Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 17 Sep 2014, 09:55

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

From Knewton The couturier hired a consultant who advised

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 05 Oct 2010
Posts: 49
GMAT 1: Q V
GMAT 2: Q V
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 1

GMAT Tests User
From Knewton The couturier hired a consultant who advised [#permalink] New post 28 Aug 2011, 13:45
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  15% (low)

Question Stats:

78% (01:35) correct 22% (00:14) wrong based on 23 sessions
From Knewton
The couturier hired a consultant who advised that the increasing of risks of failure for those in the fashion industry has prompted many young designers to seek an international customer base in order to sell their clothes more quickly and for a higher price.

(A)the increasing of risks

(B)increasing risks

(C) the increasing risk

(D)because of the increasing risk

(E)because of increasing risk


[Reveal] Spoiler: My question
In regards to this question I have a few questions:

The increasing of risks of failure.

Is the -ing form + of always an incorrect form grammatically ?



Knewton explains D and E as follows:
Choices D and E use because, which introduces a subordinate clause. However, the second part of the sentence does not make sense as a subordinate clause; the second sentence pattern becomes a fragment..

Is this (below) the right understanding ?

...who advised that (is an dependant clause).... because of increasing risk (because introduces another dependent clause)?

If you pick E, is the structure of the entire sentence.

The courier (subject) hired (main verb)=> Independent clause + dependent clause + dependent clause ?
Is this above a structurally grammatical error ?

how are the rules,

For example is it ok to structure a sentence: dependent + independent + dependent ?

can someone please help me with this , thanks in advance
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Knewton GMAT Discount CodesKaplan GMAT Prep Discount CodesManhattan GMAT Discount Codes
Expert Post
GMAT Pill Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 14 Apr 2009
Posts: 1559
Location: New York, NY
Followers: 288

Kudos [?]: 659 [0], given: 6

Re: Dependent vs. Independent? Fragment ? [#permalink] New post 28 Aug 2011, 14:59
Expert's post
hafgola wrote:
From Knewton
The couturier hired a consultant who advised that the increasing of risks of failure for those in the fashion industry has prompted many young designers to seek an international customer base in order to sell their clothes more quickly and for a higher price.

(A)the increasing of risks

(B)increasing risks

(C) the increasing risk

(D)because of the increasing risk

(E)because of increasing risk


[Reveal] Spoiler: My question
In regards to this question I have a few questions:

The increasing of risks of failure.

Is the -ing form + of always an incorrect form grammatically ?



Knewton explains D and E as follows:
Choices D and E use because, which introduces a subordinate clause. However, the second part of the sentence does not make sense as a subordinate clause; the second sentence pattern becomes a fragment..

Is this (below) the right understanding ?

...who advised that (is an dependant clause).... because of increasing risk (because introduces another dependent clause)?

If you pick E, is the structure of the entire sentence.

The courier (subject) hired (main verb)=> Independent clause + dependent clause + dependent clause ?
Is this above a structurally grammatical error ?

how are the rules,

For example is it ok to structure a sentence: dependent + independent + dependent ?

can someone please help me with this , thanks in advance



We don't teach with these fancy subordinate clauses, but here's how we think through it:

"the increasing of risks" is automatically a RED FLAG idiom.

It should be either:
increasing risk (C)
or
increasing risks (B)

But how do we know which one? Is it singular or plural?

Well, look further into the sentence for the keyword: "has prompted"

So you know it must be singular, NOT plural.

So between (B) and (C), you choose "increasing risk" (singular) HAS prompted.

And that's it. Choose (C). Not too much thinking required.
_________________


... and more


Image What's Inside GMAT Pill?

Zeke Lee, GMAT Pill Study Method (Study Less. Score More.)


GMAT Pill Reviews | GMAT PILL Free Practice Test

Re: Dependent vs. Independent? Fragment ?   [#permalink] 28 Aug 2011, 14:59
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Is it necessary to hire a consultant? jainstein 0 16 Nov 2012, 00:38
2 Anecdotal Evidence Consulting Hiring is UP rpratt620 0 20 Jul 2011, 09:50
Who is Deloitte Hiring? refurb 3 26 Jun 2009, 12:45
Looking to ruin operations ? Hire a consultant... lhotseface 2 01 Feb 2007, 11:29
Application Consultants for hire?? rosstbomb 3 10 Aug 2006, 14:04
Display posts from previous: Sort by

From Knewton The couturier hired a consultant who advised

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.