Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 24 Oct 2016, 20:44

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# From an analysis of broken pottery and statuary,

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

SVP
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1926
Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Followers: 21

Kudos [?]: 942 [0], given: 1

From an analysis of broken pottery and statuary, [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 May 2009, 04:03
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

From an analysis of broken pottery and statuary, archaeologists have estimated that an ancient settlement in southwestern Arabia was established around 1000 B.C. However, new evidence suggests that the settlement is considerably older: tests show that a piece of building timber recently uncovered at the site is substantially older than the pottery and statuary.
Which one of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the conclusion drawn from the new evidence?
(A) The building timber bore marks suggesting that it had been salvaged from an earlier settlement.
(B) The pieces of pottery and fragments of statues that were analyzed come from several parts of the site.
(C) The tests used to determine the age of the pottery and statuary had been devised more recently than those used to determine the age of the building timber.
(D) The site has yielded many more samples of pottery and statuary than of building timber.
(E) The type of pottery found at the site is similar to a type of pottery associated with civilizations that existed before 1000 B.C
_________________
Senior Manager
Joined: 30 Mar 2009
Posts: 257
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 134 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

26 May 2009, 07:34
IMO A. I use POE, although not convinced much in my answer. If I have more time, maybe I will understand more clearly

From an analysis of broken pottery and statuary, archaeologists have estimated that an ancient settlement in southwestern Arabia was established around 1000 B.C. However, new evidence suggests that the settlement is considerably older: tests show that a piece of building timber recently uncovered at the site is substantially older than the pottery and statuary.
Which one of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the conclusion drawn from the new evidence?
(A) The building timber bore marks suggesting that it had been salvaged from an earlier settlement --> the best
(B) The pieces of pottery and fragments of statues that were analyzed come from several parts of the site -->irrelevant
(C) The tests used to determine the age of the pottery and statuary had been devised more recently than those used to determine the age of the building timber -->irrelevant
(D) The site has yielded many more samples of pottery and statuary than of building timber -->irrelevant
(E) The type of pottery found at the site is similar to a type of pottery associated with civilizations that existed before 1000 B.C --> irrelevant and seems strengthen
Senior Manager
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 265
Location: nj
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 220 [0], given: 2

### Show Tags

26 May 2009, 08:37
imo A

All other choice relates to either pottery or tests .
SVP
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1926
Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Followers: 21

Kudos [?]: 942 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

26 May 2009, 20:16
Guys, How about C?
_________________
Senior Manager
Joined: 26 May 2008
Posts: 431
Schools: Kellogg Class of 2012
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 72 [0], given: 4

### Show Tags

26 May 2009, 20:31
sondenso wrote:
Guys, How about C?

I think C will require a few far fetched assumptions - just because one is devised more recently than the other doesn't mean that the original one gives incorrect results

Cheers,
Unplugged
Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Mar 2009
Posts: 312
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 300 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

27 May 2009, 10:39
I second for C....Any observations?
Director
Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 838
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 66 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

27 May 2009, 13:16
A
Manager
Affiliations: Beta Gamma Sigma
Joined: 14 Aug 2008
Posts: 210
Schools: Harvard, Penn, Maryland
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 63 [0], given: 3

### Show Tags

27 May 2009, 13:36
has to be A.

The key words here are "most seriously" undermines, C does weaken, but A weakens more. If the timber were salvaged from another village, then it would indeed be older than the pottery, undermining the conclusion that the village must be older than originally thought.

C calls into question the validity of the tests, but just raises doubts, does weaken the argument but not "undermine" it. A is best.
SVP
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1926
Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Followers: 21

Kudos [?]: 942 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

27 May 2009, 20:55
OA is A
_________________
Manager
Joined: 14 May 2009
Posts: 195
Schools: Stanford, Harvard, Berkeley, INSEAD
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

28 May 2009, 02:34
Argument is as follows:

Site was always considered so old, but this piece of timer was found there that is much older.

The big assumption is that this piece of timber was placed there during that time frame.

Show that the timer was NOT there during that time frame-- ie if it was salvaged, and then placed there at a later period in time.

A) does this.

The rest of the answers do nothing.
_________________

Manager
Joined: 05 Dec 2009
Posts: 127
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 87 [1] , given: 0

### Show Tags

13 Mar 2010, 13:53
1
KUDOS
My side is A
Re: Pottery   [#permalink] 13 Mar 2010, 13:53
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
16 Researchers from a data analysis firm have found that the 16 16 Apr 2013, 09:48
In humans, ingested protein is broken down into amino acids, 0 24 Sep 2012, 23:34
In humans, ingested protein is broken down into amino acids, 0 28 Sep 2012, 04:03
In humans, ingested protein is broken down into amino acids, 0 09 Mar 2011, 06:03
15 The earliest Mayan pottery found at Colha, in Belize, is 20 16 May 2010, 04:53
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# From an analysis of broken pottery and statuary,

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.