0], given: 1

Re: Pottery [#permalink] New post 26 May 2009, 06:34
IMO A. I use POE, although not convinced much in my answer. If I have more time, maybe I will understand more clearly

From an analysis of broken pottery and statuary, archaeologists have estimated that an ancient settlement in southwestern Arabia was established around 1000 B.C. However, new evidence suggests that the settlement is considerably older: tests show that a piece of building timber recently uncovered at the site is substantially older than the pottery and statuary.
Which one of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the conclusion drawn from the new evidence?
(A) The building timber bore marks suggesting that it had been salvaged from an earlier settlement --> the best
(B) The pieces of pottery and fragments of statues that were analyzed come from several parts of the site -->irrelevant
(C) The tests used to determine the age of the pottery and statuary had been devised more recently than those used to determine the age of the building timber -->irrelevant
(D) The site has yielded many more samples of pottery and statuary than of building timber -->irrelevant
(E) The type of pottery found at the site is similar to a type of pottery associated with civilizations that existed before 1000 B.C --> irrelevant and seems strengthen
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 267
Location: nj
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 56 [0], given: 2

Re: Pottery [#permalink] New post 26 May 2009, 07:37
imo A

All other choice relates to either pottery or tests .
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1941
Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Followers: 18

Kudos [?]: 322 [0], given: 1

Premium Member
Re: Pottery [#permalink] New post 26 May 2009, 19:16
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 26 May 2008
Posts: 432
Schools: Kellogg Class of 2012
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 58 [0], given: 4

Re: Pottery [#permalink] New post 26 May 2009, 19:31
sondenso wrote:
Guys, How about C?


I think C will require a few far fetched assumptions - just because one is devised more recently than the other doesn't mean that the original one gives incorrect results

Cheers,
Unplugged
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Mar 2009
Posts: 319
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 1

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Pottery [#permalink] New post 27 May 2009, 09:39
I second for C....Any observations?
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 840
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

Re: Pottery [#permalink] New post 27 May 2009, 12:16
A
Manager
Manager
avatar
Affiliations: Beta Gamma Sigma
Joined: 14 Aug 2008
Posts: 211
Schools: Harvard, Penn, Maryland
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 3

Re: Pottery [#permalink] New post 27 May 2009, 12:36
has to be A.

The key words here are "most seriously" undermines, C does weaken, but A weakens more. If the timber were salvaged from another village, then it would indeed be older than the pottery, undermining the conclusion that the village must be older than originally thought.

C calls into question the validity of the tests, but just raises doubts, does weaken the argument but not "undermine" it. A is best.
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1941
Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Followers: 18

Kudos [?]: 322 [0], given: 1

Premium Member
Re: Pottery [#permalink] New post 27 May 2009, 19:55
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 13 May 2009
Posts: 195
Schools: Stanford, Harvard, Berkeley, INSEAD
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 1

Re: Pottery [#permalink] New post 28 May 2009, 01:34
Argument is as follows:

Site was always considered so old, but this piece of timer was found there that is much older.

The big assumption is that this piece of timber was placed there during that time frame.

Show that the timer was NOT there during that time frame-- ie if it was salvaged, and then placed there at a later period in time.

A) does this.

Final answer A.

The rest of the answers do nothing.
_________________

Hades

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 05 Dec 2009
Posts: 127
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 78 [1] , given: 0

Re: Pottery [#permalink] New post 13 Mar 2010, 12:53
1
This post received
KUDOS
My side is A
Re: Pottery   [#permalink] 13 Mar 2010, 12:53
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
12 Experts publish their posts in the topic Researchers from a data analysis firm have found that the carcass 11 16 Apr 2013, 08:48
Chat link broken ncp 4 03 Sep 2007, 13:21
Blogs Link Broken ioiio 2 03 Sep 2007, 06:24
RSS Feeds broken ioiio 9 02 Sep 2007, 20:28
From an analysis of broken pottery and statuary, WinWinMBA 7 20 Jun 2005, 10:24
Display posts from previous: Sort by

From an analysis of broken pottery and statuary,

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.