Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 18 Sep 2014, 00:17

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

FT 2007 Rankings

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 07 Aug 2006
Posts: 572
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 29 Jan 2007, 10:14
Quote:
The thing that makes the most sense to me is the commonly accepted status that Havard and Stanford are the two best, followed by Wharton and Chicago, and then by Kellogg. Some people put Kellogg ahead of Chicago and next to Wharton.

In other words, within the ultra-elite top cluster:

1st: H/S
2nd: W/C
3rd: K


Its sort of nuanced, but for us East Coast and international folks its more like:

H/S
W
K/GSB/MIT
CBS

W's rep is probably a notch above that of the other 4 schools in the ultra elite and I think their placement profile shows that recruiters feel the same way.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
avatar
Affiliations: HHonors Diamond, BGS Honor Society
Joined: 05 Apr 2006
Posts: 5925
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2009
GMAT 1: 730 Q45 V45
WE: Business Development (Consumer Products)
Followers: 255

Kudos [?]: 1545 [0], given: 7

GMAT Tests User Premium Member
 [#permalink] New post 29 Jan 2007, 11:02
dukes wrote:
Quote:
The thing that makes the most sense to me is the commonly accepted status that Havard and Stanford are the two best, followed by Wharton and Chicago, and then by Kellogg. Some people put Kellogg ahead of Chicago and next to Wharton.

In other words, within the ultra-elite top cluster:

1st: H/S
2nd: W/C
3rd: K


Its sort of nuanced, but for us East Coast and international folks its more like:

H/S
W
K/GSB/MIT
CBS

W's rep is probably a notch above that of the other 4 schools in the ultra elite and I think their placement profile shows that recruiters feel the same way.


Hogwash! I think the appropriate ranking is:

#1: Wherever I end up
#2: The other school I was accepted to
#3: Whatever the other school I was accept to is
#4: Everywhere else.
#50: Whatever school denied me

At least thats what I tell myself. LOL!
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 1023
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 29 Jan 2007, 11:14
I never said don't take a look at the rankings to get a rough idea of the best schools. Don't do decimal level analysis..it is meaningless. If you bother to read my next post, I talk about the "clustered" ranking proposed my Hjort and it makes a whole lot sense.

3underscore wrote:
lhotseface wrote:
Why is everyone so obsessed with rankings ?


When I asked the COO of the bank I work for (one of the top20 in the world, with an award winning Derivatives IB arm) about MBAs, I got a one line reply.

Go to a top ten school or don't bother going.

When people of that power, in this kind of institution think like that, then if I don't care about rankings then I am wasting my time and money.

You can argue this is self perpetuating all you like, and I would agree. But it is the game. If you want to head into a different industry than me, or want to start your own company, this may not be quite so strongly the case.

There may be better systems, but the simple truth is that my future boss will be looking at the FT, WSJ or BusinessWeek.
[/quote]
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 29 Apr 2003
Posts: 1408
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 29 Jan 2007, 14:39
Why is Kellogg so low?
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 09 Jan 2006
Posts: 37
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 29 Jan 2007, 15:35
sm176811 wrote:
Why is Kellogg so low?


I think they are starting to be typecast as a "marketing" school. They need to hire some nobel prize winners.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jun 2006
Posts: 513
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 79 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 29 Jan 2007, 16:42
who cares -- INSEAD is 7, woohoo! ;) personally I think INSEAD should be above LBS, but then that's me... and you all know why I'd say that.
_________________

http://onwardtomba.blogspot.com - MBA, GMAT, INSEAD - the journey.
My 7 GMAT Quant Strategies/Trap
My GMAT Debrief

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 07 Aug 2006
Posts: 572
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 29 Jan 2007, 17:10
necromonger wrote:
who cares -- INSEAD is 7, woohoo! ;) personally I think INSEAD should be above LBS, but then that's me... and you all know why I'd say that.

I don't think you'd find alot of people to disagree with you. Insead is the number one school in Europe. As someone who wants to work in Europe after b-school I would only chose H/S/W over Insead.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
avatar
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4318
Followers: 22

Kudos [?]: 163 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 29 Jan 2007, 18:00
necromonger wrote:
who cares -- INSEAD is 7, woohoo! ;) personally I think INSEAD should be above LBS, but then that's me... and you all know why I'd say that.

INSEAD never was and never will be above LBS :banana :wink:
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

CEO
CEO
avatar
Joined: 17 Jul 2004
Posts: 3281
Followers: 21

Kudos [?]: 432 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 29 Jan 2007, 18:21
I suppose I am biased, but I feel that the cluster system captures the importance of reputation without getting mired in the "horse racing" aspect of the league tables. I see little value in arguing whether a given school is "hot" or "on the decline" based on the flavor of the week ranking. Of course, if all of the rankings show a consistent decline that appears to be tied to a bona fide problem (e.g., career services office that alienates recruiters) I would want to investigate further.

At least when it comes to Investment Banking, the evidence appears to be rather consistent with conventional wisdom regarding rank. While an MBA is not necessary, the MBAs that are present are overwhelmingly awarded by from the top cluster schools (UE,E,TCE).

http://www.gmatclub.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=41497
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jun 2006
Posts: 513
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 79 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 29 Jan 2007, 18:44
Paul,

Want to meet me on the streets later? >:/ :evil: :x
_________________

http://onwardtomba.blogspot.com - MBA, GMAT, INSEAD - the journey.
My 7 GMAT Quant Strategies/Trap
My GMAT Debrief

VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 1023
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 29 Jan 2007, 19:00
Bingo Hjort ! It's good that you don't have a rankings magazine...they won't sell :).

Hjort wrote:
I suppose I am biased, but I feel that the cluster system captures the importance of reputation without getting mired in the "horse racing" aspect of the league tables. I see little value in arguing whether a given school is "hot" or "on the decline" based on the flavor of the week ranking. Of course, if all of the rankings show a consistent decline that appears to be tied to a bona fide problem (e.g., career services office that alienates recruiters) I would want to investigate further.

At least when it comes to Investment Banking, the evidence appears to be rather consistent with conventional wisdom regarding rank. While an MBA is not necessary, the MBAs that are present are overwhelmingly awarded by from the top cluster schools (UE,E,TCE).

http://www.gmatclub.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=41497
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Apr 2006
Posts: 116
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 31 Jan 2007, 07:36
Truth!



3underscore wrote:
lhotseface wrote:
Why is everyone so obsessed with rankings ?


When I asked the COO of the bank I work for (one of the top20 in the world, with an award winning Derivatives IB arm) about MBAs, I got a one line reply.

Go to a top ten school or don't bother going.

When people of that power, in this kind of institution think like that, then if I don't care about rankings then I am wasting my time and money.

You can argue this is self perpetuating all you like, and I would agree. But it is the game. If you want to head into a different industry than me, or want to start your own company, this may not be quite so strongly the case.

There may be better systems, but the simple truth is that my future boss will be looking at the FT, WSJ or BusinessWeek.
  [#permalink] 31 Jan 2007, 07:36
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
ft rankings robisrojis 0 21 Aug 2013, 09:42
4 Experts publish their posts in the topic New FT Rankings are out bb 47 27 Jan 2008, 23:15
FT Ranking ywilfred 2 12 Sep 2007, 01:17
USnews rankings 2005-2007 Dilshod 0 04 May 2007, 08:26
Combined MBA Ranking 2007 GHIBI 12 19 Mar 2007, 01:25
Display posts from previous: Sort by

FT 2007 Rankings

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 32 posts ] 



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.